District of Columbia
60,000 expected for annual D.C. Black Pride this weekend
Celebration includes educational workshops, social events, more
The 33rd annual D.C. Black Pride festival and celebration is scheduled to take place May 23-27 during Memorial Day weekend with at least 60,000 people from the D.C. metro area and across the country and some from abroad expected to attend.
Like in recent years, most of the events are scheduled to take place at the Westin Washington, D.C. Downtown Hotel at 999 9th St., N.W.
Although the official DC Black Pride Opening Reception is scheduled to take place Friday, May 24, at the Westin Hotel with live entertainment, an online schedule of events shows that earlier events, including a Mr. & Miss DC Black Pride Pageant and the 8th annual DC Black Pride Unity Ball, were scheduled to take place Thursday, May 23 at the Westin.
Also similar to recent past years, a Rainbow Row: Organization & Vendor Expo will open at the hotel at 5 p.m. on May 25 and remain open most of the time throughout the weekend events. The Rainbow Row includes booths and tables set up by local and national LGBTQ organizations and LGBTQ-supportive allied organizations and businesses.
According to the official schedule, the Opening Reception will include performances by Paris Sashay, Keith Angels, Bang Garcon, Black Assets, Marcy Smiles, and Sherri Amoure and will be hosted by the āDMVās own Anthony Oakeā and the ālegendary DJ Sedrick will be spinning all night.ā
The schedule shows that 11 individual workshop sessions will take place at the hotel throughout the day on Saturday, May 25. Among the workshop titles are Drag Chronicles: From Artform to Activism; Self-Care and Self-Compassion; Sexpectations: Navigating Sexual & Romantic Compatibility While Dating; Advocating for Black LGBTQ Youth in Foster Care; Queering Theology: Black Pride in the Pews; What is the L?! All Things Lesbian; and Primary Sources: Elders Sharing Our Histories.
Two official outdoor events include Pride by the River Super Sunday scheduled for Sunday, May 26, from 12-8 p.m. at D.C.ās Anacostia Park at 1500 Anacostia Dr., S.E. presented by the local group Project Brings; and the annual Pride In The Park set for Monday, May 27, at D.C.ās Fort Dupont Park, 1500 Anacostia Dr., S.E., presented by the local community services group Us Helping Us.
Some of the other numerous events, aside from several evening parties at popular D.C. nightclubs, include a Wellness Pavilion, a Poetry Slam, a Writerās Forum, and a Faith Service.
A statement released by the D.C.-based Center for Black Equity, which organizes the D.C. Black Pride events, notes that the first D.C. Black Pride was held May 25, 1991, and organized by local Black gay activists Welmore Cook, Theodore Kirkland and Ernest Hopkins, became the ācatalyst for what is now regarded as the Black Pride Movement.ā
It notes that, among other things, the first D.C. Black Pride event and Black Pride events in subsequent years raised funds for HIV/AIDS organizations that provided services to the African-American community in D.C. and the surrounding area.
The statement adds, āSince its birth, more than 50 other Black Pride celebrations now take place throughout the world, many using DC Black Pride as its model.ā
And like in past years, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has issued an official mayoral proclamation declaring May 20-27, 2024, DC Black Pride Week.
The full schedule for DC Black Pride 2024 events can be accessed at dcblackpride.org/schedule.htm.
District of Columbia
Accused drug dealer charged with fentanyl distribution leading to deaths of two D.C. gay men
June 13 indictment links previously arrested suspect to deaths
The Office of the U.S. Attorney for D.C. has announced that federal prosecutors on June 13 obtained an indictment against one of two D.C. brothers previously charged with multiple counts of illegal drug distribution that now charges him with ādistributing cocaine and fentanylā on Dec. 26, 2023, that resulted in the deaths of D.C. gay men Brandon Roman and Robert āRobbieā Barletta.
In a June 13 press release, the U.S. Attorneyās Office said Jevaughn āLedoā Mark, 32, is charged in a new āsecondary superseding indictmentā linked to the Roman and Barletta deaths. It says he and his brother, Angelo Mark, 30, āpreviously were charged on April 9 in a 17-count superseding indictment for participating in a conspiracy that distributed large amounts of fentanyl and cocaine in the metropolitan area.ā
The press release says Jevaughn Mark is currently being held without bond on charges that include eight counts of unlawful distribution of fentanyl, cocaine, and heroin and distributing 40 grams or more of fentanyl between Jan. 10, 2024, and March 13, 2024. According to the press release, the charges were based on six illegal drug purchases from Jevaughn Mark by undercover U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and undercover D.C. police officers.
Court records show that Angelo Mark was charged in a criminal complaint on March 22 with multiple counts of conspiracy to distribute narcotics and is also being held without bond.
D.C. police and Fire and Emergency Medical Services reports show that Roman, 38, a prominent D.C. attorney and LGBTQ rights advocate, and Barletta, 28, a historic preservation expert and home renovation business owner, were found unconscious when police and emergency medical personnel responded to a 911 call and arrived at Barlettaās home on Dec. 27. The reports show that Roman was declared deceased at the scene and Barletta was taken to Washington Hospital Center where he died on Dec. 29.
A police spokesperson told the Washington Blade in February that police were investigating the Roman and Barletta deaths, but investigators had to wait for the D.C. Medical Examinerās official determination of the cause and manner of death before the investigation could fully proceed.
Both men were patrons at D.C. gay bars and their passing prompted many in the LGBTQ community to call for stepped up prevention services related to drug overdose cases, even though the cause and manner of death for the two men was not officially determined until early April.
In April, the D.C. Office of the Chief Medical Examiner disclosed that the cause of death for both men was an accidental consumption of several drugs that created a fatal ātoxicā effect. The Medical Examinerās office said Barlettaās death was linked to the consumption of at least four different drugs and Romanās death was caused by the ācombined toxic effectā of six drugs. The Medical Examinerās office disclosed that cocaine and fentanyl were among the drugs found in the bodies of both men. And for both men, the manner of death was listed as āAccident/Intoxication.ā
When the cause and manner of death were disclosed by the Medical Examiner, D.C. police spokesperson Tom Lynch said the police investigation into the deaths remained open but said,Ā āThere are no updates on the investigation that we are ready to release to the public.ā
But the Medical Examinerās findings prompted Johnny Bailey, the community outreach coordinator for HIPS D.C., an LGBTQ supportive organization that provides services and support for those who use recreational drugs, to say he strongly believed that Barletta and Roman did not intentionally consume some of the drugs found in their system.
āIām going to say I do believe this was a poisoning,ā Bailey told the Blade. āI think it is unfair to call some things an overdose because an overdose is when you do too much of a drug and you die from that drug,ā he said. āThis is like if you have a few glasses of wine every night and someone puts arsenic in your wine, no one would be like, āoh, they drank themselves to death.ā They were poisoned. And thatās what I think is happening here,ā he said in referring to Barletta and Roman.
In announcing the new charges against Jevaughn Mark that link him to Barletta and Romanās deaths, the U.S. Attorneyās press release discloses that he supplied fentanyl in the drugs he sold unknowingly to the undercover DEA and D.C. police officers when one of the officers, posing as a drug buyer, did not ask for fentanyl.
āIn each instance, the DEA/MPD agents requested to buy āSpecial Kā or Ketamine from Jevaughn Mark,ā the press release says. āIn every instance, Jevaughn Mark supplied a mixture of fentanyl and other substances, including heroin, but not ketamine,ā it says.
The release says that after the earlier indictment against Jevaughn Mark was issued, law enforcement agents conducted a search of his Southeast D.C. home and ārecovered two firearms, cocaine, fentanyl, about $38,000 in cash, body armor vests, and drug trafficking paraphernalia.ā It says on that same day authorities executed another search for a second residence linked to Jevaughn Mark, where they located a bedroom used by his brother Angelo Mark.
āFrom Angelo Markās bedroom, law enforcement recovered seven firearms, 900 rounds of ammunition, dozens of pills, cocaine, fentanyl, drug trafficking paraphernalia, and about $50,000 in cash,ā the press release says, adding, āBased on the evidence, both brothers were indicted in the first superseding indictment.ā
District of Columbia
D.C. police chief, officers marched in Pride parade in uniform
Capital Pride cautious about whether MPD violated āno uniformā policy
(Editor’s note: This story was updated Friday morning with a new statement from Police Chief Pamela Smith sent to the Blade late Thursday evening.)
D.C. Police Chief Pamela Smith led a contingent of D.C. police officers, including members of the departmentās LGBT Liaison Unit, in the June 8 Capital Pride Parade with the chief and all the officers in uniform in what appeared to be a violation of a Capital Pride policy of not allowing law enforcement officers to participate in the parade in uniform.
The Capital Pride Alliance, the group that organizes most D.C. Pride events, including the parade, posted a statement on its website in June of 2020 announcing that a policy it adopted in 2018 that does not allow uniformed police officers to march in the parade remained in effect. The group told the Washington Blade this week in a statement that the no uniform policy remained in place for this yearās Pride parade.
In her own statement released on the day of the parade Chief Smith appeared to take exception to the no uniform policy without saying so directly.
āI am proud to march in todayās Capital Pride Parade in full uniform to support our LGBTQ+ colleagues and to further our commitment to creating inclusive and supportive environments,ā the chief said. āMPD will continue to support, and ensure security, at Pride events and different community focused events year-round,ā she said.
The chiefās statement, which was sent to the news media in a press release, added, āHaving been selected as the departmentās first Chief Equity Officer, and now as the Chief of Police, Iām committed to celebrating diverse identities. I will always stand up for diversity, equity and inclusion for our members and our community.ā
In response to an inquiry from the Blade asking for confirmation of whether the āno uniformā policy was still in effect for the 2024 Pride parade, Capital Pride Alliance responded with a statement.
āThe Capital Pride Alliance policy concerning MPD remains in place,ā the statement says. āIf the group officially registers for the march, they must participate out of official uniform,ā it says.
āThis year, the police did not register and as such were not an official parade contingent,ā the statement continues. āThe police chief walked the route with on-duty police officers, and being on-duty, officers are required to be in uniform.ā
The statement adds, āWe continue to have conversations with MPD, including the Chief of Police, about how we build a collaborative relationship with our community.ā
D.C. police didnāt immediately respond to a Blade request for comment by Chief Smith or a spokesperson on the claim by Capital Pride officials that the police were not in an official contingent in this yearās parade.
But late Thursday evening on June 13, the day after the Blade reached out to the police for comment, police spokesperson Paris Lewbel sent a statement from Chief Smith expressing concern over the no uniform policy.
āI was not provided a policy from Capital Pride that informed me of the Metropolitan Police Departmentās ban on marching in the Capital Pride parade in uniform,ā the chief says. āAs Chief of Police and the Departmentās first Chief Equity Officer, I will always remain focused on ensuring that we, MPD, are inclusive of all members, partners, and stakeholders,ā her statement says.
āNow that I have been ātoldā that there is a ban on the MPD from marching in the Capital Pride parade, in uniform, I believe there needs to be more conversations around inclusivity and equality,ā the statement continues. āWe have MPD members who are allies as well as members of the LGBTQ community who support Capital Pride and safeguard the participants and attendees of the parade,ā the chief said. āWe need to break down the silos that are excluding others and find a way to be more inclusive.ā
The statement concludes by saying, āI am willing to work with Capital Pride to discuss ways where we (MPD) can be engaged in Capital Pride as participants in the parade, in uniform, as opposed to being excluded.ā
Capital Pride officials did not respond to the Bladeās additional request this week for an explanation of why the no uniform policy was adopted and whether the policy is still needed.
In earlier statements posted on its website in past years, Capital Pride officials cited the Black Lives Matter movement and the police killing of Black Minneapolis resident George Floyd that triggered anti-police protests across the country as an issue that made some in the LGBTQ community and others participating in the Pride parade uncomfortable in the presence of uniformed police officers.
āPride this year comes on the heels of a global pandemic and a nation confronting the murder of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police officers,ā the group said in a June 3, 2020, statement. The Floyd case and the 2020 police shooting deaths of a Black woman in Louisville, Ky., and a Black transgender man in Tallahassee, Fla. āhave created a nationwide uprising crying out for racial justice and the protection of Black life,ā the statement said.
āAs members of the Black and Brown communities have stood with the LGBTQ+ community, the Capital Pride Alliance stands in complete solidarity to unite against these disparities that impact communities of color,ā the 2020 statement said. āWe pledge that we will work together to find solutions and make positive changes that are so desperately needed to end inequity, injustice, and violence against people of color.ā
Activists have acknowledged that the LGBTQ community nationwide has been divided over decisions to ban uniformed police participation in Pride parades in cities across the country, including New York and San Francisco.
A June 2019 nationwide poll of 801 LGBTQ people in the U.S. conducted by the polling firm Whitman Insight Strategies and BuzzFeed News found that 79 percent of LGBTQ adults said, āpolice should be welcome to join pride events,ā with just 8 percent expressing opposition to police presence, according to BuzzFeed.
āPeople of color, who made up 21 percent of all survey respondents, support cops in pride events by 77 percent to 8 percent (15 percent say it makes no difference either way),ā BuzzFeed reported in a June 24, 2019, article.
Earl Fowlkes, the founder and former CEO of the D.C.-based Center For Black Equity, which organizes D.C.ās annual Black Pride events, told the Blade that Black Pride has not adopted a policy of restricting uniformed police officers from participating in any of its events.
District of Columbia
Cherry Fund files lawsuitĀ against Republiq Hall
LGBTQ nonprofit says breach of contract led to $137,000 in lost revenue
Cherry Fund, the D.C.-based nonprofit organization that has raised money for HIV/AIDS, mental health, and LGBTQ organizations for the past 27 years, filed a lawsuit in D.C. Superior Court on May 31 charging Republiq Hall, a large entertainment venue in Northeast D.C, with abruptly and improperly cancelling Cherry Fundās reservation to rent the hall for an April 6 event expected to draw 2,000 paid guests.
The event was to be one of several circuit dance parties that Cherry Fund produces as part of its annual Cherry weekend in April, which has raised several million dollars for LGBTQ related organizations since the Cherry weekend events began in 1996.
The lawsuit, which charges Republiq Hall with breach of contract, says the contract signed by the two parties in January called for Cherry Fund to pay Republiq Hall an initial deposit of $3,500 on Jan. 10, 2024, to be applied to a nonrefundable rental fee totaling $7,000 for the one-time use of the space on April 6.
Republiq Hall is located in a large former warehouse building at 2122 24th Place, N.E., near the intersection of Bladensburg Road and New York Avenue.
According to the lawsuit, under the contract, Cherry Fund āwas responsible for promoting the event, booking talent, and managing ticket sales,ā with Cherry Fund to āretain all door fee revenues and a percentage of the net bar sales.ā
The lawsuit states, āOn February 28, after Plaintiff had already begun promoting the event and booking talent, the Defendant unilaterally and without just cause demanded an additional $9,000 from the Plaintiff. When the Plaintiff refused to pay the additional amount, the Defendant cancelled the reservation.ā
As a result of Republiq Hallās action, the lawsuit states, Cherry Fund was āforced to book an alternative venue with significantly less capacity, resulting in substantial financial losses.ā
It says as a direct result of the alleged breach of contract, Cherry Fund āsuffered financial damages in the amount of $130,000 in lost door fees and $7,000 in a lost percentage of the net bar sales that were estimated to be collected on the date of the event.ā
A spokesperson for Republiq Hall did not respond to a phone message from the Washington Blade requesting a comment and a response to the lawsuitās allegations.
Court records show that Superior Court Judge Juliet J. McKenna, who is presiding over the case, scheduled an initial hearing for the case on Sept. 6. McKenna issued an order providing guidance for how a civil litigation case should proceed that includes a requirement that Republiq Hall must file a response to the lawsuit within 21 days of being officially served a copy of the lawsuit complaint.
Sean Morris, the Cherry Fund president, issued a statement expressing disappointment over the developments leading to the lawsuit.
āOur organization, powered by volunteer efforts, relies on our annual event to fundraise for local non-profits,ā he said. āThis abrupt and unforeseen demand, and subsequent cancellation, has severely affected our ability to support vital community programs focused on HIV/AIDS, mental health, and LGBTQ+ advocacy,ā Morris says in his statement.
The lawsuit concludes by stating, “The Plaintiff, the Cherry Fund, respectfully requests the following relief: Direct compensatory damages for the lost benefits it was entitled to under the terms of the contract; Restitution for the benefits retained by the Defendant in unjust enrichment; Reasonable attorney fees and costs of this action; and Any other relief this court deems just and proper.”
-
District of Columbia4 days ago
D.C.ās beloved Duplex Diner closes its doors
-
Politics4 days ago
EXCLUSIVE: Biden-Harris campaign debuts ads targeting LGBTQ voters
-
District of Columbia4 days ago
Pride weekend brings parade, festival, fireworks amid perfect weather
-
District of Columbia2 days ago
D.C. police chief, officers marched in Pride parade in uniform