Connect with us

Local

Stein Club president withdraws from consideration for new club election

Special meeting on Wednesday to consider invaliding Dec. 3 election of new slate of officers

Published

on

Lateefah Williams, Gertrude Stein Democratic Club, Washington Blade, gay news, Human Rights Campaign

A Gertrude Stein Democratic Club endorsements meeting from October of this year, prior to the leadership shake-up. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

Lateefah Williams, the president of the Gertrude Stein Democratic Club who lost her race for a second term in the clubā€™s Dec. 3 election, announced on Sunday that she wonā€™t be a candidate if the club decides to invalidate the balloting for her seat and calls a new election.

Her announcement comes in the wake of an uproar among many of the clubā€™s longtime members over the successful campaign by three young activists who won control of the club by defeating Williams and two vice presidential candidates running on Williamsā€™ slate.

Gay political consultant Martin Garcia, 27, who beat Williams by a vote of 47 to 45, is credited with playing the lead role in organizing the upset victory by arranging for at least 46 mostly young LGBT activists to join the club less than a week before the election and vote for him and his vice presidential running mates.

Angela Peoples, 26, a policy analyst for the U.S. Consumer Financial protection Bureau, and Vincent Villano, 26, communications director for the National Center for Transgender Equality, won the two vice presidential seats on Garciaā€™s slate.

Club treasurer Barrie Daneker and club secretary Jimmie Luthuli were not challenged by Garciaā€™s backers and won re-election unopposed. But in winning three of the clubā€™s five officerā€™s positions, Garcia, Peoples, and Villano were expected to gain control of the club when they take office Jan. 1.

Last week, several longtime members, including transgender activist Jeri Hughes, called for an official challenge to Garcia, Peoples, and Villanoā€™s election. The club’s existing officers responded by calling a special meeting for Dec. 19 to decide whether the election should be invalidated based on the challenges.

Daneker, who is in charge of maintaining the club membership list, said a review of the online application forms for 17 of the new members raised questions about whether some qualified for a lower priced special membership category.

Daneker said the review of the application forms also indicated some of the new members did not submit a valid home address, which could be a violation of club rules.

Those challenging the election say the election should be invalidated if the club determines some of the new members should be disqualified due to membership “irregularities” and the number of disqualified members exceeds the margin of victory of Garcia, Peoples, and Villano. All three won by a margin of between two and seven votes.

The longtime members who called for the special meeting, which is to decide whether the election should be upheld or invalidated, are believed to be supporters of Williams and her slate of officers who lost the election.

Williams announced her withdrawal from consideration for retaining her seat after her current term expires on Dec. 31 in an open letter sent by email on Sunday to the clubā€™s membership.

ā€œWhile I am deeply humbled and profoundly grateful for the support of these longtime members and I believe that it is important to investigate potential election irregularities, I am also very concerned about the future of the club,ā€ Williams said in her Dec. 16 email.

ā€œIt is imperative that the Stein Club move forward into the future as a unified organization, so that we may continue to focus on effectively advocating for the Districtā€™s LGBT community,ā€ she said. ā€œTo that end, I am removing myself from consideration as the 2013 Stein Club president.ā€

Williams noted that she recused herself from the vote by the clubā€™s officers, who make up the groupā€™s executive board, to call the special meeting.

ā€œWhile the decision to hold the special meeting and to possibly invalidate the election results is, and always has been, a different matter than my candidacy, I want to state my intentions unequivocally, so that itā€™s clear that any decision that is made by the membership at the special meeting should be made independent of me,ā€ Williams said in her email.

Daneker said the club had a total of 190 members prior to the effort by Garcia and his supporters to recruit new members. According to Daneker, 46 new members, including Garcia, Peoples, and Villano, who had not appeared on the clubā€™s membership rolls before, joined the club in the week prior to the Dec. 3 club election.

Although some of the new members have said their recruitment effort doubled the clubā€™s membership, Daneker said the new members appear to have increased the membership from 190 to 236, which is about 24 percent.

Confusion over the membership totals surfaced, Daneker said, when the balloting at the Dec. 3 election showed that a total of 92 ballots had been cast, with Garcia beating Williams by a razor-thin two vote margin. He said some people incorrectly assumed that the 92 people who voted in the election made up most or all of the membership.

When asked why he thought as many as 145 of the 190 existing members didnā€™t show up for the election, Daneker said, ā€œHistorically, we donā€™t get all the members to come to every single meeting.ā€

Garcia and his supporters have argued that their election recruitment effort brought in energetic new members who will reinvigorate the club.

ā€œWe are disappointed that the Stein leadership intends to challenge new members who want to contribute to Steinā€™s growth,ā€ Garcia said in a statement released last week.

ā€œThese new members are young people, people of color, and people from low-income backgrounds who were otherwise not engaged in Steinā€™s activitiesā€¦We should be having a special meeting celebrating these new members and finding ways to engage them.ā€

In a series of Facebook messages and a commentary in the Blade, Hughes has emerged as the lead advocate for invaliding the election and holding a new election for president and the two vice presidentā€™s seats.

An attorney who reviewed the question of whether the Stein Club election can be invalidated has said such an action could only take place if it can be shown that new members gave a false address or joined at the $15 membership rate rather than the standard $35 rate when they were not qualified or the lower rate. The $15 membership is limited under the clubā€™s bylaws to students, senior citizens, and ā€œlimited incomeā€ members.

Hughes, while saying the issue of possible membership irregularities should be resolved, has called the election a ā€œfarceā€ because the new members stacked the meeting with their supporters.

ā€œIt became a farce when a group of new members ā€“ most of whom have never attended a Stein Club meeting or participated in the local issues affecting the District ā€“ attended the election night process with the sole intention of usurping the Stein Club leadership,ā€ she said in her commentary.

ā€œThey are strangers,ā€ she said. ā€œBy their own admission, none had been Stein Club members for more than a week.ā€

Not all of the clubā€™s longstanding members agree with Hughes that the election should be challenged.

Gay Democratic activist Rick Rosendall, who won election last week as president of the Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance, is a longtime Stein Club member.

ā€œJeri, they won according to the rules,ā€ he told Hughes in a Facebook posting. ā€œThey represent the biggest influx of talent and energy into the group in a long time. Forcing them out in a special meeting which itself violates the rules is not legitimate,ā€ he said. ā€œNor does it advance our cause.ā€

D.C. transgender activist Julius Agers, the clubā€™s vice president for political and legislative affairs, who did not run for re-election, said he, too, considers the influx of new members to be beneficial to the club.

ā€œLet us all strive as hard as we can to be open minded, and not let old thoughts and old prejudices and old loyalties blur our vision,ā€ he wrote in a Facebook posting on Saturday. ā€œThese young people have earned their respect from many circles. In fact, they have done amazing things and I for one am thrilled that they are bringing their passion in our direction.ā€

The special meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m. Wednesday, Dec. 19, in Room 120 of the John A. Wilson D.C. city hall building at 14th Street and Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

District of Columbia

Bowser budget proposal calls for $5.25 million for 2025 World Pride

AIDS office among agencies facing cuts due to revenue shortfall

Published

on

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowserā€™s proposed 2025 budget includes a request for $5.25 million in funding to support the 2025 World Pride celebration. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowserā€™s proposed fiscal year 2025 budget includes a request for $5.25 million in funding to support the June 2025 World Pride celebration, which D.C. will host, and which is expected to bring three million or more visitors to the city.

The mayorā€™s proposed budget, which she presented to the D.C. Council for approval earlier this month, also calls for a 7.6 percent increase in funding for the Mayorā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs, which amounts to an increase of $132,000 and would bring the officeā€™s total funding to $1.7 million. The office, among other things, provides grants to local organizations that provide  services to the LGBTQ community.

Among the other LGBTQ-related funding requests in the mayorā€™s proposed budget is a call to continue the annual funding of $600,000 to provide workforce development services for transgender and gender non-conforming city residents ā€œexperiencing homelessness and housing instability.ā€ The budget proposal also calls for a separate allocation of $600,000 in new funding to support a new Advanced Technical Center at the Whitman-Walker Healthā€™s Max Robinson Center in Ward 8.

Among the city agencies facing funding cuts under the mayorā€™s proposed budget is the HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Disease, and Tuberculosis Administration, known as HAHSTA, which is an arm of the D.C. Department of Health. LGBTQ and AIDS activists have said HAHSTA plays an important role in the cityā€™s HIV prevention and support services. Observers familiar with the agency have said it recently lost federal funding, which the city would have to decide whether to replace.

ā€œWe werenā€™t able to cover the loss of federal funds for HAHSTA with local funds,ā€ Japer  Bowles, director of the Mayorā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs, told the Washington Blade. ā€œBut we are working with partners to identify resources to fill those funding  gaps,ā€ Bowles said.

The total proposed budget of $21 billion that Bowser submitted to the D.C. Council includes about $500 million in proposed cuts in various city programs that the mayor said was needed to offset a projected $700 million loss in revenue due, among other things, to an end in pandemic era federal funding and commercial office vacancies also brought about by the post pandemic commercial property and office changes.

Bowserā€™s budget proposal also includes some tax increases limited to sales and business-related taxes, including an additional fee on hotel bookings to offset the expected revenue losses. The mayor said she chose not to propose an increase in income tax or property taxes.

Earlier this year, the D.C. LGBTQ+ Budget Coalition, which consists of several local LGBTQ advocacy organizations, submitted its own fiscal year 2025 budget proposal to both Bowser and the D.C. Council. In a 14-page letter the coalition outlined in detail a wide range of funding proposals, including housing support for LGBTQ youth and LGBTQ seniors; support for LGBTQ youth homeless services; workforce and employment services for transgender and gender non-conforming residents; and harm reduction centers to address the rise in drug overdose deaths.

Another one of the coalitionā€™s proposals is $1.5 million in city funding for the completion of the D.C. Center for the LGBTQ Communityā€™s new building, a former warehouse building in the cityā€™s Shaw neighborhood that is undergoing a build out and renovation to accommodate the LGBTQ Centerā€™s plans to move in later this year. The coalitionā€™s budget proposal also calls for an additional $300,000 in ā€œrecurringā€ city funding for the LGBTQ Center in subsequent years ā€œto support ongoing operational costs and programmatic initiatives.ā€

Bowles noted that Bowser authorized and approved a $1 million grant for the LGBTQ Centerā€™s new building last year but was unable to provide additional funding requested by the budget coalition for the LGBTQ Center for fiscal year 2025.

ā€œWeā€™re still in this with them,ā€ Bowles said. ā€œWeā€™re still looking and working with them to identify funding.ā€

The total amount of funding that the LGBTQ+ Budget Coalition listed in its letter to the mayor and Council associated with its requests for specific LGBTQ programs comes to $43.1 million.

Heidi Ellis, who serves as coordinator of the coalition, said the coalition succeeded in getting some of its proposals included in the mayorā€™s budget but couldnā€™t immediately provide specific amounts.  

ā€œThere are a couple of areas I would argue we had wins,ā€ Ellis told the Blade. ā€œWe were able to maintain funding across different housing services, specifically around youth services that affect folks like SMYAL and Wanda Alston.ā€ She was referring to the LGBTQ youth services group SMYAL and the LGBTQ organization Wanda Alston Foundation, which provides housing for homeless LGBTQ youth.

ā€œWe were also able to secure funding for the transgender, gender non-conforming workforce program,ā€ she said. ā€œWe also had funding for migrant services that weā€™ve been advocating for and some wins on language access,ā€ said Ellis, referring to programs assisting LGBTQ people and others who are immigrants and arenā€™t fluent in speaking English.

Ellis said that although the coalitionā€™s letter sent to the mayor and Council had funding proposals that totaled $43.1 million, she said the coalition used those numbers as examples for programs and policies that it believes would be highly beneficial to those in the LGBTQ community in need.

 ā€œI would say to distill it down to just we ask for $43 million or whatever, thatā€™s not an accurate picture of what weā€™re asking for,ā€ she said. ā€œWeā€™re asking for major investments around a few areas ā€“ housing, healthcare, language access. And for capital investments to make sure the D.C. Center can open,ā€ she said. ā€œItā€™s not like a narrative about the dollar amounts. Itā€™s more like where weā€™re trying to go.ā€

The Blade couldnā€™tā€™ immediately determine how much of the coalitionā€™s funding proposals are included in the Bowser budget. The mayorā€™s press secretary, Daniel Gleick, told the Blade in an email that those funding levels may not have been determined by city agencies.

ā€œAs for specific funding levels for programs that may impact the LGBTQ community, such as individual health programs through the Department of Health, it is too soon in the budget process to determine potential adjustments on individual programs run though city agencies,ā€ Gleick said.

But Bowles said several of the programs funded in the mayorā€™s budget proposal that are not LGBTQ specific will be supportive of LGBTQ programs. Among them, he said, is the budgetā€™s proposal for an increase of $350,000 in funding for senior villages operated by local nonprofit organizations that help support seniors. Asked if that type of program could help LGBTQ seniors, Bowles said, ā€œAbsolutely ā€“ thatā€™s definitely a vehicle for LGBTQ senior services.ā€

He said among the programs the increased funding for the mayorā€™s LGBTQ Affairs office will support is its ongoing cultural competency training for D.C. government employees. He said he and other office staff members conduct the trainings about LGBTQ-related issues at city departments and agencies.

Bowser herself suggested during an April 19 press conference that local businesses, including LGBTQ businesses and organizations, could benefit from a newly launched city ā€œPop-Up Permit Programā€ that greatly shortens the time it takes to open a business in vacant storefront buildings in the downtown area.

Bowser and Nina Albert, D.C. Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development, suggested the new expedited city program for approving permits to open shops and small businesses in vacant storefront spaces could come into play next year when D.C. hosts World Pride, one of the wordā€™s largest LGBTQ events.

ā€œWhile we know that all special events are important, there is an especially big one coming to Washington, D.C. next year,ā€ Bowser said at the press conference. ā€œAnd to that point, we proposed a $5.25 million investment to support World Pride 2025,ā€ she said, adding, ā€œItā€™s going to be pretty great. And so, weā€™re already thinking about how we can include D.C. entrepreneurs, how weā€™re going to include artists, how weā€™re going to celebrate across all eight wards of our city as well,ā€ she said.

Among those attending the press conference were officials of D.C.ā€™s Capital Pride Alliance, which will play a lead role in organizing World Pride 2025 events.

Continue Reading

Maryland

Health care for Marylanders with HIV is facing huge cuts this summer

Providers poised to lose three-quarters of funding

Published

on

(Photo courtesy of NIH)

BY MEREDITH COHN | By the end of June, health care providers in Maryland will lose nearly three-quarters of the funding they use to find and treat thousands of people with HIV.

Advocates and providers say they had been warned there would be less money by the Maryland Department of Health, but were stunned at the size of the drop ā€” from about $17.9 million this fiscal year to $5.3 million the next. The deep cuts are less than three months away.

The rest of this article can be read on the Baltimore Banner’s website.

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Taste of Point returns at critical time for queer students

BIPOC scholar to speak at Room & Board event on May 2

Published

on

A scene from the 2022 Taste of Point. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

The Point Foundation will kick off May with its annual Taste of Point DC event. The event will be hosted at Room & Board on 14th Street and feature a silent auction, food tastings, a speech from a scholar, and more. 

Pointā€™s chief of staff, Kevin Wright, said that at Taste of Point, the scholars are the star of the show.

ā€œPeople never come to an event to hear Point staff speak, they come to hear from the people most impacted by the program,ā€ he said. ā€œAt its core Taste of Point is designed to center and highlight our scholarsā€™ voices and experiences.ā€

This year, a Point BIPOC Scholar, Katherine Guerrero Rivera will speak at the event. 

ā€œIt is a great opportunity to highlight the scholars out there on the front lines making impacts in almost every sector and job field,ā€ Wright said. 

Wright pointed out that this year especially is a pivotal time for LGBTQ students. 

ā€œIn 2023, there were 20 states that passed anti-LGBTQ legislation,ā€ he said. ā€œBy this point in [2024] we already have more.ā€

Wright said the impacts of those legislative attacks are far reaching and that Point is continuously monitoring the impact they have on students on the ground. 

Last month, The Washington Post reported that states with anti-LGBTQ laws in place saw school hate crimes quadruple. This report came a month after a non-binary student, Nex Bennedict, died after being attacked at school. 

ā€œSo, we see this as a critical moment to really step up and help students who are facing these challenges on their campus,ā€ Wright said. ā€œOur mission is to continue to empower our scholars to achieve their full academic and leadership potential.ā€ 

This year Point awarded nearly 600 LGBTQ students with scholarships. These include the flagship scholarship, community college scholarship and the BIPOC scholarship. When the foundation started in 2002, there were only eight scholarships awarded. 

Dr. Harjant Gill is one of those scholars who said the scholarship was pivotal for him. Gill said he spent his undergraduate years creating films and doing activism for the LGBTQ community. 

As a result, his academic record wasnā€™t stellar and although he was admitted into American Universityā€™s graduate program he had no clue how he would fund it. 

Upon arrival to American he was told to apply for a Point scholarship and the rest was history.

ā€œIt ended up being the one thing that kept me going otherwise I would have dropped out,ā€ he said. ā€œPoint was incredibly instrumental in my journey to becoming an academic and a professor.ā€

More than a decade later, Gill serves on the host committee for Taste of Point and is a mentor to young Point scholars. He said that he donates money yearly to Point and that when he is asked what he wants for a gift he will often tell his friends to donate too.

To attend the event on Wednesday, May 2, purchase tickets at the Point website. If you canā€™t attend this yearā€™s Taste of Point DC event but would like to get involved, you can also donate online.Ā 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular