- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
-

White House Pride reception set for June 13
-

Puerto Rico House approves non-discrimination bill
-

Lesbian EEOC commissioner re-nominated for 2nd term
-

Obama praises Boy Scouts, but hopes for more change
-

Boy Scouts of America vote to partially end gay ban
-

Lesbian elected to AAPA board
-

Summer sex and alcohol
GLAAD launches new tool to combat anti-gay pundits

A screen shot of the new GLAAD Commentator Accountability Project site, which GLAAD hopes will reduce anti-gay rhetoric in the news.
The Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation on Wednesday launched a new tool to help counter homophobic speech by anti-gay pundits in the media that the group hopes will influence the way news outlets choose guests to speak about LGBT topics.
The Commentator Accountability Project will be a repository for collecting the statements made by anti-gay pundits like Peter Sprigg and Maggie Gallagher as they make appearances in the media in large and small markets.
“If the people who book these shows knew the kind of extreme things that [these pundits] have said in other places, they would realize that they’re not experts in gay people’s lives,” said Richard Ferraro, GLAAD’s director of communications.
GLAAD said the project seeks to “educate the media about the extreme rhetoric of over three dozen activists who are often given a platform to speak in opposition to LGBT people and the issues that affect their lives.” The searchable online database will organize the history of statements commentators like Tony Perkins and Scott Lively have made over the years that reveal bias against not only LGBT people but people of different ethnic or religious backgrounds, or statements that may be considered offensive to women or immigrants.
“People like Evan Wolfson [of Freedom To Marry] can use the site before they go debate these people, as well, and say ‘remember when you said this?’” Ferraro said of other ways the site can be used to highlight the anti-gay remarks made by these pundits.
The site will also have a crowd-sourcing component, which will allow concerned viewers to document statements made by these pundits wherever they appear, which can be verified and added to their file.
“They don’t always get on CNN and say the same things that they say when they’re speaking to a more sympathetic audience,” Ferraro told the Blade. “They need to know who they’re booking.”
The new site reads “Audiences need to be aware that when they’re not talking to the mainstream media, these voices are comparing the LGBT people to Nazi Germany, predicting that equal treatment of LGBT people will lead to the total collapse of society, and even making accusations of satanic influence. ”
“Hate is not an expert opinion,” said GLAAD spokesperson Herndon Graddick in a statement. “In most cases, news outlets invite reputable experts to speak on the subject at hand, but when talking about LGBT issues, open hostility and anti-LGBT bias seems to be all the credibility required. This project holds these so-called ‘pundits’ accountable for the extreme anti-LGBT rhetoric they continue to spread.”
Tagged with Commentator Accountability Project, Evan Wolfson, Freedom to Marry, Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, gay news, gay politics dc, GLAAD, Homepage Headlines, Maggie Gallagher, Peter Sprigg, Scott Lively, Tony Perkins
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.

view print edition
[...] would say that our Commentator Accountability Project that we just launched is something that’s really important to me, and works toward what I wanted to do when I came to [...]
[Translate]