- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
-
Black Pride opening reception
-
White House Pride reception set for June 13
-
Puerto Rico House approves non-discrimination bill
-
Lesbian EEOC commissioner re-nominated for 2nd term
-
Obama praises Boy Scouts, but hopes for more change
-
Boy Scouts of America vote to partially end gay ban
-
Lesbian elected to AAPA board
House panel approves DP benefits bill
A U.S. House committee Wednesday approved legislation that would benefit the partners of LGBT federal workers after beating back amendments that inflamed passions among lawmakers.
The House Oversight & Government Reform Committee reported out the legislation, known as the Domestic Partnership Benefits & Obligations Act, 23-12.
The legislation, H.R. 2517, would make available to the same-sex partners of LGBT federal workers benefits afforded the spouses of straight employees, including health and pension benefits.
Now that the committee has approved the legislation, it will proceed to a House floor vote after the House Rules Committee has set guidelines for debate on the legislation. Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) the only out lesbian in Congress and sponsor of the House bill, told the Agenda she hopes a floor vote would take place after lawmakers return from Thanksgiving recess.
Asked whether there are enough votes in the House to pass the legislation, Baldwin replied, “Our vote counting has been going very well and I think we will.”
But during the markup, Republican lawmakers introduced amendments on a range of contentious issues, including same-sex marriage and illegal immigration.
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) put forth an amendment that would have mandated nothing in the legislation would be “considered to modify, supersede, or otherwise affect the Defense of Marriage Act.”
The amendment, which ended up failing 12-22, inspired ire over bringing the issue of marriage into the debate as well as controversy over bringing what some called a “last-minute amendment” to the committee.
Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.) rebuked the introduction of the measure, calling it “totally superfluous” and “absolutely an effort to play up people’s prejudice.”
Another amendment put forth by Rep. Brian Bilbray (R-Calif.), which failed 15-20, would have required partners to be screened through the E-Verify program under immigration law to ensure they are not illegal immigrants and have a lawful presence in the United States.
The measure riled Kennedy, who accused its supporters of bringing it up to “play on bigotry.” He suggested Republican lawmakers were making people of color, immigrants and others targets of bigotry in the legislation.
Tagged with Baldwin, domestic partner benefits, Kennedy
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.

view print edition