November 3, 2015 at 9:37 am EST | by Chris Johnson
Will Ryan bring up LGBT rights legislation?
Paul Ryan, Republican Party, United States House of Representatives, Wisconsin, CPAC, Conservative Political Action Conference, gay news, Washington Blade

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has been elected House Speaker. But will he act any differently on LGBT issues than his predecessor? (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

The election of Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) as House Speaker represents a new day in Congress, but whether it’ll change things for LGBT rights legislation remains to be seen.

In his remarks upon accepting the gavel last week, Ryan offered a forward-looking vision to addressing the dysfunctional state of Congress, saying early in his life the U.S. House represented “boundless opportunity to do good.”

“But let’s be frank: The House is broken,” Ryan said. “We are not solving problems. We are adding to them. And I am not interested in laying blame. We are not settling scores. We are wiping the slate clean. Neither the members nor the people are satisfied with how things are going. We need to make some changes, starting with how the House does business.”

Among the changes Ryan proposed was a “return to regular order,” which would require committees to craft legislation before it comes to the House floor.

The new speaker’s immediate tasks will likely be addressing criticism from Democrats over select committees on Benghazi and Planned Parenthood in addition to potential passage of cybersecurity and criminal justice reform legislation, but LGBT advocates will be waiting to see how Ryan handles LGBT rights as the push for comprehensive federal non-discrimination protections becomes a high priority.

One such bill is the Equality Act, legislation introduced by Democrats in July that would amend existing civil rights law to include LGBT people. But the bill could also be some kind of compromise non-discrimination measure that would win LGBT support.

Ryan stands out among Republicans because in 2007 he voted for a version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, although he also voted for the motion to recommit that would have killed the bill. Just this year, Ryan also broke ranks to vote in favor of an amendment to prohibit federal spending on transportation, housing and urban development contractors that engage in anti-LGBT discrimination.

In a 2010 interview with the Fiscal Times, Ryan defended his vote in favor of ENDA by saying gay employees “didn’t roll out of bed one morning and choose to be gay. That’s who they are.” Acknowledging he “took a lot of grief” from other Republicans because of the vote, Ryan was quoted as saying his attitude toward gay people is a “generational thing.”

Christian Berle, former legislative director for the LGBT group Freedom to Work, was optimistic about the chances of Ryan bringing up pro-LGBT legislation based on the speaker’s 2007 ENDA vote and conversations with lawmaker in 2013.

“Working closely with then-Chairman Ryan and his staff, he was consistent with providing full, legal protections for LGBT workers as a matter of honoring human dignity and a commonsense business practice,” Berle said. “Like many, he did have concerns about the statute being used to impugn religiously affiliated institutions. This track record certainly opens the door to many proposals [to] get considered, as long as they are not free-for-all ‘Christmas tree’ efforts.'”

Asked why Ryan wasn’t a co-sponsor of ENDA if he were so consistent on it, Berle said Ryan made tax policies his priority and although he wasn’t an ENDA co-sponsor “all indications I received were that he would vote for it again.”

It’s because of that ENDA vote that the right-wing leader Eugene Delgaudio of Public Advocate of the U.S. ran an ad on the conservative Drudge Report with a picture of Ryan and the text, “Stop Paul Ryan, the Homosexual Lobby’s Trojan Horse for Speaker.” Clicking on the ad sent readers to a petition calling ENDA a bill “granting ‘protected class’ status to sexual deviants.”

But Ryan’s vote for ENDA is a small part of his 16-year record as a member of the House. He’s also voted against hate crimes protection legislation, against “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal and twice in favor of a Federal Marriage Amendment. In the Human Rights Campaign’s most recent congressional scorecard, the organization gave him a score of “0” out of 100.

When Ryan was running mate in 2012 to Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, the vice-presidential candidate didn’t make anti-LGBT positions a major component of his proposed agenda, but touted Romney as a “defender of marriage” during an appearance at the anti-LGBT Values Voters Summit.

Gregory Angelo, president of Log Cabin Republicans, said despite Ryan’s anti-gay votes, the speaker has had a long-standing relationship with the LGBT Republican group.

“Log Cabin Republicans has long had a working relationship with Congressman Ryan and his staff and I don’t see that changing,” Angelo said. “We look forward to continuing to work with Mr. Ryan in his new role as speaker.”

Ryan’s office didn’t respond to the Washington Blade’s request for comment on whether the speaker would be open to a vote on LGBT non-discrimination legislation.

Any successful vote under Ryan on ENDA — or the Equality Act, or some other kind of LGBT non-discrimination bill — would likely come sometime after the current Congress and the Obama administration. After all, for the time being Republicans have their greatest majority in the U.S. House since the Truman administration and a majority in the Senate. On the other hand, the pro-LGBT amendment to the HUD spending bill passed in the House despite the vast Republican majority in the chamber.

On Sunday during an interview on ABC’s “This Week,” Ryan categorically ruled out the possibility of immigration reform legislation coming to the floor while Obama is president, saying the White House can’t be trusted on the issue.

“I think he’s proven untrustworthy on this issue. He tried to go around Congress with an executive order to rewrite laws unilaterally,” Ryan said. “Presidents don’t write laws. Congress writes laws.”

The same could be said about ENDA. After Congress failed to act on the legislation last year, Obama signed an executive order barring federal contractors from engaging in anti-LGBT workplace discrimination.

One option available to LGBT rights supporters is filing a discharge petition to move a non-discrimination bill to the House floor. It’s a legislative procedure that rarely works, but last week the Democrats successfully used a discharge petition to force a vote to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank. Over the objections of 177 GOP lawmakers, 62 Republicans joined 184 Democrats to exceed the 218 votes necessary to force a vote on the issue.

Roddy Flynn, executive director of the LGBT Equality Caucus, said there is “not at this time” any consideration to employing a discharge petition to bring the Equality Act to the House floor.

As LGBT advocates seek to advance a non-discrimination bill, Ryan will also face pressure to move forward with the First Amendment Defense Act, a religious freedom measure seen to enable anti-LGBT legislation. As chair of the Ways & Means Committee, Ryan had signaled a committee vote on the legislation would take place, but that vote was later cancelled amid media scrutiny. Ryan isn’t among the 151 co-sponsors of the legislation.

Angelo said in the event the First Amendment Defense Act sees movement under Ryan, the speaker’s pledge to return to regular order would effectively gut the legislation.

“If Speaker Ryan returns to Regular Order in the House as he has promised, any movement of the First Amendment Defense Act would be met with an amendment proposed by our Republican allies in the House that would severely narrow its scope,” Angelo said.

David Stacy, government affairs director for the Human Rights Campaign, said Ryan should use his new position to advance the Equality Act to enshrine LGBT non-discrimination protections into law.

“The American people are ready to turn away from the politics of discrimination, and we certainly hope that Speaker Ryan will lead the caucus in a new direction,” Stacy said. “With a majority of Republican voters in support of federal non-discrimination protections for LGBT citizens, it’s past time that Congress advanced the Equality Act, which would finally protect LGBT Americans from discrimination no matter which state they call home.”

Chris Johnson is Chief Political & White House Reporter for the Washington Blade. Johnson attends the daily White House press briefings and is a member of the White House Correspondents' Association. Follow Chris

  • I guess if you are LCR’s designated talking head, it’s not surprising that you have to regularly preface your comments with: “Despite [Fill-in Name]’s anti-gay [view or votes], we have a good relationship with….” Despite Mr. Romney’s…..Despite Mr. Carson’s…. Despite Mr. Rubio’s…..Despite Mr. Ryan’s…. Anyone sense a trend?

  • ryan is by far not the worst but he still has to pander to the extremist repubs totally freaked out about gays marrying

    BTW faux news never even mentioned the scotus rule, afraid their extremists would freak out and change the channel



    The Democrats are
    absolutely unsympathetic to the American taxpayer, thinking that we have a
    responsibility to rescue every illegal alien from their dreary existence from
    every part of the world. Then ordain it and passing out a cornucopia of
    ‘freebies’, expecting they are obligated to vote illegally for a Leftists. Then
    we have the GOP higher echelon of legislators that they have no option but
    voting for a member who will succeed in importing more cheap labor. So each
    Political party has a predicament in this Catch 22 situation. Democrats want
    those illegal votes and will deliberately look the other way and Republicans
    are tightly knotted to their Special Interests. Both sides are committed to
    their Campaign contributors who are paying all the bills and must accept they
    have become the puppets of big and small businesses, corporate and industrial entities
    who never give pockets of dollars for nothing–they always want their pound of

    Donald Trump has a
    different resume as he is completely isolated from the temptation to align
    himself with any money lender. He hands are clean of any blood money? Its
    sensational fact that this real estate developer has piles of his own loose
    cash and are able to wave away the lobbyists who have almost obscenely fused into the very chambers of the House and
    Senate, waiting in the hallway to pounce on their own campaign victim.
    Lobbyists have been haunting the Congressional buildings forever, and are have
    been produced from the retired politicians in Congress.

    Whether or not we can
    amend Birthright citizenship, which overall is a giant cost to taxpayers and up
    to the courts? But the flow of non citizens can be staunched by rescinding the
    ‘Optional’ execution of the program and using the strict alternative MANDATORY
    E-Verify. Unauthorized labor will be taken into custody and deported,


    When you see that California is overpopulated with
    illegal aliens, you know the vote is going to the Left’s Hillary Clinton or
    Socialist Marxist Bernie Sanders in that particular state. The people who vote for these two people
    equally want all the things the Democratic Party can give them, which is a free
    walk through life, feeding off the backs of taxpayer’s. Tell me who isn’t going
    to vote for a Leftist who offers free healthcare, free education, low income
    housing, and many other programs, that was originally only obtained by US
    citizens. But King Obama and his loyal Imperial Court has changed through
    his executive orders immigration laws.

    The pledge of building
    a giant wall has opened the eyes of the 92 million American seeking work; or
    required full time jobs. The wall can be easily being constructed with
    remuneration of Mexican funding, otherwise under Trump there will be giant
    consequences. Trump will induce extra tariffs from our Southern neighbor; not
    only products arriving across the border, but further penalties as punishment
    from not enforcing the demarcation line between THEM and US?

    It’s over a year before
    the presidential election, but is aware that your vote will count; I suspect
    towards a new beginning with Donald Trump or more of the same almost
    impenetrable execution of worthless bills perpetrated by the Hilary’s or god
    help us the extreme Socialist ideology of Bernie Sanders. Both Madam Clinton
    and Sanders will certainly be on a spending spree of other people’s money; then
    new layers of taxes to pay for it all.

    Fortunately Trump is primarily
    going after the illegal alien invaders, but additionally after Corporate
    Welfare. Trump will take away the incentives for companies who move overseas by
    lowering the corporate tax rates to 15 percent.
    As a further deterrent Trump will place tariffs on goods from foreign
    nations that are imported into America free of any taxes, and which do not play
    by the free trade rules–such as China, Japan and of course Mexico. Until every
    country that is fully in compliance with the US, in an environment in which
    all businesses in a given market must follow the same rules and are given an equivalent ability to compete, which is not happening now. This means renegotiation’s that will be handled with hard nose
    delegates who will not be treated as an abject fool, as the previous delegates
    assigned. Something like 2.5 Trillion dollars will be flowing back from
    countries, with thousands of jobs returning. Of course there will be profits to
    be made, but to a lesser degree by greedy mega corporate.


    There will be a rebound
    in jobs and the only President can supply it is Donald Trump. He will also
    reignite the size of our military that foreign nations will be advised not to
    defy. Veterans will be treated with great respect and will never have to beg
    for treatment again. Trumps plan will end any poorly delivered medical treatment
    and the corruption will never ever again be seen or the humiliation on our sick
    and incapacitated soldiers.

    Read these disturbing
    stories of the Obama Administration using their power to stop the legal process
    of removing illegal alien. Judicial Watch, is an
    attorney group that brings to light corruption in Washington and at the state level.
    Americans should be aware of the facts
    and not the lies from the Liberal leaning media or the pro-illegal immigration

    disturbing cases highlight the serious problems with the nation’s immigration
    laws under the Obama administration; In one, the Department of Homeland
    Security (DHS) accused a local police department of racial profiling for
    arresting two previously deported illegal immigrants and turning them over to
    federal authorities for removal. In the other, the Department of Justice (DOJ)
    charged a public school district with discrimination for verifying the immigration
    status of its employees. Read the corruption files and understand the secret
    goings on behind the public’s back.

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2020. All rights reserved.