Connect with us

Living

James Buchanan: America’s first gay president?

Buchanan was a lifelong bachelor, colleagues on the Hill viewed he and Alabama Senator William Rufus King as a couple

Published

on

This is the first in a series that will run throughout October in conjunction with our friends at the Philadelphia Gay News and partners around the nation. We hope that you treasure these little looks at where we’ve come, as they help us reflect and prepare for where we are going.

By Timothy Cwiek

National Gay History Project

More than 150 years before America elected its first black president, Barack Obama, it most likely had its first gay president, James Buchanan (1791-1868).

Buchanan, a Democrat from Lancaster County, Pa., was the 15th president of the United States, and a lifelong bachelor. He served as president from 1857-61, tumultuous years leading up to the Civil War.

Historian James W. Loewen has done extensive research into Buchanan’s personal life, and he’s convinced Buchanan was gay.

Loewen is the author of the acclaimed book “Lies Across America,” which examines how historical sites inaccurately portray figures and events in America’s past.

“I’m sure that Buchanan was gay,” Loewen said. “There is clear evidence that he was gay. And since I haven’t seen any evidence that he was heterosexual, I don’t believe he was bisexual.”

According to Loewen, Buchanan shared a residence with William Rufus King, a Democratic senator from Alabama, for several years in Washington, D.C.

Loewen said contemporary records indicate the two men were inseparable, and wags would refer to them as “the Siamese twins.”

Loewen also said Buchanan was “fairly open” about his relationship with King, causing some colleagues to view the men as a couple.

For example, Aaron Brown, a prominent Democrat, writing to Mrs. James K. Polk, referred to King as Buchanan’s “better half,” “his wife” and “Aunt Fancy … rigged out in her best clothes.”

In 1844, when King was appointed minister to France, he wrote Buchanan, “I am selfish enough to hope you will not be able to procure an associate who will cause you to feel no regret at our separation.”

Loewen also said a letter Buchanan wrote to a friend after King went to France shows the depth of his feeling for King.

“I am now solitary and alone, having no companion in the house with me,” Buchanan wrote. “I have gone a wooing to several gentlemen, but have not succeeded with any one of them. I feel that it is not good for man to be alone; and should not be astonished to find myself married to some old maid who can nurse me when I am sick provide good dinners for me when I am well, and not expect from me any very ardent or romantic affection.”

Loewen said their relationship — though interrupted due to foreign-service obligations — ended only with King’s death in 1853.

In the late 1990s, Loewen visited Wheatland, the mansion in Lancaster, Pa., where Buchanan spent his later years.

Loewen said he asked a staffer at Wheatland if Buchanan was gay, and the reply was: “He most definitely was not.”

Loewen said the staffer pointed to a portrait of Ann Coleman, the daughter of a wealthy iron maker, whom Buchanan was engaged to briefly 1819 — shortly before she committed suicide.

However, Loewen scoffed at the staffer’s suggestion that the brief engagement to Coleman proved Buchanan was heterosexual.

Loewen said Buchanan showed little interest in Coleman, appeared more interested in her fortune, and possibly contributed to her suicide due to his emotional detachment.

Patrick Clarke, the director of Wheatland, said the staff now takes a neutral stance on Buchanan’s sexual or affectional preference.

“There’s no solid proof that Buchanan was heterosexual, nor is there solid proof that he was homosexual,” Clarke said. “If we ever come up with a smoking gun that proves it one way or the other, I would definitely encourage our staff to share it with the public.”

But, he said Ann Coleman’s portrait no longer is displayed at Wheatland.

The tours focus mainly on the mansion’s décor and activities that took place there during the later years of Buchanan’s life, he added.

Wheatland also has about 45 volunteer tour guides, and to Clarke’s knowledge, none of the guides is openly gay.

“The volunteer guides who we train to share the history of James Buchanan’s life and times are directed to take a neutral stance regarding [his] sexual preference,” Clarke said.

But Clarke said he wouldn’t object if a volunteer offered a personal opinion that Buchanan was gay, if asked by a visitor.

“When you have 50 minutes to take people through a nine-room house, there’s only so much you can discuss,” Clarke said. “But if the question is raised, the guide may express a personal opinion.”

Loewen said many historians rate Buchanan as one of the worst U.S. presidents. Buchanan was part of the pro-slavery wing of the Democratic Party, and corruption plagued his administration.

But Loewen said those flaws shouldn’t discourage members of the LGBT community from acknowledging Buchanan’s status as a gay man.

“Lots of gay people have been exemplary,” he said. “Let’s look at Walt Whitman. For my money, he’s the best poet in the history of the country. But we also have to acknowledge the failures. If we only admit that really great people are gay, what kind of history is that? And how is that believable? It’s ridiculous. We have to tell it like it was.”

As a heterosexual male, Loewen added, he has no hidden agenda in outing Buchanan.

“I’m not gay,” Loewen said. “I don’t run around trying to find gay folks or black folks underneath every rock. But I’m not going to ignore clear evidence.”

Timothy Cwiek holds a bachelor of art degree in U.S. history from West Chester University. He has written for Philadelphia Gay News since the late 1970s and written freelance articles for numerous publications on topics such as the Lincoln assassination, the Kennedy family, the shootings at Kent State University, first ladies and the macrobiotic movement in America.

Introduction to the National Gay History Project:

Historians take note. This year’s National Gay History Project is a shout out to say that the LGBT community will no longer allow insensitivity, intentional or not, to downplay the contributions LGBT people have made to this country. To put it simply, this year’s project is definitive. Without people who were LGBT or LGBT allies, there would be no United States of America. We helped create this nation and we helped keep it together through the Civil War. And indeed, the Founding Fathers not only had us in mind when creating this country, they welcomed and recruited us in their efforts.

Welcome to “We Are America.”

Mark Segal

coordinator

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Advice

My partner won’t come out to her parents

How to cope when you love someone who’s closeted

Published

on

Don’t judge too harshly when a partner refuses to come out to parents. (Photo by Wavebreak Media/Bigstock)

Dear Michael:

I’m having a terrible communication problem with my girlfriend. She just isn’t hearing me on some issues that mean a lot.

Nicki doesn’t get why it’s important for me that we be out to her parents as a couple. I’ve explained my position over and over. I’m not willing to hide or pretend, and doing so makes things way more complicated down the road, if we stay together. Eventually we’d have to explain our lies. It’s crazy to imagine hiding our marriage, or hiding children. More than crazy!

How can you be believable about anything if you aren’t honest about who you are and the nature of your relationship?

Nicki’s whole response boils down to her being afraid that her parents will reject her (they’re deeply religious, conservative). Me trying to explain to her that you can’t let fear run your life just doesn’t penetrate her brain.

As a result I haven’t met her parents yet, and our relationship is a lot more tentative than I would like it to be at this point.

Besides this “biggie,” there is one other issue that she just doesn’t get, no matter how much I explain my position: She makes fun of me a lot — especially when we’re out with friends. About all sorts of things. How I dress (too stereotypically lesbian in her view); my interests (same criticism); my supposed inability to cook; my bad driving; my loving my dog too much. And more.

Nicki either says she’s not making fun of me, or says that she’s just kidding around and I am too serious. The more I ask her to stop, the more she tells me to “lighten up.” She just isn’t hearing me.

Aside from communication issues around these big topics, we have an otherwise great relationship that I would like to last. However, this stuff isn’t acceptable.

What more can I do to communicate more clearly in a way that she will hear me?

Michael replies:

It sounds like you’re both making your points loud and clear. You criticize Nicki, and Nicki criticizes you.

Communication means that you say what you want to say to your partner, and you listen when she wants to share something.  It does not mean that you get your partner to agree with you or behave as you want her to.

Even if you think that Nicki’s not being out to her parents is crazy, she doesn’t have to come out to them.  

Is Nicki open to the idea of eventually coming out to her parents? Mustering the courage to do so can be a slow process. If Nicki would like to work on this, and you are willing to wait, then stay in the relationship and work on being patient and accepting. But if this is a deal breaker issue now, Nicki is not for you.

While you can continue to try to change Nicki, this tactic doesn’t seem to be getting you anywhere, except annoyed. You have a lot of power over your own behavior, but little power over how your partner behaves. In other words, you get to be with the person you are with; not a hypothetical “improved” version that better suits you.

With regard to the teasing issue: I believe that if someone you care about tells you that you are hurting them, it’s a good idea to listen. I don’t get why Nicki wants to keep behaving toward you in ways that you find painful. Could it be that all of this is linked?

Perhaps Nicki is hurt or annoyed or angry that you won’t accept her not being out to her parents; and is getting back at you for your ongoing pestering by torturing you with criticisms and insults. Or, perhaps your hurt, annoyance, and anger over Nicki’s ongoing teasing is leading you to retaliate by continually criticizing her closeted status.

Think of your relationship as a system: When one part of a system changes, it impacts the entire system. If either one of you changes your behavior for the better, you will likely have a positive impact on your relationship. Do you want to make the first move, and see what happens?

You might also begin an ongoing discussion with Nicki about the benefits of being respectful toward each other, listening to each other, striving to understand each other’s points of view, and tolerating that you sometimes see both minor and important issues differently.

But only start that discussion if it makes sense to you that having a decent relationship depends on your continually striving to do these things.

Michael Radkowsky, Psy.D. is a licensed psychologist who works with couples and individuals in D.C. He can be found online at michaelradkowsky.com. All identifying information has been changed for reasons of confidentiality. Have a question? Send it to [email protected].

Continue Reading

Real Estate

Navigating the shift: Mid-term rentals in D.C.’s short-term market

Increase in remote work leads to big changes

Published

on

(Photo by ilixe48/Bigstock)

The short-term rental landscape in Washington, D.C., has undergone significant transformation in recent years, driven by the dual market shocks of a pandemic and changing regulations. In addition, consumer preferences have been evolving. 

At the forefront of this shift is Charlotte Perry, owner of LUXbnb, who has been in this business for 14 years. Her experience and adaptability have helped her not only to survive, but also to thrive in the furnished rental market. I sat down with Charlotte to discuss her insights on mid-term rentals, the impact of recent regulations, and her strategies for success.

Scott: Charlotte, thank you for joining me in this discussion. You’ve been in the short-term rental business for over a decade. How have you seen the landscape change in recent years, particularly with the implementation of new regulations?

Charlotte Perry:  Yes, the market has definitely evolved, especially with the pandemic and restrictions on short-term rentals. I used to have greater than 80% of my revenue coming from Airbnb and VRBO, but in recent years, both platforms now account for roughly 25% of my rental revenue.

The shift has been dramatic, especially with the rise of mid-term rentals.

Scott: How did the pandemic impact your business?

Charlotte: The pandemic was tough, I lost 35% of my managed portfolio. All were one-bedroom units in multi-unit buildings. Travel came to a halt, and the few people moving around at that time were not willing to share common areas like lobbies and stairways. But the return of U.S. Foreign Service personnel from our embassies to Washington helped stabilize occupancy. The pandemic also forced me to reevaluate all aspects of the business and become lean and efficient. Despite losing those accounts, my revenue declined marginally in 2020 and then in 2021 and 2022 actually surpassed pre-pandemic results. 

Scott: That’s quite a recovery. The short-term rental regulations that went into effect in 2022 must have added another layer of complexity. How have you navigated those changes? 

Charlotte: The regulations that were passed in October 2018 and enforced in January 2022 were a significant market shock. The new rules require short-term rental properties to be licensed and only owner-occupied primary residences qualify. This reduced my short-term rental inventory by 75%. More critically, it also reduced the total available short-term rental inventory in D.C. across VRBO and Airbnb, the two main booking platforms. I focused right away on growing my mid-term and long-term rentals in response. The rapid shift in how people travel, along with remote work trends fueled by the pandemic, helped me in ramping up quickly.

Scott: Speaking of mid-term rentals, how do you define that market, and why do you think it’s growing?

Charlotte: Mid-term rentals are stays between one and 12 months, and they’ve grown in popularity due to the flexibility that remote work offers. People can now work from anywhere, and many are choosing to spend a few months in different cities to try out new lifestyles. This demand has been further fueled by a parallel trend in vacations. I see retirees coming to D.C. for a month rather than a week.  

Demand for multi-month rentals also comes from the fact that we are the nation’s capital so we have many different renters cycling through: federal government personnel, politicians, students on government internships, government contractors, our foreign service and military. In addition to our federal government, D.C. has a strong network of museums, medical centers, universities, NGOs, and international organizations, all of which bring in staff for several months at a time.

Scott: It sounds like adapting to this trend has been key to your success. What have you done to meet the needs of mid-term renters?

Charlotte: My main shifts have been focusing on the needs of longer stays, i.e, a separate workspace, a more complete kitchen set-up, clothing storage, improving appeal, and listening and responding to changing customer needs. Location will always be important, however the set-up and appeal of the property are equally important. I want my guests to feel comfortable and at home the moment they arrive.

Scott: How do you approach pricing, given the changes in demand and market conditions?

Charlotte: I use sophisticated software to analyze market demand and adjust the rental rates. After 14 years in business, I know the cyclical demands for rentals in  D.C.. I raise prices for last-minute bookings or high-demand periods like holidays and events. At other times, I may start with lower prices to build up occupancy, then gradually increase the rates as the property gains more visibility. It’s about being flexible and responding to the market.

Scott: What about the new regulations—how have they impacted your business?

Charlotte: The new regulations did significantly impact my inventory, as I mentioned earlier. But the mid-term rental demand has been strong. In fact, business has been growing steadily since 2020. People warned me that my business would collapse, but it’s been quite the opposite. I’ve adapted, and LUXbnb is thriving.

Scott: What other opportunities have you found in the current market?

Charlotte: I work with Realtors, because a temporary turn-key rental is often needed in the buying and selling process. When relocating to D.C. buyers appreciate a soft landing in a turn-key rental. It gives them time to explore neighborhoods and schools and look for the perfect home. Likewise, sellers too appreciate the flexibility of a turn-key temporary rental while they decide their next move. Another major opportunity has been the demand from homeowners who are renovating and need to vacate during construction.

Scott: You’ve also diversified your marketing platforms. Can you speak to that for our readers?

Charlotte: Yes, the first thing I did was make changes to my own website to ensure visitors knew LUXbnb handled furnished rentals for any length of stay, from 3 nights to 3 years. Additionally, while Airbnb and VRBO are important, I’ve found success using platforms for mid- and long-term rentals along with niche platforms like Furnished Finders and Sabbatical Homes. Depending on the property and its location, I’ll choose the platforms that best match my and my owners’ goals for the property, and the renters we are looking for. This has allowed me to reach a wider pool of potential renters and not rely on any one platform.

Scott: Compliance with local regulations is critical in this market. How do you manage that aspect?

Charlotte: Compliance is key, and I always make sure my properties are fully licensed with the various licenses that D.C. issues (short-term rental, vacation rental, single-family rental). Sometimes a property needs all three. Additionally, for all rental durations under 91 nights, we collect the 15.95% sales and use tax, and remit that monthly to the Office of Tax and Revenue. It’s an essential part of doing business here, and staying compliant keeps everything running smoothly.

Scott: You’ve also explored opportunities outside of  D.C. How has that experience been?

Charlotte: Yes, we have the infrastructure in place to expand in two directions. The first is Maryland, Virginia, and Delaware vacation homes. I am seeing good consistent demand with our pilot, so we plan to ramp this up. 

Scott: It sounds like you’ve built a resilient and adaptable business. Do you have any final thoughts on the future of the short-term and mid-term rental markets?

Charlotte: The rental landscape is always changing, but we know the mid-term rental market will continue to grow. We are riding the wave of market changes driven by societal shifts in how people work and travel. The demand for flexible, high-quality housing is only increasing. For now, I’m focused on providing the best possible experience for my renters and staying ahead of the market trends.

Scott: Charlotte, thank you so much for sharing your insights. Your expertise and adaptability have clearly positioned LUXbnb as a leader in this space. 

Charlotte: Thank you, Scott, it’s been a pleasure partnering with Columbia Property Management. I’m excited about the opportunities ahead for both of our businesses, furnished rentals at LUXbnb and unfurnished property management through CPM.

As Charlotte’s experience with LUXbnb shows, the mid-term rental market in Washington, D.C., offers incredible opportunities for landlords who can navigate the new regulatory landscape. With the right strategies and partnerships, there’s plenty of room for success in this growing segment.

For more information about short to mid-term rentals, LUXbnb and Charlotte Perry, please visit luxbnb.com.


Scott Bloom is owner and senior property manager of Columbia Property Management. For more information and resources, visit ColumbiaPM.com.

Continue Reading

Autos

All charged up about EVs

Style, comfort, and technology galore

Published

on

From left, the Subaru Solterra, the Cadillac Lyriq, and the BMW iX.

Electric vehicles are charging ahead, despite recent saber rattling by politicians. After testing a bevy of EVs, the rides below certainly got my motor running. 

BMW iX (midsize SUV)

Price: $89,000-$113,000

Range: 288 to 324 miles

0 to 60 mph: 4.0 seconds

Cargo space: 35.5 cu. ft.

WHAT’S TO LIKE: Fun styling. Funky steering wheel. Floating center console. Oh, and cameras, radar and other sensors hidden in the grille, which has a special coating to magically erase minor scratches and dings. I was blown away when the BMW iX debuted in 2022. Three years later, the thrill is still there. Acceleration, cornering and braking? All breathtaking, in both the base model xDrive50 and high-test M60. Gizmos now include eye-tracking software so you can change lanes simply by glancing toward one of the side-view mirrors. An expansive digital monitor above the dash holds both a 14.9-inch infotainment display and 12.3-inch digital gauge cluster. And many materials — such as carpet and floor mats — are recycled. A truly eclectic electric? You bet.

CADILLAC LYRIQ (midsize SUV)

Price: $60,000-$70,000

Range: 314 miles

0 to 60 mph: 5.7 seconds

Cargo space: 28.0 cu. ft.

WHAT’S TO LIKE: If a BMW iX is cutting edge (say, like “Transformers One”), then a Cadillac Lyriq is old-school cool (a la “Deadpool & Wolverine”). Handsome design. Familiar feel. Quiet cabin. Handling is more affable than athletic. Ditto the acceleration. The land-yacht aura extends to the seats, which are cushy instead of taut. For older — er, more mature — drivers, this is a plus. But there’s plenty of tech here, too: 33-inch digital display, tri-zone climate control, hands-free driving, wireless charging pad and so on. When first sliding behind the wheel, I wished the navigation/infotainment interface was more intuitive. But a stellar voice-assistant system more than made up for it.

KIA EV 9 (large SUV) 

Price: $57,000-$76,000

Range: 230 to 304 miles

0 to 60 mph: 4.9 seconds

Cargo space: 20.2 cu. ft.

WHAT’S TO LIKE: A cyborg in the city? With Robocop styling and Tron-like finesse, the Kia EV9 looks and feels out of this world. Three-row seating, with scads of passenger room. Lowering all the rear seats expands cargo capacity to fit more than 15 suitcases. And unlike most EVs, the EV9 can tow up to 5,000 pounds. Yet the hulky hauler behaves like a nimble ninja, easily darting in and out of traffic. At almost 6,000 pounds, the King Kong Kia is three tons of fun —literally. There are so many creature comforts — self-leveling suspension, ambient lighting, massage seats, rear-window shades, 14-speaker Meridian audio—you would think this was a Range Rover. 

MERCEDES EQE (midsize SUV)

Price: $80,000-$110,000

Range: 265 to 307 miles

0 to 60 mph: 5.6 seconds

Cargo space: 14.0 cu. ft.

WHAT’S TO LIKE: Luxury is as luxury does and Mercedes does luxury well. With a dashing design, silken ride and hushed interior, the EQE sets a high bar. Four trim levels, including the awe-inspiring AMG with 617 horsepower. Everything is state-of-the-art: powertrains, suspension, safety, multipixel headlights, cabin air purifier, Burmeister stereo and more. An augmented-reality nav system monitors traffic, weather and such, then conveys this info into graphic overlays on the head-up display. And the standard faux leather seats? They look and feel like the real thing. One downside: minimal cargo space. But then, there’s always a full-size EQS topping out at $180,000. 

NISSAN ARIYA (compact SUV)

Price: $40,000-$56,000

Range: 205 to 289 miles

0 to 60 mph: 7.5 seconds

Cargo space: 22.8 cu. ft.

WHAT’S TO LIKE: Cute, compact, comfy. It’s easy to like a Nissan Ariya, with its cheeky exterior, composed handling and low price. Choice of two battery packs, as well as two-wheel or all-wheel drive. Base-model pricing is hard to beat, but beware the tradeoffs: pokey acceleration and reduced range. Luckily, the other trim levels offer more oomph. All Ariyas come loaded: LED headlights, heated steering wheel, heated front/rear seats, nav system, head-up display and lots of safety gear. Notable options: panoramic sunroof, hands-free liftgate, limited hands-free cruise control, automated parking and illuminated kick plates. Overall, I found the ride smooth, though not sporty. Racing mavens may want to look elsewhere, but it’ll cost you. 

SUBARU SOLTERRA (compact SUV)

Price: $40,000-$47,000

Range: 222 to 227 miles

0 to 60 mph: 6.1 seconds

Cargo space: 27.7 cu. ft.

WHAT’S TO LIKE: The first EV from Subaru — the Solterra — boasts origami-like flair. Built in tandem with the quirkily named Toyota bZ4X, both SUVs fall a bit short in battery range —less than 230 miles. But the Solterra comes standard with all-wheel drive, roof rails and front cross-traffic alert. Plus, it now has faster charging times, as well as hands-free driving at up to 25 mph and an automatic lane-changing system used in conjunction with the turn signal. While not a true off-roader, this “Subie” has above-average ground clearance — 8.3 inches — to better tackle snow and potholes. And I liked all the storage compartments, along with dual-level cargo floor to fit extra luggage. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular