Connect with us

homepage news

D.C. fares well in HQ2 pursuit

Amazon may be considering LGBT laws as criteria for new headquarters

Published

on

Jeff Bezos, gay news, Washington Blade, HQ2

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos is looking for a second headquarters and three area jurisdictions are finalists.

LGBT rights advocates in the three D.C.-area jurisdictions named by Amazon last week as being among 20 finalist cities or regions in contention for the corporate giant’s second headquarters have been touting their jurisdictions’ strong record in support of LGBT rights.

Amazon announced on Jan. 18 that D.C., Northern Virginia, and Montgomery County, Md., were among 20 finalist jurisdictions that made the cut from 238 cities and regions in North America that submitted bids to become the high tech company’s second world headquarters referred to as HQ2.

Amazon’s record as a strong supporter of nondiscrimination protections for its LGBT employees and its overall support for LGBT equality has prompted the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest LGBT civil rights organization, to assign the company a perfect 100 percent rating for its annual Corporate Equality Index.

This has prompted speculation that Amazon would likely consider a state, city, or region’s laws and policies on LGBT issues as a factor in choosing the location of the new multi-billion dollar headquarters, which is expected to bring with it 50,000 high-paying jobs.

Among the 20 cities Amazon named in its list of finalists for the new headquarters, 11 have received a 100 percent rating in HRC’s 2017 Municipal Equality Index that assesses LGBT related laws and practices. The 11 include Atlanta; Austin, Texas; Boston; Chicago; Columbus, Ohio; Dallas; Denver; Los Angeles; New York City; Philadelphia; and Pittsburgh.

HRC considers D.C. as a state rather than a city and includes it in its separate State Equality Index, which does not provide a numerical rating. HRC’s 2017 State Equality Index report places D.C. and 13 states in the highest of four categories that assess LGBT rights policies and laws for the 50 states. The category is called “Working Toward Innovative Equality.”

Based on HRC’s criteria for assessing the LGBT-related records for both states and cities, D.C. would have received a 100 percent rating in HRC’s Municipal Equality Index if it were classified as a city.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser frequently cites the city’s extensive and wide-ranging LGBT supportive laws and policy directives in her public appearances at LGBT events.

HRC doesn’t issue ratings or assessments for regions such as Northern Virginia. However, its Municipal Equality Index for 2017 assigns a rating score of 96 to Arlington County and a score of 86 to the City of Alexandria, which are among the largest jurisdictions that comprise Northern Virginia.

The HRC Municipal Equality Index doesn’t issue a rating score for Montgomery County, Md. But it has assigned a 2017 rating score for two of its largest cites – 100 percent for the city of Rockville and 59 percent for the city of Gaithersburg.

In its state Equality Index assessments, HRC places Maryland in the second highest category called “Solidifying Equality.” It says a state in this category has nondiscrimination protections for LGBT people and is “high-performing” on LGBT issues but does not rise to the “cutting-edge” level of LGBT accomplishments of D.C. and the 13 states in the top category, including California and New York.

The HRC 2017 State Equality Index places Virginia in the lowest of the four categories called “High Priority to Achieve Basic Equality.” According to HRC, the 27 states in this category “have many laws that undermine LGBTQ equality.” HRC says an “overwhelming majority” of states in this category, including Virginia, do not have anti-discrimination laws that include sexual orientation and gender identity protections and few have hate crimes laws.

Despite Virginia’s less than supportive record on a state level, LGBT rights advocates in Northern Virginia point out that as a region, Northern Virginia’s elected officials and its policies and local laws are highly supportive on LGBT rights.

Jean Kelleher, director of the Alexandria Office on Human Rights, told the Washington Blade that Alexandria, Arlington and Fairfax counties have added sexual orientation protections to their human rights ordinances. She said the three jurisdictions have embraced the U.S. Equality Employment Opportunity Commission’s interpretation of the 1964 U.S. Civil Rights Act to include protection against discrimination based on gender identity as well as sexual orientation as a form of gender discrimination.

Kelleher said invoking the EEOC’s interpretation and official legal opinion enables Northern Virginia jurisdictions to protect LGBT people from discrimination despite a longstanding state law that created what’s known as the Dillon Rule. Among other things, the Dillon Rule prohibits local jurisdictions in the state such as counties and cities from enacting or enforcing laws, including civil rights laws, whose provisions go beyond the scope of a state law.

“The Dillon Rule has constrained us in the past but we are continuously moving forward,” Kelleher said.

Nick Benton, the gay editor and publisher of the Falls Church, Va., News Press, which covers state and local current events in Virginia, said he has a strong message for Amazon should it decide to consider the LGBT rights record of a jurisdiction competing for its second corporate headquarters:

“Right now there is no place more LGBT friendly than Northern Virginia, even if the archaic state laws in Virginia limit what kinds of format protections local jurisdictions here can enforce,” Benton said.

He noted that although the Dillon Rule officially prevents local jurisdictions from passing or enforcing LGBT rights laws, nearly all of the Northern Virginia jurisdictions have adopted resolutions “unanimously expressing full support for diversity in employment, housing” and other categories.

Benton and other LGBT advocates in Northern Virginia also note that there are currently three openly gay members and one “out and proud” transgender member of the Virginia General Assembly from Northern Virginia.

Dana Beyer, a longtime civic activist, transgender rights organizer, and current candidate for the Maryland State Senate, has put in a plug for Montgomery County’s quest for the Amazon headquarters.

“It would be very satisfying to know that Amazon was seriously considering a locality’s LGBTQ rights record in its decision to situate its second headquarters,” Beyer said. “If so, my home county, Montgomery County, Md., would be ideal,” she continued.

“Beginning with sexual orientation protections first introduced and defended in 1986, and then followed by similar gender identity protections added and defended in 2007, my county has been a civil rights leader in the state and country,” she told the Blade. “Amazon’s employees would derive great benefit and satisfaction from the affirming culture being created here.”

Sheila Alexander-Reid, director of the D.C. Mayor’s Office of LGBTQ Affairs, said that based on a wide range of factors, including its strong record on LGBT rights, “D.C. is by far the best location for Amazon’s second corporate headquarters.”

Alexander-Reid notes that D.C. in 2009 became one of the first jurisdictions in the country to legally recognize same-sex marriage – “three years before Maryland and five years before Virginia.” She said that under Mayor Bowser’s leadership, D.C. has “intentionally created a safe space” for LGBTQ residents.

“By providing public accommodation laws that protect against discrimination, gender neutral markers on identification and drivers’ licenses, the ability to legally change names on birth certificates and drivers licenses to correspond with gender identity, the District is leading the country in affirming transgender, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning/queer residents,” she said.

Following is a list of the 20 cities and regions selected by Amazon as finalists in its process of selecting a home for its second world corporate headquarters. Also shown are the Human Rights Campaign’s Municipal Equality Index rating for cities and some counties and the HRC State Equality Index category based on the states’ records on LGBT rights. The Blade has designated the state categories as “Excellent,” “Good,” “Fair,” and “Poor” based on HRC’s criteria.

Atlanta—100% city rating; poor state rating for Georgia

Austin, Tex.—100% city rating; poor state rating for Texas

Boston—100% city rating; excellent state rating for Massachusetts

Chicago—100% city rating; excellent state rating for Illinois

Columbus, Ohio—100% city rating; poor state rating for Ohio

Dallas—100% city rating; poor state rating for Texas

Denver—100% city rating; excellent state rating for Colorado

Indianapolis—88% city rating; fair state rating for Indiana

Los Angeles—100% city rating; excellent state rating for California

Miami—59% city rating; poor state rating for Florida

Montgomery County, Md.—No county rating issued by HRC; good state rating for Maryland

Nashville, Tenn.—60% city rating; poor state rating for Tennessee

Newark, N.J.—67% city rating; good state rating for New Jersey

New York City—100% city rating; excellent state rating for New York

Northern Virginia—No regional rating issued by HRC; poor state rating for Virginia

Philadelphia—100% city rating; poor state rating for Pennsylvania

Pittsburgh—100% city rating; poor state rating for Pennsylvania

Raleigh, N.C.—60% city rating; poor state rating for North Carolina

Toronto, Ontario—No city or provincial rating issued by HRC

Washington, D.C.—No city rating issued by HRC; excellent state rating for District of Columbia

Continue Reading
Advertisement
4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Brooks Austin

    January 26, 2018 at 1:23 am

    Hijacking LGBTQ rights to suck up to rich powerful corporations seems like the epitome of white privilege.

    • Elizabeth

      January 26, 2018 at 8:16 am

      Gℴℴgle giving to people of every age 98 US dollars hourly to complete some work with a computer .. Work Some just few hours daily & have more time together with your own friends … Anyone can benefit this best post…last Monday I purchased a brand new Saab 99 Turbo after just earning $12458 this five weeks .it looks the easiest-work however you will no longer forgive yourself if you don’t take a look at it.!lw47x:∰∰∰ http://GoogleHomeStuffJobsFromHomeJobs/computer/jobs ♥l♥v♥y♥♥h♥l♥♥v♥v♥d♥u♥f♥♥y♥p♥♥♥f♥♥h♥♥♥k♥♥♥n♥m♥♥♥r♥♥n♥♥v♥♥♥k♥♥♥c♥y♥♥k♥♥j:::::!ie031t:chgw

    • Annette

      January 29, 2018 at 5:59 am

      Gℴogle giving to people of every age $99 every hour to complete easy jobs from the comfort of home .. Labor Some only few hours daily & stay more time with your relatives … any individual can also avail this super post…on Sunday I purchased a great Fiat Panda after just getting $17520 this last five weeks .without any doubt it is the best work but you will not forgive yourself if you do not have a peek at this.!fh07h:➧➧➧➧ http://GoogleNewNetJobsDayCareerPartTimeJobs/get/hourly ♥♥s♥♥♥a♥♥♥c♥♥t♥♥♥w♥♥♥t♥♥♥c♥a♥♥♥y♥l♥♥♥z♥♥♥f♥♥z♥♥♥m♥♥♥t♥♥d♥♥z♥♥q♥♥z♥c♥f♥♥♥f♥♥♥f♥♥b♥♥d:::::!sh423v:wkyu

    • Kemwit Tall Tree

      February 7, 2018 at 4:07 am

      Paychecks for working people supercede your snowflake activism. This is the real world we’re talking about, not a college coffee shop!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

homepage news

Equality Act, contorted as a danger by anti-LGBTQ forces, is all but dead

No political willpower to force vote or reach a compromise

Published

on

Despite having President Biden in the White House and Democratic majorities in both chambers of Congress, efforts to update federal civil rights laws to strengthen the prohibition on discrimination against LGBTQ people by passing the Equality Act are all but dead as opponents of the measure have contorted it beyond recognition.

Political willpower is lacking to find a compromise that would be acceptable to enough Republican senators to end a filibuster on the bill — a tall order in any event — nor is there the willpower to force a vote on the Equality Act as opponents stoke fears about transgender kids in sports and not even unanimity in the Democratic caucus in favor of the bill is present, stakeholders who spoke to the Blade on condition of anonymity said.

In fact, there are no imminent plans to hold a vote on the legislation even though Pride month is days away, which would be an opportune time for Congress to demonstrate solidarity with the LGBTQ community by holding a vote on the legislation.

If the Equality Act were to come up for a Senate vote in the next month, it would not have the support to pass. Continued assurances that bipartisan talks are continuing on the legislation have yielded no evidence of additional support, let alone the 10 Republicans needed to end a filibuster.

“I haven’t really heard an update either way, which is usually not good,” one Democratic insider said. “My understanding is that our side was entrenched in a no-compromise mindset and with [Sen. Joe] Manchin saying he didn’t like the bill, it doomed it this Congress. And the bullying of hundreds of trans athletes derailed our message and our arguments of why it was broadly needed.”

The only thing keeping the final nail from being hammered into the Equality Act’s coffin is the unwillingness of its supporters to admit defeat. Other stakeholders who spoke to the Blade continued to assert bipartisan talks are ongoing, strongly pushing back on any conclusion the legislation is dead.

Alphonso David, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said the Equality Act is “alive and well,” citing widespread public support he said includes “the majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents and a growing number of communities across the country engaging and mobilizing every day in support of the legislation.”

“They understand the urgent need to pass this bill and stand up for LGBTQ people across our country,” David added. “As we engage with elected officials, we have confidence that Congress will listen to the voices of their constituents and continue fighting for the Equality Act through the lengthy legislative process.  We will also continue our unprecedented campaign to grow the already-high public support for a popular bill that will save lives and make our country fairer and more equal for all. We will not stop until the Equality Act is passed.”

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), chief sponsor of the Equality Act in the Senate, also signaled through a spokesperson work continues on the legislation, refusing to give up on expectations the legislation would soon become law.

“Sen. Merkley and his staff are in active discussions with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to try to get this done,” McLennan said. “We definitely see it as a key priority that we expect to become law.”

A spokesperson Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who had promised to force a vote on the Equality Act in the Senate on the day the U.S. House approved it earlier this year, pointed to a March 25 “Dear Colleague” letter in which he identified the Equality Act as one of several bills he’d bring up for a vote.

Despite any assurances, the hold up on the bill is apparent. Although the U.S. House approved the legislation earlier this year, the Senate Judiciary Committee hasn’t even reported out the bill yet to the floor in the aftermath of the first-ever Senate hearing on the bill in March. A Senate Judiciary Committee Democratic aide, however, disputed that inaction as evidence the Equality Act is dead in its tracks: “Bipartisan efforts on a path forward are ongoing.”

Democrats are quick to blame Republicans for inaction on the Equality Act, but with Manchin withholding his support for the legislation they can’t even count on the entirety of their caucus to vote “yes” if it came to the floor. Progressives continue to advocate an end to the filibuster to advance legislation Biden has promised as part of his agenda, but even if they were to overcome headwinds and dismantle the institution needing 60 votes to advance legislation, the Equality Act would likely not have majority support to win approval in the Senate with a 50-50 party split.

The office of Manchin, who has previously said he couldn’t support the Equality Act over concerns about public schools having to implement the transgender protections applying to sports and bathrooms, hasn’t responded to multiple requests this year from the Blade on the legislation and didn’t respond to a request to comment for this article.

Meanwhile, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who declined to co-sponsor the Equality Act this year after having signed onto the legislation in the previous Congress, insisted through a spokesperson talks are still happening across the aisle despite the appearances the legislation is dead.

“There continues to be bipartisan support for passing a law that protects the civil rights of Americans, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity,” said Annie Clark, a Collins spokesperson. “The Equality Act was a starting point for negotiations, and in its current form, it cannot pass. That’s why there are ongoing discussions among senators and stakeholders about a path forward.”

Let’s face it: Anti-LGBTQ forces have railroaded the debate by making the Equality Act about an end to women’s sports by allowing transgender athletes and danger to women in sex-segregated places like bathrooms and prisons. That doesn’t even get into resolving the issue on drawing the line between civil rights for LGBTQ people and religious freedom, which continues to be litigated in the courts as the U.S. Supreme Court is expected any day now to issue a ruling in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia to determine if foster care agencies can reject same-sex couples over religious objections.

For transgender Americans, who continue to report discrimination and violence at high rates, the absence of the Equality Act may be most keenly felt.

Mara Keisling, outgoing executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, disputed any notion the Equality Act is dead and insisted the legislation is “very much alive.”

“We remain optimistic despite misinformation from the opposition,” Keisling said. “NCTE and our movement partners are still working fruitfully on the Equality Act with senators. In fact, we are gaining momentum with all the field organizing we’re doing, like phone banking constituents to call their senators. Legislating takes time. Nothing ever gets through Congress quickly. We expect to see a vote during this Congress, and we are hopeful we can win.”

But one Democratic source said calls to members of Congress against the Equality Act, apparently coordinated by groups like the Heritage Foundation, have has outnumbered calls in favor of it by a substantial margin, with a particular emphasis on Manchin.

No stories are present in the media about same-sex couples being kicked out of a restaurant for holding hands or transgender people for using the restroom consistent with their gender identity, which would be perfectly legal in 25 states thanks to the patchwork of civil rights laws throughout the United States and inadequate protections under federal law.

Tyler Deaton, senior adviser for the American Unity Fund, which has bolstered the Republican-led Fairness for All Act as an alternative to the Equality Act, said he continues to believe the votes are present for a compromise form of the bill.

“I know for a fact there is a supermajority level of support in the Senate for a version of the Equality Act that is fully protective of both LGBTQ civil rights and religious freedom,” Deaton said. “There is interest on both sides of the aisle in getting something done this Congress.”

Deaton, however, didn’t respond to a follow-up inquiry on what evidence exists of agreeing on this compromise.

Biden has already missed the goal he campaigned on in the 2020 election to sign the Equality Act into law within his first 100 days in office. Although Biden renewed his call to pass the legislation in his speech to Congress last month, as things stand now that appears to be a goal he won’t realize for the remainder of this Congress.

Nor has the Biden administration made the Equality Act an issue for top officials within the administration as it pushes for an infrastructure package as a top priority. One Democratic insider said Louisa Terrell, legislative affairs director for the White House, delegated work on the Equality Act to a deputy as opposed to handling it herself.

To be sure, Biden has demonstrated support for the LGBTQ community through executive action at an unprecedented rate, signing an executive order on day one ordering federal agencies to implement the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last year in Bostock v. Clayton County to the fullest extent possible and dismantling former President Trump’s transgender military ban. Biden also made historic LGBTQ appointments with the confirmation of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Rachel Levine as assistant secretary of health.

A White House spokesperson insisted Biden’s team across the board remains committed to the Equality Act, pointing to his remarks to Congress.

“President Biden has urged Congress to get the Equality Act to his desk so he can sign it into law and provide long overdue civil rights protections to LGBTQ+ Americans, and he remains committed to seeing this legislation passed as quickly as possible,” the spokesperson said. “The White House and its entire legislative team remains in ongoing and close coordination with organizations, leaders, members of Congress, including the Equality Caucus, and staff to ensure we are working across the aisle to push the Equality Act forward.”

But at least in the near-term, that progress will fall short of fulfilling the promise of updating federal civil rights law with the Equality Act, which will mean LGBTQ people won’t be able to rely on those protections when faced with discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

Continue Reading

homepage news

D.C. bill to ban LGBTQ panic defense delayed by Capitol security

Delivery of bill to Congress was held up due to protocols related to Jan. 6 riots

Published

on

New fencing around the Capitol following the Jan. 6 insurrection prevented some D.C. bills from being delivered to the Hill for a required congressional review. (Blade file photo by Michael K. Lavers)

A bill approved unanimously last December by the D.C. Council to ban the so-called LGBTQ panic defense has been delayed from taking effect as a city law because the fence installed around the U.S. Capitol following the Jan. 6 insurrection prevented the law from being delivered to Congress.

According to Eric Salmi, communications director for D.C. Council member Charles Allen (D-Ward 6), who guided the bill through the Council’s legislative process, all bills approved by the Council and signed by the D.C. mayor must be hand-delivered to Congress for a required congressional review.

“What happened was when the Capitol fence went up after the January insurrection, it created an issue where we physically could not deliver laws to Congress per the congressional review period,” Salmi told the Washington Blade.

Among the bills that could not immediately be delivered to Congress was the Bella Evangelista and Tony Hunter Panic Defense Prohibition and Hate Crimes Response Amendment Act of 2020, which was approved by the Council on a second and final vote on Dec. 15.

Between the time the bill was signed by Mayor Muriel Bowser and published in the D.C. Register under procedural requirements for all bills, it was not ready to be transmitted to Congress until Feb. 16, the Council’s legislative record for the bill shows.

Salmi said the impasse in delivering the bill to Congress due to the security fence prevented the bill from reaching Congress on that date and prevented the mandatory 60-day congressional review period for this bill from beginning at that time. He noted that most bills require a 30 legislative day review by Congress.

But the Evangelista-Hunter bill, named after a transgender woman and a gay man who died in violent attacks by perpetrators who attempted to use the trans and gay panic defense, includes a law enforcement related provision that under the city’s Home Rule Charter passed by Congress in the early 1970s requires a 60-day congressional review.

“There is a chance it goes into effect any day now, just given the timeline is close to being up,” Salmi said on Tuesday. “I don’t know the exact date it was delivered, but I do know the countdown is on,” said Salmi, who added, “I would expect any day now it should go into effect and there’s nothing stopping it other than an insurrection in January.”

If the delivery to Congress had not been delayed, the D.C. Council’s legislative office estimated the congressional review would have been completed by May 12.

A congressional source who spoke on condition of being identified only as a senior Democratic aide, said the holdup of D.C. bills because of the Capitol fence has been corrected.

“The House found an immediate workaround, when this issue first arose after the Jan. 6 insurrection,” the aide said.

“This is yet another reason why D.C. Council bills should not be subject to a congressional review period and why we need to grant D.C. statehood,” the aide said.

The aide added that while no disapproval resolution had been introduced in Congress to overturn the D.C. Evangelista-Hunter bill, House Democrats would have defeated such a resolution.

“House Democrats support D.C. home rule, statehood, and LGBTQ rights,” said the aide.

LGBTQ rights advocates have argued that a ban on using a gay or transgender panic defense in criminal trials is needed to prevent defense attorneys from inappropriately asking juries to find that a victim’s sexual orientation or gender identity or expression is to blame for a defendant’s criminal act, including murder.

Some attorneys have argued that their clients “panicked” after discovering the person against whom they committed a violent crime was gay or transgender, prompting them to act in a way they believed to be a form of self-defense.

In addition to its provision banning the LGBTQ panic defense, the Evangelista-Hunter bill includes a separate provision that strengthens the city’s existing hate crimes law by clarifying that hatred need not be the sole motivating factor for an underlying crime such as assault, murder, or threats to be prosecuted as a hate crime.

LGBTQ supportive prosecutors have said the clarification was needed because it is often difficult to prove to a jury that hatred is the only motive behind a violent crime. The prosecutors noted that juries have found defendants not guilty of committing a hate crime on grounds that they believed other motives were involved in a particular crime after defense lawyers argued that the law required “hate” to be the only motive in order to find someone guilty of a hate crime.

Salmi noted that while the hate crime clarification and panic defense prohibition provisions of the Evangelista-Hunter bill will become law as soon as the congressional review is completed, yet another provision in the bill will not become law after the congressional review because there are insufficient funds in the D.C. budget to cover the costs of implementing the provision.

The provision gives the D.C. Office of Human Rights and the Office of the D.C. Attorney General authority to investigate hate related discrimination at places of public accommodation. Salmi said the provision expands protections against discrimination to include web-based retailers or online delivery services that are not physically located in D.C.

“That is subject to appropriations,” Salmi said. “And until it is funded in the upcoming budget it cannot be legally enforced.”

He said that at Council member Allen’s request, the Council added language to the bill that ensures that all other provisions of the legislation that do not require additional funding – including the ban on use of the LGBTQ panic defense and the provision clarifying that hatred doesn’t have to be the sole motive for a hate crime – will take effect as soon as the congressional approval process is completed.

Continue Reading

homepage news

D.C. man charged with 2020 anti-gay death threat rearrested

Defendant implicated in three anti-LGBTQ incidents since 2011

Published

on

shooting, DC Eagle, assault, hate crime, anti-gay attack, police discrimination, sex police, Sisson, gay news, Washington Blade

A D.C. man arrested in August 2020 for allegedly threatening to kill a gay man outside the victim’s apartment in the city’s Adams Morgan neighborhood and who was released while awaiting trial was arrested again two weeks ago for allegedly threatening to kill another man in an unrelated incident.

D.C. Superior Court records show that Jalal Malki, who was 37 at the time of his 2020 arrest on a charge of bias-related attempts to do bodily harm against the gay man, was charged on May 4, 2021 with unlawful entry, simple assault, threats to kidnap and injure a person, and attempted possession of a prohibited weapon against the owner of a vacant house at 4412 Georgia Ave., N.W.

Court charging documents state that Malki was allegedly staying at the house without permission as a squatter. An arrest affidavit filed in court by D.C. police says Malki allegedly threatened to kill the man who owns the house shortly after the man arrived at the house while Malki was inside.

According to the affidavit, Malki walked up to the owner of the house while the owner was sitting in his car after having called police and told him, “If you come back here, I’m going to kill you.” While making that threat Malki displayed what appeared to be a gun in his waistband, but which was later found to be a toy gun, the affidavit says.

Malki then walked back inside the house minutes before police arrived and arrested him. Court records show that similar to the court proceedings following his 2020 arrest for threatening the gay man, a judge in the latest case ordered Malki released while awaiting trial. In both cases, the judge ordered him to stay away from the two men he allegedly threatened to kill.

An arrest affidavit filed by D.C. police in the 2020 case states that Malki allegedly made the threats inside an apartment building where the victim lived on the 2300 block of Champlain Street, N.W. It says Malki was living in a nearby building but often visited the building where the victim lived.

“Victim 1 continued to state during an interview that it was not the first time that Defendant 1 had made threats to him, but this time Defendant 1 stated that if he caught him outside, he would ‘fucking kill him.’” the affidavit says. It quotes the victim as saying during this time Malki repeatedly called the victim a “fucking faggot.”

The affidavit, prepared by the arresting officers, says that after the officers arrested Malki and were leading him to a police transport vehicle to be booked for the arrest, he expressed an “excited utterance” that he was “in disbelief that officers sided with the ‘fucking faggot.’”

Court records show that Malki is scheduled to appear in court on June 4 for a status hearing for both the 2020 arrest and the arrest two weeks ago for allegedly threatening to kill the owner of the house in which police say he was illegally squatting.

Superior Court records show that Malki had been arrested three times between 2011 and 2015 in cases unrelated to the 2021 and 2020 cases for allegedly also making threats of violence against people. Two of the cases appear to be LGBTQ related, but prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney’s Office did not list the cases as hate crimes.

In the first of the three cases, filed in July 2011, Malki allegedly shoved a man inside Dupont Circle and threatened to kill him after asking the man why he was wearing a purple shirt.

“Victim 1 believes the assault occurred because Suspect 1 believes Victim 1 is a homosexual,” the police arrest affidavit says.

Court records show prosecutors charged Malki with simple assault and threats to do bodily harm in the case. But the court records show that on Sept. 13, 2011, D.C. Superior Court Judge Stephen F. Eilperin found Malki not guilty on both charges following a non-jury trial.

The online court records do not state why the judge rendered a not guilty verdict. With the courthouse currently closed to the public and the press due to COVID-related restrictions, the Washington Blade couldn’t immediately obtain the records to determine the judge’s reason for the verdict.

In the second case, court records show Malki was arrested by D.C. police outside the Townhouse Tavern bar and restaurant at 1637 R St., N.W. on Nov. 7, 2012 for allegedly threatening one or more people with a knife after employees ordered Malki to leave the establishment for “disorderly behavior.”

At the time, the Townhouse Tavern was located next door to the gay nightclub Cobalt, which before going out of business two years ago, was located at the corner of 17th and R Streets, N.W.

The police arrest affidavit in the case says Malki allegedly pointed a knife in a threatening way at two of the tavern’s employees who blocked his path when he attempted to re-enter the tavern. The affidavit says he was initially charged by D.C. police with assault with a dangerous weapon – knife. Court records, however, show that prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney’s Office lowered the charges to two counts of simple assault. The records show that on Jan. 15, 2013, Malki pleaded guilty to the two charges as part of a plea bargain arrangement.

The records show that Judge Marissa Demeo on that same day issued a sentence of 30 days for each of the two charges but suspended all 30 days for both counts. She then sentenced Malki to one year of supervised probation for both charges and ordered that he undergo alcohol and drug testing and undergo treatment if appropriate.

In the third case prior to the 2020 and 2021 cases, court records show Malki was arrested outside the Cobalt gay nightclub on March 14, 2015 on multiple counts of simple assault, attempted assault with a dangerous weapon – knife, possession of a prohibited weapon – knife, and unlawful entry.

The arrest affidavit says an altercation started on the sidewalk outside the bar when for unknown reasons, Malki grabbed a female customer who was outside smoking and attempted to pull her toward him. When her female friend came to her aid, Malki allegedly got “aggressive” by threatening the woman and “removed what appeared to be a knife from an unknown location” and pointed it at the woman’s friend in a threatening way, the affidavit says.

It says a Cobalt employee minutes later ordered Malki to leave the area and he appeared to do so. But others noticed that he walked toward another entrance door to Cobalt and attempted to enter the establishment knowing he had been ordered not to return because of previous problems with his behavior, the affidavit says. When he attempted to push away another employee to force his way into Cobalt, Malki fell to the ground during a scuffle and other employees held him on the ground while someone else called D.C. police.

Court records show that similar to all of Malki’s arrests, a judge released him while awaiting trial and ordered him to stay away from Cobalt and all of those he was charged with threatening and assaulting.

The records show that on Sept. 18, 2015, Malki agreed to a plea bargain offer by prosecutors in which all except two of the charges – attempted possession of a prohibited weapon and simple assault – were dropped. Judge Alfred S. Irving Jr. on Oct. 2, 2015 sentenced Malki to 60 days of incarnation for each of the two charges but suspended all but five days, which he allowed Malki to serve on weekends, the court records show.

The judge ordered that the two five-day jail terms could be served concurrently, meaning just five days total would be served, according to court records. The records also show that Judge Irving sentenced Malki to one year of supervised probation for each of the two counts and ordered that he enter an alcohol treatment program and stay away from Cobalt.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts

Popular