Health
Obama AIDS panel bucks White House on drug funds
Resolution calls for $126 million ADAP emergency measure

Members of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS this week called on President Obama and Congress to approve $126 million in emergency funds for the struggling AIDS Drug Assistance Program. (Photo by Pete Souza, courtesy White House)
President Obama’s newly appointed Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS adopted a resolution Tuesday urging the White House and Congress to do something they have been reluctant to do: approve $126 million in emergency funds for the struggling AIDS Drug Assistance Program.
The federal program, which is operated jointly with states, provides subsidies for life-saving anti-retroviral drugs needed by low-income people with HIV and AIDS who lack health insurance coverage.
Due to several developments, including sharp budget cuts by states, a record 1,924 people eligible to enroll in the program in 11 states have been placed on waiting lists as state ADAPs have run out of money to pay for the drugs, state officials have said. The waiting lists are expected to grow in the coming weeks and months.
AIDS activists have criticized the White House and Democratic leaders in Congress for not taking immediate steps to push the emergency funding this year, saying people on the waiting lists face possible life-threatening illnesses related to HIV without their medication.
More than 50 members of the House, including gay Reps. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) sent a petition to the White House earlier this year calling for $126 million in supplemental funds for ADAP in the current fiscal year.
The presidential AIDS panel, known as PACHA, adopted its resolution at a special conference call meeting Tuesday.
The conference call came after some PACHA members complained that the panel was distracted from adopting the resolution and addressing other important business at its previous in-person meeting at the White House in April by administration staffers who overly “stage managed” the meeting, according to insiders familiar with the panel.
The 24-member PACHA includes seven out gay members. It’s chaired by Dr. Helen Gale, a nationally recognized AIDS physician and former top official at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention.
“I don’t think the PACHA is being stage managed, but I do think that it is being over handled,” said PACHA member Phill Wilson, executive director of the Black AIDS Institute in Los Angeles.
Wilson said it would be an exaggeration to characterize as a “rebellion” the call by PACHA members for a special meeting this week to vote on the ADAP resolution, as one source familiar with PACHA called it.
But he said PACHA members assigned to a subcommittee that monitors ADAP issues made it clear that it would be unacceptable for the advisory body to wait until its next regularly scheduled meeting in September to take up the ADAP issue.
Wilson and fellow PACHA member A. Cornelius Baker, former executive director of the National Association of People with AIDS and the Whitman-Walker Clinic, said the newly reconstituted PACHA appeared to be having some organizational and logistical problems.
Among other things, Baker and PACHA member Rosie Perez, actress and AIDS activist, expressed concern at the April meeting that White House officials arranged for the meeting to be held in an auditorium at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building next to the White House that was not conducive for members to conduct business.
Most of the first day of the two-day meeting in April was devoted to listening to comments by members of the public, including AIDS activists. Although a precedent for listening to public comments began under the Clinton administration, one AIDS activist attending the April meeting said it evolved into a “chaotic” town hall type meeting that prevented members — who were appointed for their expertise in various aspects of public health, medicine and public policy — from tackling issues such as ADAP.
Sessions on the second day were not open to the public, raising questions that administration staffers violated a federal law that requires all federal government advisory bodies to conduct business in public.
Christopher Bates, PACHA’s staff executive director, told activists who complained about the closed meeting that the session was limited to discussing “administrative” matters and no official business was conducted.
Wilson and Baker said this week that the White House and the Department of Health & Human Services, which has direct supervision over PACHA, were working to correct the problems, with the possibility that new meeting space would be found.
But new organizational and technical issues surfaced during Tuesday’s conference call when an audio muting mechanism prevented members of the public who were approved in advance to speak from being heard by Gale, who presided over the call.
When a roll call vote was taken on the ADAP resolution, some of the PACHA members also could not be heard, alerting the staff that a technical glitch kept the PACHA members’ phone on mute.
As required by a federal advisory body statute, the conference call meeting was announced two weeks earlier in the Federal Register, which instructed people interested in speaking during a public comment period how to dial in to the call.
A technician facilitating the conference call eventually lifted the muting mechanism to allow everyone to speak. But shortly after that happened, someone apparently called the meeting to an end while the phone lines remained open. At least two callers expressed outrage that they were not allowed to speak, and several callers began their own discussion before someone terminated the conference call.
Before the confusion began, Gale announced the roll call vote had been completed and the resolution calling for the $126 million emergency ADAP funds had been approved.
Prior to the discussion and vote on the resolution, HHS official Deborah Parham told call participants the administration would allocate $17.5 million in Ryan White funds in August that states could use for their ADAP programs. She said additional Ryan White funds were available to help struggling states in their overall programs to assist people with HIV/AIDS.
HHS recognizes “the need to improve access to critical HIV/AIDS prescription drugs and we’re working to prevent and ultimately eliminate the need for ADAP waiting lists,” Parham told call participants. But she did not say whether the administration would agree to the $126 million emergency funding allocation for ADAP called for by the PACHA resolution.
President Bill Clinton created PACHA in the 1990s. President George W. Bush retained the panel and continued Clinton’s practice of naming several gays to serve on PACHA, including several gay Republican activists.
The Obama administration did not call any PACHA meetings in its first year in office, prompting some activists to ask if the new administration planned to retain the panel. But in February, the White House disclosed it had dismissed all PACHA members appointed by Bush and introduced what it called a “reconstituted” PACHA with 24 new members.
According to Jeff Crowley, director of the White House Office of National AIDS Policy, the new members were appointed by Health & Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius with White House consultation.
At the first meeting Feb. 2, Sebelius administered the oath of office for members and said she and the White House would utilize PACHA as a “platform for the administration to share our plans and insights” on AIDS programs and proposals.
“Today, I’m pleased to have a new group of experts joining PACHA,” Obama said in a statement released at the February meeting. “And I look forward to hearing from the council about our continued efforts to prevent the spread of HIV infections in the United States and to provide care and treatment to people living with HIV/AIDS around the world.”
Health
CMS moves to expand HIV-positive organ transplants
HIV/AIDS activists welcome potential development
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is pushing forward a proposed rule that would make it not only easier for people with HIV in need to get organ transplants from HIV-positive donors, but also make it a priority where there was often a barrier.
The Washington Blade sat down with people familiar with this topic — from former heads of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, to HIV activists and to the first HIV-positive person to donate an organ — about what this proposed change could mean.
HIV is a virus that attacks the body’s immune system, particularly targeting the body’s T-cells, which makes it harder to fight off infection and disease. If left untreated, HIV can become AIDS. Without treatment, AIDS can lead to death within a few months or years. The virus is spread through direct contact with bodily fluids — often through sex, unclean needles, or from mother to baby during pregnancy.
According to HIV.gov, a website managed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, approximately 1.2 million people in the U.S. were living with HIV in 2022. Of those 1.2 million, 13 percent don’t know they have it.
The virus disproportionately impacts men who have sex with men and people of color.
The CDC’s statistics show men are most affected, making up almost 80 percent of diagnoses, with gay and bisexual men accounting for the majority. Racial disparities also are present — Black people make up 38 percent of diagnoses. The World Health Organization estimates that around 44.1 million people have died from AIDS-related illnesses globally as of 2024.
Since the virus was first detected 45 years ago, scientists have been working on ways to treat and prevent its spread. In 1987, the first breakthrough in fighting HIV came as the U.S. approved the first HIV medication, AZT — marking the beginning of antiretroviral therapy. This medicine — and later descendants of it, like today’s widely prescribed Biktarvy — stop the HIV virus from reproducing and allow the body to keep its T-cells.
Then in 2012, another big step toward minimizing the scope of the potentially fatal disease came as the CDC approved the first HIV prevention medication, Truvada, more commonly known as PrEP. As of 2024, nearly 600,000 people in the U.S. are using PrEP, according to AIDSVu, which uses data from Gilead Sciences (manufacturers of Truvada and Biktarvy) and is compiled by researchers at the Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University.
The following year, in 2013, the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act was signed into law, enabling the use of organs from HIV-positive donors for transplants into HIV-positive recipients, overturning a 1988 ban.
There are an estimated 123,000 people waiting for organ transplants in the U.S. The number of HIV-positive people on that list is estimated to be smaller, harder to precisely quantify, but they are still in dire need.
A study from the New England Journal of Medicine, published in 2024, analyzed the outcomes of 198 kidney transplantations to people with HIV at 26 medical centers across the U.S. from 2018 to 2021.
Results from the study showed that for kidney transplants performed using organs from 99 donors with HIV and 99 without HIV, one-year survival rates for HIV-positive recipients were nearly identical (94 percent and 95 percent, respectively). Three-year survival rates were also similar (85 percent and 87 percent). Organ rejection rates were also numerically on par after three years (21 percent and 24 percent). Other measures for surgical outcomes, including the number of side effects that occurred, were also roughly the same for both groups.
This shows that, overall, HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive transplants are nearly identical in outcome to transplants between HIV-negative donors and recipients.
Where we are now
Now in 2026, CMS is pushing past the clinical trial testing phase it has been in, making HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive organ transplants more widespread and more accessible.
Adrian Shanker, the former deputy assistant secretary for health policy and senior advisor on LGBTQ health equity at HHS, explained to the Blade that the HOPE Act was a step in the right direction, but this policy change from CMS will expand the ability to help HIV-positive patients in need.
“The original HOPE Act asked for scientific research,” Shanker explained. “There were 10 years of clinical trials. The Biden administration promulgated a rule that removed clinical trial requirements for kidney and liver transplants between people living with HIV. This proposed rule is further implementation on the CMS side with the organ procurement organizations to ensure they’re carrying out the stated intent of the HOPE Act law. It’s building on consensus that has existed through multiple administrations.”
The proposed change would go into effect on July 1, and, according to Shanker, would help everyone in need of an organ — not just HIV-positive people.
“People living with HIV, their ability to receive organs from other people living with HIV in a more streamlined way means that the overall organ waitlist is sped up as well,” he added. “So it benefits everyone on the waitlist.”
Shanker, who was also a member of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS, spoke about how this is a rare moment of bipartisanship.
“There’s no secret that the Trump administration has been quite adversarial to LGBTQI plus health, and to the health of people living with HIV/HIV prevention resources as well … From destabilizing PEPFAR to shutting down one of the primary implementation partners, which is USAID, to firing almost the entire staff of the Office of Infectious Disease and HIV Policy at HHS … But what this is is a glimmer of hope that we can have bipartisan solutions that improve quality of life for people living with HIV.”
Harold Phillips, the CEO of NMAC, a national HIV/AIDS organization that pushes policy education and public engagement to end the HIV epidemic, and an HIV-positive American, sees this as a huge gain for the HIV-positive community.
“For a number of years, we were excluded from that pool of potential donors,” Phillips said. “Many people living with HIV were excluded from being able to get organ transplants. So this opens up that door. This is a positive step forward that will help save lives.”
That “open door,” Phillips said, does more than just provide life-saving organs to people in the most need. It provides a sense of being able to support their community.
“I remember when I was no longer able to check that box on my driver’s license,” Phillips recalled during his interview with the Blade. “I remember what that meant — that my organs might not be able to save a life. The potential that now they could is really exciting for me.”
“To think about people living with HIV donating their organs to other people living with HIV and helping extend their health and well-being — that’s an exciting moment in our history. It reinforces that HIV is not a death sentence anymore.”
Human Rights Campaign Senior Public Policy Advocate Matt Rose also sat down with the Blade to explain the realities of HIV-positive people in the U.S. right now who are looking for a transplant.
“If you’re HIV positive and on the waitlist for an organ right now, your chance of getting one is slim to nil,” Rose said. “This at least gives you a real shot.”
He went on to explain that while the HOPE Act started to move in the right direction, it hasn’t done enough for HIV-positive people in dire need.
“This bill [HOPE] was supposed to fix that — and it never really has. But every administration, we keep chipping away at the next hurdle,” he said. “This latest move will drastically expand the ability for someone who is HIV positive to donate an organ.”
That slow chipping away, in addition to the non-stop trials being done to prove the efficacy and ability for HIV-positive people’s bodies to accept organ donation, is part of the broader push to normalize this practice and remove outdated restrictions.
Shanker elaborated, explaining all that time was necessary to figure out the efficacy of HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive organ transplants but now that the data has been collected — its time to expand the availability.
“There were over a decade of clinical trials between the original HOPE Act law being signed by President Obama and our rule being promulgated at the end of the Biden administration. It was to allow those clinical trials to run their course,” Shanker said.
Nina Martinez is the first HIV-positive person to donate an organ to another person with HIV.
She explained that the stigma and lack of understanding from the general public is another hurdle that those working to improve the quality of life for people living with HIV have to deal with.
“People don’t generally understand that treatment works,” Martinez said, who became the first person to undergo HIV-positive organ donation in 2019. “When you have access to antiretroviral therapy, it lowers the virus in your bloodstream to levels so low that lab tests can’t detect it. Clinically, that correlates to good health and an inability to transmit HIV sexually. I was healthy enough to pass the same evaluation as any other living donor without HIV.”
She continued explaining:
“Just by having a diagnosis of HIV, they’re labeling donors as medically complex, and that’s not accurate. Every donor with HIV has to pass the same evaluation as donors without HIV,” she said. “If someone passes that evaluation and still isn’t allowed to donate, that’s discrimination. If a patient is willing to accept that organ and you block it because of preconceived notions, you’re denying someone care based on disability. That runs counter to basic fairness.”
When asked about her decision to become a donor and what message she hopes it sends, Martinez emphasized that the choice should remain personal.
“I didn’t undertake this endeavor to say that people with HIV should donate. This is a community that’s been through a lot and has contributed to science — we have served. But for people who wanted a way to leave a legacy, and that is what I wanted, they should be supported in that. There shouldn’t be arcane scientific perceptions and myths getting in the way of that.”
National Donor Day, which raises awareness of organ donation, is on Feb. 14. To become an organ donor, visit registerme.org.
Health
CVS Health agrees to cover new HIV prevention drug
‘Groundbreaking’ PrEP medication taken by injection once every six months
CVS Health, the nation’s second largest pharmacy benefit manager company that plays a key role in deciding which drugs are covered by health insurance policies, has belatedly agreed to cover the new highly acclaimed HIV prevention drug yeztugo.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the use of yeztugo as an HIV prevention or “PrEP” medication in June 2025 as the first such drug to be taken by injection just once every six months. AIDS activists hailed the drug as a major breakthrough in the longstanding effort to end the HIV epidemic.
“We are pleased that CVS Health has finally decided to cover this groundbreaking new PrEP mediation,” said Carl Schmid, executive director of the HIV+ Hepatitis Policy Institute.
“Four months ago, 63 HIV organizations joined us in sending a letter to CVS’s president urging them to reconsider their refusal to cover Yeztugo and reminding them of their legal obligation to cover PrEP and describe the important benefits the drug would bring to preventing HIV in the U.S.,” Schmid said in a statement.
He noted that CVS Health now joins other leading pharmacy benefit manager companies and insurers in covering yeztugo. Gilead Sciences, the pharmaceutical company that developed and manufactures yeztugo, has said 85 percent of all people with health insurance in the U.S. now have coverage for the drug, according to Schmid.
“However, coverage does not automatically translate into access and usage,” Schmid said in his statement. “Too many people are being forced to pay copays while other payers, including employers, are failing to cover all forms of PrEP,” he said.
According to Schmid, the HIV+ Hepatitis Policy Institute is joining other HIV advocacy organizations in urging federal and state government officials to engage in “aggressive enforcement of PrEP insurance coverage requirements and sustained funding of state, local, and community HIV prevention programs.”
Health
Choose U ambassadors share lived experiences with HIV, personal reflections, and insights
The Choose U World AIDS Day panel brought together three longtime advocates living with HIV to talk about care, stigma, and what living with HIV over the long-term means to them. The conversation featured Jahlove Serrano, Joyce Belton, and Andrew Nichols, who have each lived with HIV for more than 20 years. News is Out hosted the event in partnership with Gilead Sciences.
“Co-created with community representatives from around the world, Choose U is comprised of inspiring examples of how the outlook for aging with HIV has dramatically changed,” Gilead shared in the recent launch of the program. “By focusing on the real-world experiences of people in different circumstances, Choose U spotlights individuals prioritizing starting and staying on HIV treatment, self-care, and overall strategies to help them lead healthier lives.”
The Choose U ambassadors opened with a clear message: Lived experience drives understanding.
Each panelist talked through the decisions, relationships, and periods of uncertainty that shaped their HIV care. They also described their approaches to HIV treatment and adherence, including the importance of staying on treatment to help lower the risk of HIV drug resistance. They reflected on the shifts they have seen in HIV treatment over the decades, the value of honest conversations with providers, and how staying engaged in care and on HIV treatment helped them lead longer, healthier lives.
The panel discussed U=U, which stands for “Undetectable equals Untransmittable.” Undetectable means there is so little virus in the blood that a lab test can’t measure it. Research shows that taking HIV treatment as prescribed, and getting to and staying undetectable, prevents HIV from spreading through sex.
The panelists also spoke about the emotional side of living with HIV over the long-term and the stigma they have faced. Joyce described a personal moment when her pastor visited her in the hospital and how that experience began her work educating her church community about HIV.
Jahlove talked about how his biological family reacted to his diagnosis. “When I disclosed my status, they told me that I put a shame on the family,” said Jahlove. When he shared his status with his peers, they responded with support, which gave him a sense of empowerment.
Andrew, a professional therapist, described how he has experienced stigma in dating and in his workplace, and why he turns to therapy for guidance. “Therapy has really helped me rebuild my confidence and realize my self-worth has to come from me,” said Andrew. “Then after that, I can help with the greater community.”
The panel closed with a message for others living with HIV: They encouraged viewers to start and stay engaged in HIV treatment and care, ask questions, and rely on supportive networks. Their stories show how starting and staying on treatment over the long-term, community, and affirmation can shape well-being.
A recording of the full 30-minute event is now available on YouTube, which you can access here.
-
State Department5 days agoFOIA lawsuit filed against State Department for PEPFAR records
-
New York5 days agoPride flag raised at Stonewall after National Park Service took it down
-
India5 days agoTrans students not included in new India University Grants Commission equity rules
-
Calendar5 days agoCalendar: February 13-19
