Opinions
Pepco/Exelon merger will burden customers
PSC should stop corporate giveaways, protect consumers

(Logos courtesy of Pepco and Exelon)
No matter how you couch it, the Pepco/Exelon merger will cost the consumer money. They did a great job of getting people to support the merger but have yet to prove how it will bring any real additional benefits to their customers. It did benefit Pepco shareholders and executives. Within hours of the D.C. Public Service Commission (PSC) vote on March 23, “Exelon dissolved Pepco by suspending the trading of Pepco stock. This move resulted in a $1.6 billion windfall for shareholders – a nice chunk of which went to Pepco executives. Pepco’s CEO Joe Rigby, cashed out nearly $25 million in Pepco stock before retiring and turning the Pepco (a company of Exelon) reigns over to David Velazquez (who made $5 million on the sale).”
Now, according to the Washington Post, “Pepco is asking the D.C. Public Service Commission for a 5.25 percent across-the-board rate increase for most of its 282,000 District customers. The request comes three months after the company completed its $6.8 billion merger with Exelon. In April, Pepco filed a request with the state of Maryland to increase rates 10 percent for Montgomery and Prince George’s counties, which would generate $127 million annually. That request is under review. Under the proposal, filed Thursday, the typical Pepco residential customer in the District would see their power bill increase by $4.36 a month.”
Now if you got an individual bill from Pepco in D.C., your April bill would have shown a $50 credit, which was part of the agreement Pepco made to get the merger passed. Now they want it back and will get it in one year if the rate increase is passed as requested.
Pepco and Exelon proposed a total package of $78 million, including credits to consumers and donations to non-profit groups to get support for the merger. They will get this back in spades if the rate increase is approved.
I recently heard Pepco CEO David Velazquez speak at a program sponsored by Leadership Greater Washington (LGW) whose signature program I went through in 2002. Velazquez came across as both sincere and impressive in his presentation and responses to questions. He spoke about how the merger was going forward and how it was impacting staff. He mentioned an issue many companies are having, which is how to work with Millennials as staff and customers. I suggested he might want to bring in Jason Dorsey to talk to and work with his senior managers. Jason is an expert on Millennials having founded The Center for Generational Kinetics.
During the Q&A part of the program, I asked a question that elicited strong responses from two people I have great respect for: Doug Duncan, CEO of LGW, and Debbi Jarvis, PHI vice president, Corporate Citizenship & Social Responsibility. My question was whether the promise of continued and even additional donations to non-profits proposed as part of the merger package was what got numerous non-profit CEOs including Duncan to sign onto a Pepco ad asking the Public Service Commission to approve the merger and whether that promise could be considered a bribe. Both Duncan and Jarvis vehemently denied any specific promises to groups were made.
On the Pepco website the company proudly boasts of their corporate donations and civic work and posts its 2014 corporate responsibility report. It lists about $2,210,729 in contributions to roughly 350 entities for 2014. They break down the contributions into six categories including: civic engagement; environment and energy; social services: health, safety and emergency services; youth and education; business initiatives and workforce development; and arts and culture.
Interesting the smallest percent of donations, five percent, was given to the groups in the Energy and Environmental area when you would think this would be the area of most concern to a company like Pepco. It claims over the last five years to have donated $10.5 million to more than 2,100 groups. The report includes awards given to Pepco for being good corporate citizens. While applauding this, customers of Pepco should remember these donations come from the money we pay for energy consumption. Pepco is donating your money.
These quick rate increase requests make it clearer why Mayor Bowser and Attorney General Karl Racine opposed the merger in its final form. It will be crucial the PSC take a long and in-depth look at these requests and stop giveaways to Exelon/Pepco and do their job protecting consumers.
Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBT rights and Democratic Party activist. He writes regularly for the Blade.
Letter-to-the-Editor
Candidates should pledge to nominate LGBTQ judge to Supreme Court
Presidential, Senate hopefuls need to go on the record
As soon as the final votes are cast and counted and verified after the November 2026 elections are over, the 2028 presidential cycle will begin in earnest. Polls, financial aid requests, and volunteer opportunities ad infinitum will flood the public and personal media. There will be more issues than candidates in both parties. The rending of garments and mudslinging will be both interesting and maybe even amusing as citizens will watch how candidates react to each and every issue of the day.
There is one particular item that I am hoping each candidate will be asked whether in private or in public. If a Supreme Court vacancy occurs in your potential administration, will you nominate an open and qualified LGBTQ to join the remaining eight?
Other interest groups on both sides have made similar demands over the years and have had them honored. Is it not time that our voices are raised as well? There are several already sitting judges on both state and federal benches that have either been elected statewide or approved by the U.S. Senate.
Our communities are being utilized and abused on judicial menus. Enough already! Challenge each and every candidate, regardless of their party with our honest question and see if honest answers are given. By the way … no harm in asking the one-third of the U.S. Senate candidates too who will be on ballots. Looking forward to any candidate tap dancing!
Opinions
2026 elections will bring major changes to D.C. government
Mayor’s office, multiple Council seats up for grabs
Next year will be a banner year for elections in D.C. The mayor announced she will not run. Two Council members, Anita Bonds, At-large, and Brianne Nadeau, Ward 1, have announced they will not run. Waiting for Del. Norton to do the same, but even if she doesn’t, there will be a real race for that office.
So far, Robert White, Council member at-large, and Brooke Pinto, Council member Ward 2, are among a host of others, who have announced. If one of these Council members should win, there would be a special election for their seat. If Kenyon McDuffie, Council member at-large, announces for mayor as a Democrat, which he is expected to do, he will have to resign his seat on the Council as he fills one of the non-Democratic seats there. Janeese George, Ward 4 Council member, announced she is running for mayor. Should she win, there would be a special election for her seat. Another special election could happen if Trayon White, Ward 8, is convicted of his alleged crimes, when he is brought to trial in January. Both the Council chair, and attorney general, have announced they are seeking reelection, along with a host of other offices that will be on the ballot.
Many of the races could look like the one in Ward 1 where at least six people have already announced. They include three members of the LGBTQ community. It seems the current leader in that race is Jackie Reyes Yanes, a Latina activist, not a member of the LGBTQ community, who worked for Mayor Fenty as head of the Latino Affairs Office, and for Mayor Bowser as head of the Office of Community Affairs. About eight, including the two Council members, have already announced they are running for the delegate seat.
I am often asked by candidates for an endorsement. The reason being my years as a community, LGBTQ, and Democratic, activist; and my ability to endorse in my column in the Washington Blade. The only candidate I endorsed so far is Phil Mendelson, for Council chair. While he and I don’t always agree on everything, he’s a staunch supporter of the LGBTQ community, a rational person, and we need someone with a steady hand if there really are six new Council members, out of the 13.
When candidates call, they realize I am a policy wonk. My unsolicited advice to all candidates is: Do more than talk in generalities, be specific and honest as to what you think you can do, if elected. Candidates running for a legislative office, should talk about what bills they will support, and then what new ones they will introduce. What are the first three things you will focus on for your constituents, if elected. If you are running against an incumbent, what do you think you can do differently than the person you hope to replace? For any new policies and programs you propose, if there is a cost, let constituents know how you intend to pay for them. Take the time to learn the city budget, and how money is currently being spent. The more information you have at your fingertips, the smarter you sound, and voters respect that, at least many do. If you are running for mayor, you need to develop a full platform, covering all the issues the city will face, something I have helped a number of previous mayors do. The next mayor will continue to have to deal with the felon in the White House. He/she/they will have to ensure he doesn’t try to eliminate home rule. The next mayor will have to understand how to walk a similar tightrope Mayor Bowser has balanced so effectively.
Currently, the District provides lots of public money to candidates. If you decide to take it, know the details. The city makes it too easy to get. But while it is available, take advantage of it. One new variable in this election is the implementation of rank-choice voting. It will impact how you campaign. If you attack another candidate, you may not be the second, or even third, choice, of their strongest supporters.
Each candidate needs a website. Aside from asking for donations and volunteers, it should have a robust issues section, biography, endorsements, and news. One example I share with candidates is my friend Zach Wahls’s website. He is running for United States Senate from Iowa. It is a comprehensive site, easy to navigate, with concise language, and great pictures. One thing to remember is that D.C. is overwhelmingly Democratic. Chances are the winner of the Democratic primary will win the general election.
Potential candidates should read the DCBOE calendar. Petitions will be available at the Board of Elections on Jan. 23, with the primary on June 16th, and general election on Nov. 3. So, ready, set, go!
Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist.
Opinions
Lighting candles in a time of exhaustion
Gunmen killed 15 people at Sydney Hanukkah celebration
In the wake of the shooting at Bondi Beach that targeted Jews, many of us are sitting with a familiar feeling: exhaustion. Not shock or surprise, but the deep weariness that comes from knowing this violence continues. It is yet another reminder that antisemitism remains persistent.
Bondi Beach is far from Washington, D.C., but antisemitism does not respect geography. When Jews are attacked anywhere, Jews everywhere feel it. We check on family and friends, absorb the headlines, and brace ourselves for the quiet, numbing normalization that has followed acts of mass violence.
Many of us live at an intersection where threats can come from multiple directions. As a community, we have embraced the concept of intersectional identity, and yet in queer spaces, many LGBTQ+ Jews are being implicitly or explicitly asked to play down our Jewishness. Jews hesitate before wearing a Magen David or a kippah. Some of us have learned to compartmentalize our identities, deciding which part of ourselves feels safest to lead with. Are we welcome as queer people only if we mute our Jewishness? Are those around us able to acknowledge that our fear is not abstract, but rooted in a lived reality, one in which our friends and family are directly affected by the rise in antisemitic violence, globally and here at home?
As a result of these experiences, many LGBTQ+ Jews feel a growing fatigue. We are told, implicitly or explicitly, that our fear is inconvenient; that Jewish trauma must be contextualized, minimized, or deferred in favor of other injustices. Certainly, the world is full of horror. And yet, we long for a world in which all lives are cherished and safe, where solidarity is not conditional on political purity or on which parts of ourselves are deemed acceptable to love.
We are now in the season of Chanuka. The story of this holiday is not one of darkness vanishing overnight. It is the story of a fragile light that should not have lasted. Chanuka teaches us that hope does not require certainty; it requires persistence and the courage to kindle a flame even when the darkness feels overwhelming.
For LGBTQ+ Jews, this lesson resonates deeply. We have survived by refusing to disappear across multiple dimensions of our identities. We have built communities, created rituals, and embraced chosen families that affirm the fullness of who we are.
To our LGBTQ+ siblings who are not Jewish: this is a moment to listen, to stand with us, and to make space for our grief. Solidarity means showing up not only when it is easy or popular, but especially when it is uncomfortable.
To our fellow Jews: your exhaustion is valid. Your fear is understandable, and so is your hope. Every candle lit this Chanuka is an act of resilience. Every refusal to hide, every moment of joy, is a declaration that hatred will not have the final word.
Light does not deny darkness. It confronts it.
As we light our candles this Chanuka season, may we protect one another and bring light to one another, even as the world too often responds to difference with violence and hate.
Joshua Maxey is the executive director of Bet Mishpachah, D.C.’s LGBTQ synagogue.
