In 2021, trans folks on Twitter debated about the ethics and usefulness of a venture-funded app suite called Euphoria, meant to facilitate transitions. 

Much of that landscape has disappeared. The Euphoria apps shuttered. Twitter is now X and trans folks are no longer debating on it, though they actively debate on Bluesky.

While the trans world moved on, one trans guy didn’t. Oliver Haimson was fascinated. In 2019, he opened a note on his phone titled “Trans Technology” and started a running list. It had four initial entries:

1. MyTransHealth, a Kickstarter-funded health resource site.
2. Solace, the first of the Euphoria app suite.
3. Transdr, an app ostensibly for transgender dating.
4. TransTech Social Enterprises, a technology skill-building community for trans folks

It demonstrated an emerging trend the trans academic was interested in: the intersection between trans people and technology. This was a very new concept, termed by Haimson and three others in a paper published that year.

The four entries spanned the breadth of what trans technology could be. Trans people were harnessing technology to their unique struggles like access to jobs and medical information.  And, technologists were seeing trans people as a new market for products, which the Euphoria app founder called a $200 billion industry—a number frequently repeated by conservative commentators. Some founders were trans, others were cis. Some entities were profit-oriented, others were not.

The information studies student was “trying to figure out if this could be an acceptable research area in academic computing spaces.” To his delight, it was warmly received so he kept digging.

Six years and several papers later, Haimson’s list has grown to 100 and has turned from a phone note to a unique body of scholarly work. Now an assistant professor at the University of Michigan School of Information, Haimson’s first book, titled Trans Technologies, will be published by MIT Press in February 2025.

The Blade read a copy of Haimson’s manuscript and chatted with him about the state of tech and trans people. The book is drawn from Haimson’s interviews with the creators of all 100 entries on the list. 

Haimson emphasizes these 100 are just a sample. “I kind of could have kept going forever,” he says. “I really didn’t intend to talk to that many people, because usually with these interview studies we talked to about 25 people.” 

At the end of every interview, Haimson asked participants if there was anyone else who may be a good candidate—a method called snowball sampling—and the project just kept growing.

“I just had to cut myself off at around 100 interviews, because I wanted to actually move forward with the analysis and writing,” he says.

Many of those that Haimson interviewed may be recognizable. He spoke to trans pioneer Lynn Conway before her death this June. He spoke to trans journalist Erin Reed, known for her informed consent clinic and trans risk maps.

If the names are not recognizable, the projects often are. While Kai Jackson may not be a trans household name, TransTape, a technology highlighted in the book, is ubiquitous in most transmasculine communities. The same could be said with the many interviewee names associated with TransLifeline or Plume.

The technologies profiled were diverse, bound by a definition given to Haimson by artist and theorist Sandy Stone in an interview—“Technology is anything that extends your agency”—which in turn had been drawn from media scholar Marshall McCluhan’s 1964 definition of technology as “any extension of ourselves.” Haimson likes Stone’s wording better. 

But ultimately, it was Haimson’s job to define the bounds of trans technology. Was it a piece of technology created by a transgender person? Was it a piece of tech used primarily by transgender people? Was it a piece of tech only concerned with “trans things,” whatever those are?

Drawn from his hours of interviews, Haimson proposed there were two definitions of trans technology.

“One is a more practical definition,” he says. “Trans technology is a kind of technology that can help address some of the needs and challenges that trans people and trans communities face.” He explains that these technologies address the practical needs of the trans community, ranging from underemployment to lack of access to healthcare to risk of violence.

That can’t encapsulate everything though. “There’s also this more theoretical definition,” Haimson says. “A lot of the technologies that I talk about in the book are creating these new trans worlds, new possibilities that might not have been possible before thinking about technology and transness together.” 

“Transness is about change and transition and crossing over boundaries and borders,” says Haimson. “There are ways that that could apply to technology.” 

Haimson argues that trans people and transness bring something unique and powerful to the tech space. “Technology can open up these new possibilities for trans people, but at the same time, trans identity opens up new possibilities for technology and what it means and what it can do.”

As “exciting and big and interesting as this world is,” Haimson emphasizes that the trans-tech space does not fully represent the diversity of the trans community

“It was pretty clear early on in the study that the people who were creating trans technologies were most likely white, highly educated, [and of a] higher socioeconomic status,” he says. “Many of the people I interviewed have Ph.D.s or other types of graduate degrees, and that doesn’t line up with the broader trans population.”

Per the 2020 Transgender Survey, only 18% of trans people have completed a bachelor’s degree or higher. This compares to 37.9% of the U.S. population, per the U.S. Census as of 2021.

“A lot of these creators, even people who are creating really amazing things, are creating based on their own experiences,” Haimson explains. “Many trans technologies are more likely to meet the needs of people who are white and highly educated and of higher socioeconomic status.”

He advocates for a community-based design approach that involves the whole of the trans community. “There are some things that are really needed,” he says, citing newer efforts to monitor violence, “They are important because they are coming from what the community needs, not just the more privileged members of the community.”

Though many technologies Haimson researched address with the practical issues of healthcare, employment, and safety, others grapple with the complex, varied emotional experiences of the trans community.

He cites creator Sasha Winter’s “game jams” where videogame developers come together to make and share games under the topics of “trans fucking rage” and “trans joy.” Developers created more than 100 unique video games for the jams, many of which are available for free or cheap download.

“I think this is such a great example of trans technologies more broadly,” Haimson reflects, “All of us hold this rage and joy together at once.”

Social media giant TikTok will spotlight LGBTQ content creators and small business owners with an inaugural list of honorees to celebrate Pride month, according to a press release on the company’s website. In addition, the company will embark on a campaign that includes webinars, community events and a ball in Los Angeles.

“We’re thrilled to celebrate Pride month by honoring the history-making impact of our diverse queer community with this year’s LGBTQ+ TikTok Visionary Voices List,” said Shavone Charles, TikTok’s head of diversity and inclusion communications. 

The 2023 LGBTQ+ Visionary Voices list recognizes 15 queer TikTok creators who use the platform to “educate, entertain and advocate for the LGBTQ+ community,” according to the release. Honorees on the list span three categories — creators, small-owned businesses and industry disruptors — and feature popular hitmakers Saucy Santana and Baby Tate and social media sensation The Old Gays. 

Jae Gurley, another of the honorees, plans to use this recognition as an opportunity to promote lucid education about Pride and cultivate a deeper understanding behind it. Gurley is well-known for using performance and storytelling to create lifestyle content that highlights their journey to self-discovery as a Black femme nonbinary person and encourages users to live their “most confident Bougie B life.” 

“I feel like a lot of the time online, Pride is portrayed as this big gay party and it is, but it’s also a protest and I want my community to understand why we still have to fight,” they said “Why we need to continue to take up space, and not be satisfied with where we are, cause it can be taken away in a second.”

TikTok’s Pride month campaign, titled “You Belong Here,” will celebrate the LGBTQ community through a series of in-app initiatives, LIVE events and special programming themed around hashtags including: #ForYourPride, #PrideAnthems and #LGBTQBusiness, according to the company’s release.

One of the events, “TikTok Takeoff: Queer Inclusivity in Marketing Webinar,” will be hosted on June 13. The online event will platform the stories of LGBTQ+ small and medium-sized businesses at a roundtable discussion. Business owners will discuss their journey taking off on TikTok and strategies they use on the application to engage with new diverse audiences and drive real-world success for their brands. 

On the company-facing end, employees will get to participate in programming organized by its employee resource group including LGBTQ film screenings and Pride marches. 

“You Belong Here is more than a campaign — it’s our commitment to the LGBTQIA+ community on TikTok,” read the company’s release. “We believe that people should be able to connect with one another, express themselves authentically, and thrive on the platform. And we know that fostering an inclusive space requires prioritizing the needs of our community.”

By Matt Tracy | The social media giant TikTok is taking a more direct stand against hate with a new policy explicitly banning deadnaming, misgendering, misogyny and the promotion of conversion therapy.

“Though these ideologies have long been prohibited on TikTok, we’ve heard from creators and civil society organizations that it’s important to be explicit in our Community Guidelines,” Cormac Keenan, TikTok’s head of trust and safety, said in a news release on Feb. 8. “On top of this, we hope our recent feature enabling people to add their pronouns will encourage respectful and inclusive dialogue on our platform.”

The new policy is also coming with a crackdown on content promoting eating disorders. The social media platform says it already works to combat content surrounding eating disorders, but now that effort is being “broadened.”

“We’re making this change, in consultation with eating disorders experts, researchers, and physicians, as we understand that people can struggle with unhealthy eating patterns and behavior without having an eating disorder diagnosis,” Keenan added. “Our aim is to acknowledge more symptoms, such as over-exercise or short-term fasting, that are frequently under-recognized signs of a potential problem.”

GLAAD, a national LGBTQ media monitoring group, and UltraViolet, a national gender justice advocacy organization, said they encouraged TikTok to amend the policy. Both groups praised the changes.

“When anti-transgender actions like misgendering or deadnaming, or the promotion of so-called ‘conversion therapy,’ occur on platforms like TikTok, they create an unsafe environment for LGBTQ people online and too often lead to real world harm,” Sarah Kate Ellis, GLAAD’s president and CEO, said in a written statement. “TikTok’s move to expressly prohibit this harmful content in its Community Guidelines and to adopt recommendations made in GLAAD’s 2021 Social Media Safety Index raises the standard for LGBTQ safety online and sends a message that other platforms which claim to prioritize LGBTQ safety should follow suit with substantive actions like these.”

Bridget Todd, UltraViolet’s communications director, said TikTok “became a little safer for women, girls, LGBQ, and trans people today.”

“We applaud TikTok for responding effectively to our recommendations and implementing them into an updated, more protective user policy,” Todd added. “Even so, it’s clear social media platforms have a long way to go across the board.”

TikTok and other platforms were grilled by the Senate Consumer Protection, Product Safety and Data Security Subcommittee last year in a hearing that brought teenage mental health issues to the fore.

The push to hold social platforms accountable has coincided with a campaign by GLAAD and UltraViolet to issue recommendations to social media companies regarding how to improve platforms and avoid discrimination. That effort, which included encouraging an expansion of the definition of hate speech and enforcing anti-harassment policies, drew support from 75 organizations, such as Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Asian Americans in Action, Equality Labs and Innovation Ohio.

At the same time, social media monitoring efforts have also elevated the issue of sex workers’ rights online. SESTA/FOSTA, which passed in 2018 with bipartisan backing, created exceptions in Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which had kept providers of computer services from being held responsible for users’ actions on their platforms.

That prompted many sites to shut down due to concern that the law would target the sites serving as hubs for sex workers. Many have complained that SESTA/FOSTA has forced many sex workers off the web and, instead of vetting clients online, end up in unsafe environments where they are vulnerable to attacks.

*********************

Matt Tracy is Gay City News’ editor-in-chief.

*********************

The preceding piece was previously published by Gay City News and is republished by permission.