Connect with us

Financial

Practical prices

Realistic expectations yield real results on the real estate front lines

Published

on

Last weekend I toured two Capitol Hill homes with clients from out of town. The first was priced at $1.1 million and had been renovated nicely, but had no parking and only one full bathroom upstairs. It had an unfinished basement, and it also didn’t have a single closet in the whole house.

The second house literally backed up to the first: they shared the same alley for rear access. It needed a little work, but it had parking, a master bathroom en-suite, and a second bathroom upstairs, a separate apartment downstairs, plus almost all the original mouldings and hardware, including three pocket doors, for $949,000.

I knew the first home was overpriced without even seeing the second and when the agent asked my opinion, I was frank about my feelings. She tried to justify the price using other smaller, more expensive properties that, not suprisingly, were also not yet sold. She also mentioned that the current owners had put a lot of money in the renovation. Neither of these are justification for my buyers to overpay for the home, especially when there is another home with a better layout in virtually the same location for $150,000 less. At last, she conceded that the list price was set by the sellers and it “is what it is.”

I understand the thought process those sellers must have went through — I’ve been a seller many times myself and I see other sellers doing the same thing all the time. Seemingly sound strategies take hold in their heads, but end up ultimately wasting a lot of time and costing them emotionally and financially too. Some of these thoughts are:

“I’ll just price it higher than it ought to be listed, because you never know if someone will come in and really like it.”

“I put so much in the renovation that I couldn’t imagine taking a hit.”

“I won’t take a penny less than what I bought it for in the first place” or better yet: “I won’t take a penny more than what I bought it for plus what it will cost me to sell it.”

“I’ll price it higher so I can give myself some room to negotiate.”

These “strategies” are all invalid. A home should be listed at its market value, perhaps just a hair more, in order to sell. And the truth is, most homes are usually pretty easy to value. Even in D.C., where homes can vary in size, condition, layout and finish level in infinite ways on just one block, these variations can all be accounted for and used to adjust the estimate to find a valid range of possible sale prices. A good agent will perform almost the same research procedure that an appraiser would, with a little more leeway to adjust for their own hunches based on their market experience. This research involves searching past sales, using a price-per-square-foot as a basis, adjusting based on differences in size, finish, amenities and other considerations, and also comparing the home to others currently being marketed.

Once a range of values is found, I usually arrive at an average value for the suggested listing price. Of course, if the home has certain problems with it (poor view, awkward layout, iffy location, etc.), it will be priced toward the cheaper end of the price spectrum. A home with all the bells and whistles, no real problems and all the latest improvements would be at the top of the spectrum.

My suggested listing price is not necessarily the price we take to the marketplace, however. Sellers must buy into my research and understand the thought process so they can actually choose the listing price themselves. This is the point where the reality of the marketplace meets the fantasy of some seller’s expectations, for a bloody fight to the death. The thoughts I identified above rear up and challenge the cold, quiet numbers on the page that show the value without much emotion at all. Sellers dream of a fantasy buyer with so much money they don’t have to worry about overpaying. They wring their hands and fear their own self-deprecation for having bought an investment that may have lost some value. They think they can plan each step in a high-stakes dance with buyers to haggle to a higher sale value by shooting for the moon with the asking price.

In the end, no matter what the seller decides, reality will win.

If sellers let their fantasies and fears set the strategy, the listing will sit on the market for months, maybe even years. Agents will waste their time, resources and sometimes their reputations trying to sell a lousy deal and never collecting a commission. And worst of all, if the home ever does sell, it will undoubtedly sell for less than its true value because of the daily drop in value from the stigma of ever-increasing days on market.

If, however, the cold, hard truth of the value of their home sets in, sellers generally will sell quickly, with better terms, and sometimes even have competing offers.

So, to the seller of that million dollar mistake, look clearly in the mirror and see the reality that your home needs to have more bathrooms, a closet or two, a finished basement and parking before you can even think of listing higher than your neighbor’s, renovation or not. And to the other seller, kudos for not using an active comparable (overpriced) property as a basis for your own list price. But, you haven’t sold yet either, so it could be that your price was a little aggressive too.

To everyone else out there thinking of selling: whether you may sell for a profit or for a loss, you’ll only sell for the home’s actual value at the end of the day. A good agent will identify the value and any easy ways to increase it and market it to feature all its good qualities. But ultimately, it’s the seller who must understand the realities of the market and choose the listing price rationally without giving way to fears or fantasy.

David Bediz is a principal of the Dwight & David Group at Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage. He is also on the Board of Directors for GCAAR, the Greater Capital Area Association of Realtors. He can be reached at 202-352-8456 or through dwightanddavid.com.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Real Estate

‘Culture eats strategy for breakfast’

Real estate agents must adapt, learn how to manage from within

Published

on

A real estate agent is contractually bound to act on their client’s behalf. (Photo by Andy Dean Photography/Bigstock)

“Culture Eats Strategy for Breakfast” was a phrase often repeated in many of my management courses from the University of Illinois. The concept was discussed at length – how the best laid plans can sometimes be supported or derailed by the culture of the people involved in whichever project to be implemented. Whether it be a project to implement new software, roll out a new product or service, or just reaching a sales target, the way the team involved works together can indeed affect the outcome.  

Perhaps this is just another way to say, “teamwork makes the dream work!” Most teams usually have someone who is designated as a leader. The leader can try to lead through authority and control or can alternatively try to lead through influence and encouraging a more collective framework for solving problems.  

Why does this matter when picking the right real estate agent or team to work with? Besides having a job as a salesperson for the brokerage, the real estate agent is contractually bound to act on their client’s behalf. The buyer broker agreement is in place so that the agent and the client can work together as a team in communications regarding offer strategy, during negotiations, implementing marketing plans, as well as selecting which renovations or upgrades to choose before selling a property.  After the property goes under contract, the job isn’t “done”.  There is still work to do.  

At this point, the agents then turn into a project manager of sorts – coordinating communications between the lending team, the title attorneys, the other client’s agents, any governmental agencies that could be involved in down payment assistance or helping to clear a property for a sale, and often times groups like a condo board, a home inspector, or contractors when arranging repairs and estimates before a final walk through. 

In short, the agent takes on somewhat of a “leadership role” in the transaction and ensures that all the ducks stay in a row until the project is complete.  That agent will hopefully be very fluid and forthcoming with their information, copying the required parties on all communications and creating a “paper trail” of who said what or didn’t offer to fix A, B, or C, so that all the minutiae of the contract can be addressed and fulfilled before the settlement date.  The agent often must wear many hats and quickly learn the communication styles of an entire new set of people in a short period.  One person may not return calls for a week after being contacted.  Another person may go on vacation at the beginning of the process and not return emails for two weeks.  Another person may wish to have daily updates of the progress of the process. 

In this way – an agent quickly learns in each transaction that “culture can eat strategy for breakfast.” Because the agent must adapt to a wide variety of communication styles, learn how to “manage from within”, build support for closing the project by the due date, and somehow keep all the interested parties invested, engaged, and responsive.  

Who you work with matters when picking the right person to represent you in your next transaction – so, just remember that “teamwork makes the dream work!”


Joseph Hudson is a referral agent with RLAH. Reach him at 703-587-0597 or [email protected].

Continue Reading

Real Estate

Does Pride decor resemble Trump’s design aesthetic?

Glitter, gold, and rejecting the idea that a home should be understated

Published

on

Trump’s White House decor features an astonishing amount of tacky gold leaf. (White House photo public domain)

Interior design is often a balancing act between taste, personality, and restraint. Sometimes, however, restraint leaves the building entirely. Such is the case when the colorful exuberance of gay Pride-inspired decorating collides with the famously excessive decorating style associated with the current occupant of the White House. The result can be a fascinating study in maximalism, spectacle, and unapologetic visual overload.

Donald Trump’s personal decorating style has long been a subject of debate among designers and critics. Admirers see luxury and grandeur. Critics see something else: a dizzying display of gold leaf, marble, mirrors, crystal, and oversized furnishings that often crosses the line from elegant into what many designers would call tacky. More is rarely enough. If one chandelier sparkles, three are better. If a room has gold accents, why not make every available surface gold? (See Oval Office and ballroom rendition for details.)

In many ways, this excess shares common ground with certain Pride celebrations. Pride has never been about blending into the background. It celebrates visibility, self-expression, individuality, and joy. Rainbow colors, dramatic costumes, glitter, flamboyant artwork, and bold statements have long been part of Pride culture. Yet there is an important difference. Pride’s extravagance is often playful, self-aware, and rooted in personal expression, while Trump’s aesthetic has frequently been criticized for equating luxury with sheer quantity and visual intensity.

Combining these influences creates an interior that could best be described as “glamorous chaos.”

Imagine entering a living room in which gold-trimmed mirrors stretch from floor to ceiling. Crystal chandeliers hang above a bright rainbow velvet sectional. Marble floors gleam beneath metallic furniture that appears determined to reflect every available light source. Pride flags become framed artwork surrounded by ornate gold moldings. A room designed this way doesn’t whisper. It shouts.

Color is central to the concept. Pride-inspired interiors often embrace the full spectrum of colors. Trump’s style, meanwhile, traditionally favors cream, gold, black, and glossy finishes. Combining them means introducing vivid jewel tones against a backdrop of faux-palatial luxury. Emerald green chairs, ruby-red draperies, sapphire-blue accent walls, and gold-trimmed furniture can coexist in a way that feels deliberately theatrical.

The key word is theatrical.

Many professional designers spend years learning how to create visual balance. A Pride-meets-Trump interior intentionally ignores many of those rules. Pattern competes with pattern. Shine competes with shine. Artwork competes with furniture. The eye rarely gets a chance to rest. For some homeowners, that sounds exhausting. For others, it sounds like the perfect party.

Lighting offers another opportunity to embrace excess. Crystal chandeliers, mirrored lamps, illuminated shelves, and color-changing LED lighting can transform a room into something resembling a cross between a luxury hotel lobby and a Pride festival. The goal is not subtlety. The goal is spectacle.

A dining room inspired by this combination might feature a massive glass table, gold dining chairs, rainbow floral arrangements, mirrored walls, and enough crystal accessories to keep a polishing cloth busy year-round. Critics would call it gaudy. Fans would call it fabulous.

Artwork becomes particularly important. Pride-themed pieces featuring LGBTQ+ history, activism, and culture can provide meaning beneath the decorative excess. Without these personal and cultural elements, the room risks becoming little more than a collection of expensive looking, but not necessarily expensive, objects. Pride design can work best when it reflects identity and community rather than simply displaying color for color’s sake.

While normally a haven for restful sleep, bedrooms can take a similar approach. Plush velvet fabrics, oversized tufted headboards, metallic and mirrored finishes, colorful accent lighting, and dramatic artwork create a space that feels more like a boutique hotel suite than a traditional bedroom. Again, the challenge is avoiding the temptation to add one more decorative element to an already crowded visual landscape.

What makes this design combination interesting is that both aesthetics reject the idea that a home should be understated. Both embrace visibility. Both invite attention. Both encourage occupants to take up space unapologetically. Yet where Pride design often celebrates authenticity and self-expression, Trump’s decorating style is frequently criticized for prioritizing conspicuous luxury over cohesion and refinement.

The result is an interior style that many people would consider delightfully outrageous and others would consider a decorating nightmare. Either way, nobody is likely to forget it.

In the end, a Pride-inspired interpretation of Donald Trump’s famously over-the-top aesthetic would be colorful, glittering, excessive, and impossible to ignore. It would break nearly every rule of minimalist design while embracing the philosophy that if something is worth doing, it is worth overdoing. Whether one sees that as fabulous or tacky may depend entirely on how much gold leaf and rainbow velvet one can tolerate in a single room.


Valerie M. Blake is a licensed associate broker in D.C., Maryland, and Virginia with RLAH @properties. Call or text her at 202-246-8602, email her at [email protected] or follow her on Facebook at TheRealst8ofAffairs.

Continue Reading

Real Estate

The advantages of owning your home

Looking beyond the financial perspective

Published

on

Renovating and customizing your home is just one advantage of homeownership. (Photo by Artazum LLC/Bigstock)

While one would hope it’s easy to calculate a break-even point for a home purchase – such as you could calculate for “how many widgets a month do I need to sell to break even?”  It’s not always easy when looking at the return on investment for a home purchase. Condo buildings can lose a view due to new construction next door. Weather patterns can expose deficiencies. Conversely, new dining and entertainment options in a neighborhood can cause home prices to skyrocket.  The addition of public transportation and employment options can make a neighborhood more desirable.  Or, as we have recently seen in the District of Columbia – an incoming presidential administration can severely affect the “vibe” of an entire city’s economy – for better or for worse.

Homeownership is not necessarily a get rich quick scheme.  Most homeowners find that staying in a house for at least 5-10 years – whether owner occupied or not, makes for a significant return on their investment.  An owner may not completely pay off a home in 10 years, but they might gain enough equity that they can receive quite a large check when they decide to sell or move.  And the old reasoning that “your apartment rental community does not cut you a sizeable check when moving out after 15 years.” still stands. Is homeownership for everyone?  Absolutely not. But many have reported other benefits besides purely financial gains. What are those benefits?

  • Feeling a sense of community.  – homeowners tend to take more pride in their buildings and neighborhoods, because they feel more invested and tend to want to protect their investment.  Neighborhood watch programs, getting to know elderly neighbors, forming building wide or cul-de-sac wide favorite TV show watch nights, super bowl parties, and other such communal and social ties lead to an overall sense of wellbeing and help to stabilize a nervous system in uncertain times.
  • Feng Shui?  Well, maybe there’s something to it. If you have been wanting to customize your own home but live in an apartment, there are many more restrictions on what you can do in a rental, than when you own your own home. Do you want new countertops?  Would you love to remove that popcorn ceiling?  Open up that kitchen?  Convert the back yard into a curated patio/cold plunge/hot tub time machine cookout/spring break adventure campsite of your wildest dreams? 
  • Forming longer lasting relationships  – sharing that CostCo membership with others on your floor, making a pan of lasagna and inviting the neighbors over for dinner, picking your neighbor’s brain for stock investment advice, asking your neighbor’s son to help you create a marketing plan for your new business, hosting the Friendsgiving you dreamed of – there are multitudes of reasons and ways that homeowners tend to feel a sense of community, sharing of resources, and realizing over time that “it takes a village.”  
  • Higher civic engagement – Studies have shown that homeowners tend to be more politically active in their districts, participate in local school boards, know the names of and how to contact their local representatives to affect change, etc.  Having a higher financial investment in and a commitment to stay in a neighborhood beyond just one or two years makes a big difference in who decides to show up at election time, especially for local elections. 

If you would like to know more about the research on homeownership, feel free to read the report from the National Association of Realtors here.


Joseph Hudson is a referral agent with RLAH. Reach him at 703-587-0597 or [email protected].

Continue Reading

Popular