- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
-

Obituary: S. Eric Thomas, 56
-

D.C. paid anti-gay gospel singer $80,000
-

Black Pride schedule and more
-

Did Obama ask Leahy to delay gay-inclusive immigration reform?
-

Oldham resigns from leadership post of new AIDS coalition
-

Puerto Rico Senate approves non-discrimination bill
-

Study quantifies bullying effects in students
ENDA is the best use of our energy
Economic security is at the forefront of everyone’s mind during a recession. For the LGBT employee or job seeker, employment anxiety is an issue that transcends the business cycle.
People change jobs. People get transferred. People seek out new opportunities. Without consistent federal protections, LGBT employees and job seekers face more uncertainty than their heterosexual counterparts. They, after all, rarely worry about losing their economic rights simply by transferring to a new city, crossing state lines or changing companies.
It remains legal in 29 states to discriminate based on sexual orientation, and in 38 states to do so based on gender identity or expression. The patchwork of states and municipalities have outlawed discrimination on the basis of a person’s sexual orientation (including the smaller minority of those that include gender identity or expression) is wholly inadequate. You simply cannot wish away this geographic reality.
GOProud’s Jessica Lee argues that we shouldn’t spend so much political capital on passage of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, but work on a more “practical approach” focused on tax inequities and other smaller steps that might provide incremental benefits for “as much of the LGBT community as possible.” (Question for Jessica: Which “part” of the community do you recommend we leave behind?)
I couldn’t disagree more with that approach.
ENDA is a fundamental brick in the foundation of LGBT civil equality. Once in place, a wide range of “practical” opportunities open up that will have an impact on healthcare, taxes, marriage equality and the general public’s attitudes toward LGBT people.
Our political opponents know and understand this, which is why they are fighting so hard against it. They understand that once basic discrimination is outlawed, other forms of inequality start to fall from their own weight.
Passing ENDA is hardly, as trans blogger Corrina Cohn calls it, “perfume” on a symptom. What Ms. Cohn fails to understand is that attitude follows behavior more often than not. Negative behaviors such as those driven by prejudice do not simply wither away – especially when they continue to be nurtured or worse, excused.
Will workplace discrimination fade away simply because the Human Rights Campaign publishes an annual Corporate Equality Index (CEI)? Hardly. As wonderful a benchmarking tool as the CEI is, affecting change in the workplace takes a great deal more effort. It requires committed, top-down leadership. It requires education and outreach. It requires enforcement of policies to change negative behaviors. It requires straight allies who stand up for us. And it requires courage and fortitude for LGBT people (and their families) to come out – and to continue to push for policies and practices that are inclusive for everyone.
This is how it has already worked in corporate America. First, a company bans harassment based on sexual orientation and gender identity. They, it includes sexual orientation and gender identity in employment non-discrimination policies. As employees become more comfortable being “out” at work, non-LGBT co-workers attitudes shift. Policies are updated to include recognition of LGBT families. These relationships and attitudes extend from the workplace into the community at large and the ripples continue.
And for those companies that have gone down this path? They are more competitive in their respective markets, find it easier to find and retain employees and generally have a more productive (and happy) workforce. The communities where they are located have greater economic stability and this all feeds on itself.
This is what ENDA will help enable. This is why we must pass it NOW. For so many reasons, ENDA is the best use of our energy and I hope that Lee, Cohn and GOProud will join the rest of us in fighting to make it happen.
Mike Craig is co-chair of Out & Equal Houston. As the former president of Chevron PRIDE, he helped secure Chevron’s endorsement of ENDA and is the principle author of “Transgender@Chevron.”
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.


view print edition
Seldom has the LGBTQ community had a greater oppportunity to level the playing field for all. Of their face DADT and ENDA seem unrelated but to both our world and the US in the A recognition that we have a right to be in the work force and in service to our country with our Intergrity in tact is a big deal. We cannot, must not let this moment pass for lack of our willingness to stand up speak our Pride and fund the fight.
[Translate]
Mike, I plead with you to contact me on Facebook at ENDA Summer 2010. We agree. We’re starting another push for ENDA this summer. We believe that after mid-term elections, ENDA could die. Please join forces with us. We want to unite everyone.
[Translate]