Books
New trans memoir relays strictures of ultra-orthodox Jewish upbringing
Author Stein weaves compelling tale of her journey to self identity
āBecoming Eve: My Journey from Ultra-Orthodox Rabbi to Transgender Womanā
By Abby Chava Stein
Seal Press
$28
272 pages
Who are you?
There are many possibilities. You can answer with ethnicity, gender, social strata or surname, mention your species, family origins, religion or hobbies. So many things and yet, as in the new book āBecoming Eveā by Abby Chava Stein, only one answer really matters.
Yisroel Avrom Ben Menachem Mendel was born on the 24th of Tishrei in the year 5752 ā or, for those who are not Ultra-Orthodox Jews, the first of October, 1991. The sixth child and firstborn son, Yisroelās birth was the cause of great jubilation: one main forebear was Baal Shem Tov, a holy leader and the founder of Hasidism. In their Brooklyn community, that made Yisroel a member of royalty.
Almost from the moment of birth, the future was set: Yisroel would follow the same path laid out for the males of the family, starting with ritual circumcision and religious observances, then yeshiva to study the Torah and Jewish law, marriage at age 18 and hope for sons to continue the line. There was no alternative. The entire family lived like this, like ā18th-century Eastern Europeans,ā and had done so for centuries.
The exception came when then-4-year-old Yisroel insisted on having always been a girl.
Later, though other childish things were forgotten, those thoughts never were. They were constant, remembered, boxed up, ignored or excused. Even when theological questions roared, when religious texts seemed to confirm Yisroelās suspicions of girlhood, when sex ā a subject no Ultra-Orthodox Jew was supposed to know about until days before marriage ā made an all-boy yeshiva more bearable, questions of gender were suppressed. At 18, āmatchedā with and married to a woman who was nearly a stranger, Yisroel burned with envy that wearing a bridal gown would forever be denied. Naming their firstborn son was devastating.
āOh, and gender?ā says author Abby Chava Stein today. āIt started punching me in the face.ā
Without a doubt, āBecoming Eveā may be one of the most fascinating books youāll read this winter. Certainly, itāll be one of the most unusual.
Set in a community that is meant only for adherents, author Steinās story is told in rich detail that lets readers imagine everyday life with restrictions most of us would chafe under, and without internet, blue jeans, fast food or English. These day-to-day details are relayed in a matter-of-fact tone that makes the severity of the ālawsā seem even more astounding because of the seeming scarcity of emotion associated in their telling.
Steinās lifelong question of gender almost seems secondary to those astonishments, but as the tale progresses, her demand for answers grows quietly in a way you almost wonāt notice until it pounces on you. Whoosh, itās a relief you never knew you were waiting for.
And yet, relief is fleeting: Stein leaves readers hanging by not including an up-to-date which could be frustrating in any other story, but this unusual bookās end still feels just right. For that, āBecoming Eveā is a most satisfyingly unsatisfying book, and youāll love it no matter who you are.
āWhen the Band Played Onā
By Michael G. Lee
c.2025, Chicago Review Press
$30/282 pages
You spent most of your early career playing second fiddle.
But nowĀ youāve got the baton, and a story to tell that people arenāt going to want to hear,Ā though itās essentialĀ that theyĀ face the music.Ā They mustĀ know whatās happening. As in the new bookĀ āWhen the Band Played Onā by Michael G. Lee,Ā this time, itās personal.
Born in 1951 in small-town Iowa, Randy Shilts was his alcoholic, abusive motherās third of six sons. Frustrated, drunk, she reportedly beat Shilts almost daily when he was young; she also called him a āsissy,ā which āseemed to follow Randy everywhere.ā
Perhaps because of the abuse, Shilts had to āteach himself social graces,ā developing āadultlike impassivenessā and ābiting sarcasm,ā traits that featured strongly as he matured and became a writer. He was exploring his sexuality then, learning āthe subtleties of sexual communication,ā while sleeping with women before fully coming out as gay to friends.
Nearing his 21st birthday, Shilts moved to Oregon to attend college and to āallow myself love.ā There, he became somewhat of an activist before leaving San Francisco to fully pursue journalism, focusing on stories of gay life that were āmostly unknown to anyone outside of gay culture.ā
He would bounce between Oregon and California several times, though he never lost sight of his writing career and, through it, his activism. In both states, Shilts reported on gay life, until he was well known to national readers and gay influencers. After San Francisco supervisor Harvey Milk was assassinated, he was tapped to write Milkās biography.
By 1982, Shilts was in love, had a book under his belt, a radio gig, and a regular byline in a national publication reporting āon the GRID beat,ā an acronym later changed to AIDS. He was even under contract to write a second book.
But Shilts was careless. Just once, careless.
āIn hindsight,ā says Lee, āā¦ it was likely the night when Randy crossed the line, becoming more a part of the pandemic than just another worried bystander.ā
Perhaps not surprisingly, there are two distinct audiences for āWhen the Band Played On.ā One type of reader will remember the AIDS crisis and the seminal book about it. The other is too young to remember it, but needs to know Randy Shiltsās place in its history.
The journey may be different, but the result is the same: author Michael G. Lee tells a complicated, still-controversial story of Shilts and the book that made America pay attention, and itās edgy for modern eyes. Lee clearly shows why Shilts had fans and haters, why Shilts was who he was, and Lee keeps some mystery in the tale. Shilts had the knowledge to keep himself safe but he apparently didnāt, and readers are left to wonder why. Thereās uncomfortable tension in that, and a lot of hypothetical thinking to be had.
For scholars of gay history, this is an essential book to read. Also, for anyone too young to remember AIDS as it was, āWhen the Band Played Onā hits the right note.
The Blade may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via this post.
Books
āHello Strangerā unpacks the possibilities of flirting
Manuel Betancourtās new book contains musings on modern intimacy
āHello Stranger: Musings on Modern Intimaciesā
Published by Catapult
Available Jan. 14; hardcover $27
Two strangers lock eyes across a bar. Or maybe they reach for the same book on a shelf in a bookstore. Or maybe theyāre a model and artist, exchanging nervous smiles as the artist tries to capture a piece of the modelās soul on canvas or film.
In a Hollywood film, weād be led to believe that these moments are laden with momentous importance ā a flicker of sexual charge and desire, a chemical reaction that leads inexorably to life-altering romance and happily ever after.
But in his new book of essaysĀ āHello Stranger: Musings on Modern Intimacies,āĀ queer Colombian film and culture critic Manuel Betancourt unpacks the notion that flirting needs to be anything more, suggesting that flirtation can be a worthwhile endeavor in itself.
āOne of the things that if you read any kind of love story or watch any kind of rom-com, youāre constantly encouraged to think that flirtation is sort of like preamble to something else,ā Betancourt tells me over cookies outside of Levain bakery in Larchmont.
āActually, flirtation doesnāt need to do that. You can flirt just for the act of flirting, and that can be fun, and that can be great. What is it that you find instead in that moment of possibility, at that moment when anything can happen? Just what happens when youāre trying to be the best person you could be? Itās almost more exciting when you know, thereās nothing else on the horizon.ā
But āHello Strangerāisnāt a how-to guide to flirting. Itās more like a cross between cultural criticism and memoir.
Over a series of essays that alternate between examinations of flirting scenes in movies, books, and art, and anecdotes from his own personal life, Betancourt traces the ways that we use flirting to create different kinds of intimacies.
āThis is not a how-to, because I donāt think gay men need help with that,ā Betancourt says. āBut I also know that Iām a gay man in Los Angeles whereas I know there are young folks in Ohio that may not think of it this way because theyāve been conditioned, and actually we now have such a breadth of gay literature and a culture thatās continually teaching us we need to find the one.ā
The book is a deeply personal one for Betancourt, who recently got divorced from his husband and joined a polyamorous relationship as he began writing it.
āIāve been thinking a lot about different intimacies with strangers, with friends, with lovers, things that fell outside of what we understand as traditional. And so it felt like an easy way to turn all of these things that I was dealing with on a personal level into a more cohesive and coherent project,ā he says.
āI wanted to think through where the joy in flirtation lies. Like, why are we so drawn to it? Why was I so drawn to it? Why do I enjoy it so much? And of course, being the kind of literary academic that I was, I was willing to find other people must have thought about this, other people must have depicted it on screen and books,ā he says. āOther people can teach me about this.ā
The book starts with examinations of the fleeting, flirtatious intimacies seen in films like āCloserā and āBefore Sunrise,ā before diving into more complicated (and queer) relationships in the books āThe Sexual Outlawā and āA Little Lifeā and the portraiture of photographer Peter Hujar, using them as springboards to examine Betancourtās own relationships to cruising, dating, nudity, and relationships both monogamous and otherwise.
āI wanted to begin with those straight, very common, understandable ways of thinking about these things, and then the book slowly gets clearer and we end in polyamory and conceptual monogamy, and these very different ways of thinking.
āWhat else I wanted to do for those gay readers that are maybe looking to find something here, is show that none of this is new. I think a lot of us try to think, like, āThis is modern and polyamory is so 2024,ā but what I wanted to do is give a cultural history of that.ā
Though itās not an instruction manual, Betancourt says he did improve his own flirtation skills while researching the book, as evidenced in a spicy anecdote he recounts in the book about cruising a man in a hotel bar, where he was actually working on writing āHello Stranger.ā
āYou just have to pay attention, open yourself up, which is also what Hollinghurst, writes in āThe Swimming-Pool Library.ā His protagonist is able to like cruise and hook up anywhere he wants to in London, because heās always looking, like literally looking. Heās constantly out seeing the world as if itās a cruising playground and that is all apparently you need to do.
āIf youāre crossing paths and you see someone who youāre attracted to and you lock eyes, that is the moment to make something happen and itās about being open to the possibility and then also letting the other person know that you are.ā
Nurturing that openness was difficult at first for Betancourt, due to his upbringing in Bogota, Colombia.
āFor me it was a very different cultural thing because of the kind of culture of violence, the culture of unsafety in Colombia. Youāre sort of encouraged to not really trust anyone,ā he says. āIt takes almost locking that away because you canāt approach any of those situations with fear.ā
āThis is about, like, teaching myself because Iām not great at it either. So, itās about reminding myself, oh yeah, be open and more attentive.ā
The Blade may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via this post.
Books
Cherās memoir a funny, profane take on celebrity
āPart Oneā focuses on childhood, abandonment
āCher: The Memoir Part Oneā
By Cher
c.2024, Dey St.
$36/413 pages
Mother knows best.
At least thatās what sheād like you to thinkĀ because she said itĀ a hundred timesĀ while you wereĀ growing up,Ā untilĀ you actually believed.Ā One day, though, if you were lucky,Ā you learned that Mother didnāt alwaysĀ knowĀ best, but sheĀ did herĀ bestĀ ā likeĀ in the new bookĀ āCher: The Memoir Part Oneā by Cher,Ā whenĀ MomĀ helped make a star.
Though she doesnāt remember it, little Cheryl Sarkisian spent a few weeks in a Catholic Charities orphanage when she was tiny, because her father had disappeared and her mother couldnāt afford to take care of her. āCheryl,ā by the way, was the name on her birth certificate, although her mother meant to name her āCherilyn.ā
That first time wasnāt the last time little Cher was left with someone other than her mother, Jackie Jean, a beautiful, talented struggling singer-actress whoād been born into poverty and stayed there much of her life. When money was tight, she temporarily dropped her daughter off with friends or family, or the little family moved from house to house and state to state. Along the way, relocating in and out of California gave Cher opportunities to act, sing, and to learn the art of performance, which is what she loved best.
In the meantime, Jackie Jean married and married again, five or six husbands in all; she changed her name to Georgia, worked in the movies and on TV, and she gave Cher a little sister, moved the family again, landed odd jobs, and did what it took to keep the lights on.
As Cher grew up in the shadow of her glamorous mother, she gained a bit of glam herself, becoming sassy and independent, and prone to separation anxiety, which she blamed on her abandonment as a small child. In her motherās shadow, sheād always been surrounded by movie and TV stars and, taking acting classes, she met even more.
And then she met Salvatore āSonnyā Bono, who was a friend before he was a lover. So, hereās the very, very happy surprise: āCher: The Memoir Part Oneā is a downright fun book to read.
If youāve ever seen author Cher in interviews or on late night TV, what you saw is what you get here: bald-faced truth, sarcastic humor, sass, and no pity-partying. She tells a good story, ending this book with her nascent movie career, and she leaves readers hanging in anticipation of the stories sheāll tell in her next book.
The other happy surprise is that this memoir isnāt just about her. Cher spends a good amount of the first half writing about her mother and her grandmother, both complicated women who fought to keep their heads and those of their offspring above water. Readers looking between the lines will be enthralled.
Surely, āCher: The Memoir Part Oneā is a fanās delight, but itās also a great memoir for anyone who particularly loves the genre and doesnāt mind a bit of profanity. If thatās you, then you got this, babe.
The Blade may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via this post.
-
District of Columbia4 days ago
D.C. police demoted gay captain for taking parental leave: Lawsuit
-
Politics4 days ago
Biden to leave office revered as most pro-LGBTQ president in history
-
Uganda4 days ago
Ugandan minister: Western human rights sanctions forced country to join BRICS
-
District of Columbia4 days ago
Many LGBTQ residents escaping D.C. for inauguration weekend