Connect with us

News

Evan Wolfson habla sobre libertad religiosa, matrimonio igualitario

Fundador de Freedom to Marry viajó a Costa Rica este mes

Published

on

Evan Wolfson, gay news, Washington Blade

Evan Wolfson, el fundador de Freedom to Marry, asistió este mes a un congreso en Costa Rica enfocado en matrimonio igualitario en América Latina. (Foto del Washington Blade por Michael Key)

Nota del editor: Esta nota fue traducida al español por Alejandro Piercy.

SAN JOSÉ, Costa Rica — El fundador de Freedom to Marry dice que los esfuerzos de impulsar medidas y litigios anti-LGBT basados en la libertad religiosa no son “nada nuevos.”

“Es parte del patrón clásico del avance de los derechos civiles en la historia americana,” Evan Wolfson le dijo al Washington Blade el 10 de noviembre durante una entrevista en San José, la capital de Costa Rica.  “Los opositores a la igualdad y la inclusión tratan de bloquear los avances del bloque de los derechos civiles y cuando fallan en bloquearlos, tratan de subvertirlos usando esta táctica de la supuesta libertad religiosa. Esto no es nada nuevo.”

“Las personas gays no son las primeras en experimentar esto,” agregó. “Las personas trans no son las primeras en experimentar esto. Todavía lo vemos aquí mismo con las mujeres en un esfuerzo para corroer el acceso a los derechos reproductivos en el cuidado de la salud.”

Wolfson habló con el Blade menos de un mes antes que la Corte Suprema (de los EEUU) tuviera programado escuchar los argumentos orales en un caso sobre si la Primera Enmienda le permite a Masterpiece Cakeshop en Colorado rehusarse a hornear pasteles de boda para parejas entre personas del mismo sexo, en razón de sus creencias religiosas.

El mes pasado, el Fiscal General de EEUU Jeff Sessions emitió una directriz general que dice que individuos y empresas pueden actuar con base en su libertad religiosa sin miedo a represalias del gobierno.

La ley de libertad religiosa de Misisipí que cuyos críticos aseguran que permite discriminación en contra de personas LGBT en el estado entró en vigor el mes pasado. Una orden ejecutiva sobre libertad religiosa que el presidente Trump firmó en mayo no contenía ninguna referencia LGBT específica.

“Es parte de una lucha en la cual progresamos, pero la oposición no nada más se derrite,” dijo Wolfson, quien ha presentado un escrito amicus en el caso Masterpiece. “Tratan de subvertirlo y esta es una técnica muy, muy común que utilizan.”

“La libertad religiosa es un escudo, no una espada,” agregó. “La libertad religiosa pretende proteger derechos muy importantes de las personas de libertad de culto, de orar y hablar como elijan y tener sus propias canciones dentro de sus templos, pero no es una espada para llevar al mercado y decir quiero todos los beneficios de participar en la esfera pública, pero no voy a seguir la ley, quiero una licencia para discriminar y sí, soy una empresa que pone un rótulo afuera que dice que está abierta al público, pero no voy a estar abierta al público.”

Wolfson le dijo al Blade que las personas y las cortes de Estados Unidos “han rechazado” este argumento “una y otra vez.”

“Aunque estamos en una especie de momento político disfuncional donde la oposición es más feroz de lo que en realidad es representativo del pueblo estadounidense, aún así estoy confiado que vamos a hacer retroceder estos ataques,” dijo. “No vamos a ganar todas las batallas, pero sí vamos a hacer retroceder estos ataques porque el pueblo estadounidense comprende esto como una gran amenaza a la democracia, ya que si cada quien se vuelve ley en sí mismo y puede simplemente decir ‘no quiero’ como defensa contra una ley sobre derechos civiles, abre una caja de pandora que asesta perjuicio real en personas reales, pero que además socava el estado de derecho y la cohesión misma de nuestra democracia y por todas estas razones creo que venceremos.”

‘Tenemos que aprender mutuamente’

Wolfson conversó con el Blade en el Congreso de Matrimonio Civil Igualitario, el cual fue el primero en su especie en América Latina y que estuvo enfocado exclusivamente en el derecho al matrimonio para parejas entre personas del mismo sexo.

Herman Duarte de Fundación Igualitos, un grupo de defensores del matrimonio igualitario basado en Costa Rica, organizó la conferencia junto con HduarteLex, su firma legal la cual lucha en contra de la discriminación por orientación sexual. Dos grupos de abogacía costarricenses — Acceder y Asociación Costarricense de Derecho Internacional — fueron coanfitriones del evento que atrajo más de 100 activistas provenientes de todo hemisferio occidental.

“Estamos aquí para aprender mutuamente,” dijo Wolfson.

En 2015 Wolfson presentó un testimonio a favor de los derechos maritales de las parejas entre personas del mismo sexo ante la Corte Constitucional de Colombia.

Ha presentado un escrito ante la Corte Suprema de Panamá a favor de la parte actora en un caso de matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo. Wolfson además trabaja con dos grupos de abogacía LGBT Chilenos — Movimiento de Integración y Liberación Homosexual y Fundación Iguales — que trabajan para impulsar el asunto en el país.

“En ninguno de estos países … lo estoy manejando todo”, le dijo al Blade. Estoy aconsejando y compartiendo y tratando de ayudar y alentar y darle a las personas la experiencia y los elementos que puedan adoptar.”

En 2016, Wolfson se reunió con defensores en Cuba que promueven el derecho al matrimonio para parejas entre personas del mismo sexo en el país. También se ha reunido con activistas, dirigentes de empresas y oficiales de gobierno en Suiza, Austria, Alemania, Japón, Sudáfrica y otros países desde el 2015 cuando la Corte Suprema de los EEUU emitió su sentencia hito en el caso Obergefell.

Wolfson señaló que 1,100 millones de personas al rededor del mundo habitan en jurisdicciones donde parejas entre personas del mismo sexo pueden casarse legalmente. Conversó con el Blade a menos de dos semanas antes que oficiales australianos anunciaran que la mayoría de votantes que participaron de un plebiscito no vinculante sobre si los gays y lesbianas deberían poder casarse dijo que “sí.” 

“Esto refuta los alegatos de la oposición de que cosas malas van a suceder,” dijo Wolfson, refiriéndose al creciente número de jurisdicciones que permiten el matrimonio igualitario. “Esto es parte importante del caso que tenemos que presentarle a la corte de la opinión pública, así como en las cortes de derecho en estos países. Pero también suministra esta montaña de experiencia y evidencia que puede traerse a las discusiones, ya sea con el público o con quienes toman las decisiones. Esta no es una nueva pregunta.”
 
“No estamos en los Estados Unidos en 1972. Estamos en Costa Rica en 2017,” señalando que el 70 por ciento de la población total de América Latina viven en jurisdicciones que han extendido el derecho al matrimonio para las parejas entre personas del mismo sexo. “Entonces, ¿Por qué no deberían tener los pueblos de Costa Rica, o del Perú, o Panamá o sigue la lista lo que todos sus hermanos y hermanas a través del continente — o alrededor del mundo — ya tienen.”

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Congress

House moves to block gender-affirming care for children of service members

Rules Committee approved NDAA on Monday

Published

on

U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

House Republicans added a provision to the annual must-pass military spending bill, filed over the weekend, that would prohibit the children of U.S. service members from accessing gender-affirming healthcare interventions.

President Joe Biden has promised to veto legislation that discriminates against the trans community, and the likelihood that the bill would pass through the U.S. Senate is uncertain with Democrats controlling the upper chamber until the 119th Congress is convened on Jan. 3.

Nevertheless, the GOP’s National Defense Authorization Act was passed along party lines by the U.S. House Rules Committee on Monday night, and a floor vote could come as early as Tuesday.

During the hearing yesterday, the committee’s top Democrat, U.S. Rep. Adam Smith (Wash.) said the NDAA negotiated by the chairs and ranking members of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees did not include this provision barring gender-affirming care and it was House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) who insisted that it be added after the fact.

Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is urging House Republicans to attach the Antisemitism Awareness Act, which is aimed at college campuses, to the NDAA, but Johnson reportedly wants the Democratic leader to put the bill to a floor vote on its own — a move that would inhibit his party’s ability to confirm as many judicial nominees as possible before control of the upper chamber changes hands.

Smith’s office published a statement objecting to the anti-transgender language added by the Republican leader:

“For the 64th consecutive year, House and Senate Armed Services Committee Democrats and Republicans worked across the aisle to craft a defense bill that invests in the greatest sources of America’s strength: Service members and their families, science and technology, modernization, and a commitment to allies and partners.  

Rooted in the work of the bipartisan Quality of Life Panel, the bill delivers a 14.5 percent pay raise for junior enlisted service members and 4.5 percent pay raise for all other service members. It includes improvements for housing, health care, childcare, and spousal support.

House Armed Services Democrats were successful in blocking many harmful provisions that attacked DEI programs, the LGBTQ community, and women’s access to reproductive health care. It also included provisions that required bipartisan compromise. And had it remained as such, it would easily pass both chambers in a bipartisan vote.

However, the final text includes a provision prohibiting medical treatment for military dependents under the age of 18 who are diagnosed with gender dysphoria. Blanketly denying health care to people who clearly need it, just because of a biased notion against transgender people, is wrong. This provision injected a level of partisanship not traditionally seen in defense bills. Speaker Johnson is pandering to the most extreme elements of his party to ensure that he retains his speakership. In doing so, he has upended what had been a bipartisan process.

I urge the speaker to abandon this current effort and let the House bring forward a bill — reflective of the traditional bipartisan process — that supports our troops and their families, invests in innovation and modernization, and doesn’t attack the transgender community.”

Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson also issued a statement, arguing that “This legislation has been hijacked by Speaker Mike Johnson and anti-LGBTQ+ lawmakers, who have chosen to put our national security and military readiness at risk for no other reason than to harm the transgender kids of military families.”

“The decisions that families and doctors make for the wellbeing of their transgender kids are important and complex, especially so for military families, and the last thing they need is politicians stepping in and taking away their right to make those decisions,” she said.

“When this comes up in the full House, lawmakers need to vote down this damaging and dehumanizing legislation,” Robinson added.

“This is a dangerous affront to the dignity and well-being of young people whose parents have dedicated their lives to this country’s armed forces,” said Mike Zamore, national director of policy and government affairs at the American Civil Liberties Union.

“Medical care should stay between families and their doctors but this provision would baselessly and recklessly inject politics into the health care military families receive,” he said. “Nobody should have to choose between serving the country and ensuring their child has the health care they need to live and thrive. Members of Congress must vote against the defense bill because of the inclusion of this deeply harmful, unconstitutional provision.”

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Dupont’s Soho Coffee and Tea closes

Neighborhood institution holds fond memories for many older gay residents

Published

on

Soho today, emptied of tables and artwork. (Photo courtesy Larry Ray)

Beloved Dupont Circle Soho Coffee and Tea has closed unexpectedly.

During the early evening of Nov. 25, Soho Coffee and Tea employees began taking down artwork and menus of the establishment. Within 12 hours, everything from the rolling counters to the patio furniture had disappeared. Today, only the yellow walls remain.

On May 30, 2018, Eduard Badalyan received his new business license: Group Soho and closed on the sale of Soho Tea and Coffee at 2150 P St., N.W., in Dupont Circle. Eduard’s sister Liana Badalyan became the manager. Conveniently, they lived in the neighborhood.

Eduard Badalyan was born in Yerevan, Armenia and earned his master’s in Public Administration. Liana had experience in the service industry. She was front office manager for the Remington Hotel Marriot in Beverly Hills and Santa Monica, Calif.   

So the stage was set for a great neighborhood coffee and tea shop.

Owner Edward and manager Liana transformed it into a clean and organized establishment. But business gradually fell off and the rent continued to rise so Edward closed Soho unexpectedly.  

For many older gay residents, the closing brought back fond memories when Soho Coffee and Tea was the gay hub of West Dupont Circle. At that time, 22nd and P Streets, N.W., aka West Dupont Circle, was D.C.’s gayborhood. Across the street from Soho was a section of Rock Creek Park known as P Street Beach, a large grassy area perfect for sunbathing. For many years starting in 1972, this was home for the unofficial Gay Pride celebration. In fact, for many years the Gay Pride Parade kicked off at 22nd and P streets.

Adjacent to the so-called P Street Beach was the Black Forest, a popular cruising area occasionally raided by the National Park Police. They chopped down many bushes and trees so their cruisers could drive directly onto P Street Beach.

Entrepreneurs and lesbians Helene Bloom and Fran Levine opened Soho in 1994. At that time, this was the center of many gay bars including the dance bar Badlands (1984-2002 which then became Apex) on 22nd Street; Fraternity House, which became Omega, was located down the Twining Alley (closed 2013); Friends Piano Bar on P Street then became gay Latino bar Escandalo; and finally Deco Cabana, as well as P Street Station (rebranded as The Fireplace) and Mr. P’s. Each night when the bars closed, the patrons would flood to Soho for eggs, bacon, and coffee.

Helene and Fran had envisioned a New York City-style eclectic restaurant hangout. It became a spot for book clubs, art shows, political meetings and wine parties. 

Longtime Dupont Circle residents and Soho customers Gordon Binder and Michael Rawson lamented the loss of Soho.   

“Soho was around the corner from where we live, we’ve been going to Soho several times a week since it opened in the ‘90s, 30 years enjoying the atmosphere, the patrons, the friendly albeit ever changing staff, the chicken salad sandwich, and so much more,” Binder said. “Sad news indeed. We will surely miss this neighborhood hangout.”

Continue Reading

World

HRC Foundation awards grants to 18 LGBTQ groups around the world

Organizations to receive up to $5,000 through Global Small Grants program

Published

on

(Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

The Human Rights Campaign Foundation on Tuesday announced it has awarded grants to 18 LGBTQ rights groups around the world.

A press release notes the groups will receive up to $5,000 through its Global Small Grants program. The recipients include:

• LighT in Central Asia

• Más Igualdad Perú

• The Eastern Caribbean Alliance for Diversity and Equality

• XY Spectrum in Serbia

• Lesbian Intersex Trans and Other Extensions in Malawi

• Right Side Human Rights Defender NGO in Armenia

• The Blue Diamond Society in Nepal

• The Barbados LGBTQ+ Coalition

• Sin Etiquetas +593 in Ecuador

• Icebreakers Uganda

• Equal Ground in Sri Lanka

• The Equal Asia Foundation in Thailand

• The Taiwan Tongzhi (LGBTQ+) Hotline Association

• Key Watch Ghana

• South Trans Voice in Morocco

The press release notes this year’s grant priorities included “projects centering LGBTQI+ people who are racial, religious or ethnic minorities, have a disability, communities disproportionately impacted by climate change, or who have experienced displacement.” The HRC Foundation also “sought to assist programs working to focus on increasing trans and/or intersex leadership or advocacy and those generally creating more inclusive access to services or other institutions of daily life, including engaging employers/businesses or faith institutions as allies for equality.”

Sean Sih-Cheng Du of the Taiwan Tongzhi (LGBTQ+ Hotline Association said the grant will allow his organization to expand its campaign that seeks to make “workplaces in Taiwan more diverse and inclusive.”

HRC launched the Global Small Grants Program in 2020.

Tuesday’s announcement coincides with International Human Rights Day, which commemorates the U.N. General Assembly’s ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on Dec. 10, 1948.

President-elect Donald Trump’s election last month sparked concern among LGBTQ activists and advocacy groups in the U.S. and around the world. The incoming president has nominated U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) to serve as his administration’s secretary of state and U.S. ambassador to the U.N. respectively.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular