Connect with us

Arts & Entertainment

Gay couple takes stage at Renaissance Festival

Marylanders relive 1544 England each weekend

Published

on

The year is 1544. The location is Revel Grove, a small village in the county of Oxfordshire, England. The Royal Court of King Henry VIII is paying a visit to this village as part of its annual summer progress. Attending on His Majesty is the Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Cranmer, and his partner, the diplomat Sir Ralph Sadler.

Wait a minute! If you don’t remember reading that in a history book, perhaps some clarification is needed. Revel Grove is a fictitious name given to the site at The Maryland Renaissance Festival. And while no history book mentioned a relationship between the Archbishop and Sir Ralph, the actors who portray those characters have been together for 17 years.

Steven Edward Kirkpatrick (Archbishop Cranmer), and Charles Boyington (Sir Ralph), currently live in Hyattsville but make the drive to 16th century England each weekend as part of the acting company of the Maryland Renaissance Festival.

Not surprisingly, theater is what drew the couple together. They met in Memphis, Tenn., while working at the Playhouse on the Square. Charles was directing the play, “Marvin’s Room,” and Steven was supposed to audition but someone had told him there was no role for him in the play.

“It worked out for the best since I would not have been open to dating him if I was also directing him at the time,” says Charles.

“Looking at pictures of those years, we look like mere kids,” muses Steven. “The amazing thing is that it doesn’t seem like that long.”

Both have been performing for more than 20 years but do not often act together.

“More often than not we do our own thing,” says Charles. “We were in a production of Jekyll and Hyde, which was written for us. I was Jekyll and Steven was Hyde.”

“We haven’t performed together in several years,” notes Steven, “so the festival has been fun. Once we did play the same role in the same show. There was a period back in Memphis when Charles somehow ended up being my unofficial understudy for several roles. He took over for me as Sebastian in The Tempest when I had to step in as Prospero. It’s amusing to see photos of us playing the same role and wearing the same costume, but I will say he always played the character very differently from me.”

While both feel a major benefit for a couple performing in the same show is the ability to carpool, is there ever a strain to being in the same production?

“Theater has always been a primary bond between us, so it is far more positive than a negative. If we don’t get a chance to perform regularly we both suffer, so this way we’re both getting an important need met,” says Steven.

“Most of the time it is great fun,” says Charles. “The only issue is I like to arrive early to rehearsals and performances and then stay later than necessary to hang out. Steven wants to arrive later and leave earlier. This is true in just about everything we do though.”

Actors can be sensitive regarding their work. Shelley Winters claimed her husband, Vittorio Gassman, once gave her a black eye when she confessed she preferred Olivier’s Hamlet to his.  As a couple, do they ever critique each other’s work?

“As the years have gone by, we have learned how to critique each other without tripping on toes,” laughs Steven.

Steven first performed at the Festival in 2002, and Charles in 2008. Steven was on a hiatus for a few seasons, so this is the first year they have performed together at the venue. As a gay couple, they have they found the Renaissance Festival a positive performing environment.

“It can appear different on the surface since there is an emphasis on machismo by some of the guys in the cast,” says Charles. “But most of that is just trying to play up the time period. Once you get to know these folks, they are perhaps the most accepting people on the face of the earth.  They come from all walks of life and have a ‘live and let live’ philosophy.”

Stephen agrees, “Because so many actors love this venue and are given a chance to return, there is definitely a sense of this being like a second family. I’ve always felt that I can truly be me in all of my many aspects and have complete acceptance in this venue. And I don’t always feel that way in certain sectors of the gay community! The cast and vendors are wonderful, so it’s been great.”

Steven and Charles will be performing at The Maryland Renaissance Festival weekends through Oct. 23.

 

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Photos

PHOTOS: The Bonnet Ball

Published

on

Sirene Noir Sidora Jackson dances at The Bonnet Ball at JR.'s Bar on Sunday, April 5. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

The Bonnet Ball was held at JR.’s Bar (1519 17th St., N.W.) on Sunday.

(Washington Blade photos and video by Michael Key)

Continue Reading

Books

Risking it all for love during World War II

New book follows story of Black, gay expat in Paris

Published

on

(Book cover image courtesy Viking)

‘The Remarkable Life of Reed Peggram’
By Ethelene Whitmire
c.2026, Viking
$30/308 pages

You couldn’t escape it.

When you fell in love, that was it: you were there for good. Leaving your amour’s side was unthinkable, turning away was impossible. You’d do anything for that person you loved – even, as in the new biography, “The Remarkable Life of Reed Peggram” by Ethelene Whitmire, you’d escape toward danger.

On Aug. 28, 1938, Reed Peggram boarded a ship from Hoboken, N.J., hoping to “become a proper gentleman” and fulfill his dreams. A prolific writer and Harvard scholar of comparative literature, he’d recently been awarded the Rosenwald Fellowship, which put him in the company of literary stars like Du Bois, Hurston, and Hughes.

Both Peggram’s mother and grandmother were then domestic workers, and they had big expectations for him. Reed himself was eager to study abroad, for professional and personal reasons; he was “determined to become a French professor and an accomplished linguist” and “He also hoped to find love.”

What better place to do it than in Paris?

Outgoing and confident, Peggram made friends easily and had no trouble moving “through the world of his white male peers.” Where he faltered was in his lack of funds. He relied on the kindness of his many friends – one of whom introduced Peggram to a “man who would become so pivotal in his life,” a Danish man named Arne.

Peggram and Arne had a lot in common, and they began to enmesh their lives and dreams of living in the United States. But there were complications: homosexuality was largely forbidden, World War II was in its early stages, and it quickly became apparent that it was dangerous to stay in Europe.

And yet, Peggram loved Arne. He refused to leave without him and so, while most visiting Black Americans fled the war in Europe, “Reed was trying to stay.”

There’s so much more to the story inside “The Remarkable Life of Reed Peggram,” so much to know about Reed himself. Problem is, it’s a long haul to get to the good stuff.

In her introduction, author Ethelene Whitmire explains how she came to this tale and yes, it needs telling but probably not with the staggering number of inconsequential details here. Peggram moved homes a lot, and many people were involved in keeping him in Europe. That alone can be overwhelming; add the fact that costs and other monetary issues are mentioned in what seems like nearly every page, and you may wonder if you’ll ever find the reason for the book’s subtitle.

It’s there, nearly halfway through the book, which is when the tale takes a tender, urgent turn — albeit one with determination, rashness, and a dash of faux nonchalance. Also, if you’re expecting an unhappily-ever-after because, after all, it’s a World War II tale, don’t assume anything.

Reading this book will take a certain amount of patience, so skip it if you don’t have that fortitude. If you’re OK with minuscule details and want a heart-pounder, though, “The Remarkable Life of Reed Peggram” might be a good escape.

The Blade may receive commissions from qualifying purchases made via this post.

Continue Reading

Theater

Iconic Eddie Izzard takes on 23 characters in ‘Hamlet’

Energized take on role offers accessible way to enjoy Shakespeare

Published

on

Eddie Izzard in ‘The Tragedy of Hamlet.’ (Photo by Carol Rosegg)

‘The Tragedy of Hamlet’
Through April 11
Shakespeare Theatre Company’s Klein Theatre
450 7th St., N.W.
Tickets start at $90
Shakespearetheatre.org

Eddie Izzard is an icon.  

Best known for her innovative standup and film roles, the famed British performer is also a queer activist who over the years has good-naturedly shared details from her decades long trans journey. What’s more, Izzard has remarkably run 43 marathons in 51 days for charity. 

And now, Izzard finds a towering new challenge with the worldwide tour of “The Tragedy of Hamlet” (at Shakespeare Theatre Company’s Klein Theatre through April 11), in which she plays 23 characters (Hamlet, King Claudius, Queen Gertrude, the ghost, etc.) in a solo performance running just over two hours. 

At a recent performance, Izzard, before slipping into character, appeared on the unadorned stage to say that though infused with comedy, “Hamlet” is definitely a tragedy, a story of a family and country both tearing themselves apart. She also warns that there’ll be a lot of breaking the fourth wall. After all, it didn’t exist in 1600 around the time when “Hamlet” was written.

The play unfolds in flurry of movement and scandal as the Danish prince begins to plot revenge after learning that his father, the old king was conspired against and murdered. 

While some of Izzard’s character shifts are shown only by a subtle change in stance or modulation of voice, others are more obviously displayed like court sycophant Polonius walking with a stiff leg and mimed cane, or his ill-fated daughter Ophelia trotting girlishly across the upstage platform.

Delivered downstage at the intimate Klein venue, Izzard’s Hamlet soliloquies are performed with striking clarity. The one actor play is adapted and edited by Mark Izzard (the star’s older brother) and directed by Selina Cadell who successfully fosters the visceral connection between the actor and the house. Directly addressing an audience is something Izzard does exceedingly well. You feel as if she’s looking at/speaking to only you. 

Cuts and choices are made that might not please traditionalists. The stabbing of eavesdropping Polonius might prove disappointingly underplayed to some. Whereas, the subsequent satisfying dual/death scene is long and precisely choreographed. Fear not, Izzard doesn’t flag a bit, not even when battling a cough (as was the case on the night of No Kings Day).

Not surprisingly, Izzard leans into the comedy. Her deliciously placed pauses, lines read ironically, and double takes, all gifts of comedy sharpened to perfection over a long career that kicked off as a street performer in the early eighties in London’s Covent Garden.

The play within a play scene finds Hamlet slyly rattling the conscience of King Claudius. As played by Izzard, it’s wickedly delightful and especially good. And the back and forth between the grave diggers done as a clever Cockney and his green assistant is a master class in how to play a Shakespearean clown.

Kitted out in a black peplum jacket over leather leggings and boots, Izzard gives gender fluid shades of contemporary diehard scenester and a Renaissance courtier. (Design and styling by Tom Piper and Libby DaCosta)

Attention has been paid to the blonde high ponytail, crimson lips and matching lacquered nails. The hands are important. Whether balled into fists or fingers fluttering, they’re in use, especially when playing Hamlet’s ex-friends Rosencrantz and Guildenstern (a clever surprise that can’t be spoiled).

Tom Piper’s set is wonderfully minimal. It’s an empty white walled space with three narrow windows that appear cut deeply into stone like those of a castle. These white flats serve as the ideal canvas for lighting designer Tyler Elich’s looming shadows, ghostly green light, and other unexpected flourishes of drama.

Izzard fills the stage. Her presence is huge, and her acting first-rate. At times, you forget it’s a one-person show.  

I’d like to say, prior knowledge of the Bard’s best tragedy isn’t necessary to enjoy this fast-paced production. Despite a halved runtime and obscure words replaced with modern equivalents (“tedious old git” Hamlet says of Polonius), familiarity with the play is helpful. 

With “The Tragedy of Hamlet,” Izzard secures a place among fellow queer Brits like Miriam Margolyes (“Dickens’ Women”), Sir Ian Mckellan (“Ian McKellen on Stage”), and more recently Andrew Scott (“Vanya”) in the solo players’ pantheon. 

Izzard’s energized take on Hamlet is terrific. The way her powerful public persona bleeds into the work without taking over is exciting, and a uniquely accessible way to enjoy Shakespeare. 

Continue Reading

Popular