September 12, 2013 | by Staff reports
Opinion: Unfair judgments about Adams Morgan ANC
Adams Morgan, gay news, Washington Blade

Whatever determination we ultimately make with respect to the Adams Morgan moratorium will carefully and thoughtfully take into account all viewpoints. (Photo by Aude via Wikimedia Commons)

By BILLY SIMPSON

In Mark Lee’s opinion piece on Sept. 6, he wrote an assessment of alcohol license moratoriums that included the following assertions:

“It appears that the advisory neighborhood group for the namesake Adams Morgan of epithetic nomenclature is again likely to refuse shedding its nay-saying notoriety. The odds are long that they will ask the city to terminate a 14-year alcohol-license ban when it expires next April, despite plethoric negative effects on community business development … It is expected that, at best, only modest revisions will be advanced for city agency consideration.”

As the chair of the Advisory Neighborhood Commission 1C, the “advisory neighborhood group” for Adams Morgan that you reference, I defy Lee to provide to Blade readers any facts in his possession that he believes support these statements.

To my knowledge, neither the commission itself, nor any of our eight commissioners, has said or done anything that could possibly lead Lee to draw these conclusions, or any conclusion about what we might or might not do. We have been completely neutral in our approach and we are seeking to have a thoughtful community discussion on the topic over the months ahead.

Once that public process has run its course, it may turn out that we end up seeking to extend the Adams Morgan moratorium. Or it may turn out that we end up not seeking to extend the Adams Morgan moratorium. Or it may turn out that we end up seeking to extend parts of the moratorium, not seeking to extend others, and seeking to make adjustments to yet others.

I don’t know and neither does Lee.

He is entitled to have whatever opinions he wishes concerning the pros or cons of moratoriums. But he is not entitled to fabricate assertions about what our Commission is or isn’t likely to do.

We have a talented and dedicated group of commissioners. We put in a tremendous amount of work and effort to take fair and informed decisions on every matter that comes before us.

Whatever determination we ultimately make with respect to the Adams Morgan moratorium will carefully and thoughtfully take into account all viewpoints. In that context, the thing that particularly angered me about the assertions Lee made concerning our commission is that their primary effect will be to inflame the public discussion. Our commissioners put in way too many volunteer hours trying to promote constructive and respectful community dialogue to deserve to be made subject to that.

Billy Simpson is chair of Advisory Neighborhood Commission 1C.

2 Comments
  • Commissioner, please. The Adams Morgan ANC has a record, and Mark Lee has a computer and a phone. The notion that the views and agendas of community members who have been involved in ABC and moratorium-related issues are hard to discern is preposterous. If the notorious anti-business and anti-nightlife cranks are suddenly rational and respectful of other stakeholders in their neighborhoods, it will be the biggest breakthrough since Monica Lewinsky delivered a pizza to the Oval Office. But hope is a brazen intern. I’ll have extra cheese.

  • “namesake Adams Morgan of epithetic nomenclature” — What?

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2014. All rights reserved.
Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin