Connect with us

homepage news

Nevada Republican may be nation’s first openly trans state legislator

Scott wants to make Nevada ‘a better place to live and work for everybody’



Lauren Scott, gay news, Washington Blade

Lauren Scott, who’s transgender, has won the Republican nomination to represent District 30 in the Nevada state legislature. (Photo courtesy of the Scott Campaign; via Wikimedia Commons)

For Lauren Scott, the potential of being the first openly transgender person to be elected and serve in a state legislature isn’t a focus of her campaign.

“I would say I’m a really good candidate,” Scott said. “I think people know me. They know the work that I’ve done on business and civil rights issues, so I’m very credible, I guess, unlike other people who may run just because they’re trans and just for the press. It’s about making Nevada a better place to live and work for everybody. That’s what I’m focusing on.”

Scott, who’s seeking to represent District 30 in the Nevada State Assembly, talked about her race in an interview with the Washington Blade.

A business development consultant, Scott, 50, lives in the Reno area along with the seven cats that she’s rescued. If elected, she could make history as being the first openly transgender person to be elected and take a seat in a state legislature.

“The economy here has been so bad since 2007 and 2008, and we’ve really not recovered well,” Scott said. “Jobs, economy — those issues really affect everyone, so my business background, my startup business background, my technology background lends itself well to helping get business, as my tagline in my campaign says, get them out working again.”

In addition to her business background, Scott has worked with the state legislature on passage of pro-LGBT legislation as founder of the group Equality Nevada. Among the bills she helped shepherd through to passage were trans-inclusive protections in housing, public accommodations, employment and hate crimes.

Her next big LGBT-related goal for the state: marriage equality. Although the state Assembly already got the ball rolling by passing a measure to repeal the state’s constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, Scott said the best bet is pending litigation before the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

“I talked to Lambda Legal in 2012 when they were starting their move for gay marriage in Nevada,” Scott said. “Right now where it’s at, with Gov. Sandoval not defending it anymore, and the Ninth Circuit wanting to pull that up as soon as possible, we’re going to guess that we’ll have gay marriage in Nevada probably by September, October sometime.”

Formerly a Democrat, Scott said she switched to become a Republican because she felt the Democrats would “pander” to the LGBT community to gain power, then institute bad fiscal policy once elected.

“Like the Republicans with the Tea Party, you find a group you can make promises to, and then once you’re in you pass policies that are more in line with your party and not really in line with the people who elected you,” Scott said.

She recalled that President Bill Clinton was responsible for signing the Defense of Marriage Act and “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” into law.

Scott said she’s aware her party has a reputation for being anti-LGBT and there may be some Republicans who “vehemently don’t like me.” But Scott said she’s always been able to push back against bigotry, and has been outspoken about both transgender and intersex rights as she maintained that gender shouldn’t be an either-or option.

Scott recalled encountering a conservative woman who said she changed her mind on gender identity issues after viewing a presentation made by Scott.

“I guess her daughter must have given her a link to my presentation and she was flabbergasted that everything she’d been told by all of her friends that God made male and female people, and that’s all there is, nice and simple,” Scott said. “My presentation deconstructs all that.”

Endorsed by Sandoval, Scott won the Republican primary on June 10, taking 58 percent of the vote compared to 42 percent won by her more conservative opponent, Adam Khan.

“I guess one of the big reasons for why I won was I was talking about things other than LGBT issues; I was talking about the fiscal and tax issues the Republicans want to hear about,” Scott said. “The fact that I was trans — I wasn’t running on that — I was running on Republican issues that weren’t hard-right issues.”

In the general election, she’ll face an uphill battle in the Democratic district as she faces Democratic incumbent State Assembly member Michael Sprinkle.

Laura Martin, spokesperson for the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, said she doesn’t know Scott well, but has met her and vouched for her participation in lobbying for trans-inclusive legislative protections.

“Our country and Nevada are becoming more accepting of people and their gender identities thanks to legislative victories and activists coming out and sharing their stories and really demanding that people respect their humanity,” Martin said. “I think as time goes on you will see more and more diverse candidates from all parties.”

The Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund hasn’t yet endorsed Scott, but that process is in the works. Scott said in the week after her primary, the organization contacted her and urged her to fill out an application for an endorsement, which she said she intends to pursue.

Ed Williams, president of Log Cabin Nevada, said his organization still needs to meet with her before offering its support and plans to do so this month.

“She definitely had what it took to beat her Republican primary opponent, so I think that’s a good, strong starting point as a Republican,” Williams said. “I don’t think that I’ve looked deeply into her views other than that; I think our members are going to be looking at her closely and seeing how conservative her views are in terms of being a fiscal conservative, and things of that nature.”

She might have competition for the distinction of being the first openly transgender legislator. Paula Sophia, a transgender former police officer in Oklahoma City, secured enough votes to force a run-off on Aug. 26 against her leading Democratic opponent, Jason Dunnington, for an open seat in the Oklahoma State Legislature.

Stacie Laughton, another openly transgender candidate, was elected to the New Hampshire legislature in 2012 but her candidacy was declared to be invalid. She resigned and was never seated.

Scott said she transitioned in the late 1990s. Although she explored the idea in the 1980s, she didn’t like model offered at the time because it insisted she’d have to adopt certain female stereotypes (she identifies as a lesbian and dates women). It wasn’t until she began seeing a therapist later in life that she determined her sexual orientation didn’t need to change, but her gender expression did.

“I didn’t want to give up all of my male life,” Scott said. “A lot of people when they transition believe, ‘well, I’m not going to fix my tire because I’d break a nail.’ If I have a flat, I will get the jack out and fix the flat tire. So, I think there’s a lot of pressure on the trans community to live those stereotypes.”

Before she transitioned, Scott was an active-duty member of the U.S. Air Force in the 1990s for nearly seven years and served during the Persian Gulf War in Iraq. According to her website, she served three years in Nevada at the Tonopah Test Range in support of F-117A Stealth Fighter operations. Scott earned two Achievement Medals and a Commendation Medal before receiving an honorable discharge in 1994.

Despite her achievements in the military, Scott said the experience was difficult for her.

“It was very disquieting,” Scott said. “The smell of all that maleness around me, as a woman, it was almost like being mentally raped. Just imagine being a woman, and you’re thrown into jail with a lot of other men in the room and you can’t get out.”

She recalled an incident in which she wrecked her motorcycle on base. When she was taken to the hospital and her boots removed, they revealed feet with toe nails painted pink. When word got out, she was called anti-gay epithets, had her name scraped off her locker and her equipment damaged before she was assigned to new duties.

Openly transgender people are currently barred from service under medical regulation, although LGBT advocates have been ramping up pressure for a change in that policy. In a recent interview, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the ban should be reviewed, but no formal review process has been announced.

Scott was reluctant to endorse the idea of instituting openly transgender service in U.S. military, saying the military may have a reason to bar transgender people from certain roles.

“If  you can serve in the military and it doesn’t cause any loss in effectiveness of your unit or the overall service in the military, then, yes, I think that openly transgender people should be able to serve in the military,” Scott said. “However, I also believe that if it’s a medical condition that impairs the ability to serve or to be 100 percent operational during deployment, that has to be looked at. Maybe trans people, like women, can only serve in certain functions. Because of the inherent nature of being trans, you require additional landside support that a non-trans person may not.”

Nonetheless, Scott acknowledged a growing awareness of trans issues in recent years — especially with the growing visibility of personalities like Laverne Cox from “Orange is the New Black” — is positive for transgender people.

“I think that trans issues have gone from more of a voyeuristic issue to a civil rights issue,” Scott said. “We’re fighting to be who we are and we’re fighting to not be pigeon-holed into one gender or the other, or one sex or the other.”

Continue Reading


  1. Kathy

    July 3, 2014 at 9:39 am

    Brava to Ms. Scott.

    Technically, she would be the first openly trans legislator to serve. One was openly trans, elected and did not serve as problems in her background came to light. (2012 NH)

    There were, of course – closeted trans legislators who were outed during their time serving. Back to 1992 I think (MA).

  2. Krista Ann

    July 4, 2014 at 8:53 am

    What district is she running in ? I can only hope its mine.

  3. Krista Ann

    July 4, 2014 at 4:57 am

    I would love her to serve in my district, time to do some research and get out the check book.

  4. Brooks Austin

    July 5, 2014 at 10:13 pm

    I congratulate her for her bravery in running, but it seems a bit insulting for her to compare liberals that campaign on LGBT issues to the Tea Party and I don't understand her logic in opposing ending discrimination in the military.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

homepage news

Top 10 Blade news stories by web traffic

COVID breakthroughs, Equality Act, and anti-trans attacks



Elliot Page created excitement by posting his first photo in swim trunks back in May.

Each year our staff gathers in late December to review the highest trafficked stories of the year and there’s more than a little bit of competitive spirit as we review the results. Here are the top 10 stories by web traffic at  HYPERLINK “” for 2021.

#10: Mark Glaze, gun reform advocate, dies at 51

The sad, tragic story of Glaze’s death captivated readers in November. 

#9: COVID breakthrough infections strike summer tourists visiting Provincetown

This one went viral in July after a COVID outbreak was blamed on gay tourists.

#8: Thank you, Kordell Stewart, for thoughtful response to ‘the rumor’

This opinion piece thanked the former NFL quarterback for writing a personal essay addressing gay rumors. 

#7: Elliot Page tweets; trans bb’s first swim trunks #transjoy #transisbeautiful

The actor created excitement by posting his first photo in swim trunks back in May.

#6: Romney declares opposition to LGBTQ Equality Act

Mitt Romney disappointed activists with his announcement; the Equality Act passed the House but never saw a vote in the Senate.

#5: White House warns state legislatures that passing anti-trans bills is illegal

The year 2021 saw a disturbing trend of GOP-led legislatures attacking trans people.

#4: Lincoln Project’s avowed ignorance of Weaver texts undercut by leaked communications

The Lincoln Project’s leaders, amid a scandal of co-founder John Weaver soliciting sexual favors from young men, have asserted they were unaware of his indiscretions until the Blade obtained electronic communications that called that claim into question.

#3: FOX 5’s McCoy suspended over offensive Tweet

Blake McCoy tweeted that obese people shouldn’t get priority for the COVID vaccine. 

#2: Transgender USAF veteran trapped in Taliban takeover of Kabul

Among the Americans trapped in the suburban areas of Kabul under Taliban control was a transgender government contractor for the U.S. State Department and former U.S. Air Force Sergeant. She was later safely evacuated.

#1: Amid coup chaos, Trump quietly erases LGBTQ protections in adoption, health services

And our most popular story of 2021 was about the Trump administration nixing regulations barring federal grantees in the Department of Health & Human Services from discriminating against LGBTQ people, including in adoption services.

Continue Reading

homepage news

CDC still falling short on LGBTQ data collection for COVID patients: expert



COVID-19 vaccine, gay news, Washington Blade
The CDC is still not issuing guidance to states on LGBTQ data collection among COVID patients.

Despite requests since the start of the COVID pandemic for the U.S. government to enhance data collection for patients who are LGBTQ, the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention is still falling short on issuing nationwide guidance to states on the issue, a leading expert health on the issue told the Blade.

With a renewed focus on COVID infections reaching new heights just before the start of the holidays amid the emergence of Omicron, the absence of any LGBTQ data collection — now across both the Trump and Biden administrations — remains a sore point for health experts who say that information could be used for public outreach.

Sean Cahill, director of Health Policy Research at the Boston-based Fenway Institute, said Wednesday major federal entities and hospitals have been collecting data on whether patients identify as LGBTQ for years — such as the National Health & Nutrition Examination Survey, which has been collecting sexual orientation data since the 1990s — but the CDC hasn’t duplicated that effort for COVID even though the pandemic has been underway for two years.

“It’s not like this is a new idea,” Cahill said. “But for some reason, the pandemic hit, and all of a sudden, we realize how little systematic data we were collecting in our health system. And it’s a real problem because we’re two years into the pandemic almost, and we still don’t know how it’s affecting this vulnerable population that experiences health disparities in other areas.”

The Blade was among the first outlets to report on the lack of efforts by the states to collect data on whether a COVID patient identifies as LGBTQ, reporting in April 2020 on the absence of data even in places with influential LGBTQ communities. The CDC hasn’t responded to the Blade’s requests for nearly two years on why it doesn’t instruct states to collect this data, nor did it respond this week to a request for comment on this article.

Cahill, who has published articles in the American Journal of Public Health on the importance of LGBTQ data collection and reporting in COVID-19 testing, care, and vaccination — said he’s been making the case to the CDC to issue guidance to states on whether COVID patients identify as LGBTQ since June 2020.

Among those efforts, he said, were to include two comments he delivered to the Biden COVID-19 Health Equity Task Force in spring 2021, a letter a coalition of groups sent to the Association of State & Territorial Health Officers asking for states to collect and report SOGI in COVID in December 2020 as well as letters to HHS leadership and congressional leadership in spring and summer 2020 asking for them to take steps to encourage or require SOGI data collection in COVID.

Asked what CDC officials had to say in response when he brought this issue to their attention, Cahill said, “They listen, but they don’t really tell me anything.”

“We’ve been making that case, and to date, as of December 22, 2021, they have not issued guidance, they have not changed the case report form. I hope that they’re in the process of doing that, and maybe we’ll be pleasantly surprised in January, and they’ll come up with something…I really hope that’s true, but right now they’re not doing anything to promote SOGI data collection and reporting in surveillance data.”

Cahill, in an email to the Blade after the initial publication of this article, clarified CDC has indicated guidance on LGBTQ data collection for COVID patients may come in the near future.

“HHS leaders told us this fall that CDC is working on an initiative to expand SOGI data collection,” Cahill said. “We are hopeful that we will see guidance early in 2022. Key people at CDC, including Director Walensky, understand the importance of SOGI data collection given their long history of working on HIV prevention.”

In other issues related to LGBTQ data collection, there has been a history of states resisting federal mandates. The Trump administration, for example, rescinded guidance calling on states to collect information on whether foster youth identified as LGBTQ after complaints from states on the Obama-era process, much to the consternation of LGBTQ advocates who said the data was helpful.

The White House COVID-19 Health Equity Task Force has at least recognized the potential for enhancing LGBTQ data collection efforts. Last month, it published an implementation plan, calling for “an equity-centered approach to data collection, including sufficient funding to collect data for groups that are often left out of data collection (e.g….LGBTQIA+ people).”

The plan also calls for “fund[ing] activities to improve data collection…including tracking COVID-19 related outcomes for people of color and other underserved populations,” and specifically calls for the collection of LGBTQ data.

The importance of collecting LGBTQ data, Cahill said, is based on its potential use in public outreach, including efforts to recognize disparities in health population and to create messaging for outreach, including for populations that may be reluctant to take the vaccine.

“If we see a disparity, we can say: Why is that?” Cahill said. “We could do focus groups of the population — try to understand and then what kind of messages would reassure you and make you feel comfortable getting a vaccine, and we could push those messages out through public education campaigns led by state local health departments led by the federal government.”

The LGBTQ data, Cahill said, could be broken down further to determine if racial and ethnic disparities exist within the LGBTQ population, or whether LGBTQ people are likely to suffer from the disease in certain regions, such as the South.

“We have data showing that lesbian or bisexual women, and transgender people are less likely to be in preventive regular routine care for their health,” Cahill said. “And so if that’s true, there’s a good chance that they’re less likely to know where to get a vaccine, to have a medical professional they trust to talk to about it today.”

Among the leaders who are supportive, Cahill said, is Rachel Levine, assistant secretary for health and the first openly transgender person confirmed by the U.S. Senate for a presidential appointment. Cahill said he raised the issue with her along with other officials at the Department of Health & Human Services three times in the last year.

In her previous role as Pennsylvania secretary of health, Levine led the way and made her state the first in the nation to set up an LGBTQ data collection system for COVID patients.

“So she definitely gets it, and I know she’s supportive of it, but we really need the CDC to act,” Cahill said.

Although the federal government has remained intransigent in taking action, Cahill said the situation has improved among states and counted five states — California, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Nevada and Oregon — in addition to D.C. as among those that have elected to collect data on sexual orientation and gender identity of COVID patients.

However, Cahill said even those data collection efforts are falling short because those jurisdictions have merely been public about collecting the data, but haven’t reported back anything yet.

“Only California has reported data publicly, and the data that they’re reporting is really just the completeness of the data,” Cahill said. “They’re not reporting the data itself…And they’re also just asking people who tests positive. So, if somebody says positive COVID in California, a contact tracer follows up with that individual and asks them a battery of questions, and among the questions that are asked are SOGI questions.”

As a result of these efforts, Cahill said, California has data on the LGBTQ status of COVID patients, but the data is overwhelmingly more complete for the gender identity of these patients rather than their sexual orientation. As of May 2021, California reported that they had sexual orientation data for 9.5 percent of individuals who had died from COVID and 16 percent of people who tested positive, but for gender identity, the data were 99.5 percent.

Continue Reading

homepage news

Equality Act, contorted as a danger by anti-LGBTQ forces, is all but dead

No political willpower to force vote or reach a compromise



Despite having President Biden in the White House and Democratic majorities in both chambers of Congress, efforts to update federal civil rights laws to strengthen the prohibition on discrimination against LGBTQ people by passing the Equality Act are all but dead as opponents of the measure have contorted it beyond recognition.

Political willpower is lacking to find a compromise that would be acceptable to enough Republican senators to end a filibuster on the bill — a tall order in any event — nor is there the willpower to force a vote on the Equality Act as opponents stoke fears about transgender kids in sports and not even unanimity in the Democratic caucus in favor of the bill is present, stakeholders who spoke to the Blade on condition of anonymity said.

In fact, there are no imminent plans to hold a vote on the legislation even though Pride month is days away, which would be an opportune time for Congress to demonstrate solidarity with the LGBTQ community by holding a vote on the legislation.

If the Equality Act were to come up for a Senate vote in the next month, it would not have the support to pass. Continued assurances that bipartisan talks are continuing on the legislation have yielded no evidence of additional support, let alone the 10 Republicans needed to end a filibuster.

“I haven’t really heard an update either way, which is usually not good,” one Democratic insider said. “My understanding is that our side was entrenched in a no-compromise mindset and with [Sen. Joe] Manchin saying he didn’t like the bill, it doomed it this Congress. And the bullying of hundreds of trans athletes derailed our message and our arguments of why it was broadly needed.”

The only thing keeping the final nail from being hammered into the Equality Act’s coffin is the unwillingness of its supporters to admit defeat. Other stakeholders who spoke to the Blade continued to assert bipartisan talks are ongoing, strongly pushing back on any conclusion the legislation is dead.

Alphonso David, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said the Equality Act is “alive and well,” citing widespread public support he said includes “the majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents and a growing number of communities across the country engaging and mobilizing every day in support of the legislation.”

“They understand the urgent need to pass this bill and stand up for LGBTQ people across our country,” David added. “As we engage with elected officials, we have confidence that Congress will listen to the voices of their constituents and continue fighting for the Equality Act through the lengthy legislative process.  We will also continue our unprecedented campaign to grow the already-high public support for a popular bill that will save lives and make our country fairer and more equal for all. We will not stop until the Equality Act is passed.”

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), chief sponsor of the Equality Act in the Senate, also signaled through a spokesperson work continues on the legislation, refusing to give up on expectations the legislation would soon become law.

“Sen. Merkley and his staff are in active discussions with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to try to get this done,” McLennan said. “We definitely see it as a key priority that we expect to become law.”

A spokesperson Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who had promised to force a vote on the Equality Act in the Senate on the day the U.S. House approved it earlier this year, pointed to a March 25 “Dear Colleague” letter in which he identified the Equality Act as one of several bills he’d bring up for a vote.

Despite any assurances, the hold up on the bill is apparent. Although the U.S. House approved the legislation earlier this year, the Senate Judiciary Committee hasn’t even reported out the bill yet to the floor in the aftermath of the first-ever Senate hearing on the bill in March. A Senate Judiciary Committee Democratic aide, however, disputed that inaction as evidence the Equality Act is dead in its tracks: “Bipartisan efforts on a path forward are ongoing.”

Democrats are quick to blame Republicans for inaction on the Equality Act, but with Manchin withholding his support for the legislation they can’t even count on the entirety of their caucus to vote “yes” if it came to the floor. Progressives continue to advocate an end to the filibuster to advance legislation Biden has promised as part of his agenda, but even if they were to overcome headwinds and dismantle the institution needing 60 votes to advance legislation, the Equality Act would likely not have majority support to win approval in the Senate with a 50-50 party split.

The office of Manchin, who has previously said he couldn’t support the Equality Act over concerns about public schools having to implement the transgender protections applying to sports and bathrooms, hasn’t responded to multiple requests this year from the Blade on the legislation and didn’t respond to a request to comment for this article.

Meanwhile, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who declined to co-sponsor the Equality Act this year after having signed onto the legislation in the previous Congress, insisted through a spokesperson talks are still happening across the aisle despite the appearances the legislation is dead.

“There continues to be bipartisan support for passing a law that protects the civil rights of Americans, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity,” said Annie Clark, a Collins spokesperson. “The Equality Act was a starting point for negotiations, and in its current form, it cannot pass. That’s why there are ongoing discussions among senators and stakeholders about a path forward.”

Let’s face it: Anti-LGBTQ forces have railroaded the debate by making the Equality Act about an end to women’s sports by allowing transgender athletes and danger to women in sex-segregated places like bathrooms and prisons. That doesn’t even get into resolving the issue on drawing the line between civil rights for LGBTQ people and religious freedom, which continues to be litigated in the courts as the U.S. Supreme Court is expected any day now to issue a ruling in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia to determine if foster care agencies can reject same-sex couples over religious objections.

For transgender Americans, who continue to report discrimination and violence at high rates, the absence of the Equality Act may be most keenly felt.

Mara Keisling, outgoing executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, disputed any notion the Equality Act is dead and insisted the legislation is “very much alive.”

“We remain optimistic despite misinformation from the opposition,” Keisling said. “NCTE and our movement partners are still working fruitfully on the Equality Act with senators. In fact, we are gaining momentum with all the field organizing we’re doing, like phone banking constituents to call their senators. Legislating takes time. Nothing ever gets through Congress quickly. We expect to see a vote during this Congress, and we are hopeful we can win.”

But one Democratic source said calls to members of Congress against the Equality Act, apparently coordinated by groups like the Heritage Foundation, have has outnumbered calls in favor of it by a substantial margin, with a particular emphasis on Manchin.

No stories are present in the media about same-sex couples being kicked out of a restaurant for holding hands or transgender people for using the restroom consistent with their gender identity, which would be perfectly legal in 25 states thanks to the patchwork of civil rights laws throughout the United States and inadequate protections under federal law.

Tyler Deaton, senior adviser for the American Unity Fund, which has bolstered the Republican-led Fairness for All Act as an alternative to the Equality Act, said he continues to believe the votes are present for a compromise form of the bill.

“I know for a fact there is a supermajority level of support in the Senate for a version of the Equality Act that is fully protective of both LGBTQ civil rights and religious freedom,” Deaton said. “There is interest on both sides of the aisle in getting something done this Congress.”

Deaton, however, didn’t respond to a follow-up inquiry on what evidence exists of agreeing on this compromise.

Biden has already missed the goal he campaigned on in the 2020 election to sign the Equality Act into law within his first 100 days in office. Although Biden renewed his call to pass the legislation in his speech to Congress last month, as things stand now that appears to be a goal he won’t realize for the remainder of this Congress.

Nor has the Biden administration made the Equality Act an issue for top officials within the administration as it pushes for an infrastructure package as a top priority. One Democratic insider said Louisa Terrell, legislative affairs director for the White House, delegated work on the Equality Act to a deputy as opposed to handling it herself.

To be sure, Biden has demonstrated support for the LGBTQ community through executive action at an unprecedented rate, signing an executive order on day one ordering federal agencies to implement the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last year in Bostock v. Clayton County to the fullest extent possible and dismantling former President Trump’s transgender military ban. Biden also made historic LGBTQ appointments with the confirmation of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Rachel Levine as assistant secretary of health.

A White House spokesperson insisted Biden’s team across the board remains committed to the Equality Act, pointing to his remarks to Congress.

“President Biden has urged Congress to get the Equality Act to his desk so he can sign it into law and provide long overdue civil rights protections to LGBTQ+ Americans, and he remains committed to seeing this legislation passed as quickly as possible,” the spokesperson said. “The White House and its entire legislative team remains in ongoing and close coordination with organizations, leaders, members of Congress, including the Equality Caucus, and staff to ensure we are working across the aisle to push the Equality Act forward.”

But at least in the near-term, that progress will fall short of fulfilling the promise of updating federal civil rights law with the Equality Act, which will mean LGBTQ people won’t be able to rely on those protections when faced with discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

Continue Reading

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts