Connect with us

Opinions

Rodham rising: A seasoned liberal steps up

Hillary’s grit will help her break that final glass ceiling

Published

on

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton held the first major speech of her presidential campaign.

Democratic presidential candidate <strong>Hillary Rodham Clinton</strong> held the first major speech of her presidential campaign.

I checked my Twitter feed as I watched Hillary Rodham Clinton speak in Four Freedoms Park on June 13 with One World Trade Center in the distance. Her well-crafted speech touted a host of liberal causes, but some progressives had already made up their minds against her. “Same conservative shit,” one person tweeted, to which others replied that they must not have been watching the same speech.

Utopian standards allow people to reject any candidate who can actually get elected; but getting things done requires a candidate who will engage the system we have. Similarly, the welcome given to corporate floats by the huge crowds at DC’s Capital Pride Parade the same day as Clinton’s rally demonstrated the success of the mainstream LGBT movement and the failure of counterculturists who romanticize life at the margins from their positions of privilege.

Reality-based activists pursue practical reforms rather than phantoms of revolution. But dissenting voices remain indispensable. Socialist candidate Bernie Sanders got results with his hammering of Clinton for her previous silence on the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Speaking in Iowa after her New York rally, Clinton called for any trade agreement to include protections for American workers, and said there should be no deal without them.

In her New York speech, Clinton wisely made a virtue of her battle scars. Those expecting her to charge up San Juan Hill over every intractable problem may still be disappointed; but she showed herself to be a smart, confident woman ready to take on know-nothingism and intolerance and defend the middle class. This puts her in stark contrast with the Republican field.

Right-wing hyperventilating and gun-toting displays notwithstanding, we are not on the verge of another civil war. The harshness of struggles elsewhere in the world, made more visible via new media, remind us of how good we have it. If we were as powerless as portrayed by leftist purveyors of perpetual outrage, plutocrats would not spend so much money to influence our votes.

Litmus tests undermine the liberal cause, which must be fought on multiple fronts. Creating change is a marathon, and requires working with people and candidates who do not agree with us on everything. The likely alternative to Clinton is not a perfect candidate but a victory for homophobes, misogynists, white supremacists, and religious bullies. If a Republican wins the White House in 2016, we will soon have only two liberal justices on the Supreme Court — the two women put there by President Obama.

Patrick Healy in The New York Times offers Sanders hope by comparing his underdog presidential race to the Tony Award upset by Alison Bechdel’s Broadway musical “Fun Home” over “An American in Paris.” As a fan of Bechdel’s ground-breaking comic strip, “Dykes to Watch Out For,” I was thrilled at her victory; but this is a classic Bad Analogy, despite Bechdel’s own support for Sanders. One might just as well call Sanders the Steph Curry of this campaign, comparing him to the MVP five decades his junior whose magical play in the NBA finals proved him a true peer of the magnificent LeBron James.

Bernie is a great guy, but he is no Steph Curry, and he is no Alison Bechdel. His value, not to be underestimated, is in pressuring the frontrunner by energizing progressives. To be sure, Barack Obama was an underdog himself going into the 2008 primaries, but there is no one of comparable gifts in sight this time around. Obama has shown remarkable endurance in dealing with conservative obstruction; but the hand-to-hand combat ahead favors those familiar with the territory and adept with the available weapons. No one fits the bill better than Hillary. She faces a long, tough race. She seems to understand, better than some of her supporters, that she cannot afford to take anything for granted.

@JesseRodriguez tweeted on June 13 that there was more Rodham than Clinton in the Roosevelt Island speech. That is apt. She has come into her own. When she smiles at her crowd’s reactions, you can see how much she relishes a political fight. More than any other quality, that is the one that will enable her to break the final glass ceiling.

 

Richard J. Rosendall is a writer and activist. He can be reached at [email protected].

Copyright © 2015 by Richard J. Rosendall. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. Kyle

    June 19, 2015 at 11:44 am

    Look, come November 2016, I will hold my nose and pull the lever for Clinton. After all, I remember the horror of 2000, and the role Nader played in getting Bush elected. Anyone with half a brain will do the same as me. But for decency’s sake, don’t call any Clinton a liberal. It insults true liberals to be put in the same boat. The election of 2016 is not an election of hope. It cannot be. It is an election of fear: fear of what an unreconstructed Republican party will do to this country. So all you pundits who want to keep Republicans out of office for another term, remember that, and focus on it. Remind people of the sheer terror of life under Republican rule, of how they’ll try to turn the whole country into another Mississippi, Alabama, Kansas, South Carolina. We need a Democrat to win not because Democrats are awesome (much less liberal), but because Republicans are the party of destruction.

  2. Brian's Ions

    June 24, 2015 at 10:39 am

    Rick is right, again. Zammit.
    —-
    “Litmus tests undermine the liberal cause, which must be fought on multiple fronts. Creating change is a marathon, and requires working with people and candidates who do not agree with us on everything.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinions

The future of lesbian bars

Resolve to support our queer spaces in 2022

Published

on

lockdown zone, gay news, Washington Blade

This New Year, I hope you wish for more lesbian bars across the country. The story of lesbian bars in the U.S. has been slightly tragic of late: as of January 2021, there were only 15 clubs or bars dedicated to queer women across the country. 

That’s right—only 15. Across all 50 states. 

In Washington, D.C., my hometown, A League of Her Own stands out as the only lesbian bar in the city, dedicated to queer women. Located in Adams Morgan, A League of Her Own, also known as ALOHO, is a small mecca for queer ladies to pass through, socialize, and flirt. ALOHO is a chic gathering point for all queer folk, with posters of softball players dotting the walls and gender neutral signs lying about. 

Several years ago, another lesbian bar called Phase 1 existed in Southeast, where queer women could slam eight balls in pool games and engage in raunchy yet ever-so-hot jello wrestling competitions. 

Unfortunately, Phase 1 shut its doors in 2016. 

So what explains the closure of so many lesbian bars, while bars for gay men continue to flourish? Perhaps many queer women view gay bars as a space for their own as well, whereas gay men view lesbian bars as less of a place for them to socialize. 

Either way, we need to give support to lesbian bars now more than ever. Tokens of support can take many forms. 

For one, make sure to socialize in spaces dedicated to queer ladies. There are three lesbian bars in New York City: Cubbyhole (281 W. 12th St.), Gingers in Brooklyn (363 5th Ave.), and Henrietta Hudson (438 Hudson St.). Next time you visit the Big Apple, make sure to give these three spots some love. Maybe drag your experimenting bi friend to these locations. Or your pansexual roommate. 

Back in D.C., you can buy unisex shirts in A League of Her Own’s merchandise store, available online. 

Proceeds will go toward funding the bar, and making sure it stays afloat, especially during this COVID economy. 

Most of all, I hope you encourage your queer lady friends to keep on frequenting queer lady destinations. After all, there is only one thing that will keep lesbian bars afloat—and that is attendance. 

I, for one, will be frequenting many lesbian destinations this new year.  

Isaac Amend is a Yale graduate and participated in National Geographic’s ‘Gender Revolution’ documentary. He also is a member of the LGBT Democrats of Virginia, and contributes regularly to the Blade. Follow him on Twitter and Instagram at @isaacamend.

Continue Reading

Opinions

Breaking barriers as an out trans ‘Jeopardy’ champion

Amy Schneider’s run inspires us all

Published

on

Amy Schneider (Photo courtesy of Sony Pictures Television)

“When was the last time anybody said ‘wow!’” a friend asked me.

I couldn’t remember the last time anyone I know (including me) had any “Wow!” moments. Until I heard about trans woman and software engineering manager Amy Schneider’s 29-game winning streak on “Jeopardy.”

You wouldn’t think anything could dispel our COVID exhaustion and political divisiveness. Yet, news about a champion on “Jeopardy,” a quiz show that has been on TV since 1964, has broken through our gloom.

In our culture, there are few things that everyone loves. But, “Jeopardy” is beloved by many, from theater geeks to 80-year-old sports nuts. A progressive friend was over the moon when his brother was a “Jeopardy” contestant. A buddy, a hetero (non-Trump) Republican, is a “Jeopardy” fanatic and a gay librarian pal is a “Jeopardy” freak.

Many of us daydream about being on “Jeopardy.” But we know that we wouldn’t have a chance on this legendary quiz show with its deceptively simple format: You give the answer to the (often incredibly hard) clues in the form of a question. You have to have a strategic military commander’s and a world-class athlete’s coordination: so you can press the buzzer to answer the clue.

The game’s categories run the gamut from opera to mountain ranges. Most of us, mere mortals, would be lucky to know even one category in the first round of the game. Let alone in the “Double Jeopardy” round or the “Final Jeopardy” clue. I might jump on clues about Katharine Hepburn movies or M&Ms. But that would be it for me.

It’s exciting to watch a “Jeopardy” contestant become a long-running champion. You marvel at the player’s intelligence, endurance, and nerve. It’s thrilling when the contestant on a winning-streak is part of your community.

Many of us LGBTQ “Jeopardy” fans are thrilled by Schneider’s record-setting winning streak. As I write this, Schneider has won more than $1 million in 29 games of “Jeopardy.” She is the fifth millionaire in “Jeopardy” history, and only the fourth player to reach this milestone in the regular season. She has won more than any other female “Jeopardy” contestant.

Schneider, like so many of us, doesn’t want to be defined by her gender identity or sexuality. Schneider’s life is multi-faceted; she has many interests. Schneider lives with her girlfriend Genevieve. They have a cat named Meep.

Yet, Schneider doesn’t want to hide that she’s trans. On “Jeopardy,” Schneider brilliantly dealt with this dilemma. She didn’t make a big deal about being out. She just wore the trans Pride flag pin.

“It was something that I wanted to get out there and to show my pride in while not making it the focus of what I was doing there,” Schneider told the New York Times. “Because I was just there to answer trivia questions and win money.”

As a cisgender lesbian, I can’t speak to how Schneider’s record-setting “Jeopardy” streak feels to transgender people.

But, as a trans ally, I’m cheering for Schneider. Kudos for her bravery! At a time when many states are passing anti-trans laws, it takes guts to be out on TV and the Internet.

Few things are as mainstream as “Jeopardy.” I bet that many “Jeopardy” viewers who are frightened at the idea of trans people, will become more comfortable with transgender people after watching Schneider on the popular quiz show. Because folks on TV come into our living and bedrooms and we feel as if we know them after watching them for a while.

“Amy looks like everybody else,” my neighbor said when I told her Schneider was trans. “She doesn’t act odd. She’s not strange.”

Transgender people encounter violence and discrimination in everything from housing to health care to employment.

I know Schneider’s “Jeopardy” triumph won’t end transphobia. But her winning streak will go a long way toward jumpstarting a change in hearts and minds.

Kathi Wolfe, a writer and a poet, is a regular contributor to the Blade.

Continue Reading

Opinions

SCARY: Tucker Carlson now the conscience of GOP

Cruz bows down, kisses ring of Fox host

Published

on

Tucker Carlson (Screen capture via Fox on YouTube)

The Republican Party has sunk to a new low, hard to do, when a sleazebag like Tucker Carlson is now their conscience. Seeing Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) groveling before him is laughable, disgusting, and frightening all at the same time. 

As reported in Rolling Stone, Cruz said, “We are approaching a solemn anniversary this week. It is an anniversary of a violent terrorist attack on the Capitol where we saw the men and women of law enforcement demonstrate incredible courage, incredible bravery, risk their lives to defend the men and women who serve in this Capitol.” Then “Cruz was lambasted by Tucker Carlson that night, prompting him to hop on Carlson’s show Thursday and beg for forgiveness. “The way I phrased things yesterday, it was sloppy and it was frankly dumb,” Cruz said before Carlson cut him off and said he didn’t believe him. Cruz took it up a notch, stammering through an absurd bit about how he wasn’t talking about the “patriots across the country supporting President Trump,” only those who assaulted police officers, and that he’s always described anyone who assaults a cop as a terrorist.

Carlson has made a career of being a pompous commentator. Interestingly he worked at CNN, PBS, and MSNBC, before finally landing at Fox in 2009. According to his Wikipedia page he went to Trinity College where he earned a bachelor’s degree and Carlson’s Trinity yearbook describes him as a member of the “Dan White Society,” an apparent reference to the American political assassin who murdered San Francisco Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk. After college, Carlson tried to join the CIA, but his application was denied, after which he decided to pursue a career in journalism with the encouragement of his father, who advised him that “they’ll take anybody.” Reading this clearly raised my opinion of the CIA and based on what we see in some media today I agree with Carlson’s father on his view of journalism. 

When you have a moment of silence in the House of Representatives to honor those who lost their lives on Jan. 6 and only two Republicans show up, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and her father Dick Cheney, the former vice president, one understands the influence Carlson has on the GOP. The rest were afraid of being criticized on-air by him or lambasted by Trump. 

Dick Cheney remarked on the GOP, “It’s not a leadership that resembles any of the folks I knew when I was here for 10 years.” He spoke to ABC News saying, “I’m deeply disappointed we don’t have better leadership in the Republican Party to restore the Constitution.” 

There is a leadership void in the Republican Party today. Their so-called leaders are afraid to say what they think if it differs in any way from Trumpism or Carlson’s view of the world, which requires total fealty to Trump. He found a home on Fox where he can lie with impunity and have millions believe his lies. 

President Biden said, in what many think was the best speech of his presidency so far, these people are “holding a dagger to the neck of democracy.” He went on to say, “For the first time in our history, a president not just lost an election, he tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power as a violent mob breached the Capitol.” 

Tucker Carlson and his ilk have never bothered to answer a question the president threw at them, which is how they can accept all their down ballot victories, governors, and members of Congress, which occurred on the same ballots, cast by the same people, on the same day, as those for president. Of course, Carlson has no need to make sense, tell the truth, or speak rationally because of his platform on Fox, which doesn’t require that.

My question is whether Carlson is as dumb as he makes himself sound or is he brilliant and this is all a big act? Either way the acolytes that follow Trump don’t seem to care and are bowing down to Carlson’s big audience. It’s as if he can tell any Republican senator or congressperson, or Republican candidate for those jobs, to just ‘bend over and take it’ and they do. All we can do is mourn for the GOP of Lincoln and Eisenhower. Non-Trumpers will have to work hard and speak out if they ever want to resurrect a GOP that can be respected.

Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist. He writes regularly for the Blade.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts

Popular