Connect with us

Opinions

To my queer community: You are failing your Jewish members

Our struggle is your struggle, so stand with us, or stand down

Published

on

A scene from Tel Aviv Pride 2023. (Photo by RnDmS/Bigstock)

In the landscape of identity and activism, there comes a moment when peoplesā€™ true intentions and unabashed biases are unveiled, revealing the stark incongruities within our own communities. As a Jewish gay man, I can say this moment is now, and the battlefield is none other than the war-torn narratives surrounding Israel and the Hamas terrorist organization, which has been the de facto governing body in the Gaza Strip since 2007 when it ousted the Palestinian Authority from power (this is after Israel completely withdrew from Gaza in 2005).

Letā€™s cut through the noise: In the grand theater of activism, where the LGBTQ community has long demanded education, patience, and understanding on queer issues, it seems these courtesies vanish when the topic switches to Middle Eastern politics. “Apartheid!” they scream, from the comfort of their free societies, neglecting the fact that in parts of the Middle East, being queer isn’t just taboo, itā€™s a crime.

The stark parallels here are maddening. As queer individuals, we’ve spent lifetimes imploring others to look beyond black-or-white narratives. “Educate yourselves,” we’ve pleaded, “understand the spectrum, the stories, the struggles behind each letter of LGBTQIA+.” Yet, when it comes to Israel, a land teeming with stories as diverse as our own community, the rainbow lens suddenly flips to monochrome.

This isn’t just hypocrisy; it’s a betrayal of the very principles of social justice. It’s a slap to those of us who sit at the intersection of being queer and Jewish, fighting on two fronts for recognition and understanding. We have not demanded that others walk on eggshells, only that they walk in knowledge before they talk. 

Let’s address a big elephant in the room: the claim of “pinkwashing” by Israel. Critics, quick to label, fail to grasp the genuine strides Israel has made in LGBTQ rights, which are not a facade but a reality for countless people who live, love, and thrive there. The accusation of pinkwashing is not only reductive, but it negates the lived experiences of an estimated 25% of Tel Aviv’s residents alone who identify as LGBTQ, and the undeniable fact that Israel has become a sanctuary for LGBTQ Palestinians seeking asylum. These are not hollow gestures meant for international optics; they are tangible freedoms, hard-won by local activists and safeguarded by an independent judiciary. 

The blunt truth? Our queer spaces, once sanctuaries, have now turned into forums where Jewish voices are drowned out, where our history and pain are oversimplified into soundbites. The irony is bitingā€”our community, which fiercely demands inclusivity, has become selectively deaf to our cries against anti-Semitic propaganda.

I have never felt more embraced for my queerness than in my Jewish circles, yet I am watching in dismay as parts of the queer community dismiss the perils we face. When a popular LGBTQ platform with more than a million followers on Instagram alone labels Hamas, a brutal terrorist organization, as a mere ā€œresistance movement,ā€ itā€™s a sobering wake-up call fraught with unspeakable danger.

Israel stands as a haven for LGBTQ rights in a region where such freedoms are scarce. From the legal milestones achieved in the 1960s to Tel Avivā€™s renowned Pride parade, Israel has been at the forefront of LGBTQ advocacy. The path isnā€™t perfectā€”same-sex marriage isnā€™t legal, but Israel recognizes same-sex unions from abroad and grants comprehensive rights domestically. The Israeli Supreme Courtā€™s decisions to uphold LGBTQ rights are beacons of hope, shining examples of progress that have come from the demands of its citizens, not from the desire to distract.

Yet, here we are, witnessing a disturbing paradox. While Israel fosters LGBTQ rights, in the territories under Hamas, an internationally recognized terrorist organization, being queer can mean imprisonment, and yes, death. This dichotomy is conveniently ignored by too many self-proclaimed progressives. Their silence on this is deafening and damning.

Itā€™s time for the larger queer community to wake up. Our struggle for rights doesnā€™t stop at our doorstep; it stretches across the globe. To my queer ā€œsocial justice warriorsā€ who soak in the sun at Tel Aviv Pride but cast shadows on Israel, or for that matter donā€™t speak up at all, your hypocrisy and silence are noted. Your selective advocacy is not only noticeable; it’s a betrayal.

To the queer activists who have let anti-Semitism taint their advocacy: Your narrative is not complete until it includes us. We demand a seat at the table. We demand to be heard. And to those who stand with us, know this: our fight is united, our cause is just, and our spirit is indomitable. We will not retreat into the shadows. 

Before you raise your banners, remember the diligence you asked of others to understand your queerness. Apply that same rigor to unravel the narratives you consume and the stances you adopt. Recognize that this isn’t a game of ‘pick a side and shout the loudest.’ Lives, histories, and truths are woven into this complex narrative, and they deserve more than a cursory glance and a hasty hashtag. To be truly progressive, the queer community must embrace complexity, reject hypocrisy, and fight for every memberā€™s right to be seen and heard. We are a part of this community, and we will hold it accountable. Our struggle is your struggle. Stand with us, or stand down.

Jason Feldman is principal of JMF Communications and a member of the Atlanta Mayorā€™s LGBTQ Advisory Board.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Opinions

Vote NO on Initiative 83 in D.C.

If you want a say in primaries, then register and join a party

Published

on

(Photo by BackyardProductions/Bigstock)

There are two parts to Initiative 83 and many agree they should never have been put together in one initiative. 

One part was designed to create an open primary system allowing voters who are unaffiliated with a political party to vote in any partyā€™s primary election. If this passes, those who call themselves ā€˜independentā€™ voters could vote in a Democratic primary to help choose the candidate who would represent the party in the general election. If you look at current national polling for president, you see close to 50% of so-called ā€˜independentā€™ voters are planning to vote for Trump. I donā€™t want any of those voters helping to select a Democratic nominee. Just imagine the games they could, and would, play.Ā 

I urge those who claim to be independent to speak out and get involved in the political process. Not everyone is going to be as involved as I am, having worked for a progressive congressperson, Bella S. Abzug (D-N.Y.); as coordinator of Local Government for the City of New York; written campaign speeches and helped write candidate platforms; and raised money for many Democratic candidates. But nothing stops any independent from doing all those things. If you choose not to, but still find one of the candidates running in a Democratic primary, or for that matter in the Green Party, or Republican Party primaries, and want to support them, D.C. makes that really easy. You can register for that party up to 21 days before the primary. You can do it online. If you are not even motivated enough to do that, you shouldnā€™t get to vote in the primary. 

The initiative also establishesĀ ranked-choice votingĀ (RCV) for elections in Washington, D.C., beginning in 2026. A ranked-choice voting system is an electoral system in which voters rank candidates by preference on their ballots. If a candidate wins a majority of first-preference votes, he or she is declared the winner. If no candidate wins a majority of first-preference votes, the candidate with the fewest first-preference votes is eliminated. First-preference votes cast for the failed candidate are eliminated, and counting the next-preference choice indicated on those ballots. A new tally is conducted to determine whether any candidate has won a majority of the adjusted votes. The process is repeated until a candidate wins an outright majority.Ā 

The person who initially proposed this initiative in D.C. is Lisa D.T. Rice, a Ward 7 ANC commissioner, who claims independent voters are currently disenfranchised. Lisa, you have disenfranchised yourselves when it comes to a primary. It is your choice to not register for a party. We know from history that ā€˜independentsā€™ lean either Republican or Democratic. They have no independent platform. Generally, initiatives like this are brought to you by one of two groups. One thinks they are being ā€œprogressive;ā€ the other simply deems getting involved in party politics not worth their time, or beneath them. 

I have spoken to several people who support this initiative, and they think itā€™s fine to let others fight over the party principles and platform, and then step in and tell the party who should represent them in the general election. Others, including some Republicans, have told me they think open primaries would be a great way for them to have a voice in choosing the Democratic candidate. They recognize in D.C., which is overwhelmingly Democratic, the winner of the Democratic nomination nearly always wins the general election. My response to them is, if they want to help choose the Democratic candidate, just register as a Democrat. You can still vote Republican in a general election. Also remember, D.C.ā€™s Home Rule charter ensures two members of the Council be non-Democrats. 

People usually choose a political party when they register to vote based on the general philosophy of that party. Then they work within it to bring to the fore issues they care about. Today there is a huge difference between political parties on issues. So, I question what makes the decision so difficult for some. 

The reason you have party primaries is not everyone in the party agrees on a candidate. I support the idea we should not have candidates representing us in the general election who canā€™t get 50% of the primary vote. The answer to that is simple. Hold a run-off election between the top two candidates, if no one reaches 50%. These run-offs can be held two weeks after the initial primary. This has been done successfully in many cities and states. Some question the cost of this. But that is irrelevant in D.C. where the City Council passed legislation to spend millions on public financing of candidates, making it so easy to access that money, we end up with seven, eight, and even nine candidates for each office. Most of them having no chance in hell of winning.

Some claim RCV brings out more voters.Ā Fair Vote, the national group promoting RCV, and funding a lot of this initiative, agrees there is no definitive research to prove that. With RCV you have the real chance for games as we saw in New Yorkā€™s ranked choice mayoral primary, when Andrew Yang and Kathryn GarciaĀ cross-endorsedĀ each other, suggesting each of their voters give the other their second vote, even though they had totally different platforms.

The two ideas proposed in Initiative 83 are not positive change for the voters of the District of Columbia. I urge a NO vote on Initiative 83.


Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist.

Continue Reading

Opinions

Ending Trumpā€™s ā€˜rough hourā€™

Upholding honor, decency, and sanity requires electing Harris

Published

on

Donald Trump (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

Madness is the monster in the closet as Election Day approaches. For example, Donald Trump says Kamala Harris wants to ban cows and windows.

Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank, after pointing out that Trump said the same thing about Joe Biden in 2020, writes, ā€œFour years later, there are still 87 million head of cattle on U.S. farms. And the multibillion-dollar U.S. window market is growing steadily. Yet it didnā€™t occur to Trump to defenestrate these wacky claims.ā€

Defenestration is execution by throwing people out windows. Someone once told me defenestration is a synonym for masturbation, which is true only if it is done with extreme carelessness.

This election could be a referendum on Americaā€™s original sin, embodied in the hypocrisy of a slave owner declaring that ā€œall men are created equal.ā€ The contrast between our creed and our conduct has driven 248 years of struggle.

We are days away from learning whether our constitutional republic will endure or be ripped apart by people who object to being called racist while voting for a man who says, ā€œWeā€™re like a garbage can for the rest of the world to dump the people they donā€™t want.ā€

Vice President Harris, the most qualified presidential nominee in living memory, is the only real alternative to a disastrous return to power by Trump. Those who say they donā€™t know enough about her are hardly credible, considering they know enough about her opponent to disqualify him many times over.

Trump says ā€œone rough hourā€ by police will end crime. He is not referring to his own crimes.

Soviet-era Russia made it a crime to possess a photo of anyone who had been purged and rendered a non-person. Hitlerā€™s Germany forced the exile of sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld, whose Institute for Sexual Science was looted and its books burned by Nazis in 1933.

What makes anyone think Trump, who admires Putin and echoes Hitler in calling minority populations vermin, would spare queer folk?

As for me, it is fruitless to try to erase the hundreds of commentaries I wrote that remain online, including my 2015 year-in-review in the Washington Blade titled ā€œYear of the Arsonistā€ and illustrated with a photo of the Reichstag Fire. The arsonist, naturally, was Trump.

In the intervening years I have cursed and mocked him, sometimes simultaneously. I might as well throw myself on the mercy of the court.

Honestly, any fear I might have is overcome by indignation. Those commentators willing to kowtow endlessly to an ignorant thug are already with him.

The rest of us will go down writing.

Harris showed the right stuff with her strong, confident handling of a hostile interview with Bret Baier on Fox News. She did not let herself be rolled. Afterward, Baier said he ā€œmade a mistakeā€ by running the wrong clip of Trump. Was it a mistake when he repeatedly talked over her? Harris didnā€™t let him get away with erasing Trumpā€™s talk of an ā€œenemy from withinā€ and threat to use the military against domestic opponents.

Why be intimidated by a man who, as Harris points out, is unhinged and doesnā€™t know what heā€™s talking about? His abuses are too many to review here. He may hope to win by wearing us down.

A British friend advises me to keep a packed bag ready in case I find myself like Humphrey Bogart in ā€œCasablancaā€ taking the last train out of Paris. I live in a town where every other person thinks theyā€™re the lead character, so the train will be awfully crowded.

Trump is deteriorating before our eyes; but he was never a prize. Facebook reminds me of something I posted in 2019: ā€œTrumpā€™s ignorance and refusal to prepare are a continual source of embarrassment. He called Italian President Sergio Mattarella ā€˜President Mozzarella.ā€™ He called American DefSec Mark Esper ā€˜Mark Esperanto.ā€™ He calls the Asian countries Nepal and Bhutan ā€˜Nippleā€™ and ā€˜Button.ā€™ He referred to the nonexistent African country Nambia. Next heā€™ll invite General Tso to a summit meeting.ā€ (General Tso, it turned out, was too chicken to show up.)

Worse than stupidity are fascism (which has threatened America before) and disrespect for our fallen warriors. Neither can ever be accepted.

Trump has said so much beyond the pale that for people to continue supporting him shows they like him for his sociopathy rather than despite it.

Our Founders, in declaring independence from Great Britain, pledged ā€œour lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.ā€ Upholding honor, decency, and sanity requires electing Kamala Harris.


Richard J. Rosendall is a writer and activist. Reach him at [email protected].

Continue Reading

Opinions

Queer Diwali: Lighting a future of hope

Hindu festival of lights begins Thursday

Published

on

Joshua Patel (Photo by Rago Images)

Growing up with a Christian mother and Hindu father, neither religious, Diwali and Christmas were my two favorite holidays because it meant gifts were to be received and delicious food was to be served! Hostess with the mostest, my mother would go out of her way to make each holiday special, where I felt lucky to celebrate all the American, Christian, and Hindu holidays (thinking Jesus was a Hindu God for the longest time.)

Each fall, we would help my mother, aka Indian Martha Stewart, clean our house and garnish the entrance with vibrant decor, only to welcome the VIP Goddess Laxmi ā€” a symbol of wealth, prosperity, beauty, and power. The origin dates back to 5064 BC, the year Ram came back to Ayodhya with Sita after killing Ravana. As Ram and Sita returned back to India from Sri Lanka, the kingdom lined up and lit oil lamps to welcome their arrival. Thus the festival’s name comes from the Sanskrit word ā€œDeepawali,ā€ which means “rows of lights.” 

Flash forward to today, where for us Indian American Hinduā€™s ā€” Diwali is not just a celebration of the new year, it is the most auspicious annual event recognizing the triumph of good over evil. Over a billion people globally are joining hands while praying that their hopes, desires, and dreams come true. 

Queerness in Hinduism


An outspoken teenager confused about religion, I took it upon myself to learn about all faiths and their views on homosexuality, afterlife, and the consequences of sin. In studying Hinduism beyond what my peers shared ā€” I learned that Hinduism is the most liberal and open-minded group of teachings to exist. So liberal in fact ā€” it is very queer. I donā€™t know if the Mughal conquerors or the British colonizers are to blame for Indiaā€™s conservative nature ā€” but when one digs into our scriptures ā€” our holidays are all a celebration of mind, body, and soul.Ā 

  • First Transgender Gods: Vishnu and Shiva have both been noted for transforming into female form ā€” where Ardhanarishvara means “The Lord whose half is a woman.” 
  • Kama, most recognized in the Kama Sutra, is a tenet stating the desire for passion, pleasure, and emotion is a spiritual goal that is rewarded, not punished. If you are still reading this, google ā€œKhajuraho.ā€ The erotic art sculpted into a series of temples built around 885 CE and 1000 CE depict relations among men, women, and groups. Scholars will argue that British colonialism shaped India to be a conservative culture, shaming its history of sexual freedom.Ā 
  • The tenet of reincarnation and resharing moments in the future with those in your current life is set to be believed around one’s soul, not gender. In my next life, not only may I be reincarnated as a cisgender woman ā€” depending on how I treat others, I could be reincarnated as nonhuman ā€” such as an insect.Ā 

If you are looking to join in the festivities ā€” light your candles and make note of your financial and career goals. The prosperity the holiday brings is the best time to manifest your destiny, welcoming positive energy in your home. I also welcome everyone to visit a local Indian clothing store ā€” us Indian’s love and welcome cultural appreciation.Ā 

Wishing everyone a Happy Diwali filled with light and laughter!

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular