- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
Appeals court dismisses ‘Don’t Ask’ litigation as moot
A federal appellate court panel on Thursday dismissed litigation challenging the constitutionality of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” as moot now that the military’s gay ban has been lifted from the books.
In a decision dated Sept. 29, a three-judge panel on the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the challenge to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” or Section 654, in the case of Log Cabin v. United States based on precedent in previous federal litigation.
“This suit became moot when the repeal of section 654 took effect on September 20,” the opinion states. “If Log Cabin filed suit today seeking a declaration that section 654 is unconstitutional or an injunction against its application (or both), there would be no Article III controversy because there is no section 654.”
The court concludes that the lifting of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” on Sept. 20 gave Log Cabin everything it hoped to achieve as a result of its lawsuit and a controversy no longer exists for judges to consider.
In addition to declaring the lawsuit moot, the decision vacates the decision that U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips placed last year on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” enjoining the U.S. government from enforcing the military’s gay ban.
The three-judge panel within the Ninth Circuit was made up of Chief Judge Alex Kozinski and Circuit Judges Kim Wardlow and Richard Paez. The decision was a per curiam opinion, meaning the judges agreed to it as group acting collectively and anonymously.
Dan Woods, a partner at White & Case who’s representing Log Cabin, vowed to take the litigation before the entire Ninth Circuit.
“We are, of course, disappointed by today’s ruling, but we will continue to fight on for the constitutional rights of all people impacted by ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,’” Woods said. “This is an important issue for all Americans, and we anticipate seeking a re-hearing before the full Ninth Circuit.”
Even though “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” has been lifted, plaintiffs continued with the litigation on the basis that a ruling that the ban was unconstitutional would prohibit future reinstatement of the law. Republican presidential candidates Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum have said they’d reinstitute “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” if elected to the White House.
A ruling that “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” was unconstitutional could also aid service members discharged under the law seeking back pay, reinstatement or a change in discharge status.
The decision came down from the Ninth Circuit panel after the U.S. Justice Department asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit in the wake of the end to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
R. Clarke Cooper, executive director of the National Log Cabin Republicans, said President Obama “should be ashamed that he is responsible” for taking part in the undoing of the district court’s decision on the matter.
“The ruling in Log Cabin Republicans v. United States is the reason why Congress finally acted to end this failed and unconstitutional policy,” Cooper said. “This decision by the Ninth Circuit denies more than 14,000 discharged gay and lesbian servicemembers an important means of obtaining justice for the wrong perpetuated against them under the ban, and leaves open the possibility of future violations of servicemembers’ rights. The court can vacate this ruling, but that does not change the fact that ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ was unconstitutional.”
A White House spokesperson deferred comment on the decision to the Justice Department. Tracy Schmaler, a Justice Department spokesperson, had no immediate comment.
Alex Nicholson, executive director of Servicemembers United and sole named veteran plaintiff in the lawsuit, called the ruling “unfortunate.”
“This resolution to the Log Cabin lawsuit is unfortunate for lesbian and gay service members and those dismissed under this policy, as there remains no law or ruling prohibiting future discrimination of this sort in the armed forces,” Nicholson said. “Log Cabin has done a comendable job in pursuing this case over the years, and I am proud to have served as the sole named veteran plaintiff in this case for Log Cabin, which enabled the case to continue on to this point.”
Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, said the Ninth Circuit panel’s decision isn’t a surprise, but still disappointing.
“This decision from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals was not unexpected, but we do regret that the court did not uphold Judge Phillips’ ruling that ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ was unconstitutional,” Sarvis said. “Notwithstanding today’s decision, the Log Cabin case, like the Cook case before it, played a major role in persuading policy makers to repeal ['Don't Ask, Don't Tell.']“
Tagged with Aubrey Sarvis, Dan Woods, Don't Ask Don't Tell, Homepage Headlines, Log Cabin Republicans, R. Clarke Cooper, Servicemembers Legal Defense Network
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.