February 22, 2017 at 3:31 pm EST | by Chris Johnson
Trump rescinds transgender student protections
President Donald Trump (Blade file photo by Michael Key)

President Donald Trump has rescinded trans student protections. (Blade file photo by Michael Key)

Much to the dismay of the LGBT advocates who sought to keep guidance barring discrimination against transgender kids in schools, the Trump administration on Wednesday revoked the guidance.

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said Wednesday during the daily press briefing a letter rescinding the guidance would come out that day, reiterating his words from earlier in the week the decision to withdraw the guidance is based on President Trump’s support for states’ rights.

“As far as the conclusion goes, I’ve made this clear and the president’s made it clear throughout the campaign that he’s a firm believer in states’ rights, and that certain issues like this are not best dealt with at the federal level,” Spicer said.

A two-page “Dear Colleague” letter from the administration to schools indicates the Justice and Education Departments “are withdrawing the statements of policy and guidance” assuring protections for transgender students. Issued in May by those same departments during the Obama administration, the guidance invokes Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 to bar schools from discriminating against transgender kids or denying them access to the restroom consistent with their gender identity.

Citing “significant litigation” against the guidance, the letter cites a U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling based on the guidance in favor of transgender student Gavin Grimm as well as a decision from U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor enjoining enforcement of the guidance.

In these circumstances, the Department of Education and the Department of Justice have decided to withdraw and rescind the above-referenced guidance documents in order to further and more completely consider the legal issues involved,” the letter says. “The Departments thus will not rely on the views expressed within them.”

Notably, the letter is slightly different from a draft copy MSNBC published earlier in the day. The draft copy says even with the guidance withdrawn, schools “must ensure that transgender students, like all students, are able to learn in a safe environment,” but the final letter replaces the explicit mention of transgender students with “LGBT students.”

The final letter also adds the Department of Education Office for Civil Rights will continue to “hear all claims of discrimination and will explore every appropriate opportunity to protect all students” and says the administration is “committed to the application of Title IX and other federal laws to ensure such protection.”

The letter is issued just weeks after the White House declared in a statement Trump is “determined to protect the rights of all Americans, including the LGBTQ community.”

J. Bob Alotta, executive director of the Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice, condemned the decision to revoke the guidance as an attack on transgender students.

“These protections were put into place to ensure the safety of transgender students,” Alotta said. “Today’s decision actively harms the people who are most vulnerable to violence and the administration should immediately reverse course. Discrimination doesn’t belong in our schools or in our society. Everyone should have the freedom to express their gender identity without fear, retribution or risk of violence.”

Major media outlets reported the process leading to the revocation of the guidance was a source of contention. The Washington Post reported the transgender guidance was rescinded over the objections of newly confirmed Education Secretary Betsy DeVos. The Washington Blade has placed a call to the Education Department to verify those objections and determine who overruled her in the decision to overturn the guidance.

According to The New York Times, a fight erupted in the Trump administration over the letter between DeVos and U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who reportedly pressed the education secretary sign off on the change because he couldn’t go forward without her consent. The order had to come from both the Justice and Education Departments.

Trump sided with Sessions over DeVos, the New York Times reported, and faced with the choice of either resigning or defying the president, DeVos agreed to go along. The order was expected Wednesday, but held up, the Times reported, because the two Cabinet members disputed the final language.

“This is an issue best solved at the state and local level,” DeVos said. “Schools, communities, and families can find – and in many cases have found – solutions that protect all students.”

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, however, denied there was significant contention among members of the Trump administration, insisting there was “no daylight” between DeVos and Sessions on rescinding the guidance.

“I think where you might be hearing something is more on the timing of stuff,” Spicer said. “The conclusions every person in the administration has agreed upon. There’s no daylight between anybody, between the president, between any of the secretaries.”

Asked to clarify further the education secretary’s position, Spicer said DeVos is “100 percent” in favor rescinding the guidance.

In a statement announcing the guidance, DeVos said she considers “protecting all students, including LGBTQ students” a “key priority” for the Department of Education, but ultimately believes the issue should be left to the states.

The reported view of Sessions in favor of rescinding the guidance is consistent with recent actions from the Justice Department in litigation filed against the guidance by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on behalf of 12 states. As a result of the litigation, U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor issued a preliminary injunction barring the administration from enforcing the guidance nationwide.

Although the Justice Department under the Obama administration filed an appeal with the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals seeking along with a request to limit the scope of the injunction to the 12 plaintiff states, a legal brief under Sessions withdraws that second request and declares the Trump administration is “currently considering how best to proceed in this appeal.”

During the White House briefing, Spicer denied the timing for revoking the guidance meant it was a priority for the president and said the decision is based on the Gloucester County Schools v. G.G. case pending before the Supreme Court. Arguments are set for March 28.

“It’s dictated by that,” Spicer said. “The Obama administration had issued joint guidance from the Department of Education and the Department of Justice. We now have to decide whether or not this administration wants to continue that track that they were on. It’s plain and simple if we don’t.”

Explaining the decision to reverse course, Spicer said a review from the Education and Justice Departments under Trump identified “areas of concern,” such as the interpretation of Title IX to apply to transgender students.

“And so, it’s incumbent upon us to actually follow the law and recognize that Title IX never talked about this; it was an act of 1972,” Spicer said. “There was no discussion of this back then, and to assume certain elements of the law were thought of back then…would be completely preposterous.”

Despite Spicer’s words, a long body of case law — including a determination from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 2012 and rulings from federal appeals courts as far back as 2000 — have determined the prohibition on sex discrimination in federal civil rights laws like Title IX apply to transgender people. The 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, which found the law covers not just discrimination on the basis of sex, but also sex stereotyping, formed the basis for those decisions.

Gary McCaleb, senior counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom, was among those cheering Trump for following up on his campaign promise to rescind the guidance.

“The privacy, safety, and dignity of young students should be the first concern of every local school official across America,” McCaleb said. “The Obama administration radically distorted a federal law that was meant to equalize educational opportunities for women and then forced local officials to intermingle boys and girls within students’ private facilities like locker rooms, hotel rooms on school trips, and restrooms. The Trump administration would be right to return to the rule of law by rescinding the Obama administration’s misleading guidance.”

The action comes despite calls from transgender advocates to keep the policy in place. On Tuesday, the Human Rights Campaign promoted a letter to Trump signed by more than 1,000 parents of transgender children calling on him to preserve the guidance.

“Like all parents, all we want is for our children to be healthy, safe, and loved,” the letter says. “No young person should wake up in the morning fearful of the school day ahead. When this guidance was issued last year, it provided our families — and other families like our own across the country — with the knowledge and security that our government was determined to protect our children from bullying and discrimination. Please do not take that away from us.”

In the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey conducted by the National Center for Transgender Equality, more than three-quarters of those who were out or perceived as transgender at some point in kindergarten through high school experienced at that time some from of mistreatment, such as being verbally harassed, prohibited from dressing according to their gender identity, disciplined more harshly, or physically or sexually assaulted.

The survey doesn’t look specifically at the degree to which transgender students were barred from the restroom or locker room consistent with their gender identity. However, the survey found 59 percent of respondents reported in the past year they had avoided using a restroom, such as in public, at work, or at school, because they were afraid of confrontations.

Nearly one-third of the sample avoided drinking or eating so they wouldn’t have to use the restroom, and eight percent reported having a urinary tract infection or kidney-related medical problem as a result of avoiding restrooms.

Chad Griffin, president of the Human Rights Campaign, lambasted Trump for the decision to revoke the guidance in a statement and said it would only serve to harm transgender youth.

“What could possibly motivate a blind and cruel attack on young children like this?” Griffin said. “These transgender students simply want to go to school in the morning without fear of discrimination or harassment. The consequences of this decision will no doubt be heartbreaking. This isn’t a ‘states rights’ issue, it’s a civil rights issue. Children deserve protection from bullying no matter what state they live in. Period.”

Even though the guidance is rescinded, transgender advocates insist transgender students can still sue on their own if they feel they’ve experienced discrimination in schools under the provision of Title IX barring discrimination of the basis of sex. Because of the order from O’Connor, the guidance wasn’t an option for relief anyway.

But the plans could have an impact on pending litigation before the U.S. Supreme Court in which Gavin Grimm, a transgender student in Virginia, is suing his Gloucester County high school to use the restroom consistent with his gender identity. The court accepted the case to evaluate whether courts should defer to the guidance, a point that now seems moot, as well as whether Title IX prohibits schools from barring students from using the restroom consistent with their gender identity.

Chris Johnson is Chief Political & White House Reporter for the Washington Blade. Johnson attends the daily White House press briefings and is a member of the White House Correspondents' Association. Follow Chris

  • Edziu Lisowski

    No comments from the Log Cabin Republicans?

    • lnm3921

      There busy looking for a job for Miss Milo now that her fifteen minutes are up!!!!

    • mginsd

      Sorry, we do have lives, you know, and usually jobs, too. This LCRer has no problem with President Trump’s rescinding a “guideline” that should never have been issued in the first place. A LOT of us in “the gay community,” GOP and otherwise, believe that the whole T issue has been blown way out of proportion and a LOT of kids have had their lives irreversible damaged by the T advocates’ “change now, deal with it later” approach. In short, these kids have been used as pawns by “activists” who are more interested in boosting their own egos than those of the kids they claim to serve.

      • Kathy11

        This is exactly why gay kids shouldn’t be allowed to come out – it could harm them. They should be told by gay orgs to stay in the closet. But – gay orgs like Log Cabin use them by saying things like they should be out and respected. And gay leaders like Milo – well – you know.

      • DC20037

        So Mr. Log Cabiner please provide us with some “facts” related to how the whole T issue has been blown way out of proportion and the evidence ALOT of you have uncovered showing that T advocates use children as pawns? Perhaps LCR has issued some talking points to pass out since you of course might be too busy living or working to save us from our ignorance.

      • lnm3921

        You have lives and jobs, really? Seems yourives are nothing but Trump and how deep your heads can squeeze up his rump! He may need emergency surgery soon due to the severe bowel obstruction you create!
        Liberals fighting for equality is the reason people like you can say your are gay without receiving violent threats or slurs, being arrested or Used to be you’d be fired for being gay if hired at all.

  • lnm3921

    Tim Spicer has special needs doesn’t he? He sounds so simplistic. He tells us such outrageous things like Trump has always been consistently tough on Russia or that he has a great relationship with Mexico. Does the Trump administration really think we live in a vacuum?!

    So what is Caitlyn Jenner doing these days? She attended Trump’s inauguration yet where is she now to influence Trump on this policy change? Sounds like a typical GLBT conservative, getting recognition is all that counts not taking stand for our rights or pushing for them. Don’t upset the status quo you might not get invited to a GOP function or the White House!

    • mginsd

      Careful there! Wasn’t President Trump castigated for aping a “tardo” during his campaign?

      • lnm3921

        Trump was aping a “tardo” then? He normally comes across to me like that!

  • Kathy11

    And that’s Trump’s plan to defeat ISIS.

  • DC20037

    Just came across an interview with Greg Angelo, President of the Log Cabin Republicans on a site called “Quartz.” The article which ironically was published yesterday revealed this from Mr. Angelo regarding the new Attorney General, Jeff Sessions:

    Q: How do you feel about Jeff Sessions? [Trump’s attorney general consistently voted against LGBT equality measures during his time in the senate.]

    A: I’m willing to give Jeff Sessions a chance. I’m willing to give him a chance…something that puts us at odds with, to my knowledge, every LGBT advocacy organization out there.

    This comes from my perceptions of what it means to be an attorney general. I believe liberals feel it is the job of the attorney general to interpret the law, and conservatives feel it’s the job of the attorney general to uphold the law. There’s a key difference there.

    All of the opposition to Sessions from the LGBT left was born from questions about ways he’d interpret law. And time and again during his hearing, Sessions said that he would faithfully execute the laws of the country. In his opening statement, he said explicitly that he recognized the fight for equality that the country’s LGBT community values.

    So Greggy, the next time your position is at odds with every other LGBT advocacy organization (which in the case of LCR is almost always) take this as a lesson, that the odds are very high that LCR is on the wrong side of LGBT advocacy. Oh and take down that picture and statement of support for Betsy DeVos from your home page. It just makes LCR look even more pathetic if that is even possible.

    • mginsd

      I like the way you respond to Angelo’s statements with facts and logic, if not exactly reason. What a fine advocate for “every other LGBT advocacy organization” you are!

      • lnm3921

        At least they are consistent advocates for LGBT rights unlike LCR leadership who are GINOs(Gays in Name Only) and do little else than go with the status quo of their party in fear that they will be ostracized otherwise! They like bending over!

  • customartist

    Conspicupously evident is the absence of commentary from Advisor-to-the-President Peter Thiel, gay PayPal entrepreneur extraordinaire. WHERE is he? Where in the world IS Trump’s token gay? Are all of the Whitehouse doormats out for a cleaning today?

    • mginsd

      Unlike the Democrats, GOPers, gay and straight, see no reason to wear their diversity on their sleeve.

      • Brian’s Ions

        Of course you don’t wear your diversity on your sleeve. Because remaining in the closet is the only way you’ll be tepidly ‘accepted’ by the racists, sexists, homophobes, transphobes, Islamophobes, anti-Latinos, and anti-Semites that have seized the GOP. Now go back to your slobbery boot-iickin, LCR.

        State’s Rights for civil rights??? OMG! This is unquestionably the last straw, for those of us who were willing to give a decent benefit of doubt to the new president, however popularly unelected he is.

        An OUT.COM wag’s prediction the day after the election if worth noting again…
        http://www.out.com/news-opinion/2016/11/09/5-ways-trump-presidency-could-affect-lgbt-rights

        • customartist

          I saw this coming a mile away. It was exposed months ago, just after the election, that Conservatives had come to understand that while Marriage equality was a done deal, they calculated to focus their efforts on Other issues surrounding LGBT rights, ones that had not yet been adjudicated. Nothin surprising with this particular decision.

      • lnm3921

        Really? Like you can all hide it let alone should have to hide it. What happens to your spouses and boyfriends? Do they meet you in the parking lot when it gets dark to go home?! Do

      • customartist

        Hyperbole will not help. The issue here is that [some] voters, LGBT or supporters, may have been encouraged in part to vote for Trump because of his association with Thiel, and the portrayed support for LGBT folks.

        Most if not all of Trump’s OTHER close allies have spoken out, time and again, on the issues important to them. Questioning why Thiel is not doing the same is not asking him to “wear diversity on his sleeve”.

    • lnm3921

      Forget Peter Thiel. Where is Caitlyn Jenner on this issue?!

  • Count Dracula

    Ladies rooms are for ladies, chix with dix are not ladies.

    • lnm3921

      You should know about dix You’re a big one!

      • Count Dracula

        Stop fantasizing.

  • lnm3921

    You say get over it! Openly gay men were treated the same way in regards to sharing the same spaces with hetero men! Do you have any concept of what that’s like? If you weren’t out in High School then you’re clueless as ever! We were forced to take showers by our gym coach like It or not without any privacy partitions!

    It’s a GLBT movement now isn’t it? Not just gay anymore!

  • customartist

    “What do you say to Whites who know they are White…..locker rooms and public swimming pools…?”

    This too was said back in the day.

    • Mark Hatchett

      Sorry but public school boys and girls in America have never been forced to share the same restrooms, locker rooms and showers at the same time no matter their color. Adult men and women in America have never been forced to share the same public restrooms, locker rooms and showers at the same time no matter their color. Men who pretend to be women and women who pretend to be men are simply out of luck because the rest of us are under no obligation whatsoever to accommodate or enable their particular desires.

      • lnm3921

        So will you be telling Caitlyn Jenner that at your next conservative social gathering and inform her she should keep a bed pan in her purse if she won’t share the bathroom with you?! Maybe you can empty it for her and wash it out along with disposing of the used toilet paper.

        I guess she won’t get the trans ambassador job she wanted after all from the Trump administration. Sigh!

        Also where do drag queens and flaming queens fit in your world?! You need to tell miss Milo to butch it up more!

  • lnm3921

    Where is Dave Lampo? Sounds like he owes Gay, Inc. an apology instead of giving us his typical lisp service on supporting conservatives and the GOP to promote our rights! It sounds from the tone of many conservatives on this message board that they encouraged the Trump administration to rescind the order Obama put in place not promote it.

    Why do liberals need to play the victim card when so many conservatives provide them happily? I see some saying they don’t wear being gay on their sleeve like Democrats so in other words they like to identify as gay just not fight for gay rights within their party!

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2017. All rights reserved.
Blade Blast

Get the latest LGBTQ news to your inbox every Thursday!