November 29, 2012 at 12:10 pm EST | by Michael K. Lavers
Equality Maryland sets post-marriage agenda
Gay News, Washington Blade, Carrie Evans, Gay Maryland

Equality Maryland executive director Carrie Evans (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

Equality Maryland executive director Carrie Evans decided to stand along the side of the stage at the Baltimore Soundstage shortly after midnight on Nov. 7 as Gov. Martin O’Malley, gay state Sen. Rich Madaleno (D-Montgomery County) and others officially proclaimed the referendum on Maryland’s same-sex marriage law had passed. She said in a post-Election Day interview in D.C. it was the “best vantage point to look out at everyone” who had played a role in the long fight to secure marriage rights for same-sex couples in the state.

“I was crying like a baby,” Evans told the Washington Blade. “You’d see every person out there whose been a part of this in some way, shape or form. Everybody out there was crying and hugging and kissing. We will never experience this moment again, ever. And I just wanted to absorb it all.”

Election Day capped off a long and often tumultuous effort for Maryland’s same-sex marriage advocates that began in 1997 when three lawmakers introduced the first bill that would have allowed nuptials for gays and lesbians.

Equality Maryland and the American Civil Liberties Union in 2004 filed a lawsuit on behalf of Lisa Polyak and Gita Deane and eight other same-sex couples and a gay widow who sought the right to marry in the state. Baltimore Circuit Court Judge M. Brooke Murdock in 2006 found Maryland’s same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional. The Maryland Court of Appeals a year later upheld the prohibition on nuptials for gays and lesbians.

State lawmakers in 2011 narrowly defeated a same-sex marriage bill, but legislators approved it in February. O’Malley signed the law on March 1.

Evans said Equality Maryland, the Human Rights Campaign, the ACLU and other organizations that had fought for the same-sex marriage bill knew opponents would almost certainly collect enough signatures to force a referendum on the issue. The coalition that eventually became known as Marylanders for Marriage Equality formed before the legislative session ended in April.

“We’ve won in the Baltimore trial court, got excited but we knew we had to go to Court of Appeals, lost there,” Evans said. “[We] went to the legislature, couldn’t even really celebrate after that because you knew it was going to referendum. We had our little woohoo, but knowing this is going to referendum and being able to finally say ‘This is it, we’re done.’”

Evans, who took the helm of Equality Maryland last December, said her organization contributed more than $200,000 to Marylanders for Marriage Equality. The campaign ultimately raised nearly $6 million, but she said Equality Maryland’s contribution is remarkable considering her organization nearly closed its doors in the summer of 2011 in the wake of former executive director Morgan Meneses-Sheets’ termination.

“I’m so proud because 12 months ago Equality Maryland was pretty much broke and struggling,” said Evans. “Not only have we come out of that and had a good 2012 budget for the organization, we raised over $200,000 for the campaign, which is amazing.”

Mass., Iowa groups re-evaluate missions after marriage victories

Advocacy groups in other states have had to re-evaluate their agenda once same-sex couples won the right to marry.

Love Makes a Family of Connecticut, which spearheaded the passage of the state’s same-sex marriage law, disbanded in 2009 after then-Gov. Jodi Rell signed the measure. It took effect in Oct. 2010.

MassEquality also re-evaluated its mission after lawmakers in 2007 rejected a proposed referendum on amending the state constitution to ban nuptials for gays and lesbians. Massachusetts’ same-sex marriage law took effect in 2004.

“There were town halls that were done all over the state to ask people should MassEquality continue to exist, should we change the resources and the political power and the reputation, the expertise we had developed and leverage it to a multi-issue agenda that would basically lift up the other existing LGBT groups throughout the state,” Kara Suffredini, the group’s executive director, told the Blade. “The conclusion was yes: We have all the resources, we have all this political power. Yes, let’s use it to leverage other groups. And that’s what we’ve done since.”

Since the same-sex marriage debate ended in Massachusetts, MassEquality has worked with the Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition to advocate on behalf of a trans rights bill Gov. Deval Patrick signed into law last November. The group has also worked with the LGBT Aging Project to address health disparities among LGBT elders and the Boston Alliance of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Youth (BAGLY) to address homelessness among LGBT youth and bullying.

MassEquality has a seat on a commission state lawmakers created earlier this year to study the issue of homelessness among young people.

“Obviously marriage equality is an issue that garners a lot of attention and resources,” said Suffredini. “Once it’s done, there is plenty else to do and it was not difficult for us to figure out what else there was to do.”

Same-sex couples have been able to legally marry in the Hawkeye State since the Iowa Supreme Court in 2009 unanimously struck down the ban on nuptials for gays and lesbians. Voters in 2010 removed three of the justices who backed the ruling from the bench. Opponents failed to unseat a fourth on Nov. 6.

“Just because you have marriage, it doesn’t mean you stop being vigilant,” Donna Red Wing, executive director of One Iowa, told the Blade. “Here in Iowa if we don’t maintain a Democratic Senate majority at this time, we might see marriage on the ballot. And so we need to really make sure that we not only continue to hold back the forces working against us, but that we do the work that needs to be done across the state and that’s putting a face and a voice to what it means to be gay and lesbian or bi or trans in Iowa.”

One Iowa continues to fight to secure parental rights for same-sex couples — she noted the state’s Department of Public Health refused to allow a married lesbian who had a child with her wife to be recognized on their birth certificate. Red Wing pointed to another case in which officials “crudely whited-out” a lesbian mother’s name on her stillborn child’s birth certificate because she said the Department of Public Health would not recognize the two women as parents.

The group is also working with HIV/AIDS service providers to decriminalize those living with the virus and to address LGBT-specific health care disparities across Iowa.

“From birth to death we’re looking at the issues that impact Iowans — specifically LGBT Iowans – and how we can really strengthen and deepen what equality means for them,” Red Wing said.

Back in Maryland, Evans said Equality Maryland plans to work to make sure the same-sex marriage law is fully implemented once it takes effect on Jan. 1.

“We have to clean up a few regulations,” she said. “There may even be some litigation for clerks of court who aren’t complying. We still have some counties that aren’t offering spousal benefits to same-sex couples to same-sex spouses despite the Port v. Cowan court case [where the Court of Appeals in May unanimously ruled same-sex couples who legally married in another state can obtain divorces in Maryland] and attorney general.”

Equality Maryland continues to strategize with the Maryland Coalition for Trans Equality on how to advance a bill during the upcoming legislative session that would add gender identity and expression to the state’s anti-discrimination law. The organization also hopes to work with the NAACP and Revs. Delman Coates of Mt. Ennon Baptist Church in Prince George’s County and Donté Hickman of Southern Baptist Church in Baltimore and other groups to address health disparities and reduce HIV/AIDS rates among disproportionately affected populations in the state.

Evans further stressed she hopes to continue Equality Maryland’s work on immigration-related issues that began in August when it and CASA de Maryland announced a campaign to build additional support for the same-sex marriage and a law that provides in-state tuition to undocumented immigrants — voters on Nov. 6 approved the Maryland Dream Act by a 59-41 percent margin.

Equality Maryland also plans to work with the Maryland State Department of Education to ensure the state’s anti-bullying regulations are properly implemented.

“We’re going to start really focusing on that, making sure the way students are treated in Montgomery County is the way they’re treated in Garrett County and the way they’re treated in Cecil [County],” Evans said.

Michael K. Lavers is the international news editor of the Washington Blade. Follow Michael

  • HI Carrie sorry I didnt stay at soundstage, left half an hour too early. Wer’e going to get together after Dec 1 and I’m one of your bigger doners, was on the board of D early on. Told you about a friend of ours and how his anti gay was the common farce.

    See you maybe next week.

    One of the battles is to insure that Catholic adoption agencies dont get away with claiming they were forced to drop their adoption biz because they cant discriminate. A lie by omission is a lie – like they did in IL. Yes they can discriminate re placing kids. They just have to stop accepting my and your and other taxpayers money. Its put up or shut up with their own $$$

    And expect more of the same kind of BS about “I wont sign your marriage license” because it violates my conscious BS. We should provide those type of people with signs saying “because I object to (pick any minority grouP) checkoff lists.

    In other words do they di their job or go find another one where its not an issue. Still plenty of unemployed people who’d be glad to do the job as required by law.

  • Soooooo proud of Carrie and the awesome work they did during the campaign and plan to do in the future. We are LUCKY to have her at the helm to steer the LGBT community in Maryland to MORE victories!

  • I suspect this is the last we'll hear of the trans rights bill in the MD legislature for some time to come. Don't forget the bill never got a vote because it was killed by Senate President Mike Miller, a Democrat. Gov. O'Mally, a strong and vocal supporter of same-sex marriage, has said little or nothing on the trans rights bill since marriage passed. I expect all the Gay Inc. money to continue to go toward making sure gays and lesbians can access all the rights and benefits of marriage in Maryland while trans people continue to be left out in the cold. After all, why should it be any different in Maryland than it is in New York or Delaware?

    • Becky, those are serious concerns. However, let me ask you, did you read this article in respect to what Carrie Evans said? Have you asked the right questions of her or at least framed them here?

      HB235 never receive a vote because the Senate President was not convinced it was a winner in light of how the marriage bill went in 2011. In 2012, there was a "usurping" of control where two individuals felt they had the right to speak for the hundreds of thousands of gender non conforming Marylanders , instead of the large coalition which had formed in December of last years. Their "efforts" were a complete failure because no persons of color were involved in the process, nor did a single one of their community members testifying offer a single instance of discrimination, or did they know "how the sausage" was actually made.

      Carrie spoke of the coalition, The Maryland Coalition for Trans Equality. MCTE, who's steering committee is 90% transgender and gender non conforming Marylanders, has gone out into the state, conducted needs assessments and community checkins and based on that data and those experiences is placing a campaign into action.

      It should be considerably different than New York or Delaware. I suspect what you will be hearing from Maryland is how to run a successful campaign to pass a bill AND defeat a referendum. Because in Maryland, its passing the referendum which ultimately matters.

    • If Miller's concerns were strictly political, why did he call the bill "anti-family"? Sorry but I just don't buy it. This is just more "money talks, working class walks" politics from our "friends" in the Democratic Party.

    • You do not have to buy it, because no one is trying to sell it. Take it or leave it. The truth is the truth. Come spend time in Maryland and get to know the players and the politics and you may come to understand things differently.

  • Trans rights? What’s that? I thought the next item on the agenda in Maryland was securing the rights of gay llamas to march in the St. Patrick’s Day parade wearing chaps, cock rings and ball gags.

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2020. All rights reserved.