Connect with us


D.C. needs Council member, not mayor, Vince Gray

Mayor Bowser likely to have easy path to winning second term



Vincent Gray, gay news, Washington Blade

Ward 7 D.C. Council member Vincent Gray (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

Labor Day weekend is traditionally the launch of the next political campaign season, with politicians typically announcing next-aspiration intentions following the holiday.

In D.C., the guessing game regarding candidate composition for the 2018 mayoral race has been the subject of increasing media conjecture in recent weeks. By most accounts, it may be one of the most predictable in the city’s electoral history.

Incumbent Mayor Muriel Bowser appears likely to have an easy path seeking re-election to a second term. She is expected to have little, if any, significant opposition – or, put another way – won’t encounter a successful challenger.

While Bowser’s support is broader than deep, envious approval numbers for a mayor provoking less passion than performance appreciation are at nearly 70 percent.

Bowser has neutralized skeptics who, based on her rather lackluster tenure as a D.C. Council member, had ample reason to wonder if she was well suited for the task of the District’s top hometown spot. While she may not have won the wholehearted support of those doubters, she has successfully navigated her role in a city that plays politics as bloodletting sport.

Beating expectations and being perceived as over-performing are a politician’s best survival situation. Bowser benefits from being mayor during continued population growth filling the city’s tax coffers combined with strong private sector development generating growing civic pride, along with satisfaction regarding public safety statistics. Simply not interrupting those trajectories, while balancing such stewardship with signature efforts to facilitate affordable housing while sheltering the homeless, has proven a winning formula.

Speculation regarding challenges by former mayor and now D.C. Council member Vincent Gray or first-elected first-term D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine continue to dissipate. Neither seems disposed to enter the race – both likely recognizing their chances of besting Bowser are unfavorable.

Racine suffers low name recognition despite citywide election and evokes even less enthusiasm. He also lacks possession of a politician’s personality, in addition to appearing to genuinely relish his current role.

Former Mayor Gray, defeated for re-election in the previous Democratic mayoral primary by Bowser and subsequently elected to the Ward 7 Council seat, may desire to avenge that loss and diminish the legacy of an alleged campaign financing scandal never prosecuted but that derailed his winning a second term. Gray, however, seems smartly moving away from seeking to settle that score. He is undoubtedly looking at polling numbers indicating he would not prevail.

Others who may covet becoming mayor some day know that, in the one-party town that is Democratic D.C., “waiting your turn” is a basic tenet of advancement.

Gray’s Ward 7 constituents – and the city as a whole – greatly gain from his return to serving on the Council. The former mayor has been a strenuous and effective advocate for the often-neglected east end of the District.

More important is that Gray joins a small but critical cadre of leaders on the 13-member D.C. Council appropriately measuring matters so as to balance the competing interests of all the city’s components. Like Bowser, he learned the importance of circumspection on issues and comprehending legislative and regulatory implications, especially when affecting the business community.

Gray, also a former Council chair, serves as a vital component of a valuable “brain trust” of experienced civic leadership alongside colleagues Jack Evans of Ward 2, Mary Cheh of Ward 3, and Council Chair Phil Mendelson.

An example of this collective contribution is that all four seasoned Council members have proposed variable remedies to revise gargantuan funding and administrative requirements for planned implementation in 2020 of a massive paid leave mandate. Deliberations on what is now widely expected to produce a legislative repair also urged by Bowser that will reduce the financial burden on local businesses while not substantively affecting benefits begin in mid-October.

It may be tough for a former mayor to find complete fulfillment as a Council member, but D.C. distinctly benefits from having Gray sitting in that seat.


Mark Lee is a long-time entrepreneur and community business advocate. Follow on Twitter: @MarkLeeDC. Reach him at [email protected].

Continue Reading


  1. Point Pleasant

    September 1, 2017 at 10:19 am

    No way!

  2. Typical DC BS

    September 2, 2017 at 8:27 am

    Vince Gray is a scumbag who should be serving time, NOT a D.C. City Councilman. If you think he didn’t know about that $650,000 in illegal contributions for his shadow campaign when he became mayor, then you are the very definition of a Dumocrat. And SJW’s wonder why they are generally such pathetic morons when they overlook blatant corruption that DC Dems continue to foist on us.


      September 12, 2017 at 3:15 am

      Who gives 5 Phucks about what you think?

      • Typical DC BS

        September 12, 2017 at 8:02 am

        Thank so for showing us what a complete moron you are


          September 18, 2017 at 3:34 am

          I know for conversing with one

          • Typical DC BS

            September 18, 2017 at 9:11 am

            Maybe some day you’ll post something intelligent. Today isn’t that day.

  3. Madame Queen

    September 2, 2017 at 9:19 am

    Mayor Vince Gray has done so very much for our LGBTQA comuunity! He is an upstanding man who has been a victim of an EGREGIOUS miscarriage of justice. The US Attorney appointed by President Obama dismissed that case against Gray in less than 30 days when he took it over! That speaks volumes!

    Mayor Gray 2018

  4. Cole Carter

    September 4, 2017 at 3:55 pm

    Only an idiot would vote for this idiot! Corrupt, dishonest and sleazy!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Sondheim’s art will be with us for the ages

Iconic work explored sadness, rage, irony, and love of humanity



Stephen Sondheim (Screen capture via CBS)

“The only regret I have in life is giving you birth,” his mother wrote in a letter to Stephen Sondheim.

The only regret so many of us feel now is that Sondheim, the iconic composer and lyricist, died on Nov. 26 at his Roxbury, Conn. home at age 91.

He is survived by Jeffrey Romley, whom he married in 2017, and Walter Sondheim, a half-brother.

F. Richard Pappas, his lawyer and friend, told the New York Times that the cause of death was unknown, and that Sondheim had died suddenly. The day before he passed away, Sondheim celebrated Thanksgiving with friends, Pappas told the Times.

“Every day a little death,” Sondheim wrote in “A Little Night Music.”

This isn’t the case with the passing of Sondheim. Whether you’re a Broadway star or a tone-deaf aficionado like me, you’ll sorely miss Sondheim, who the Times aptly called “one of Broadway history’s songwriting titans.”

Like multitudes of his fans, I don’t remember a time in my life when a song from a Sondheim musical hasn’t been in my head.

When I was a child, my parents repeatedly played the cast album of “Gypsy,” the 1959 musical with music by Jule Styne, lyrics by Sondheim and book by Arthur Laurents. My folks loved the story of the show, which was loosely based on the life of the burlesque artist Gypsy Rose Lee. You haven’t lived until you’ve heard Ethel Merman belt out “Everything’s Coming Up Roses!” When I need to jumpstart my creative juices, I remember that “You Gotta Get a Gimmick.”

In college, I felt that “Company,” the 1970 musical with music and lyrics by Sondheim and book by George Furth, spoke to my generation. 

As was the case with Sondheim’s musicals, “Company” didn’t have a conventional plot, happy ending, or tidy resolution. It takes place during Bobby’s 35th birthday party. Bobby, who is single, is celebrating with his friends (straight, married couples). Bobby likes having friends but doesn’t want to get married.

Sondheim didn’t come out as gay until he was 40. Yet, even in the 1970s, it was hard not to think that Bobby in “Company” wasn’t gay.

Once you’ve heard Elaine Stritch sing “The Ladies Who Lunch” from “Company,” it becomes indelibly etched in your brain.

Who else but Sondheim could have written, “And here’s to the girls who play/smart-/Aren’t they a gas/Rushing to their classes in optical art,/Wishing it would pass/Another long exhausting day/Another thousand dollars/A matinee, a Pinter play/Perhaps a piece of Mahler’s/I’ll drink to that/And one for Mahler!”

In September, I, along with legions of other theater lovers, were thrilled when Sondheim told Stephen Colbert on “The Late Show,” that he was working with David Ives on a new musical called “Square One.”

In his musicals from “Follies” to “Sweeney Todd” to “Sunday in the Park with George,” Sondheim, through his lyrics and music, revealed the internal depths of his characters and the sadness, tenderness, bitterness, rage, irony, wit, and love of humanity. Sondheim’s wordplay was so brilliant that he did crossword puzzles for New York magazine.

Over his decades-long career, Sondheim won every award imaginable from the Pulitzer Prize for “Sunday in the Park with George” to the Presidential Medal of Freedom (awarded to him by President Barack Obama in 2015). He received more than a dozen Tony Awards for his Broadway musicals and revivals as well as a Tony Award for lifetime achievement in 2008.

Thankfully, Sondheim’s art will be with us for the ages.

A remake of “West Side Story,” directed by Steven Spielberg with a screenplay by Tony Kushner, premieres this month.

Sondheim is a character in the Netflix film “tick, tick BOOM!,” directed by Lin-Manuel Miranda. The movie is based on an autobiographical posthumous Jonathan Larson (the composer of “Rent”) musical. Sondheim is supportive of Larson’s work.

Thank you Stephen, for your art! R.I.P.

Kathi Wolfe, a writer and poet, is a regular contributor to the Blade.

Continue Reading


Publish trans employment stats

Not enough corporations that march in Pride are hiring non-binary staff



On Nov. 10, the top-tier consulting firm McKinsey published a report on discrimination toward trans people in the workplace. The report came out with numbers that we have all known true for a long time and lead to one conclusion: Trans people have a harder time finding jobs, holding them down, and advancing in their careers. 

Specifically, McKinsey cited the fact that cisgender people are twice as likely to be employed as trans people, and that more than half of trans employees are uncomfortable being out at work. Meanwhile, cisgender employees make 32% more than trans employees in the workplace, even if those trans employees hold the same positions or higher positions. 

On top of this, trans people are 2.4 times more likely to be working in the food and retail industries, which pay entry level wages that are much less than decent pay. 

These statistics are true based on a number of factors. For one, many trans people have a harder time passing at work, and people who don’t pass well face worse job prospects. (As a side note, on top of that, the study pointed to the fact that many trans people exert undue emotional and psychological energy into trying to pass really well and not be discriminated against, which takes a toll on their mental health.) 

So what is a concrete step that corporations can take to make the trans experience in the workplace better? It’s time that corporations step up their game by publishing and making transparent the number of trans employees that they actually hire. Such numbers can be published in any kind of company document: a pamphlet, online report, or even annual shareholder’s report. As it is, most corporations do not publish numbers on LGBT employees. 

“Rainbow capitalism” is a term we know all too well: major corporations and multinationals flaunting a rainbow and trans pride flag during the month of June, but seemingly doing little to hire more trans people or give back to the community during other months. 

Every corporation surely has the time and company-wide infrastructure to get statistics on their trans employees. All they need to do is implement a company-wide survey to new hires. This takes extremely little effort and time in the grand scheme of company workings. 

If major corporations like McKinsey, Bain, Deloitte, defense contractors, and hundreds of other huge companies published statistics on trans employees, they would be held accountable for their actions and words.

If these statistics were to be published today, we would probably find out that not enough corporations that march in Pride parades are hiring trans and gender nonconforming employees. 

Turning the numbers against corporations will ensure that these same corporations finally live up to their words about workplace inclusion and diversity. It won’t cure everything about the issue of being trans in the workplace, but it’s a step in the right direction. 

Isaac Amend (he/him/his) is a trans man and young professional in the D.C. area. He was featured on National Geographic’s ‘Gender Revolution’ in 2017 as a student at Yale University. Isaac is also on the board of the LGBT Democrats of Virginia. Find him on Instagram @isaacamend.

Continue Reading


Should we be scared of Omicron?

A reminder to stay vigilant against latest mutation



It’s Sunday of Thanksgiving weekend when I sit down to write this column. The craziness in the world continues but other than the scare of the new COVID mutation, which has been named Omicron, there isn’t one headline to grab attention. Instead, there are many, including some manufactured by the news media to gain viewers or sell papers. Some like the car rampaging through the Christmas parade is frightening but incidents like this seem to be happening all too often.  

The stock market went down 1,000 points on Friday because market players freaked out about the new COVID mutation coming out of South Africa. However that didn’t seem to stop people from spending their money on Black Friday. Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) was again on the attack this time against fellow Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) accusing her of being a Muslim terrorist. She apologized, or pretended to, but again the Republican leadership wouldn’t condemn her statements. These things seemed to be grist for the news media with no one else unfortunately really voicing concern. 

Boebert’s comments were taken as old hat. They are disgusting, offensive, and dangerous, but as long as her constituents reelect her we will have to live with them. She is joined by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.),  Madison Cawthorn (R-N.C.), and Paul Gosar  (R-Wyo.) who represent the worst in Congress and the worst of the American people. Yet again until their constituents throw them out we have to live with their stupidity and the absurdity of their being where they are. 

The new COVID mutation out of South Africa is potentially a game changer. But it will be important for scientists to look at this carefully to determine how quickly it spreads and whether or not the current vaccines will offer any protection against it. Countries around the world, including the United States, have quickly instituted travel bans for South Africans and those in countries surrounding it. The World Health Organization at this time has suggested this should not be done as it will have limited impact on its spreading and could have severe and detrimental economic impact on countries whose people are being banned. One thing we must learn from this is how important it is to ensure everyone all over the world has access to vaccines as we know the more people who are inoculated the harder it is for the virus to mutate. It is not time to panic yet and by Sunday there was some reporting this new mutation may not be any more difficult to deal with than the current ones and not lead to any more severe illness. The takeaway from all this is we need to keep vigilant, get vaccinated and get booster shots, and make sure we vaccinate our children. Continue to wear masks indoors and wash our hands. 

Now the other interesting stories last weekend were about what will happen in the Senate in the weeks leading up to the Christmas holidays. Remember the House of Representatives passed President Biden’s Build Back Better bill as a reconciliation measure, which means it can pass the Senate with a simple majority. That would mean every Democratic senator and the vice president. The focus is on two senators: Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Sinema (D-Ariz.). In reality we need to look at a number of others who will fight to either take out or put something into the bill the House passed. It is clear it will not pass in the current form and then it has to go back to the House again. 

Another issue that will be taken up is the debt ceiling. It may be a little easier than thought because as recently reported, “After taking a hard line and refusing to negotiate with Democrats during the last standoff over the debt limit, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is quietly looking for a way to get the issue resolved without another high-profile battle.” Then there is the budget and since none is passed Congress will have to pass another continuing resolution since the one they passed in September expires on Dec. 3. 

So for the next few weeks there will be a focus on the Senate to see what they do and how obstructionist Republicans want to be. Seems while things change, they somehow remain the same.

Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist. He writes regularly for the Blade.

Continue Reading

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts