Connect with us

National

Mainstream media press Obama on marriage

President again declines to endorse marriage equality

Published

on

President Obama (Blade file photo by Michael Key)

President Obama said on Wednesday the process that led to passage of the New York marriage law was “a good thing” when asked during a news conference, although he refrained from endorsing marriage equality.

“What I’ve seen happen over the last several years, and what happened in New York last week, I think is a good thing because what we saw was the people of New York having a debate talking through these issues,” Obama said. “It was contentious, it was emotional, but ultimately, they made a decision to recognize civil marriage, and I think that’s exactly how things should work.”

Obama also said he believes “each community is going to be different, each state is going to be different to work through them.”

Questions on marriage for Obama came from two reporters during the news conference: NBC’s Chuck Todd and the Wall Street Journal’s Laura Meckler. Coupled with questions that White House Press Secretary Jay Carney took from Meckler and reporter Bill Press on Monday, these inquiries reflect a greater interest in Obama’s marriage position from the mainstream media.

NBC News asked Obama if he believes marriage is a civil right, but Obama didn’t respond and instead detailed the administration’s accomplishments for the LGBT community, including his decision to no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act in court.

“Let me start by saying that this administration, under my direction, has consistently said we cannot discriminate as a country against people on the basis of sexual orientation,” Obama said. “And we have done more in the two-and-a-half years that I’ve been in here than the previous 43 presidents.”

Pressed Ā on whether he’s uncomfortable with the idea of different states having different rules or whether anti-marriage laws smack of segregation, Obama talked instead about the growing acceptance of LGBT people.

“Chuck, I think what you’re saying is the profound recognition on the part of the American people that gays and lesbians and transgender persons are our brothers, our sisters, our children, our cousins, our friends, our co-workers ā€” and they have to be treated like every other American, and I think that principle will win out,” Obama said.

Obama’s statement on the passage of the New York marriage law being “a good thing” received further attention during the news conference when the Journal asked if that remark meant he personally supports same-sex marriage, but Obama said that comment didn’t mark a change in his position.

ā€œIā€™m not going to make news on that today,” Obama said. “Good try, though.ā€

Pressed further, Obama maintained he wouldn’t make news on the issue and replied, “Laura, I think this has been asked and answered. I’ll keep on giving you the same answer until I give you a different one. All right? And that won’t be today.”

Obama has faced increased scrutiny over his lack of support for same-sex marriage as reaches out to the LGBT community for help to win re-election in 2012. Last week, he held a LGBT fundraiser in New York City and later today a Pride reception is set to take place at the White House.

A brief transcript of the exchange between reporters and Obama on the marriage issue follows:

NBC News: Should marriage be a civil right?

President Obama: Let me start by saying that this administration, under my direction, has consistently said we cannot discriminate as a country against people on the basis of sexual orientation. And we have done more in the two-and-a-half years that I’ve been in here than the previous 43 presidents …

Ending “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” making sure that gay and lesbian partners can visit each other in hospitals, making sure that federal benefits can be provided to same-sex couples across the board, hate crimes ā€” we have made sure that that is a central principle of this administration because I think that’s the central position of America.

Now, what we’ve also done is we’ve said that DOMA, the Defense of Marriage Act, is unconstitutional, and so, we’ve said we cannot defend the federal government poking its nose into what states are doing and putting the thumb on the scale against same-sex couples.

What I’ve seen happen over the last several years, and what happened in New York last week, I think is a good thing because what we saw was the people of New York having a debate talking through these issues. It was contentious, it was emotional, but ultimately, they made a decision to recognize civil marriage, and I think that’s exactly how things should work. …

So I think it is important for us to work through this issues because each community is going to be different, each state is going to be different to work through them. In the meantime, we filed briefs before the Supreme Court that say we think that any discrimination against gays, lesbians, transgenders is subject to heightened scrutiny and we don’t think DOMA is constitutional.

So, I think the combination of what states are doing, what the courts are doing and the actions that we’re taking administratively all are how the process works…

NBC News: Aren’t you at all uncomfortable about different rules in different states? Some people make the argument that that’s what we saw during segregation.

Obama: Chuck, I think what you’re saying is the profound recognition on the part of the American people that gays and lesbians and transgender persons are our brothers, our sisters, our children, our cousins, our friends, our co-workers ā€” and they have to be treated like every other American, and I think that principle will win out. It’s not going to be perfectly smooth, and it turns out the president, and I’ve discovered since I’ve been in this office, can’t dictate precisely how the process works, but I think we’re moving … and I think that’s a good thing.

Wall Street Journal: …I wanted to follow up on one of your earlier answers on same-sex marriage. You said that it’s a positive step that some of these states including New York are moving towards that. Does that mean that you now personally do support same-sex marriage putting aside what individual states decide?

Obama: Iā€™m not going to make news on that today. Good try, though.

Journal: I know you said you didn’t want to say anything more on same-sex marriage, but what said before really led me to believe that that’s what you personally believe. …

Obama: Laura, I think this has been asked and answered. I’ll keep on giving you the same answer until I give you a different one. All right? And that won’t be today.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

U.S. Federal Courts

9th Circuit upholds lower court ruling that blocked anti-trans Ariz. law

Statute bans transgender girls from sports teams that correspond with gender identity

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday upheld a lower court’s decision that blocked enforcement of an Arizona law banning transgender girls from playing on public schools’ sports team that correspond with their gender identity.

Then-Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, in 2022 signed the law.

The Associated Press reported the parents of two trans girls challenged the law in a lawsuit they filed in U.S. District Court in Tucson, Ariz., in April 2023. U.S. District Judge Jennifer Zipps on July 20, 2023, blocked the law.

Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne, who was named as a defendant in the lawsuit, appealed the ruling to the 9th Circuit. Democratic Attorney General Kris Mayes is not defending the law.

A three-judge panel on the 9th Circuit unanimously upheld Zipps’s ruling.

“We are pleased with the 9th Circuitā€™s ruling today, which held that the Arizona law likely violates the Equal Protection Clause and recognizes that a studentā€™s transgender status is not an accurate proxy for athletic ability and competitive advantage,ā€ said Rachel Berg, a staff attorney for the National Center for Lesbian Rights, in a press release.

NCLR represents the two plaintiffs in the case.

Continue Reading

California

LGBTQ journalists convene in Los Angeles for largest-ever NLGJA conference

NLGJA hits Hollywood: Empowering diverse voices in media

Published

on

(Washington Blade photo by Joe Reberkenny)

This weekend, the heat wasn’t the only thing taking over Los Angeles. NLGJA: The Association of LGBTQ+ Journalists was hosting its convention in Hollywood. This weekend was slated to be the biggest and most attended conference NLGJA has ever seen.

The NLGJA conference is hosted annually in a different city, focusing on uplifting and supporting LGBTQ journalists who have often been overlooked in newsrooms across the U.S. This year it’s in Los Angeles at the Loews Hollywood Hotel, right off the famous Hollywood Boulevard. The conference has an extensive range of events including networking meetings, panel discussions with LGBTQ media giants and workshops, all designed to aid LGBTQ journalists.

The mission of NLGJA is to “advance fair and accurate coverage of LGBTQ+ communities and issues” and “promote diverse and inclusive workplaces.” NLGJA has worked toward this mission since 1990, when Leroy F. Aarons founded the association.

Los Angeles last hosted the conference in 2003, the year discrimination protections for sexual orientation and gender identity expression became state law. It was held at the Renaissance Hollywood Hotel that year and attendance included more than 500 journalists from around the nation.

The city has a vibrant gay scene ā€” West Hollywood (often referred to as WeHo) has more than 40 percent of residents identifying within the LGBTQ community, holds the record for the earliest lesbian publication in the U.S. with Vice Versa in 1947, and hosted the first Pride parade in the U.S. (alongside New York and Chicago.)

This year has a long lineup of convention speakers touching on multiple themes. The lineup includes actors Jesse Tyler Ferguson and Zachary Quinto, who will talk about their upcoming projects; CNN national news correspondent David Culver to discuss accurate social media reporting; Los Angeles Times reporter Tracy Brown to dissect pop culture reporting; and many more.

The conference talks cover a wide variety of topics, but all center around maximizing coverage of LGBTQ communities in traditional and new age media. Other key topics include how and why outlets need to diversify newsrooms as well as how to properly cover the ongoing and nuanced fight for transgender rights in America.

Besides professional talks, the conference offers LGBTQ journalists a way to strengthen their community, much of which is achieved outside the conference halls. One way the conference does this is by hosting a “night OUT” at a local gay bar where discussions of journalist-source relations, how to navigate being the only queer person in the newsroom, and what to say to allies when they begin to encroach on unfriendly rhetoric are just some of the topics that can be heard from attendees.

In addition to talks and community building, the conference is giving out awards to LGBTQ journalists who have made significant contributions to the coverage of LGBTQ issues in the past year. Awardees include popular social media journalist Erin Reed, the Texas Newsroom’s Lauren McGaughy, “Journalist of the Year” Steven Romo and many more.

This conference is crucial for the ongoing professional development of LGBTQ journalists, providing a unique opportunity to connect with peers, share experiences and gain insights from others within their community.

For more information, visit NLGJA’s website at www.nlgja.org.

Continue Reading

U.S. Supreme Court

164 members of Congress urge Supreme Court to protect trans rights

GRACE files separate brief in gender affirming care case

Published

on

U.S. Supreme Court (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

A group of 164 members of Congress filed an amicus brief on Tuesday urging the U.S. Supreme Court to defend transgender Americans’ access to medically necessary healthcare as the justices prepare to hear oral arguments this fall in U.S. v. Skrmetti.

Lawmakers who issued the 27-page brief include House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.) House Democratic Whip Katherine Clark (Mass.), House Democratic Caucus Chairman Pete Aguilar (Calif.),Ā U.S. Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), and Congressional Equality Caucus Chair U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.), along with the caucus’s 8 co-chairs and 25 vice-chairs. Ranking members of the powerful House Judiciary and House Ways and Means Committees, U.S. Reps. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) and Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.), were also among the signatories.

The case, among the most closely watched this term, will determine whether Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors, along with a similar law passed in Kentucky, violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

In their brief, the lawmakers urge the Supreme Court to treat with skepticism “legislation banning safe and effective therapies that comport with the standard of care” and to examine the role of “animosity towards transgender people” in states’ gender affirming care bans.

ā€œDecisions about healthcare belong to patients, their doctors, and their familiesā€”not politicians,ā€ Pocan said. ā€œThe law at issue in this case is motivated by an animus towards the trans community and is part of a cruel, coordinated attack on trans rights by anti-equality extremists. We strongly urge the Supreme Court to uphold the constitutionā€™s promise of equal protection under the law and strike down Tennesseeā€™s harmful ban.ā€

ā€œFor years, far-right Republicans have been leading constant, relentless, and escalating attacks on transgender Americans. Their age-old, discriminatory playbook now threatens access to lifesaving, gender-affirming care for more than 100,000 transgender and nonbinary children living in states with these bans if the Supreme Court uphold laws like Tennesseeā€™s at the heart ofĀ SkrmettiĀ fueled by ignorance and hate,” Markey said.

ā€œTransgender people deserve the same access to healthcare as everyone else,” said Nadler. “There is no constitutionally sound justification to strip from families with transgender children, and their doctors, the decision to seek medical care and give it to politicians sitting in the state capitol. I trust parents, not politicians, to decide what is best for their transgender children.ā€

Pallone warned that if Tennessee’s ban, S.B. 1, is “allowed to stand, it will establish a dangerous precedent that will open the floodgates to further discrimination against transgender Americans.ā€

ā€œUnending attacks from MAGA extremists across the nation are putting trans youth at risk with hateful laws to ban gender-affirming care,” said Merkley author of the Equality Act. “Letā€™s get politiciansā€”who have no expertise in making decisions for patientsā€”out of the exam room.Ā The Court must reject these divisive policies, and Congress must pass the Equality Act to fully realize a more equal and just union for all.ā€

Also filing an amicus brief on Tuesday was the Gender Research Advisory Council + Education (GRACE), a transgender-led nonprofit that wrote, in a press release, “SkrmettiĀ  is critically important to the transgender community because approximately 40% of trans youth live in the 25 states that have enacted such bans.”

The group argued laws like Tennessee’s S.B. 1 are cruel, discriminatory, and contradict “the position of every major medical association that such treatments are safe, effective and medically necessary for adolescents suffering from gender dysphoria.”

GRACE’s brief includes 28 families “who hope to share with the Court that they are responsible, committed parents from a variety of backgrounds who have successfully navigated their adolescentā€™s transition.”

ā€œThese parents sought medical expertise for their children with diligence regarding the best care available and input from experienced physicians and mental health professionals and they have seen firsthand the profound benefits of providing medically appropriate care to their transgender children,” said GRACE Board Member and brief co-author Sean Madden.

Left unchecked, this may start with the transgender community, but it certainly won’t end there,” added GRACE President Alaina Kupec. “Next it could be treatments for HIV or cancer.ā€

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular