Opinions
D.C. statehood, LGBT polls shock
Young adult LGBT affinity and national backing for District statehood are worsening


Two national polls producing headlines in recent days startled many. The data, indicating a huge drop in LGBT affinity among non-gay Americans under 35 and scant support nationwide for D.C. statehood, should not surprise.
The reasons, however, are distinctly divergent.
Released this week, a first-ever national Gallup survey asking whether D.C. should become a state indicated that the cityās quixotic quest is opposed by nearly two-thirds of the country. Americans oppose statehood for the District by a margin of 64 percent to only 29 percent in favor. These results track with prior polls conducted over past decades, all showing weak support for a notion that isnāt growing.
Majorities of Democrats, Republicans, independents, liberals, moderates, and conservatives all reject the proposal. Much more than half of every demographic category ā whether sliced-and-diced in major subgroups by gender, race, age, education, or political ideology ā say no.
Only 38 percent of residents in the northeast portion of the country stretching as far south as the District itself, arguably most familiar with the idea, back statehood. The rest of the nation weighs it at only one-quarter endorsing.
In fact, support for D.C. statehood has actually declined in recent years, despite a renewed effort by advocates to promote the idea across the country and now funded with city tax dollars. A Yankelovich national poll conducted in 1992 found that a smaller 57 percent opposed statehood, similar to a 1989 Washington Post poll showing only 52 percent opposed.
For residents among the super-majority of locals hoping for statehood, the startling level of opposition elsewhere proved disheartening. Yet, truth be told, it is those whoāve lived here a while who often are the most circumspect about the deepening failure of advocacy groups and dim prospects to advance statehood.
Only the most sanguine remain confident that a decades-long aspiration to add another star to the national flag is achievable. All good arguments aside, the issue is now bluntly viewed through the starkly partisan lens of a highly polarized era and almost certain addition of two Democratic U.S. Senators and single House seat. Hate it or not, hope isnāt high that the city will become a state.
Troubling for the LGBT community was GLAADās fifth annual āAccelerating Acceptanceā national survey conducted by marketing research firm The Harris Poll. Released late last month only days ahead of the Stonewall 50th anniversary and WorldPride events in New York City, the notable finding was a substantial drop in Millennial and Gen-Z affinity as āalliesā of the LGBT community.
This dual cohort, combined among those aged 18-34, demonstrated a whopping 18-point decline in LGBT āstrongā alliance in the past two annual measures. Most startling among this youthful age group were both the 27-point drop among men during those two years, falling from 62 percent to a mere 35 percent, and the 12-point downward shift among women in only the past single year, plummeting from 64 percent to 52 percent.
While small shifts within the attitudinal margin of error for this annual survey have previously been over-hyped by GLAAD to the groupās increasingly diminished credibility, this select and significant finding is, in fact, worrisome.
The problem is that GLAAD lazily attributes this specific highest-category affinity reversal to causational claims that miss the mark. Blaming this dramatic shrinkage solely on a harsher political environment simply doesnāt cut it ā especially for the age group historically most supportive of LGBT equality and in light of an overall 80 percent in general support for full equality among all straight Americans of all ages.
There is clearly a reason for the sudden hefty dwindling in LGBT affinity among younger Americans. It might just be because weāre becoming a bunch of bullies ourselves, increasingly led by a radical bossy-queer far-left fringe from which the youngest adults are revolting in reaction. Whatever the real and actual cause, weād better figure it out. Soon.
Mark Lee is a long-time entrepreneur and community business advocate. Follow on Twitter: @MarkLeeDC. Reach him at [email protected].
Opinions
Trans people must be allowed to live full, safe lives
MAGA, Project 2025 targeting most vulnerable in society

I have spent much of my life fighting for equality for all people. I grew up with parents who were refugees from Hitler, and am a first-generation gay, Jewish, American. I understand discrimination, though I have had what we now call āwhite privilege.ā That is something granted to me by society, not something I earned. I have fought for civil rights, womenās rights, the rights of people with disabilities, and finally my own rights, when I came out at the age of 34. I was working for Rep. Bella S. Abzug (D-N.Y.), and still not out when she introduced the first version of the Equality Act in 1974. It was five years after Stonewall.
It is now 56 years after Stonewall, and Donald Trump and his MAGA acolytes, still felt they could easily attack transgender people in his campaign for president. The campaign used ads attacking transgender persons to great effect, saying, āDemocrats are more into helping they/them, than into helping you.ā It was unfair, and disgusting, but effective. It was also a great way to distract people from the havoc they intended to create with Project 2025, both here at home, and around the world. It worked.
What helped make those ads so effective is the simple fact 99% of the population has likely never met a transgender person, or if they have, they donāt know it. Only about 1 percent of the population in the U.S. identify as transgender. There is some debate about the numbers, but currently the LGBTQ community as a whole makes up nearly 10% of the population.Ā
One of the issues people are making a big deal about is whether transgender women should be able to participate in womenās sports, despite the fact their numbers in sport are nearly non-existent. But the argument, even among members of the LGBTQ community, allows questioning their participation be a touch point for discrimination. Those, like lesbian tennis great Martina Navratilova, and others in the LGBTQ community, think those who have transitioned to being women, should not be allowed to participate in womenās sports. Recently California Gov. Gavin Newsom agreed with that. There is some scientific debate about whether a man who goes through puberty as a man, and then transitions, will have an advantage over a cisgender woman. Again, this debate within the LGBTQ community, and the Democratic Party, which generally supports transgender rights, has helped MAGA Republicans use this as a divisive cultural issue.Ā
The debate within the LGBTQ community over transgender people is not new. Over the years there has been debate about how Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), a hero in the LGBTQ community, managed to get ENDA passed in the House in 2007 without including trans protections. His bill was not opposed by the Human Rights Campaign at the time. Barney and HRC came under vicious attack for doing this.Ā
Today, Trump has signed an executive order barring trans people from serving in our military, despite their having fought bravely, and effectively, for years. At the moment a judge has blocked him from carrying out this order but we still donāt know the final decision as Trumpās Justice Department is appealing the ruling. This is just another way Trump and his acolytes, using Project 2025, are going after the most vulnerable in our society. So far, they have threatened Republicans with primaries, and kept any Republican in Congress from speaking out. As we move forward, we will find out if any will put their oath to the Constitution, ahead of their next election.
I have been fortunate to meet many transgender people, some of whom I have fought alongside for the rights of the LGBTQ community. There are groups like Advocates for Trans Equality, and their CEO, Rodrigo Heng-Lehtinen, whose mom happened to be a congresswoman, and Diego Miguel Sanchez, who has fought valiantly for the rights of the LGBTQ community, and is now at PFLAG. Now we have our first transgender congresswoman, Sarah McBride (D-Del.). Then there is Virginia State Sen. Danica Roem, a recognized national leader in the fight for transgender rights. These are men and women who will allow more and more people to see transgender persons are the same as them. They just want to live free, full, and safe lives, like the rest of us.
Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist.
Opinions
Finding the courage to flee U.S. to save my trans daughter
āMy child has begged for her safety so I must goā

Well, we did it. Two weeks ago, I climbed into our SUV with my 23-year-old trans daughter and I drove to Toronto. A foot firmly in the highly logical/practical and a foot in the conceptual/creative means I am not risk averse because I can sense a problem and comfortably decide whether I can absorb the outcome.
As a result, I donāt scare easily. Every now and then though, my more intuitive self will sound an alarm letting me know that I need to pay attention, and so I do ā especially when it comes to my children. Like many of you my internal sirens have been clanging at air raid levels for some time. Itās been clear to me that trans people are going to be both a political tool and a targeted group for the new administration. As ugly forces converged to deliver the results that Tuesday in November I have been fighting the urge to grab my family and simply leave. To get up, get out of the way of what I feel is coming. Thatās crazy talk, right? This is the United States. I mean we canāt be there? You know what I mean. THERE.
The place that created the phrase: āPessimists went to New York, optimists went to Auschwitz.ā Rounding up people and simply sending them somewhere. I think we are, and I can’t wait to be wrong.
As I listen to stunning silence from Democrats and threat-immobilized or power-driven Republicans alike, and watch companies pay fealty and capitulate in advance, I am appalled by so few rising to meet the moment. I am disgusted by the demonstrated cowardice just about everywhere we look. What luxury it is to think that as a politician youāre secure enough to wait it out, as though there will be anything left. To think that you will never be in the crosshairs or to think that itās too hard to do more than you already do. I decided I didnāt have that privilege; for my family optimism could be ruinous.
On occasion I ask my daughter how she feels about things as they evolve, the clank of each hammer on the chisel chipping away her rights, or each time the president of our country has spent five rambling minutes regularly declaring my child a villain or abomination or the result of some woke virus. Being aware, far too sharp and equally sensitive, the question would overwhelm her, āMom, I know. I know. I just canāt.ā For months that would be the end of the conversation. Sometimes she would come to me in tears to talk about how it felt to be unsafe in your own country, or to know that the administration wants to eliminate you. Itās gut wrenching.
Her circle of friends, many of whom struggle, are her lifeline. We all know how important our 20-something tribes are. But when sheād raise the topic with her loves in hopes of creating a plan they too would shut down. This is not unique. For so many of us it is overwhelming. For my daughter, any desire to leave felt like a betrayal, or like she would be abandoning her circle. Any desire to stay felt perilous. Iāve shed torrents of tears at their predicament. That this is their future. And I waited, hitting the snooze button on my internal alarm.
Then politicians started talking about camps and withholding medications. I got a text. āLetās go. Itās time. [My girlfriend] said sheād move to Canada.ā Three weeks later we left.
My family members are fighters and protesters. Ask any one of them and they’ll roll up their sleeves and argue. My parents marched on Washington in the 1960s. They demonstrated at nuclear plants in the ā70s. My daughter has always fantasized about how the only good Nazi is a dead Nazi, and embracing her free-floating desire to stay and fight. Itās only a fantasy, but I get it. I have that blood in my veins and that idealism thumping in my heart. A political science student and obsessive political hobbyist, I have gone with my peers to rage against the machine, and been an activist from time to time. I never imagined that I would be willing to walk off the field.
The optimist in me says it will all work out, that it is always worth the fight. The middle-aged woman, burdened with the tasks of modern living complains that itās too hard, too expensive. But my child, my child. My child has begged for her safety. So, I must go. Itās really just logistics, like everything else when you have to move mountains ā or countries ā for your child. Rent our house. Sell our things. Pack. Drive. Get gas. Check and check. Just like weād do for any other life change. Look for jobs. Split up the family and delegate responsibilities. Done. As I go through this I think, is it any less than Taylor Swiftās mom did when she left Pennsylvania for Tennessee? Or any family that moves and wakes way before dawn for gymnastics or hockey? Iām not going to lie, I picked the easiest place to go, and the one she was most willing to take on. We joke that if the administration is serious about invading Canada that she may choose to fight for the side where the government fights behind her. On her side and at her back.
āI want to live somewhere my own government doesnāt want me dead.ā
Staying to fight the good fight is important. But leaving to protect the vulnerable and the precarious is (while no small feat) doable. I hope. If you feel you should, do. If you feel you canāt, look again. If you have to you will.
Anonymous is the mother of a trans daughter who recently moved from the U.S. to Canada.Ā

Itās time for transgender Americans to be more scared. Donald Trump is leading a fascist administration. In his first month in office, Trump signed a flurry of executive orders that clamp down on trans people. One ordered that trans women canāt compete in womenās sports in federally funded institutions. Another banned transgender service members from the military. And yet another executive order, signed on his very first day in office, told the federal government that only two genders exist ā those that people were given at birth.
Furthermore, Trump took over the Kennedy Center, electing himself as the chair of the board, and immediately a Pride event was cancelled. Taking over arts and letters is a surefire sign of fascism. Fascism, as defined by Merriam Webster, is a āpopulist political philosophy or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual, that is associated with a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, and that is characterized by severe economic and social regimentation and by forcible suppression of opposition.ā
America, in essence, is becoming more and more of a fascist state, and Trump is already a fascist leader. Trumpās strand of fascism is interesting, because he is an utter capitalist, with a fetish for colonizing foreign spaces. Trump has been trying to colonize Greenland for many years now, and he also shared an AI generated video of him colonizing the Gaza strip with a Trump hotel and pictures of Elon Musk spooning hummus next to the beach. Both of these are concerning, but the Trump Gaza video is especially horrifying because it shows he is in some sort of quasi break from reality where posting an AI generated future of a war-torn land seems OK. When I floated the Trump Gaza video among friends and family, they reacted with words like ācrazy,ā āinsane,ā and ādelusional.ā
When mentioning his transphobia, one relative who is politically aware theorized that Trump would unleash all of his anti-trans fury in just a few months but that he would run out of transphobic things to do. Unfortunately, the opposite seems to be true. Every passing day seems to bring a new anti-trans piece of legislation, whether itās Texasās proposed ban on being transgender in and of itself, or whether itās Utahās anti-trans bathroom ban.
Yet even more unfortunately, I am not seeing trans people get scared enough. I am not seeing enough action on our part. I am unsure whether our collective inaction is due to the fact that both houses of Congress are red, or whether some of us simply donāt have the privilege of fighting.
Regardless, I can propose one policy solution that trans people in the D.C. area can implement: Make Arlington a sanctuary city. In order to make Arlington a sanctuary city, Arlingtonians (and other Virginians for that matter) should lobby the county board to do so. However, Virginia faces stiff pushback from Gov. Youngkin when it comes to the formation of sanctuary cities. On Dec. 12, 2024, Youngkin proposed a budget that would include a āsanctuary city banā across the state. We have to make sure that we lobby the legislature to reject this proposed version of the budget.
Until then, transgender Americans need to start devising plans to move to sanctuary cities across the country and to fund underprivileged trans people who need the money to do so. Some of us also need to start thinking about moving to Canada if our futures become less bright.
Isaac Amend is a writer based in the D.C. area. He is a transgender man and was featured in National Geographicās āGender Revolutionā documentary. He serves on the board of the LGBT Democrats of Virginia. Contact him at [email protected] or on Instagram at @literatipapi. Ā
-
Opinions1 day ago
Finding the courage to flee U.S. to save my trans daughter
-
District of Columbia2 days ago
D.C. queer bar owners sound alarm on WorldPride security concerns
-
Advice4 days ago
I want to leave my perfect boyfriend
-
District of Columbia1 day ago
First D.C. LGBTQ seniors home readyĀ to open