Connect with us

Federal Government

HHS official discusses agency’s proposed LGBTQ-inclusive nondiscrimination rule

Proposed regulation change published Tuesday



Melanie Fontes Rainer, director of the Office of Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, during the agency's June 2023 Pride Summit (Screen capture/YouTube)

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Tuesday for a new regulation that clarifies nondiscrimination rules on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

“The department is doing all that it can to protect access to health and human services,” Melanie Fontes Rainer, director of HHS’s Office of Civil Rights, told the Washington Blade by phone on Tuesday.

“This proposed rule is a step in that effort,” she said.

Health programs administered by the agency are covered by the nondiscrimination rules in Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, Fontes Rainer said, so, “This rule is meant to get to that other slice of the pie that encompasses really important work at the Department of Human Services.”

Nondiscrimination, here, is a priority, “specifically nondiscrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity,” she said.

If finalized pursuant to the 60-day public comment period, HHS’s rule will apply to such programs as those administered by the “Administration for Children and Families, SAMHSA, and some other organizations within HHS that have grants,” Fontes Rainer said.

Examples include Head Start, which provides educational, health, nutritional and other services to low income children and their families.

The agency’s legal authority to enforce inclusive nondiscrimination rules was statutorily ordained by Congress, but clarified with the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County, which “made clear that sexual orientation and gender identity were part of this protected sex based discrimination class,” Fontes Rainer said.

The decision helped to accelerate the Biden-Harris administration’s coordination of efforts across the federal government to shore up protections for LGBTQ Americans, she noted, beginning with the Justice Department and then the U.S. Department of Education and HHS.

Those agencies and federal courts have since made clear the law applies not just in the Title VII context — which covers nondiscrimination in employment, the legal question at issue in Bostock — but also “to other federal programs like Title IX,” Fontes Rainer said.

HHS is coordinating efforts with the White House, which last month unveiled a series of new actions to better protect LGBTQ Americans, including through programs administered by HHS, such as those targeting queer youth and their families.

Last June, Fontes Rainer noted, the administration announced that the department’s Administration for Children and Families would pursue a new rule making to “clarify that state child welfare agencies must ensure LGBTQI youth are treated in a safe and appropriate manner.”

The agency’s rule “is inclusive of some grants and services that are inclusive of homelessness services for LGBTQI youth,” Fontes Rainer said. “That’s certainly a part of it. And this grants rule is certainly a part of that effort in the Human Services context.”

“It’s really important right now to have the federal government be strong in the LGBTQI space, whether it’s healthcare, human services or some other service that the federal government provides and [also to] be very clear about what non discrimination means,” she said. “Because, you know, there there is a tsunami of these [anti-trans] healthcare bans across the country.”

According to the Human Rights Campaign, almost 30 percent of transgender youth in the U.S. live in places that have passed bans on gender affirming care, criminalizing healthcare interventions that are backed by every mainstream scientific and medical society.

“We’re seeing a shift right now, where there are a lot of healthcare bans,” Fontes Rainer said. “And, I think, ultimately, these are decisions that are going to be taken into litigation in various contexts, which we’re already seeing across the country.”

Meanwhile, on the federal level, Congressional Republicans are moving to add riders restricting access to healthcare for trans youth into must-pass appropriations bills. Asked to respond to these efforts, Fontes Rainer was quick to note that, “my job is not on the legislative front, here.”

At the same time, she said, when it comes to HHS’s proposed regulation, for “every single program and service we’ve identified, these [nondiscrimination] protections already exist in the law,” so the agency is therefore confident that “we are on good authority and legal footing here.”

While the regulation and its implementation would be new, Fontes Rainer said, HHS is acting under its statutory authority as established long ago by the legislature.

Policy carries real impact on people, families

Last month, HHS hosted a Pride Summit, where officials at the agency from Fontes Rainer to Assistant Secretary Adm. Rachel Levine and Secretary Xavier Becerra, along with other high ranking members of the Biden-Harris administration like White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, spoke about the government’s work advancing rights and protections for the LGBTQ community.

At the event, Becerra dedicated a portion of his remarks to recounting discussions he had with LGBTQ families about how his agency can better serve their needs across the various health and human services programs that comprise its book of business.

Fontes Rainer told the Blade she has participated in many of these conversations, with and without the secretary. “I have made a point to visit with providers, advocates, parents and kids, in many of the states that either have passed or are seeking to pass bans on healthcare for trans youth,” she said.

“Every time I have these conversations, I feel emotional afterwards,” she said. “For a lot of these kids and families, you know, they’re not asking for much. They’re asking to go to the doctor. They’re asking to be treated with respect. They’re asking to have the appropriate pronouns used — things that are very basic.”

The circumstances vary, Fontes Rainer said. Some families have the resources to travel or even relocate to states that are committed to protecting their transgender residents’ access to healthcare.

Others, however, do not. Parents, she said, often “don’t know what they’re gonna do as their child is [forcibly] tapered off of medication, mid treatment” and many are unsure how to respond to the resulting impacts on their child’s mental health.

Fontes Rainer said she has also seen the impacts of legislative restrictions on the healthcare system. “I’ve talked to providers who tell me that they provide gender affirming care in a state where it’s not banned and it’s impossible to get appointments now, because they have so many people traveling there,” she said.

“These efforts by the Biden administration, while they don’t solve everything, they’re really important — both in being strong on the policy and what the law means, but also in being very clear to parents and families and doctors that we have your back,” Fontes Rainer said.

“I’ve been in rooms with the secretary where people, providers, you know, hug him and cry,” she said, “because they feel like it’s really important to have somebody that understands the law in this moment, and they feel like it’s important that, you know, from the secretary on up to the president of the United States, they have support from the Biden administration.”

Fontes Rainer told the Blade she is proud of HHS’s legacy of leadership on LGBTQ rights. With a ceremony last year, the agency became the first to raise the Progress Pride flag, which includes colors to represent Black and brown LGBTQ communities and incorporates the stripes of the transgender Pride flag.

“Now, this year, almost every single agency did that,” she said, adding that last month, “my husband and I put up a Pride Unity flag in our yard” too.

“Right now is not the time to be shy,” Fontes Rainer said. “Now is not the time to like go hide in a hole. Now is the time to be loud and vocal and use your power for good.”


Federal Government

Census Bureau asks White House to test questions on sexual orientation, gender identity

Data would be included in annual American Community Survey



U.S. Census Bureau (Photo credit: GSA)

The U.S. Census Bureau on Tuesday asked the Biden administration to sign off on plans to test questions on sexual orientation and gender identity for respondents aged 15 and older on the agency’s annual American Community Survey.

Data on these metrics will help inform civil rights and equal employment enforcement, the Census Bureau said in a notice published on the Federal Register.

Testing will help the agency determine wording, response categories and placement of the questions on the survey — its most comprehensive, covering 3.5 million households each year.

A key unknown will be how answers will be provided by proxies such as parents, spouses or others in a household who isn’t the person about whom the question is asked.

“Younger LGBT people might not yet be out to their parents or others who are answering these questions as a proxy reporter, so the quality of the data might not be as good for younger people,” M. V. Lee Badgett, an economics professor at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, told PBS News.

Currently, the Census Bureau and its annual American Community Survey only ask questions about same-sex couples who are married or cohabitating.

“We anticipate having much more info about the LGBT people than is currently available — including about the demographic and socioeconomic status of LGBT people who aren’t in same-sex couple households, including occupational status, industry and wages, and about LGBT people who were born outside the U.S. and LGBT people with disabilities, and their families,” Kerith Conron, research director of the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law, told the Associated Press.

Continue Reading

Federal Government

Pentagon to restore honor to veterans kicked out over their sexual orientation

Legislation seeks accountability for DoD



U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin (screen capture/YouTube/CNN)

The U.S. Department of Defense announced plans to restore honor to service members who were kicked out of the military over their sexual orientation, the agency announced on Wednesday, the 12th anniversary of the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

“Over the past decade, we’ve tried to make it easier for service members discharged based on their sexual orientation to obtain corrective relief,” U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin said in a statement.

“While this process can be difficult to navigate, we are working to make it more accessible and efficient,” he said, adding, “in the coming weeks, we will be initiating new outreach campaigns to encourage all service members and veterans who believe they have suffered an error or injustice to seek correction to their military records.”

The move follows a class action lawsuit filed last month by LGBTQ veterans against the Pentagon for allegedly failing to remedy “ongoing discrimination,” including biased language in the discharge papers of LGBTQ veterans.

CBS News has investigated the Pentagon’s handling of service records of veterans who were kicked out of the military because of their sexual orientation, revealing the broad scope of discrimination experienced by these LGBTQ veterans — finding, for instance, that more than 29,000 were denied honorable discharges.

Also on Wednesday, U.S. Reps. Mark Takano (D-Calif.) and Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.), along with U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) re-introduced a bill that would establish “a commission to investigate the historic and ongoing impacts of discriminatory military policies on LGBTQ service members and veterans.”

“This commission would study the impact of these bigoted rules” barring LGBTQ troops from serving “and forge a more welcoming future in the military and at the VA,” said Takano, who serves as ranking member of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs and co-chair of the Congressional Equality Caucus.

“Our country has never made amends for official discriminatory policies like ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ and the transgender military ban – and that failure still haunts today’s service members and veterans,” said Jacobs.

“That’s why I’m so proud to co-lead this bicameral legislation that will right these historic wrongs, investigate the past and present impact of anti-LGBTQ+ policies, and help us move forward to build and sustain a diverse, inclusive, strong, and welcoming military.”  

“This commission would be an important step to understand the full scope of the harms caused by policies like Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, and to ensure a more equitable future for all who serve our country in uniform,” Blumenthal said.

Continue Reading

Federal Government

Rulemaking on Older Americans Act targets seniors who are LGBTQ, living with HIV

Monday was National HIV/AIDS and Aging Awareness Day



U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Hubert Humphrey Building. (Public domain photo courtesy GSA)

Ahead of Monday’s National HIV/AIDS and Aging Awareness Day, the Washington Blade spoke with Aaron Tax, director of federal government relations for SAGE, to discuss what proposed updates to the Older Americans Act might mean for LGBTQ elders and older adults living with HIV.

The conversation followed the conclusion of the public comment period for a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking filed by the Administration for Community Living, a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services agency that is responsible for administering the statute.

An HHS spokesperson told the Blade a final rule is expected “early next year.”

“We’ve looked at the many challenges facing LGBT older people and older people living with HIV,” said Tax, whose organization, Services and Advocacy for GLBT Elders, is the country’s largest group focused on the needs of LGBTQ seniors.

These populations experience “higher rates of social isolation” and “higher rates of poverty” and are “less likely to be partnered, less likely to have children, [and are] more culturally and socially isolated from mainstream institutions,” he said.

Therefore, they “seem to fit the definition of greatest social need quite well,” Tax said, referring to a distinction in the legislation that SAGE has sought to effectuate for LGBTQ elders and older adults with HIV, coming “quite close” in the law’s 2020 reauthorization.

Tax explained, “what we got at the end of the day is some language that requires every state unit on aging in the country and every area agency on aging in the country — which are basically state departments of aging and local departments of aging — to do three things.

“One,” he said, “engage in outreach to LGBT older people; two, to collect data on their needs; and three, to collect data on whether they are meeting their needs.”

SAGE is now working with these state and local entities to ensure “they’re, in fact, carrying out these requirements” Tax said.

Next year, the Older Americans Act will be up for reauthorization again, so “we will once again be fighting for an explicit greatest social need designation again for LGBT older people and older people living with HIV,” he said, adding, “And we recently introduced legislation with [U.S. Rep.] Suzanne Bonamici [D-Ore.] that would try to accomplish that goal in 2024.”

The legislation, Tax explained, originally “came about in 1965 under Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society as a counterpart to Medicare and Social Security,” which respectively addressed the medical and financial needs of older Americans.

“The Older Americans Act is everything else that should enable you to age in place in your community,” Tax said — and, as such, the statute covers, among other programs, “home and congregate meals and meals at senior centers, Meals on Wheels, transportation assistance, legal assistance, caregiver support, respite, all the things that have enabled people to age in place in their community.”

SAGE’s legislative efforts are coupled with advocacy around the administration and enforcement of the statute by ACL, which prior to the forthcoming rulemaking has not issued new regulations on the Older Americans Act since 1988, Tax said.

“Part of that,” he said, “is because there have been so many legislative changes since the law came about in 1988, so, their goal now is to modernize those regs and recognize the changes to the OAA and also maybe put some additional information in there or some additional guidance in there that might not be captured in the statute.”

SAGE wants the ACL “to be as explicit as possible, as proscriptive as possible, about ensuring that the aging network is meeting the needs of both LGBT older people and older people living with HIV,” Tax said, which informed the organization’s public comment to the agency.

This work is important because there are state-by-state differences in how older LGBTQ adults and seniors with HIV are treated, Tax said.

For instance, the “New York State Office for the Aging is extremely aware of the needs of LGBT older people and older people living with HIV,” he said. “They acknowledge that in the work that they do; they’re very intentional in the work that they do to meet the needs of LGBT folks and older people living with HIV.”

Tax said, “we are working hard at SAGE to make sure that other states first acknowledge that this population, or these populations, even exist, and secondly, [that they] are doing more to make sure that LGBT older people and older people living with HIV have access to the same aging services and supports other older people have access to.”

Politics, unfortunately, can play a role, Tax told the Blade.

“When anti equality forces are in control in the White House, of course, that does have an impact on the types of rules and regulations you see coming out of the administration and its agencies” he said.

By contrast, “it’s pretty clear now with the Biden administration’s focus on equity and its interest in making sure that LGBT folks are treated like everybody else, that we’re seeing regulations or proposed regulations that incorporate those important themes.”

“There are good people in state agencies across the country who want to do the right thing,” Tax said, but “Sometimes they bump up against the political realities of their states.”

“We are working hard at SAGE to make sure people who want to do the right thing regardless of what state they live in have the resources and the information and the tools that they need to take care of all of the older people in their states,” Tax said.

Continue Reading

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade