A D.C. Superior Court jury began deliberations on Tuesday in the month-long trial of two men charged with the July 4, 2016 shooting death of transgender woman Deeniquia “Dee Dee” Dodds on a Northeast D.C. street near her home.
The deliberations began one week after Judge Milton C. Lee issued a controversial decision to dismiss the hate crime designation for first-degree murder and four other charges against defendants Jolonta Little, 28, and Monte Johnson, 23, who prosecutors say targeted Dodds because of her status as a transgender woman.
In a development that has raised concern among LGBT activists, Lee’s decision to dismiss the hate crime “enhancement” designations came in response to a request by both prosecutors and the defense attorneys.
But despite the removal of the hate crime designation, Assistant U.S. Attorneys Thomas Saunders and Ahmed Baset, the lead prosecutors in the case, argued that defendants Johnson and Little along with two other men conspired to target female transgender sex workers for armed street robberies in the early morning hours of July 4, 2016. They said Dodds was among those they targeted.
Without mentioning the words “hate crime” Saunders in his closing arguments said the defendants believed trans women would be “easy targets” for robberies and chose to go to sections of the city known for where trans sex workers congregate to carry out robberies.
Shortly before jurors were called back to the courtroom to hear the completion of the lawyers’ closing arguments on Tuesday, Lee issued another controversial decision – this time to allow the trial to continue following a dramatic disclosure by prosecutors one day earlier. In an email to the defense and the judge, the head of the U.S. Attorney’s division handling murder cases disclosed that prosecutor Saunders spoke to a colleague at the U.S. Attorney’s Office about the prosecution of a case involving the son of one of the jurors.
Defense attorneys called Saunders’ action a possible act of jury tampering because he reportedly asked the prosecutor working on the case of the juror’s son about the possibility of probation rather than a prison sentence and possibly mentioning this to the juror. The defense attorneys argued that the juror, a woman, could have perceived the action as favorable to her son and prompted her to push for a verdict of guilty in the Dodds case in support of the prosecutors.
Assistant U.S. Attorney David Gorman, Saunders’ boss and the head of the U.S. Attorney’s Homicide Section, argued that there was no evidence that the development would impact the juror or the jury as a whole because there was no evidence that any juror knew about it. He said Saunders’ action did not constitute jury tampering.
Lee declined to act on the defense attorney’s request that the entire case be dismissed over Saunders’ actions. But he said he would consider holding a post-trial fact-finding hearing to determine whether Saunders acted improperly.
Following the discussion over the jury matter and Lee’s ruling, which occurred while the jury was outside the courtroom, the lawyers resumed the closing arguments they began on Monday.
Among the hot topics of the closing arguments on both sides was the role of the other two men involved in the robberies of trans women who were implicated in the Dodds murder. The two are Shareem Hall, 25, and his brother, Cyheme Hall, 23. Both men pleaded guilty to a charge of second-degree murder in connection with Dodds’ murder and agreed to become government witnesses at the trial.
Cyheme Hall testified that it was Johnson who fatally shot Dodds in the neck after she fought back when he and Johnson attacked her with guns drawn and demanded her money as she was walking home on Division Avenue, N.E.
He told the jury that after Dodds fell to the sidewalk bleeding, the two grabbed her purse and cell phone and ran away before being picked up by Little and Shareem Hall, who had remained in Little’s car. Cyheme Hall testified that the group discovered the purse was empty.
“The plan was to just rob a person,” the Washington Post quoted Cyheme Hall as telling the jury. “I was in shock. He shot a person for nothing,” the Post quoted Hall as saying in referring to Johnson, who he identified as the one who fatally shot Dodds.
Defense attorney Brandi Harden, who represents Little, and Kevin Irving, who represents Johnson, told the jury the Hall brothers should be considered untrustworthy, unreliable, and habitual liars interested only in getting off with a more lenient sentence. The defense attorneys accused the Halls of falsely blaming their clients for the Dodds murder to gain the favor of prosecutors, who have the power to recommend a lenient sentence for them.
Prosecutors Saunders and Baset disputed those claims in their opening and closing arguments, saying the Hall brothers admitted they committed second-degree murder knowing they face a considerable sentence sometime later this year. All four men charged in the case have been held without bond since the time of their arrests.
Saunders reminded the jury in his rebuttal argument on Tuesday that prosecutors presented corroborating evidence, including corroborating witnesses linking Johnson and Little to the Dodds murder and a string of armed robberies of at least seven trans women, including Dodds on the night of the murder.
Among the key corroborating evidence, Saunders noted, was a GPS ankle bracelet that Little wore on the night of the murder as part of a conviction and probation he received in an unrelated criminal case. The tracking of Little’s whereabouts that night by GPS experts placed him at the scene of each of the three robberies the men were charged with committing, including the scene where Dodds was shot, at the exact time those incidents occurred.
Prosecutors and police also tracked the cell phone conversations between Little and Johnson and the Halls that they say placed them at the scene of the robberies and shooting.
In addition, Saunders pointed to recorded phone conversations that the government obtained of Johnson talking with his girlfriend while in prison in which prosecutors say he admitted committing the murder.
Defense attorneys Harden and Irving disputed the reliability of the GPS and cell phone evidence, saying the government was relying on the testimony of the Hall brothers to prove its case, even though the two attorneys said the Halls should be considered unreliable and completely biased toward prosecutors.
“What lie are you going to believe?” Irving asked jurors in his closing argument, noting that both Halls have admitted they lied when they testified before a grand jury prior to the trial, committing perjury.
Similar to defense attorney Harden, he disputed the reliability of the GPS tracking information presented by prosecutors. He said there were no finger prints on the gun police said was the murder weapon and no video to show his client, Monte Johnson, was present where Dodds was shot.
Irving also noted that one of two eyewitnesses who saw the shooting but didn’t have a clear view of the shooter’s face testified that one of the two men at the scene of the shooting wore his hair in dreadlocks. Yet neither Johnson nor Cyheme Hall had dreads at that time, Irving said.
Noting that the case presented by prosecutors is riddled with doubt, Irving and Harden told jurors that they are required under the law for criminal trials to find someone not guilty if they have “reasonable doubt” on any aspect of the case.
“If you cannot say you are firmly convinced because you are seeing all these lies, you must find not guilty,” he said.
Shortly after their arrests Little and Johnson were charged with 16 criminal offenses in connection with the Dodds murder and the armed robberies of at least six other trans women on the night of Dodds’ murder.
The charges include felony first-degree murder while armed, two counts of robbery while armed, conspiracy, and assault with a dangerous weapon. Prosecutors charged Little and Johnson with 11 other offenses related to Dodds’ murder that were not designated as hate crimes, including possession of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence and assault to commit robbery while armed.
William Miller, a spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office, declined to say why one of the prosecutors asked the judge to dismiss the hate crimes designations for Johnson’s offenses, saying his office has a policy of not commenting on specific details for trials in progress.
Defense attorney Harden moved to have the hate crime designations dismissed for Little, saying the government lacked evidence that her client targeted or had animus toward transgender people. Harden also argued that a hate crime designation would create prejudice against her client in the eyes of the jury.
In handing down his decision to dismiss the hate crime designations, Lee said he too believed there was insufficient evidence to support the designations.
The D.C. hate crimes statute calls for designating an underlying offense such as murder, assault, or robbery with a hate crime “enhancement,” which can result in a more severe sentence if the individual charged is convicted.
LGBT activists have complained in the past that the U.S. Attorney’s Office, which serves as the prosecutor for D.C. criminal cases, has been reluctant to issue hate crime designations to cases of anti-LGBT violence.
Court observers, such as D.C. attorney Dale Edwin Sanders, have said prosecutors sometimes worry that a hate crime designation could confuse a jury and result in an acquittal for the underlying charge, including a charge of murder.
Court observers were uncertain about how long the jury would take to reach a verdict, among other things, because they must decide on 16 separate charges against Little and Johnson, including first-degree murder while armed.
Top 10 Blade news stories by web traffic
COVID breakthroughs, Equality Act, and anti-trans attacks
Each year our staff gathers in late December to review the highest trafficked stories of the year and there’s more than a little bit of competitive spirit as we review the results. Here are the top 10 stories by web traffic at HYPERLINK “http://washingtonblade.com”washingtonblade.com for 2021.
#10: Mark Glaze, gun reform advocate, dies at 51
The sad, tragic story of Glaze’s death captivated readers in November.
#9: COVID breakthrough infections strike summer tourists visiting Provincetown
This one went viral in July after a COVID outbreak was blamed on gay tourists.
#8: Thank you, Kordell Stewart, for thoughtful response to ‘the rumor’
This opinion piece thanked the former NFL quarterback for writing a personal essay addressing gay rumors.
#7: Elliot Page tweets; trans bb’s first swim trunks #transjoy #transisbeautiful
The actor created excitement by posting his first photo in swim trunks back in May.
#6: Romney declares opposition to LGBTQ Equality Act
Mitt Romney disappointed activists with his announcement; the Equality Act passed the House but never saw a vote in the Senate.
#5: White House warns state legislatures that passing anti-trans bills is illegal
The year 2021 saw a disturbing trend of GOP-led legislatures attacking trans people.
#4: Lincoln Project’s avowed ignorance of Weaver texts undercut by leaked communications
The Lincoln Project’s leaders, amid a scandal of co-founder John Weaver soliciting sexual favors from young men, have asserted they were unaware of his indiscretions until the Blade obtained electronic communications that called that claim into question.
#3: FOX 5’s McCoy suspended over offensive Tweet
Blake McCoy tweeted that obese people shouldn’t get priority for the COVID vaccine.
#2: Transgender USAF veteran trapped in Taliban takeover of Kabul
Among the Americans trapped in the suburban areas of Kabul under Taliban control was a transgender government contractor for the U.S. State Department and former U.S. Air Force Sergeant. She was later safely evacuated.
#1: Amid coup chaos, Trump quietly erases LGBTQ protections in adoption, health services
And our most popular story of 2021 was about the Trump administration nixing regulations barring federal grantees in the Department of Health & Human Services from discriminating against LGBTQ people, including in adoption services.
CDC still falling short on LGBTQ data collection for COVID patients: expert
Despite requests since the start of the COVID pandemic for the U.S. government to enhance data collection for patients who are LGBTQ, the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention is still falling short on issuing nationwide guidance to states on the issue, a leading expert health on the issue told the Blade.
With a renewed focus on COVID infections reaching new heights just before the start of the holidays amid the emergence of Omicron, the absence of any LGBTQ data collection — now across both the Trump and Biden administrations — remains a sore point for health experts who say that information could be used for public outreach.
Sean Cahill, director of Health Policy Research at the Boston-based Fenway Institute, said Wednesday major federal entities and hospitals have been collecting data on whether patients identify as LGBTQ for years — such as the National Health & Nutrition Examination Survey, which has been collecting sexual orientation data since the 1990s — but the CDC hasn’t duplicated that effort for COVID even though the pandemic has been underway for two years.
“It’s not like this is a new idea,” Cahill said. “But for some reason, the pandemic hit, and all of a sudden, we realize how little systematic data we were collecting in our health system. And it’s a real problem because we’re two years into the pandemic almost, and we still don’t know how it’s affecting this vulnerable population that experiences health disparities in other areas.”
The Blade was among the first outlets to report on the lack of efforts by the states to collect data on whether a COVID patient identifies as LGBTQ, reporting in April 2020 on the absence of data even in places with influential LGBTQ communities. The CDC hasn’t responded to the Blade’s requests for nearly two years on why it doesn’t instruct states to collect this data, nor did it respond this week to a request for comment on this article.
Cahill, who has published articles in the American Journal of Public Health on the importance of LGBTQ data collection and reporting in COVID-19 testing, care, and vaccination — said he’s been making the case to the CDC to issue guidance to states on whether COVID patients identify as LGBTQ since June 2020.
Among those efforts, he said, were to include two comments he delivered to the Biden COVID-19 Health Equity Task Force in spring 2021, a letter a coalition of groups sent to the Association of State & Territorial Health Officers asking for states to collect and report SOGI in COVID in December 2020 as well as letters to HHS leadership and congressional leadership in spring and summer 2020 asking for them to take steps to encourage or require SOGI data collection in COVID.
Asked what CDC officials had to say in response when he brought this issue to their attention, Cahill said, “They listen, but they don’t really tell me anything.”
“We’ve been making that case, and to date, as of December 22, 2021, they have not issued guidance, they have not changed the case report form. I hope that they’re in the process of doing that, and maybe we’ll be pleasantly surprised in January, and they’ll come up with something…I really hope that’s true, but right now they’re not doing anything to promote SOGI data collection and reporting in surveillance data.”
Cahill, in an email to the Blade after the initial publication of this article, clarified CDC has indicated guidance on LGBTQ data collection for COVID patients may come in the near future.
“HHS leaders told us this fall that CDC is working on an initiative to expand SOGI data collection,” Cahill said. “We are hopeful that we will see guidance early in 2022. Key people at CDC, including Director Walensky, understand the importance of SOGI data collection given their long history of working on HIV prevention.”
In other issues related to LGBTQ data collection, there has been a history of states resisting federal mandates. The Trump administration, for example, rescinded guidance calling on states to collect information on whether foster youth identified as LGBTQ after complaints from states on the Obama-era process, much to the consternation of LGBTQ advocates who said the data was helpful.
The White House COVID-19 Health Equity Task Force has at least recognized the potential for enhancing LGBTQ data collection efforts. Last month, it published an implementation plan, calling for “an equity-centered approach to data collection, including sufficient funding to collect data for groups that are often left out of data collection (e.g….LGBTQIA+ people).”
The plan also calls for “fund[ing] activities to improve data collection…including tracking COVID-19 related outcomes for people of color and other underserved populations,” and specifically calls for the collection of LGBTQ data.
The importance of collecting LGBTQ data, Cahill said, is based on its potential use in public outreach, including efforts to recognize disparities in health population and to create messaging for outreach, including for populations that may be reluctant to take the vaccine.
“If we see a disparity, we can say: Why is that?” Cahill said. “We could do focus groups of the population — try to understand and then what kind of messages would reassure you and make you feel comfortable getting a vaccine, and we could push those messages out through public education campaigns led by state local health departments led by the federal government.”
The LGBTQ data, Cahill said, could be broken down further to determine if racial and ethnic disparities exist within the LGBTQ population, or whether LGBTQ people are likely to suffer from the disease in certain regions, such as the South.
“We have data showing that lesbian or bisexual women, and transgender people are less likely to be in preventive regular routine care for their health,” Cahill said. “And so if that’s true, there’s a good chance that they’re less likely to know where to get a vaccine, to have a medical professional they trust to talk to about it today.”
Among the leaders who are supportive, Cahill said, is Rachel Levine, assistant secretary for health and the first openly transgender person confirmed by the U.S. Senate for a presidential appointment. Cahill said he raised the issue with her along with other officials at the Department of Health & Human Services three times in the last year.
In her previous role as Pennsylvania secretary of health, Levine led the way and made her state the first in the nation to set up an LGBTQ data collection system for COVID patients.
“So she definitely gets it, and I know she’s supportive of it, but we really need the CDC to act,” Cahill said.
Although the federal government has remained intransigent in taking action, Cahill said the situation has improved among states and counted five states — California, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Nevada and Oregon — in addition to D.C. as among those that have elected to collect data on sexual orientation and gender identity of COVID patients.
However, Cahill said even those data collection efforts are falling short because those jurisdictions have merely been public about collecting the data, but haven’t reported back anything yet.
“Only California has reported data publicly, and the data that they’re reporting is really just the completeness of the data,” Cahill said. “They’re not reporting the data itself…And they’re also just asking people who tests positive. So, if somebody says positive COVID in California, a contact tracer follows up with that individual and asks them a battery of questions, and among the questions that are asked are SOGI questions.”
As a result of these efforts, Cahill said, California has data on the LGBTQ status of COVID patients, but the data is overwhelmingly more complete for the gender identity of these patients rather than their sexual orientation. As of May 2021, California reported that they had sexual orientation data for 9.5 percent of individuals who had died from COVID and 16 percent of people who tested positive, but for gender identity, the data were 99.5 percent.
Equality Act, contorted as a danger by anti-LGBTQ forces, is all but dead
No political willpower to force vote or reach a compromise
Despite having President Biden in the White House and Democratic majorities in both chambers of Congress, efforts to update federal civil rights laws to strengthen the prohibition on discrimination against LGBTQ people by passing the Equality Act are all but dead as opponents of the measure have contorted it beyond recognition.
Political willpower is lacking to find a compromise that would be acceptable to enough Republican senators to end a filibuster on the bill — a tall order in any event — nor is there the willpower to force a vote on the Equality Act as opponents stoke fears about transgender kids in sports and not even unanimity in the Democratic caucus in favor of the bill is present, stakeholders who spoke to the Blade on condition of anonymity said.
In fact, there are no imminent plans to hold a vote on the legislation even though Pride month is days away, which would be an opportune time for Congress to demonstrate solidarity with the LGBTQ community by holding a vote on the legislation.
If the Equality Act were to come up for a Senate vote in the next month, it would not have the support to pass. Continued assurances that bipartisan talks are continuing on the legislation have yielded no evidence of additional support, let alone the 10 Republicans needed to end a filibuster.
“I haven’t really heard an update either way, which is usually not good,” one Democratic insider said. “My understanding is that our side was entrenched in a no-compromise mindset and with [Sen. Joe] Manchin saying he didn’t like the bill, it doomed it this Congress. And the bullying of hundreds of trans athletes derailed our message and our arguments of why it was broadly needed.”
The only thing keeping the final nail from being hammered into the Equality Act’s coffin is the unwillingness of its supporters to admit defeat. Other stakeholders who spoke to the Blade continued to assert bipartisan talks are ongoing, strongly pushing back on any conclusion the legislation is dead.
Alphonso David, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said the Equality Act is “alive and well,” citing widespread public support he said includes “the majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents and a growing number of communities across the country engaging and mobilizing every day in support of the legislation.”
“They understand the urgent need to pass this bill and stand up for LGBTQ people across our country,” David added. “As we engage with elected officials, we have confidence that Congress will listen to the voices of their constituents and continue fighting for the Equality Act through the lengthy legislative process. We will also continue our unprecedented campaign to grow the already-high public support for a popular bill that will save lives and make our country fairer and more equal for all. We will not stop until the Equality Act is passed.”
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), chief sponsor of the Equality Act in the Senate, also signaled through a spokesperson work continues on the legislation, refusing to give up on expectations the legislation would soon become law.
“Sen. Merkley and his staff are in active discussions with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to try to get this done,” McLennan said. “We definitely see it as a key priority that we expect to become law.”
A spokesperson Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who had promised to force a vote on the Equality Act in the Senate on the day the U.S. House approved it earlier this year, pointed to a March 25 “Dear Colleague” letter in which he identified the Equality Act as one of several bills he’d bring up for a vote.
Despite any assurances, the hold up on the bill is apparent. Although the U.S. House approved the legislation earlier this year, the Senate Judiciary Committee hasn’t even reported out the bill yet to the floor in the aftermath of the first-ever Senate hearing on the bill in March. A Senate Judiciary Committee Democratic aide, however, disputed that inaction as evidence the Equality Act is dead in its tracks: “Bipartisan efforts on a path forward are ongoing.”
Democrats are quick to blame Republicans for inaction on the Equality Act, but with Manchin withholding his support for the legislation they can’t even count on the entirety of their caucus to vote “yes” if it came to the floor. Progressives continue to advocate an end to the filibuster to advance legislation Biden has promised as part of his agenda, but even if they were to overcome headwinds and dismantle the institution needing 60 votes to advance legislation, the Equality Act would likely not have majority support to win approval in the Senate with a 50-50 party split.
The office of Manchin, who has previously said he couldn’t support the Equality Act over concerns about public schools having to implement the transgender protections applying to sports and bathrooms, hasn’t responded to multiple requests this year from the Blade on the legislation and didn’t respond to a request to comment for this article.
Meanwhile, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who declined to co-sponsor the Equality Act this year after having signed onto the legislation in the previous Congress, insisted through a spokesperson talks are still happening across the aisle despite the appearances the legislation is dead.
“There continues to be bipartisan support for passing a law that protects the civil rights of Americans, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity,” said Annie Clark, a Collins spokesperson. “The Equality Act was a starting point for negotiations, and in its current form, it cannot pass. That’s why there are ongoing discussions among senators and stakeholders about a path forward.”
Let’s face it: Anti-LGBTQ forces have railroaded the debate by making the Equality Act about an end to women’s sports by allowing transgender athletes and danger to women in sex-segregated places like bathrooms and prisons. That doesn’t even get into resolving the issue on drawing the line between civil rights for LGBTQ people and religious freedom, which continues to be litigated in the courts as the U.S. Supreme Court is expected any day now to issue a ruling in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia to determine if foster care agencies can reject same-sex couples over religious objections.
For transgender Americans, who continue to report discrimination and violence at high rates, the absence of the Equality Act may be most keenly felt.
Mara Keisling, outgoing executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, disputed any notion the Equality Act is dead and insisted the legislation is “very much alive.”
“We remain optimistic despite misinformation from the opposition,” Keisling said. “NCTE and our movement partners are still working fruitfully on the Equality Act with senators. In fact, we are gaining momentum with all the field organizing we’re doing, like phone banking constituents to call their senators. Legislating takes time. Nothing ever gets through Congress quickly. We expect to see a vote during this Congress, and we are hopeful we can win.”
But one Democratic source said calls to members of Congress against the Equality Act, apparently coordinated by groups like the Heritage Foundation, have has outnumbered calls in favor of it by a substantial margin, with a particular emphasis on Manchin.
No stories are present in the media about same-sex couples being kicked out of a restaurant for holding hands or transgender people for using the restroom consistent with their gender identity, which would be perfectly legal in 25 states thanks to the patchwork of civil rights laws throughout the United States and inadequate protections under federal law.
Tyler Deaton, senior adviser for the American Unity Fund, which has bolstered the Republican-led Fairness for All Act as an alternative to the Equality Act, said he continues to believe the votes are present for a compromise form of the bill.
“I know for a fact there is a supermajority level of support in the Senate for a version of the Equality Act that is fully protective of both LGBTQ civil rights and religious freedom,” Deaton said. “There is interest on both sides of the aisle in getting something done this Congress.”
Deaton, however, didn’t respond to a follow-up inquiry on what evidence exists of agreeing on this compromise.
Biden has already missed the goal he campaigned on in the 2020 election to sign the Equality Act into law within his first 100 days in office. Although Biden renewed his call to pass the legislation in his speech to Congress last month, as things stand now that appears to be a goal he won’t realize for the remainder of this Congress.
Nor has the Biden administration made the Equality Act an issue for top officials within the administration as it pushes for an infrastructure package as a top priority. One Democratic insider said Louisa Terrell, legislative affairs director for the White House, delegated work on the Equality Act to a deputy as opposed to handling it herself.
To be sure, Biden has demonstrated support for the LGBTQ community through executive action at an unprecedented rate, signing an executive order on day one ordering federal agencies to implement the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last year in Bostock v. Clayton County to the fullest extent possible and dismantling former President Trump’s transgender military ban. Biden also made historic LGBTQ appointments with the confirmation of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Rachel Levine as assistant secretary of health.
A White House spokesperson insisted Biden’s team across the board remains committed to the Equality Act, pointing to his remarks to Congress.
“President Biden has urged Congress to get the Equality Act to his desk so he can sign it into law and provide long overdue civil rights protections to LGBTQ+ Americans, and he remains committed to seeing this legislation passed as quickly as possible,” the spokesperson said. “The White House and its entire legislative team remains in ongoing and close coordination with organizations, leaders, members of Congress, including the Equality Caucus, and staff to ensure we are working across the aisle to push the Equality Act forward.”
But at least in the near-term, that progress will fall short of fulfilling the promise of updating federal civil rights law with the Equality Act, which will mean LGBTQ people won’t be able to rely on those protections when faced with discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
Va. Senate subcommittee tables anti-transgender student athlete bill
Two anti-LGBTQ bills die in Va. Senate
State Department reiterates concerns over Chechnya human rights record
At 15, restored ‘Shortbus’ is still a movie ahead of its time
DeSantis doesn’t want racism, LGBTQ topics taught in schools
Florida House committee passes “Don’t Say Gay” bill
Hyattsville mayor dies by suicide
Gus Kenworthy skis for Great Britain at 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics
SAG Award slate points to a not-very-queer Oscar night
California mom claims school manipulated child into changing gender identity
Sign Up for Blade eBlasts
Florida3 days ago
Florida House committee passes “Don’t Say Gay” bill
Maryland1 day ago
Hyattsville mayor dies by suicide
Opinions6 days ago
Why are gays so terrible at intergenerational friendships?
Local6 days ago
Va. senator introduces anti-transgender student athlete bill
World7 days ago
Two LGBTQ people named to Chilean president-elect’s Cabinet
Sports5 days ago
Gus Kenworthy skis for Great Britain at 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics
Local6 days ago
Comings & Goings
Theater6 days ago
In ‘Trans Am,’ a trans person telling a trans story