Connect with us

homepage news

A mystery in Philadelphia

Unsolved murder of gay man raises questions about police response



Dino Dizdarevic, gay news, Washington Blade
Dino Dizdarevic, gay news, Washington Blade

Dino Dizdarevic, 25, was found strangled and beaten to death near Philadelphia in 2014. (Photo courtesy of Facebook)

An ongoing mystery surrounding the May 2014 murder of a gay man in a town just outside Philadelphia has raised questions about whether the FBI and the U.S. Justice Department should intervene in a case that friends of the victim believe could be a hate crime.

Dino Dizdarevic, 25, a chemical engineer who lived with his boyfriend in Philadelphia, was found on the morning of May 1, 2014 strangled and beaten to death in an alley behind a row of houses in Chester, Pa., according to Chester police.

His body was found one day after he told his roommate and boyfriend Nick McBee that he met a man on the gay dating and hookup site Adam4Adam and planned to visit him in Chester for a few hours before returning home that night.

McBee, who currently lives in Arlington, Va., told the Washington Blade that many news media outlets that published stories about the murder shortly after it occurred incorrectly reported that Dizdarevic met the man he traveled to Chester to see on Grindr, another social media hookup app.

“It was Adam4Adam, not Grindr,” McBee said.

McBee and two mutual friends of the couple told the Blade that they and Dizdarevic’s family in Kentucky are concerned that more than a year and a half after the murder Chester police don’t appear to be adequately investigating the case.

The friends have joined McBee in questioning a decision by Chester police and the local District Attorney not to investigate the murder as a hate crime. McBee and the friends say the brutality of the beating that disfigured Dizdarevic’s face beyond recognition is a sign of a possible hate crime.

The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009, among other things, gives the U.S. Justice Department and the FBI authority to step in and investigate hate crimes under certain circumstances when local law enforcement agencies don’t have the resources to adequately investigate or who decline to investigate such crimes.

Legal experts contacted by the Blade have said the Dizdarevic case raises a question that federal officials have yet to definitively answer: Can the Shepard-Byrd hate crimes law be invoked in a case where it’s unclear whether the offense is a hate crime and a local law enforcement agency may not be adequately investigating to find out if it is or isn’t?

Jon Davidson, national legal director for the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, an LGBT litigation group, said one key requirement for invoking the Shepard-Byrd Act is that a crime must be linked in some way to interstate commerce or a “channel, facility or instrumentality of interstate commerce” in connection with criminal conduct.

“Meeting on the Internet, talking via cell phone, and texting might meet this requirement, but I believe only if it could be shown that the perpetrator was setting up the meeting via these devices in order to commit the crime,” Davison said.

Patricia Hartman, a spokesperson for the Office of the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, which would become involved in the case if the Shepard-Byrd law were to be invoked, said she could neither confirm nor deny that the office is involved in the investigation.

“Our policy is we cannot comment on a case until a charge is brought,” she said.

Two of Dizdarevic’s friends, Kentucky resident Thomas Carrier and Philadelphia resident Mike Hollinshead, worked with McBee to tap into Dizdarevic’s Adam4Adam account. They quickly identified and tracked down the name, address and phone number of the man Dizdarevic met on the hookup site and turned over the information to police the day after Dizdarevic traveled to Chester.

“I called and left two messages to ask if they got the information I found and was given to them,” said Carrier. “They never returned my calls.”

Louisville, Ky., resident Drew Owen, another friend of McBee and Dizdarevic, said Dizdarevic’s mother and sister told him police have not returned their calls seeking to find out where things stand in the investigation.

Among other things, McBee and the friends and family are concerned that the Delaware County, Pa., District Attorney with jurisdiction over Chester law enforcement matters disclosed this past November that his office and Chester police have been unable to tap into Dizdarevic’s Android smartphone, which McBee and Hollinshead helped track down near the site of the murder. Police point out that the phone is password protected and McBee doesn’t know the password.

McBee and the friends believe Dizdarevic exchanged text messages and spoke to the man he traveled to Chester to meet on his phone, and the phone likely has information that could reveal whether the man should be considered a suspect in the case.

The District Attorney, John Whelan, told the television program Crime Watch Daily, which reported on the Dizdarevic case on Nov. 19, 2015, that his office has access to “sophisticated technology to try to resolve issues with phones, to try to work with pass codes.” He said his office also had access to an FBI-run facility in Virginia that provides help to local law enforcement agencies in cell phone related matters.

But he didn’t say whether he or Chester police actually sought out that help. Whelan didn’t respond to a call from the Blade seeking more details about his office’s efforts to tap into Dizdarevic’s phone.

“I can imagine they don’t have the capability of doing something of that nature,” Owen said. “But I guarantee they know somebody who can. Why haven’t they done that?”

At the time Dizdarevic’s body was found police could find no identification documents such as a wallet or driver’s license and listed him as a “John Doe,” McBee said he was told.

The unidentified body was found one day after Dizdarevic told McBee that he met a man on Adam4Adam and planned to visit him in Chester for a few hours before returning home that night.

McBee, who told the Washington Blade the two had an open relationship, said Dizdarevic had a flight scheduled the next morning to Louisville, Ky., where he planned to visit his parents. Friends have said Dizdarevic grew up in central Kentucky when his family settled there in the 1990s as refugees from war-torn Bosnia-Herzegovina.

When Dizdarevic didn’t return home on the night of his visit to Chester and his mother told McBee he was not on his scheduled flight that arrived in Louisville the next morning, McBee knew something was terribly wrong. He said he immediately attempted to file a missing person’s report with Philadelphia police, but was told he would have to wait 72 hours to do so because he wasn’t officially related to Dizdarevic.

Friends investigated before police

Not wanting to wait that long before doing something to find his boyfriend, McBee said he contacted Hollinshead, who used information McBee gave him about Dizdarevic’s Adam4Adam account and began tracking online the person Dizdarevic arranged to visit.

Meanwhile, almost at the same time, Carrier, the friend from Louisville, began his own online search into the Adam4Adam interaction between Dizdarevic and the man in Chester, also using information provided by McBee. Carrier said he obtained through McBee Dizdarevic’s Adam4Adam password to enable him to gain access to Dizdarevic’s account.

He quickly discovered that Dizdarevic and the man exchanged phone numbers. Each of their photos had been posted on the Adam4Adam site enabling Carrier to retrieve the man’s photo, Carrier told the Blade. He said he then did a search on Facebook using the name the man used on his Adam4Adam account and found someone with the same name on Facebook.

According to Carrier, the man’s Facebook page showed him with a woman and children, leading Carrier to believe that the woman was his wife or girlfriend and the children were their kids.

“On Facebook he looked like a straight person,” said Carrier.

When asked about the information that Dizdarevic’s friends provided police, Chester police Det. Joseph McFate, the lead investigator in the case, told the Blade he could not comment on specific details of the investigation.

“It’s still open and active,” he said. “I can tell you that we’re tracking down every lead that we can possibly come across. Hopefully, we’re going to get some closure soon,” he said.

The Blade could not find the Facebook page in question and could not verify the man’s identity. The police also did not verify the man’s name, so the Blade is not reporting it here.

Owen, the friend from Louisville, said members of Dizdarevic’s family in Kentucky told him police at one point told them they interviewed the man in Chester and said he was “cooperative” but claimed he never hooked up with Dizdarevic at the time Dizdarevic traveled to Chester.

“All they’re saying is he’s cooperative,” Owen said. “That’s all they’ve ever said. And then the issue just kind of went silent. I didn’t hear much after that,” he said.

“I was under the assumption that they think they did their due diligence and he’s fine, he wasn’t a suspect,” Owen said.

McBee and Hollinshead told Crime Watch Daily they used a GPS app associated with Dizdarevic’s Adam4Adam account to retrace Dizdarevic’s trip they believe he took by taxicab to Chester in his effort to meet the man. The two drove twice to Chester and came upon a location within 100 feet or so where Dizdarevic appears to have traveled to meet him.

On their second trip to Chester a local resident informed them that police found a body a few days earlier in a nearby location. That prompted them to go directly to the Chester police department, where police arranged for McBee to identify Dizdarevic’s body through the clothing police found that he apparently was wearing at the time of the murder.

“I had to – they showed me his clothes,” McBee said in the Crime Watch Daily interview while crying.

“Dino gave me a new life,” he said later in the TV interview. “He gave me hope and I move forward because I know that’s what he would want me to do,” he said. “And his life matters. And we’re never going to give up. We’re never going to stop looking for who did this to him.”

Continue Reading


  1. Rob Preston

    January 28, 2016 at 2:54 pm

    Dino was a friend. Thank you for continuing to report on this.

  2. Brian's Ions

    January 29, 2016 at 8:57 am

    Hate crime coverups by both MPD and Metro Transit PD can occur with impunity in DC because our local political leaders who claim to be LGBT-friendly tacitly encourage hate crime coverups.

    MTP arrested only ONE of a reported teenage gang of a DOZEN attackers. And MTP intentionally did not charge this crime as a hate crime. See…

    Did Council’s Judiciary/’Public Safety’ Kenyan McDuffie– who claims to be LGBT-friendly because he marches at Pride every year– protest this apparent injustice?

    And how much did phony-baloney Phil Mendelson, the city’s SECOND ranking elected official– protest this hate crime coverup by MTP? Not at all.

    These two Council violent crime frauds talk a good game to LGBTQs at election time, but they could care less how much LGBTQ blood runs in the streets or on Metrorail trains and platforms.

    A few days ago, skulking around like thieves under cover of darkness, Mendelson and McDuffie engineered a post-blizzard quickie vote to shoot down Mayor Bowser’s modest crime bill.

    In a rare move, Chair Mendelson even decided to interject his own vote on Council’s Public Safety because he knew the mayor had the votes to win in McDuffie’s Public Safety committee.

    Read all about these killer coddlers latest slap in the face to the public safety of Washingtonians– both LGBTQ and straight…
    *D.C. Council says no to higher penalties for crimes committed on Metro*

    Note well, Red Line neighbors, and other Metro riders and businesses dependent on Metro-riding customers…
    — Evans, Bonds and May voted *FOR* your public safety.
    — Mendelson, McDuffie and Cheh voted *AGAINST* your public safety. Shame on them!

    BTW, Mendelson’s apparent flip-flop on enhanced penalties for certain crimes tells us all we need to know how he really feels about enforcing hate crimes against LGBTQ.

  3. Asher Daman

    June 22, 2017 at 12:51 am

    Everyone judges everyone. If I want to call Dino a perverse and sick person, than I am entitled to that just as much as you say that I need to get help. That’s your opinion and this is mine. It’s disgusting that desperate men have to resort to doing pretty much anything to get off. They never think about what the consequences are after. I don’t feel sorry for this filth, and in all honesty, he deserved death.

  4. TheRealDeal

    July 11, 2017 at 12:07 am

    SHUT UP!

    • Asher Daman

      July 19, 2017 at 5:43 am

      You shut up! ?

  5. Asher Daman

    July 19, 2017 at 5:44 am

    You judge me like I judge others. How does that make you look? ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

homepage news

Equality Act, contorted as a danger by anti-LGBTQ forces, is all but dead

No political willpower to force vote or reach a compromise



Despite having President Biden in the White House and Democratic majorities in both chambers of Congress, efforts to update federal civil rights laws to strengthen the prohibition on discrimination against LGBTQ people by passing the Equality Act are all but dead as opponents of the measure have contorted it beyond recognition.

Political willpower is lacking to find a compromise that would be acceptable to enough Republican senators to end a filibuster on the bill — a tall order in any event — nor is there the willpower to force a vote on the Equality Act as opponents stoke fears about transgender kids in sports and not even unanimity in the Democratic caucus in favor of the bill is present, stakeholders who spoke to the Blade on condition of anonymity said.

In fact, there are no imminent plans to hold a vote on the legislation even though Pride month is days away, which would be an opportune time for Congress to demonstrate solidarity with the LGBTQ community by holding a vote on the legislation.

If the Equality Act were to come up for a Senate vote in the next month, it would not have the support to pass. Continued assurances that bipartisan talks are continuing on the legislation have yielded no evidence of additional support, let alone the 10 Republicans needed to end a filibuster.

“I haven’t really heard an update either way, which is usually not good,” one Democratic insider said. “My understanding is that our side was entrenched in a no-compromise mindset and with [Sen. Joe] Manchin saying he didn’t like the bill, it doomed it this Congress. And the bullying of hundreds of trans athletes derailed our message and our arguments of why it was broadly needed.”

The only thing keeping the final nail from being hammered into the Equality Act’s coffin is the unwillingness of its supporters to admit defeat. Other stakeholders who spoke to the Blade continued to assert bipartisan talks are ongoing, strongly pushing back on any conclusion the legislation is dead.

Alphonso David, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said the Equality Act is “alive and well,” citing widespread public support he said includes “the majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents and a growing number of communities across the country engaging and mobilizing every day in support of the legislation.”

“They understand the urgent need to pass this bill and stand up for LGBTQ people across our country,” David added. “As we engage with elected officials, we have confidence that Congress will listen to the voices of their constituents and continue fighting for the Equality Act through the lengthy legislative process.  We will also continue our unprecedented campaign to grow the already-high public support for a popular bill that will save lives and make our country fairer and more equal for all. We will not stop until the Equality Act is passed.”

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), chief sponsor of the Equality Act in the Senate, also signaled through a spokesperson work continues on the legislation, refusing to give up on expectations the legislation would soon become law.

“Sen. Merkley and his staff are in active discussions with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to try to get this done,” McLennan said. “We definitely see it as a key priority that we expect to become law.”

A spokesperson Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who had promised to force a vote on the Equality Act in the Senate on the day the U.S. House approved it earlier this year, pointed to a March 25 “Dear Colleague” letter in which he identified the Equality Act as one of several bills he’d bring up for a vote.

Despite any assurances, the hold up on the bill is apparent. Although the U.S. House approved the legislation earlier this year, the Senate Judiciary Committee hasn’t even reported out the bill yet to the floor in the aftermath of the first-ever Senate hearing on the bill in March. A Senate Judiciary Committee Democratic aide, however, disputed that inaction as evidence the Equality Act is dead in its tracks: “Bipartisan efforts on a path forward are ongoing.”

Democrats are quick to blame Republicans for inaction on the Equality Act, but with Manchin withholding his support for the legislation they can’t even count on the entirety of their caucus to vote “yes” if it came to the floor. Progressives continue to advocate an end to the filibuster to advance legislation Biden has promised as part of his agenda, but even if they were to overcome headwinds and dismantle the institution needing 60 votes to advance legislation, the Equality Act would likely not have majority support to win approval in the Senate with a 50-50 party split.

The office of Manchin, who has previously said he couldn’t support the Equality Act over concerns about public schools having to implement the transgender protections applying to sports and bathrooms, hasn’t responded to multiple requests this year from the Blade on the legislation and didn’t respond to a request to comment for this article.

Meanwhile, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who declined to co-sponsor the Equality Act this year after having signed onto the legislation in the previous Congress, insisted through a spokesperson talks are still happening across the aisle despite the appearances the legislation is dead.

“There continues to be bipartisan support for passing a law that protects the civil rights of Americans, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity,” said Annie Clark, a Collins spokesperson. “The Equality Act was a starting point for negotiations, and in its current form, it cannot pass. That’s why there are ongoing discussions among senators and stakeholders about a path forward.”

Let’s face it: Anti-LGBTQ forces have railroaded the debate by making the Equality Act about an end to women’s sports by allowing transgender athletes and danger to women in sex-segregated places like bathrooms and prisons. That doesn’t even get into resolving the issue on drawing the line between civil rights for LGBTQ people and religious freedom, which continues to be litigated in the courts as the U.S. Supreme Court is expected any day now to issue a ruling in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia to determine if foster care agencies can reject same-sex couples over religious objections.

For transgender Americans, who continue to report discrimination and violence at high rates, the absence of the Equality Act may be most keenly felt.

Mara Keisling, outgoing executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, disputed any notion the Equality Act is dead and insisted the legislation is “very much alive.”

“We remain optimistic despite misinformation from the opposition,” Keisling said. “NCTE and our movement partners are still working fruitfully on the Equality Act with senators. In fact, we are gaining momentum with all the field organizing we’re doing, like phone banking constituents to call their senators. Legislating takes time. Nothing ever gets through Congress quickly. We expect to see a vote during this Congress, and we are hopeful we can win.”

But one Democratic source said calls to members of Congress against the Equality Act, apparently coordinated by groups like the Heritage Foundation, have has outnumbered calls in favor of it by a substantial margin, with a particular emphasis on Manchin.

No stories are present in the media about same-sex couples being kicked out of a restaurant for holding hands or transgender people for using the restroom consistent with their gender identity, which would be perfectly legal in 25 states thanks to the patchwork of civil rights laws throughout the United States and inadequate protections under federal law.

Tyler Deaton, senior adviser for the American Unity Fund, which has bolstered the Republican-led Fairness for All Act as an alternative to the Equality Act, said he continues to believe the votes are present for a compromise form of the bill.

“I know for a fact there is a supermajority level of support in the Senate for a version of the Equality Act that is fully protective of both LGBTQ civil rights and religious freedom,” Deaton said. “There is interest on both sides of the aisle in getting something done this Congress.”

Deaton, however, didn’t respond to a follow-up inquiry on what evidence exists of agreeing on this compromise.

Biden has already missed the goal he campaigned on in the 2020 election to sign the Equality Act into law within his first 100 days in office. Although Biden renewed his call to pass the legislation in his speech to Congress last month, as things stand now that appears to be a goal he won’t realize for the remainder of this Congress.

Nor has the Biden administration made the Equality Act an issue for top officials within the administration as it pushes for an infrastructure package as a top priority. One Democratic insider said Louisa Terrell, legislative affairs director for the White House, delegated work on the Equality Act to a deputy as opposed to handling it herself.

To be sure, Biden has demonstrated support for the LGBTQ community through executive action at an unprecedented rate, signing an executive order on day one ordering federal agencies to implement the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last year in Bostock v. Clayton County to the fullest extent possible and dismantling former President Trump’s transgender military ban. Biden also made historic LGBTQ appointments with the confirmation of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Rachel Levine as assistant secretary of health.

A White House spokesperson insisted Biden’s team across the board remains committed to the Equality Act, pointing to his remarks to Congress.

“President Biden has urged Congress to get the Equality Act to his desk so he can sign it into law and provide long overdue civil rights protections to LGBTQ+ Americans, and he remains committed to seeing this legislation passed as quickly as possible,” the spokesperson said. “The White House and its entire legislative team remains in ongoing and close coordination with organizations, leaders, members of Congress, including the Equality Caucus, and staff to ensure we are working across the aisle to push the Equality Act forward.”

But at least in the near-term, that progress will fall short of fulfilling the promise of updating federal civil rights law with the Equality Act, which will mean LGBTQ people won’t be able to rely on those protections when faced with discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

Continue Reading

homepage news

D.C. bill to ban LGBTQ panic defense delayed by Capitol security

Delivery of bill to Congress was held up due to protocols related to Jan. 6 riots



New fencing around the Capitol following the Jan. 6 insurrection prevented some D.C. bills from being delivered to the Hill for a required congressional review. (Blade file photo by Michael K. Lavers)

A bill approved unanimously last December by the D.C. Council to ban the so-called LGBTQ panic defense has been delayed from taking effect as a city law because the fence installed around the U.S. Capitol following the Jan. 6 insurrection prevented the law from being delivered to Congress.

According to Eric Salmi, communications director for D.C. Council member Charles Allen (D-Ward 6), who guided the bill through the Council’s legislative process, all bills approved by the Council and signed by the D.C. mayor must be hand-delivered to Congress for a required congressional review.

“What happened was when the Capitol fence went up after the January insurrection, it created an issue where we physically could not deliver laws to Congress per the congressional review period,” Salmi told the Washington Blade.

Among the bills that could not immediately be delivered to Congress was the Bella Evangelista and Tony Hunter Panic Defense Prohibition and Hate Crimes Response Amendment Act of 2020, which was approved by the Council on a second and final vote on Dec. 15.

Between the time the bill was signed by Mayor Muriel Bowser and published in the D.C. Register under procedural requirements for all bills, it was not ready to be transmitted to Congress until Feb. 16, the Council’s legislative record for the bill shows.

Salmi said the impasse in delivering the bill to Congress due to the security fence prevented the bill from reaching Congress on that date and prevented the mandatory 60-day congressional review period for this bill from beginning at that time. He noted that most bills require a 30 legislative day review by Congress.

But the Evangelista-Hunter bill, named after a transgender woman and a gay man who died in violent attacks by perpetrators who attempted to use the trans and gay panic defense, includes a law enforcement related provision that under the city’s Home Rule Charter passed by Congress in the early 1970s requires a 60-day congressional review.

“There is a chance it goes into effect any day now, just given the timeline is close to being up,” Salmi said on Tuesday. “I don’t know the exact date it was delivered, but I do know the countdown is on,” said Salmi, who added, “I would expect any day now it should go into effect and there’s nothing stopping it other than an insurrection in January.”

If the delivery to Congress had not been delayed, the D.C. Council’s legislative office estimated the congressional review would have been completed by May 12.

A congressional source who spoke on condition of being identified only as a senior Democratic aide, said the holdup of D.C. bills because of the Capitol fence has been corrected.

“The House found an immediate workaround, when this issue first arose after the Jan. 6 insurrection,” the aide said.

“This is yet another reason why D.C. Council bills should not be subject to a congressional review period and why we need to grant D.C. statehood,” the aide said.

The aide added that while no disapproval resolution had been introduced in Congress to overturn the D.C. Evangelista-Hunter bill, House Democrats would have defeated such a resolution.

“House Democrats support D.C. home rule, statehood, and LGBTQ rights,” said the aide.

LGBTQ rights advocates have argued that a ban on using a gay or transgender panic defense in criminal trials is needed to prevent defense attorneys from inappropriately asking juries to find that a victim’s sexual orientation or gender identity or expression is to blame for a defendant’s criminal act, including murder.

Some attorneys have argued that their clients “panicked” after discovering the person against whom they committed a violent crime was gay or transgender, prompting them to act in a way they believed to be a form of self-defense.

In addition to its provision banning the LGBTQ panic defense, the Evangelista-Hunter bill includes a separate provision that strengthens the city’s existing hate crimes law by clarifying that hatred need not be the sole motivating factor for an underlying crime such as assault, murder, or threats to be prosecuted as a hate crime.

LGBTQ supportive prosecutors have said the clarification was needed because it is often difficult to prove to a jury that hatred is the only motive behind a violent crime. The prosecutors noted that juries have found defendants not guilty of committing a hate crime on grounds that they believed other motives were involved in a particular crime after defense lawyers argued that the law required “hate” to be the only motive in order to find someone guilty of a hate crime.

Salmi noted that while the hate crime clarification and panic defense prohibition provisions of the Evangelista-Hunter bill will become law as soon as the congressional review is completed, yet another provision in the bill will not become law after the congressional review because there are insufficient funds in the D.C. budget to cover the costs of implementing the provision.

The provision gives the D.C. Office of Human Rights and the Office of the D.C. Attorney General authority to investigate hate related discrimination at places of public accommodation. Salmi said the provision expands protections against discrimination to include web-based retailers or online delivery services that are not physically located in D.C.

“That is subject to appropriations,” Salmi said. “And until it is funded in the upcoming budget it cannot be legally enforced.”

He said that at Council member Allen’s request, the Council added language to the bill that ensures that all other provisions of the legislation that do not require additional funding – including the ban on use of the LGBTQ panic defense and the provision clarifying that hatred doesn’t have to be the sole motive for a hate crime – will take effect as soon as the congressional approval process is completed.

Continue Reading

homepage news

D.C. man charged with 2020 anti-gay death threat rearrested

Defendant implicated in three anti-LGBTQ incidents since 2011



shooting, DC Eagle, assault, hate crime, anti-gay attack, police discrimination, sex police, Sisson, gay news, Washington Blade

A D.C. man arrested in August 2020 for allegedly threatening to kill a gay man outside the victim’s apartment in the city’s Adams Morgan neighborhood and who was released while awaiting trial was arrested again two weeks ago for allegedly threatening to kill another man in an unrelated incident.

D.C. Superior Court records show that Jalal Malki, who was 37 at the time of his 2020 arrest on a charge of bias-related attempts to do bodily harm against the gay man, was charged on May 4, 2021 with unlawful entry, simple assault, threats to kidnap and injure a person, and attempted possession of a prohibited weapon against the owner of a vacant house at 4412 Georgia Ave., N.W.

Court charging documents state that Malki was allegedly staying at the house without permission as a squatter. An arrest affidavit filed in court by D.C. police says Malki allegedly threatened to kill the man who owns the house shortly after the man arrived at the house while Malki was inside.

According to the affidavit, Malki walked up to the owner of the house while the owner was sitting in his car after having called police and told him, “If you come back here, I’m going to kill you.” While making that threat Malki displayed what appeared to be a gun in his waistband, but which was later found to be a toy gun, the affidavit says.

Malki then walked back inside the house minutes before police arrived and arrested him. Court records show that similar to the court proceedings following his 2020 arrest for threatening the gay man, a judge in the latest case ordered Malki released while awaiting trial. In both cases, the judge ordered him to stay away from the two men he allegedly threatened to kill.

An arrest affidavit filed by D.C. police in the 2020 case states that Malki allegedly made the threats inside an apartment building where the victim lived on the 2300 block of Champlain Street, N.W. It says Malki was living in a nearby building but often visited the building where the victim lived.

“Victim 1 continued to state during an interview that it was not the first time that Defendant 1 had made threats to him, but this time Defendant 1 stated that if he caught him outside, he would ‘fucking kill him.’” the affidavit says. It quotes the victim as saying during this time Malki repeatedly called the victim a “fucking faggot.”

The affidavit, prepared by the arresting officers, says that after the officers arrested Malki and were leading him to a police transport vehicle to be booked for the arrest, he expressed an “excited utterance” that he was “in disbelief that officers sided with the ‘fucking faggot.’”

Court records show that Malki is scheduled to appear in court on June 4 for a status hearing for both the 2020 arrest and the arrest two weeks ago for allegedly threatening to kill the owner of the house in which police say he was illegally squatting.

Superior Court records show that Malki had been arrested three times between 2011 and 2015 in cases unrelated to the 2021 and 2020 cases for allegedly also making threats of violence against people. Two of the cases appear to be LGBTQ related, but prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney’s Office did not list the cases as hate crimes.

In the first of the three cases, filed in July 2011, Malki allegedly shoved a man inside Dupont Circle and threatened to kill him after asking the man why he was wearing a purple shirt.

“Victim 1 believes the assault occurred because Suspect 1 believes Victim 1 is a homosexual,” the police arrest affidavit says.

Court records show prosecutors charged Malki with simple assault and threats to do bodily harm in the case. But the court records show that on Sept. 13, 2011, D.C. Superior Court Judge Stephen F. Eilperin found Malki not guilty on both charges following a non-jury trial.

The online court records do not state why the judge rendered a not guilty verdict. With the courthouse currently closed to the public and the press due to COVID-related restrictions, the Washington Blade couldn’t immediately obtain the records to determine the judge’s reason for the verdict.

In the second case, court records show Malki was arrested by D.C. police outside the Townhouse Tavern bar and restaurant at 1637 R St., N.W. on Nov. 7, 2012 for allegedly threatening one or more people with a knife after employees ordered Malki to leave the establishment for “disorderly behavior.”

At the time, the Townhouse Tavern was located next door to the gay nightclub Cobalt, which before going out of business two years ago, was located at the corner of 17th and R Streets, N.W.

The police arrest affidavit in the case says Malki allegedly pointed a knife in a threatening way at two of the tavern’s employees who blocked his path when he attempted to re-enter the tavern. The affidavit says he was initially charged by D.C. police with assault with a dangerous weapon – knife. Court records, however, show that prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney’s Office lowered the charges to two counts of simple assault. The records show that on Jan. 15, 2013, Malki pleaded guilty to the two charges as part of a plea bargain arrangement.

The records show that Judge Marissa Demeo on that same day issued a sentence of 30 days for each of the two charges but suspended all 30 days for both counts. She then sentenced Malki to one year of supervised probation for both charges and ordered that he undergo alcohol and drug testing and undergo treatment if appropriate.

In the third case prior to the 2020 and 2021 cases, court records show Malki was arrested outside the Cobalt gay nightclub on March 14, 2015 on multiple counts of simple assault, attempted assault with a dangerous weapon – knife, possession of a prohibited weapon – knife, and unlawful entry.

The arrest affidavit says an altercation started on the sidewalk outside the bar when for unknown reasons, Malki grabbed a female customer who was outside smoking and attempted to pull her toward him. When her female friend came to her aid, Malki allegedly got “aggressive” by threatening the woman and “removed what appeared to be a knife from an unknown location” and pointed it at the woman’s friend in a threatening way, the affidavit says.

It says a Cobalt employee minutes later ordered Malki to leave the area and he appeared to do so. But others noticed that he walked toward another entrance door to Cobalt and attempted to enter the establishment knowing he had been ordered not to return because of previous problems with his behavior, the affidavit says. When he attempted to push away another employee to force his way into Cobalt, Malki fell to the ground during a scuffle and other employees held him on the ground while someone else called D.C. police.

Court records show that similar to all of Malki’s arrests, a judge released him while awaiting trial and ordered him to stay away from Cobalt and all of those he was charged with threatening and assaulting.

The records show that on Sept. 18, 2015, Malki agreed to a plea bargain offer by prosecutors in which all except two of the charges – attempted possession of a prohibited weapon and simple assault – were dropped. Judge Alfred S. Irving Jr. on Oct. 2, 2015 sentenced Malki to 60 days of incarnation for each of the two charges but suspended all but five days, which he allowed Malki to serve on weekends, the court records show.

The judge ordered that the two five-day jail terms could be served concurrently, meaning just five days total would be served, according to court records. The records also show that Judge Irving sentenced Malki to one year of supervised probation for each of the two counts and ordered that he enter an alcohol treatment program and stay away from Cobalt.

Continue Reading

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts