Connect with us

National

Court rules for same-sex couple denied housing by Colo. landlord

Judge determines anti-gay discrimination amounts to sex stereotyping

Published

on

Tonya Smith, Rachel Smith, gay news, Washington Blade
Tonya Smith, Rachel Smith, gay news, Washington Blade

Tonya and Rachel Smith were denied housing in Colorado, but a judge found that violated the Fair Housing Act. (Photo courtesy of Lambda Legal)

A federal judge has ruled for a same-sex couple who alleged discrimination after a Colorado landlord refused to grant them housing, issuing relief on the basis the discrimination they faced amounted to unlawful sex stereotyping.

In a 12-page decision, U.S. District Judge Raymond Moore, an Obama appointee, ruled Wednesday the Boulder County property owner violated the Fair Housing Act and the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act by denyingĀ housing to Rachel, who’s transgender, and Tonya Smith. The couple were married seven years ago and have two children, ages seven and three.

The couple, represented by Lambda Legal, argued the landlord, Deepika Avanti, discriminated against them for failing to conform to gender stereotypes violates the prohibition on sex discrimination in the Fair Housing Act.

“The Court agrees,” Moore ruled. “Such stereotypical norms are no different from other stereotypes associated with women, such as the way she should dress or act (e.g., that a woman should not be overly aggressive, or should not act macho), and are products of sex stereotyping.”

Moore also grants relief on the basis the landlord’s denial of housing to the couple violates a stateĀ law in Colorado prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex, sexual orientation and familial status.

Although the couple made the case the Fair Housing Act was violated explicitly because of the transgender status of Rachel and the couple’s sexual orientation, Moore declined to accept this argument.

“The Court declines to do so for two reasons,” Moore writes. “First, the Motion as to Count I is based on sex stereotyping, and Count I’s reliance on sex stereotype as ‘discrimination based on sex’ did not include such allegations. Second, Count I also relies on discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression, but the Motion was not based on such theories. To the extent Plaintiffs are attempting to bootstrap such other theories onto their sex stereotype theory, the Court declines to consider something not pled.”

The decision comes on the heels of the U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that determined sexual-orientation discrimination in the workplace violates the ban on sex discrimination in Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964.

Had the district court in Colorado adopted the same idea, it would have been the first to determine the prohibition on sex discrimination under Fair Housing Act also bars discrimination in housing on the basis of sexual orientation.

Omar Gonzalez-Pagan, staff attorney for Lambda Legal and attorney for the couple, nonetheless said in a statement the decision is a “tremendous victory” for LGBT people because it found anti-LGBT discrimination stems from sex stereotyping.

ā€œFor the first time, a federal court has ruled that the Fair Housing Actā€™s sex discrimination prohibitions apply to discrimination based on stereotypes about sexual orientation and gender identity,” Gonzalez-Pagan said. “This is two federal courts two days in a row that have said that laws prohibiting sex discrimination protect LGBT people. It sends a strong message: discrimination against LGBT Americans in housing and employment is illegal and will not be tolerated.”

In 2015, Tonya and Rachel Smith sought to rent a two-bedroom home in Gold Hill, Colo., along with their children. Although Avanti expressed a willingness to rent the home to the family, that changed after she met the couple in person.

Avanti allegedly wrote to the couple in an email after meeting them and declined to offer the house to them based on the coupleā€™s ā€œuniquenessā€ and a fear it would jeopardize her standing in the community.

ā€œYour unique relationship would become the town focus, in small towns everyone talks and gossips, all of us would be the most popular subject of town, in this way I could not be a low profile,ā€ Avanti wrote.

In a statement, Tonya Smith said the couple is “delighted with this ruling” because of hardship the couple had to endure in their search for housing.

ā€œWe were so shocked and upset by Deepikaā€™s emails, that simply because of who we are she wouldnā€™t rent to us,” Tonya Smith said. “We felt it was unfair and illegal, and now a court has agreed. No one should ever have to go through what we went through, and hopefully this ruling will protect other couples like us who are trying to provide safe homes for their families.ā€

The prayer of relief sought by the couple was a determination Avanti’s actions violated both federal and state law; an order enjoining the landlord from future discrimination and requiring her to complete a fair housing training; and payment for compulsory and punitive damages as well as litigation costs.

Gonzalez-Pagan said in a statement the decision serves as evidence housing discrimination is a pervasive problem for LGBT people, but “very much underreported.”

ā€œIn many instances, LGBT people who are either overtly or subtly discriminated against in housing do not report the discrimination because of their immediate need to find housing or due to the costs of pursuing a claim,” Gonzalez-Pagan said. “Property owners who engage in this kind of discrimination must be held accountable.ā€

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

National

LGBTQ asylum seeker ‘forcibly removed’ from US, sent to El Salvador

Immigrant Defenders Law Center represents Venezuelan national

Published

on

The Salvadoran capital of El Salvador from El BoquerĆ³n Volcano in 2023. (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

An immigrant rights group that represents an LGBTQ asylum seeker from Venezuela says the Trump-Vance administration on March 15 “forcibly removed” him from the U.S. and sent him to El Salvador.

Immigrant Defenders Law Center Litigation and Advocacy Director Alvaro M. Huerta during a telephone interview with the Washington Blade on Tuesday said officials with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection alleged his organization’s client was a member of Tren de Aragua, a Venezuela-based gang, because of his tattoos and no other information.

“It’s very flimsy,” said Huerta. “These are the types of tattoos that any artist in New York City or Los Angeles would have. It’s nothing that makes him a gang member.”

The White House on Feb. 20 designated Tren de Aragua an “international terrorist organization.”

President Donald Trump on March 15 invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, which the Associated Press notes allows the U.S. to deport “noncitizens without any legal recourse.”

“I proclaim that all Venezuelan citizens 14 years of age or older who are members of TdA (Tren de Aragua), are within the United States, and are not actually naturalized or lawful permanent residents of the United States are liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as alien enemies,” said Trump in a proclamation that announced his invocation of the 18th century law.

The asylum seeker ā€” who the Immigrant Defenders Law Center has not identified by name because he is “in danger” ā€” is among the hundreds of Venezuelans who the U.S. sent to El Salvador on March 15.

Chief Judge James E. Boasberg of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia temporarily blocked the deportations. The AP notes the flights were already in the air when Boasberg issued his ruling.

Huerta said U.S. officials on Monday confirmed the asylum seeker is “indeed in El Salvador.” He told the Blade it remains unclear whether the asylum seeker is in the country’s Terrorism Confinement Center, a maximum-security prison known by the Spanish acronym CECOT.

‘We couldn’t find him’

Huerta said the Immigrant Defenders Law Center client fled Venezuela and asked for asylum in the U.S.

The asylum seeker, according to Huerta, passed a “credible fear interview” that determines whether an asylum claim is valid. Huerta said U.S. officials detained the asylum seeker last year when he returned to the country from the Mexican border city of Tijuana.

Huerta told the Blade the asylum seeker was supposed to appear before an immigration judge on March 13.

“We couldn’t find him,” said Huerta.

He noted speculation over whether Trump was about to invoke the Alien Enemies Act, and the Immigrant Defenders Law Center “started getting concerned that maybe he was caught up in this situation.”

“He’s an LGBT individual who is an artist in Venezuela,” said Huerta.

Neither ICE nor CBP have responded to the Blade’s request for comment.

Huerta said it is “hard to say” whether the asylum seeker has any legal recourse.

“He still has an ongoing case in immigration court here,” said Huerta, noting the asylum seeker’s attorney was in court on Monday, and has another hearing in two weeks. “Presumably they should have to allow him to appear, at least virtually, for court because he still has these cases.”

Huerta noted the U.S. since Trump took office has deported hundreds of migrants to Panama; officials in the Central American country have released dozens of them from detention. Migrants sent to the GuantƔnamo Bay naval base in Cuba have returned to detention facilities in the U.S.

“Something where the government, kind of unliterally, can just say that someone is a gang member based on tattoos, without any offer of proof, without having to go to court to say that and then take them externally to what effectively a prison state (El Salvador), it certainly is completely just different than what we’ve seen,” Huerta told the Blade.

Huerta also spoke about the Trump-Vance administration’s overall immigration policy.

“The Trump administration knows exactly what they’re doing when it comes to scapegoating immigrants, scapegoating asylees,” he said. “They have a population that, in many ways, is politically powerless, but in many other ways, is politically powerful because they have other folks standing behind them as well, but they’re an easy punching bag.”

“They can use this specter of we’re just deporting criminals, even though they’re the ones who are saying that they’re criminal, they’re not necessarily proving that,” added Huerta. “They feel like they can really take that fight and run with it, and they’re testing the bounds of what they can get away with inside and outside of the courtroom.”

Continue Reading

National

Kennedy Center official slams Harvey Fiersteinā€™s ban claim as ā€˜total lieā€™

Grenell invites iconic gay actor to perform ā€˜Hairsprayā€™

Published

on

Richard Grenell, president and interim executive director of the John F. Kennedy Center, denies that actor Harvey Fierstein was banned from the venue. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

Richard Grenell, who was appointed president and interim executive director of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts by President Trump, pushed back against Harvey Fiersteinā€™s claim of being banned from the Kennedy Center, calling it ā€œa total lieā€ in a new X post.

On Wednesday, gay icon and Tony Award-winning actor Harvey Fierstein posted on Instagram, claiming to have been ā€œbanned from THE KENNEDY CENTER.ā€ In the post, Fierstein shared a picture of himself walking in the 1979 Christopher Street Liberation Day parade alongside LGBTQ rights activist Marsha P. Johnson. In the caption, he alleged that Trumpā€™s takeover of the Kennedy Center was the reason for his ban, calling it an attack on free speech and a threat to democracy.

The Blade emailed the Kennedy Centerā€™s public relations team, seeking confirmation of Fiersteinā€™s claim and an official statement from the cultural center. More than an hour later, in a separate email that did not directly address the original request, Brendan Padgett, the Kennedy Centerā€™s director of Public Relations, responded with a link to a post on his boss Grenellā€™s X account.

ā€œMaking sure you saw this,ā€ Padgettā€™s email read, followed by a link to Grenellā€™s post.

ā€œHey, @HarveyFierstein This is a total lie,ā€ Grenell wrote in the post. ā€œWhoever told you this (because you obviously didnā€™t do your own research) should be fired from your team for purposefully making you look foolish.ā€

Grenellā€™s post, uploaded the morning after Fiersteinā€™s initial claim, included screenshots of Fiersteinā€™s Instagram post. Grenell went on to assert that, like Fierstein, he had been a fighter ā€œfor equality for decades,ā€ citing his position as the first openly gay member of a U.S. presidentā€™s Cabinet as proof. (Grenell was never confirmed by the Senate; the first openly gay Senate-confirmed Cabinet official is Pete Buttigieg, former Secretary of Transportation.)

ā€œYou arenā€™t banned,ā€ Grenell continued. ā€œIn fact, come do Hairspray or La Cage here at the Kennedy Center. This is your personal invite. Letā€™s meetā€”if, however, you can handle diverse opinions and want to be inclusive of everyone, that is.ā€

The Washington Blade reached out to both Harvey Fierstein and Brendan Padgett for comment on the ongoing situation. Padgett responded, stating, ā€œNo comment aside from the Kennedy Center Presidentā€™s post.ā€ Fierstein has yet to respond.

Continue Reading

National

Trump administration considering closing HIV prevention agency: reports

Sources say funding cuts possible for CDC

Published

on

Reports have emerged that President Trumpā€™s HHS plans to cut HIV prevention efforts, rolling back a program he initiated in his first term. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

The Department of Health and Human Services is considering closing the HIV Prevention Division of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and transferring some of its programs to a different agency, according to a report by the New York Times.

The Times and Politico cited government sources who spoke on condition of not being identified as saying plans under consideration from the administration also call for possible funding cuts in the domestic HIV prevention program following funding cuts already put in place for foreign U.S. HIV programs.

ā€œItā€™s not 100 percent going to happen, but 100 percent being discussed,ā€ the Times quoted one of the sources as saying.

News of the possible shutdown of the HIV Prevention Division and possible cuts in HIV prevention funds prompted 13 of the nationā€™s leading LGBTQ, HIV, and health organizations to release a joint statement on March19 condemning what they said could result in a ā€œdevastating effectā€ on the nationā€™s progress in fighting AIDS.

Among the organizations signing on to the joint statement were D.C.ā€™s Whitman-Walker Health and the Los Angeles LGBT Center.

Carl Schmid, executive director of the HIV+ Hepatitis Policy Institute, which opposes funding cuts or curtailment in domestic AIDS programs, points out in a separate statement that it was President Trump during his first term in office who put in place the HIV Epidemic Initiative, which calls for ending the HIV epidemic in the U.S. by 2030.

That initiative, which Trump announced in his 2019 State of the Union address, is credited with having reduced new HIV infections nationwide by 30 percent in adolescents and young adults, and by about 10 percent in most other groups, according to the Times report on possible plans to scale back the program.

In a statement released to Politico, HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said, ā€œHHS is following the Administrationā€™s guidance and taking a careful look at all divisions to see where there is overlap that could be streamlined to support the Presidentā€™s broader efforts to restructure the federal government.ā€

ā€œNo final decision on streamlining CDCā€™s HIV Prevention Division has been made,ā€ Nixon said in his statement. 

ā€œAn effort to defund HIV prevention by this administration would set us back decades, cost innocent people their lives and cost taxpayers millions,ā€ said Kelley Robinson, president of the Human Rights Campaign, the nationā€™s largest LGBTQ advocacy organization, in a March 19 statement.

ā€œThe LGBTQ+ community still carries the scars of the government negligence and mass death of the HIV/AIDS epidemic,ā€  Robinson said. ā€œWe should be doubling down on our investment to end the HIV epidemic once and for all, not regressing to the days of funeral services and a virus running rampant,ā€ she said. 

ā€œWe are deeply concerned by the Trump administrationā€™s reckless moves to defund and de-prioritize HIV prevention,ā€ the statement released by the 13 organizations says. ā€œThese abrupt and incomprehensible possible cuts threaten to reverse decades of progress, exposing our nation to a resurgence of a preventable disease with devastating and avoidable human and financial costs,ā€ the statement says. Ā 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular