Connect with us

News

Grupos LGBTI de El Salvador preocupados ante caravanas de migrantes

Organización trans emitió aviso el pasado mes

Published

on

Grupos LGBTI en El Salvador han expresado su preocupación sobre los caravanas de migrantes. (Foto del Washington Blade por Michael K. Lavers)

SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador — El pasado 28 de octubre, alrededor de las 8 de la mañana, equipados con sus mochilas y diferentes cosas para un largo viaje, partieron hombres, mujeres, niños y niñas desde la Plaza del Divino Salvador del Mundo en la capital salvadoreña en una caravana que se formó con rumbo hacia los EEUU. Pese a que el gobierno salvadoreño en un mensaje a la nación pidió no poner en riegos sus vidas con un viaje de este tipo, más de 300 personas decidieron arriesgarse a los peligros del camino, replicando la caravana de hondureños que salió el 13 de octubre de la ciudad de San Pedro Sula.

“Ponte de acuerdo con las personas que participarán de esta caravana,” fue el mensaje que la página de Facebook publicó el 24 de octubre. “Comenta de dónde eres para que los demás sepan y sea más fácil para todos llegar en grupos.”

“Hay gente de todo el país,” añadió. “El Salvador emigra por un futuro mejor.”

Dicha página entró en funciones desde el 16 de octubre, administrada por una persona sin identificarse. Alenta a personas que querían salir del país a crear y unirse a grupos de redes sociales para enterarse así de los grupos cercanos que se unirían a dicha caravana y así salir con ellos.

Esta situación comenzó a preocupar a diferentes personas y organizaciones de la sociedad civil, entre ellas las organizaciones LGBTI que conforman la Federación Salvadoreña LGBTI. COMCAVIS Trans tomó la iniciativa de publicar un aviso de advertencia para la población LGBTI.

“MIGRAR es un DERECHO pero hacerlo de forma irregular implica riesgos altos, especialmente para las personas LGBTI,” lea el aviso de COMCAVIS Trans en su página de Facebook.

“Algunas de las personas LGBTI viajan por mejorar sus condiciones económicas, ya que en El Salvador existe una discriminación evidente al acceso de trabajo para muchas de las personas LGBTI, especialmente para las mujeres transgénero, existe mucha inseguridad a su integridad física, asedio por pandillas, tratos crueles y abuso de autoridad por parte de policías, soldados,” comenta al Washington Blade Bianca Rodríguez, directora ejecutiva de COMCAVIS Trans.

Entre los enunciados del aviso mencionaban que ser una persona LGBTI no es garantía de recibir y/o refugio en los EEUU, a la vez hacían énfasis que el gobierno estadounidense ha lanzado una advertencia para todas las personas que entren de manera irregular, que serán detenidas y procesadas judicialmente para su deportación.

Por otro lado, Liduvina Magarin, viceministra del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, declaró que brindarían “acompañamiento” al grupo de salvadoreños migrantes, con el único objetivo de que las familias salvadoreñas se informen, tomen una decisión responsable y no pongan en riesgo la vida de los niños y niñas en la ruta migratoria.

Pero el 31 de octubre se concentró otro número de personas en el mismo lugar para conformar una segunda caravana, con el mismo objetivo de buscar un futuro mejor para sus familias.

“Si normalmente corremos peligro en nuestro diario vivir, en las caravanas de arriesga el triple y no solo son o serán violentados en las fronteras por las autoridades o la delincuencia, sino también por los mismos que forman las caravanas,” comentó al Blade Aldo Peña de Hombres Trans HT.

“Yo no me iría para posiblemente morir en el camino, además que recuerden que en este país dejan a sus familias, y ellos seguirán viviendo las injusticias de este país,” agrega Peña.

COMCAVIS Trans ha emitido un aviso que insta a los migrantes LGBTI a no viajan a los EEUU con caravanas de migrantes.

Por su parte Camila Portillo, una activista trans, comenta al Blade que “no hay que detener el sueño de emigrar por un mejor futuro, si por ejemplo el Estado y el país no garantiza el desarrollo socio económico de la población LGBTI.”

“Práctica no se ejecutan de la forma correcta, aunque hayan personas en la disposición de apoyar a las personas LGBTI,” ella dijo.

“Acá hay mucho desplazamiento forzado internamente, por el tema de la violencia, así que no creo que sea una moda,” Portillo comenta al Blade. “Es más que todo una cuestión estructural de que el Estado no garantiza no solo a la población LGBTI sino a la población en general, pero que por ser una población en riesgo es más vulnerada, por eso el estado debe garantizar el bienestar de las personas.”

Portillo no pierde la esperanza que en los países donde pasen las caravanas logren tener la ayuda que necesitan y poder cumplir sus objetivos sin tener muchos obstáculos, que el Estado salvadoreño debe comenzar a depurar sus mismas estructuras llenas de corrupción, que hacen valer decretos y diferentes lineamientos que se han creado a favor de la población LGBTI, no solo tener todo por escrito, sino comenzar a ejecutarlo.

En la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos en sus artículos 13 y 14 reivindica expresa que las personas tienen derecho a moverse libremente e incluso a buscar refugio y asilo en casos extremos donde su vida corre peligro.

“Ante los altos índices de violencia en El Salvador muchas de las personas que integran esa caravana tendrán sus propios motivos para migrar,” expresó Rodríguez. “Pero ante esta situación el Estado salvadoreño por lo menos debería coordinar con instituciones nacionales y asociaciones y organismos internacionales para brindar una protección durante su recorrido, que incluso los países que ellos transitan hacia EEUU (Guatemala, México) proteja sus derechos humanos.”

Al cierre de esta nota las personas de la primera caravana ya se encontraban en tierras mexicanas, en donde se les dio albergue a las familias para que pudieran mantenerse juntas. También recibieron asistencia médica, alimentos, baños y regaderas.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Philippines

Philippines Supreme Court rules same-sex couples can co-own property

Advocacy group celebrated landmark decision

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

The Philippines Supreme Court in a landmark ruling said same-sex couples can co-own property under the country’s Family Code.

The Philippine News Agency on Tuesday notes the court issued its ruling in the case of two women who bought a house in Quezon City, a suburb of Manila, the Filipino capital, before they broke up.

The two women, according to the Philippine News Agency, “agreed to sell the property” after they ended their relationship, “and the registered owner — the respondent — signed a document acknowledging that the other partner paid for half of the purchase and renovations.” The Philippine News Agency notes “the registered owner” later “refused to sell the property and withdrew her earlier acknowledgment of co-ownership, prompting the other partner to file a complaint.”

A Regional Trial Court and the Philippines Court of Appeals ruled against the plaintiff.

The Supreme Court in a 14-page ruling it issued on Feb. 5 overturned the decisions. The Supreme Court published its decision on Tuesday.

“Considering that there is co-ownership between petitioner and respondent, then each co-owner may demand at any time the partition of the thing owned in common, insofar as her share is concerned,” said the Supreme Court in its ruling, according to the Philippine News Agency. “Having rightful interest over the subject property, petitioner has the right to demand the division of the subject property.”

The predominantly Catholic country’s Family Code defines marriage as “a special contract of permanent union between a man and a woman entered into in accordance with law for the establishment of conjugal and family life.” It also states in Article 148 that “in cases of cohabitation” outside of marriage, “only the properties acquired by both of the parties through their actual joint contribution of money, property, or industry shall be owned by them in common in proportion to their respective contributions.”

“In the absence of proof to the contrary, their contributions and corresponding shares are presumed to be equal,” it reads.

The BBC reported the Supreme Court ruling states this provision “applies to all forms of co-habitation,” regardless of the couple’s gender. A Supreme Court press release indicates the decision notes lawmakers and the Filipino government “must address same-sex couples’ rights, as courts alone cannot resolve all related policy concerns.”

“This court does not have the monopoly to assure the freedom and rights of homosexual couples,” it reads. “With the political, moral, and cultural questions that surround the issue concerning the rights of same-sex couples, political departments, especially the Congress must be involved to quest for solutions, which balance interests while maintaining fealty to fundamental freedoms.”

LGBT Pilipinas, a Filipino advocacy group, welcomed the ruling.

“This ruling marks a monumental step forward in the legal recognition of LGBTQ+ families and relationships in the country,” it said in a statement.

LGBT Pilipinas added the ruling “lays a crucial legal foundation for broader recognition of same-sex relationships and strengthens the push for comprehensive anti-discrimination protections.”

“This is a win not only for the LGBTQ+ community, but for fairness and justice in Philippine society as a whole,” said the group.

Continue Reading

Florida

Disney’s Gay Days ‘has not been canceled’ despite political challenges

GayDays is moving forward with its planned LGBTQ meet-up

Published

on

(Photo by Ben Gingell/Bigstock)

Gay Days in Orlando is preparing for its 2026 gathering though organizers have yet to release full details.

Concerns emerged about the status of the annual meetup of LGBTQ people at Walt Disney World in Orlando, Fla., after social media posts and multiple news outlets reported the event would not take place this year.

In response to inquiries from the Blade, Josh Duke, co-owner of Gay Days, clarified that an update would come this week.

“At this time, I’d like to clarify that Gay Days Orlando has not been canceled,” an email to the Blade said. “We are currently finalizing details regarding our plans for 2026 and will be making an official announcement later this week.”

Earlier this week, Gay Days posted about a pause in their plans for the annual meeting, which quickly gained traction online.

In an official statement on social media, Gay Days organizers cited several factors behind what had initially appeared to be a cancellation of their 2026 event.

“Changes to our host hotel agreement, the loss of key sponsorship support, and broader challenges currently impacting LGBTQIA+ events nationwide made it impossible to deliver the experience our community deserves,” organizers wrote. However, the statement added, “This is a pause — not an ending.”

In a longer message shared with supporters, organizers elaborated on that now-reversed decision.

“Gay Days Family — it is with very heavy hearts that we share Gay Days 2026 will not take place this year. This was an incredibly difficult decision and one that was only made after every possible option was explored.

“Gay Days has always been more than an event — it is community, family, and a place where so many memories are made. While this pause is painful, it also gives us the opportunity to step back, listen, and begin shaping a stronger and reimagined GayDays for the future. Thank you for your continued love, patience, and support. This is not goodbye — it’s a reset, and we look forward to creating the future of GayDays together.”

GayDays, which began in 1991, encourages queer Disney fans to visit the Orlando theme park while wearing red shirts to identify one another. Originally focused on gay men reclaiming the childhood joy often denied due to homophobia, the event has expanded over the years to include LGBTQ+ families on summer vacations and queer couples honeymooning in the Magic Kingdom.

Disney made history in 2019 by holding its first-ever official Pride event at its European park, Disneyland Paris. In 2023, Disneyland California hosted the first U.S. official Pride event.

Concerns about the potential cancellation had arisen amid broader challenges affecting LGBTQ events nationwide. These include changes in hotel agreements, sponsorship support, and Florida’s increasingly restrictive anti-LGBTQ policies under Gov. Ron DeSantis. Florida currently has an equality score of -3.00 out of 49 from the Movement Advancement Project, which evaluates states based on policies affecting relationship and parental recognition, nondiscrimination, religious exemptions, LGBTQ youth, healthcare, criminal justice, and transgender identity documentation.

Recent legislation in Florida has included prohibitions on hormone replacement therapy for transgender minors, restrictions on adult access to treatment, bans on drag performances for those under 18, bathroom bans for transgender people in state buildings, and expansion of the Parental Rights in Education Act, commonly called the “Don’t Say Gay” law. These measures limit public school instruction or discussion about sexual orientation and gender identity.

Gay Days Anaheim is scheduled to take place at Disneyland Resort in September.

Disney has also maintained a focus on Pride, reporting in 2022 that proceeds from Pride merchandise benefited numerous LGBTQ organizations, including GLSEN, PFLAG, The Trevor Project, Zebra Coalition, the Los Angeles LGBT Center, the LGBT Center Orange County, the San Francisco LGBT Center, and the Ali Forney Center. Pride merchandise sold internationally supports local LGBTQ organizations in those regions.

More details about this event are expected to be released on Friday.

Continue Reading

New York

Pride flag removed from Stonewall Monument as Trump targets LGBTQ landmarks

The new NPS policy targets Pride flags amid consistent efforts from the Trump administration to minimize LGBTQ history.

Published

on

(Photo courtesy of the National Park Service)

A rainbow Pride flag flying at the Stonewall National Monument in New York was removed at the direction of Trump administration officials at the National Park Service, according to a source familiar with the matter who spoke to the Blade on condition of anonymity.

The source said the move had been in the works for weeks and is part of ongoing efforts by the Trump-Vance administration to erase LGBTQ identity from federally controlled landmarks.

In response to the Blade’s request for information about the new flag policy, the National Park Service provided the following statement:

“Current Department of the Interior policy provides that the National Park Service may only fly the U.S. flag, Department of the Interior flags, and the Prisoner of War/Missing in Action flag on flagpoles and public display points. The policy allows limited exceptions, permitting non-agency flags when they serve an official purpose. These include historical context or reenactments, current military branch flags, flags of federally recognized tribal nations affiliated with a park, flags at sites co-managed with other federal, state, or municipal partners, flags required for international park designations, and flags displayed under agreements with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services for Naturalization ceremonies.”

The statement also included official guidance on the display of non-agency flags issued by Trump-appointed National Park Service Director Jessica Bowron.

The Blade reached out to other organizations to confirm the status of the Pride flag last week, including the Stonewall National Monument Visitor Center, the NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission, and the National Parks Conservation Association. None were able to provide details about whether the flag was still flying at that time but it has since been removed.

This action aligns with other moves targeting and erasing LGBTQ history. In September, the Blade reported that three organizations originally slated to receive more than $1.25 million from the National Park Service’s Underrepresented Communities Grant Program would no longer receive funding: In Washington, D.C., the Preservation League had been awarded $75,000 to document LGBTQ+ historic resources. In Providence, R.I., the Preservation Society was slated for $74,692 to conduct an LGBTQ+ survey and prepare a National Register nomination. And in New York, the Fund for the City of New York, Inc., had been awarded $32,000 to nominate the residence of Bayard Rustin — the iconic civil rights and LGBTQ activist — as a National Historic Landmark. 

Continue Reading

Popular