Politics
Rep. Lauren Boebert: coming Out before age 21 should be illegal
The Congresswoman posted on Twitter that Americans should be required until they reach age 21 to remain ‘undeclared’ about their sexual orientation or gender identity.
U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert, (R-CO), who has garnered a reputation for embracing radical right-wing ideology and Q-Anon conspiracy theories in addition to her unabashed support of former President Donald Trump, postulated on Twitter that Americans should be required until they reach age 21 to remain ‘undeclared’ about their sexual orientation or gender identity.
“We require people to be 21 to purchase alcohol beverages, and 21 to purchase tobacco products. Why is it so unreasonable to require people to reach a certain level of maturity before making life-altering decisions about their sexuality and identity?” Boebert posited on Friday.

The Congresswoman, who dropped out of high school and in fact only received her diploma well into her thirties, was eviscerated by the Twitterverse- some pointing out the hypocrisy of her position given her publicly held views on unfettered access to firearms including those who are only 18 or indeed younger.
Boebert has long been critical of the LGBTQ+ community, most recently drafting a resolution that would strip away a recent win from transgender swimmer Lia Thomas who earned a medal for the 2022 NCAA Division I Women’s 500 Yard Freestyle event in Atlanta last month. Boebert was demanding that cis-gender NCAA swimmer Emma Weyant be awarded the medal instead.
“[Emma Weyant’s] first-place medal was stolen from her by a man competing in women’s swimming,” the resolution states.
Boebert has attracted a Democratic challenger for the mid-term elections, openly gay candidate Alex Walker who dismisses the Congresswoman’s antics as spewing feces. Other critics have labeled the Congresswoman’s hyper-right partisan attacks as ignorant. A frequent guest on Fox News and Newsmax, Boebert derides efforts by the Biden Administration to contain the coronavirus pandemic declaring vaccinations as government overreach.
In response to her latest anti-LGBTQ+ screed the Twitterverse [sampling] retorted her viewpoint:
Thinks there should be a law preventing #LGBTQ from coming out until age 21. Someone needs to ask her if she’s willing to apply this law to under 21 cis heterosexuals as well.
— leesa mishel 🏳️🌈🌸🌷 (@LeesaMishel) April 2, 2022
No more dating.
No more high school proms.
No nothing.
Who voted for this thing???
Kick. Rocks. https://t.co/MQD9hWX8sT
I highly doubt that you made the decision to be a straight woman after you turned 21. https://t.co/XGhQbp28sD
— Alex Plinck🏳️🌈 (@aplinckTX) April 2, 2022
At what age did you discover you were heterosexual? https://t.co/vVsdtGHZKJ
— Common Sense 🇺🇦 (@commonsense_tom) April 2, 2022
Buying alcohol or tobacco is a choice. Sexual orientation and gender identity is not. #LaurenBoebertIsSoDumb https://t.co/5rK2jiD0RW
— Greg Buster (@Gregnus_2022) April 2, 2022
Why is it so unreasonable to require @laurenboebert to reach a certain level of maturity before making life-altering decisions about the cost of insulin or legalization of marijuana?#CapCostOfInsulin #LegalizeMarijuana #ExpelLaurenBoebert https://t.co/McUJL02AQP
— Carl Sagan on being bamboozled . . . (@27_gooner) April 1, 2022
Why are you fine with an 18 year old owning a gun but not owning their sexuality? https://t.co/hzxScbo5nB
— Kat K stands with Ukraine 🇺🇦 (@HIHKatharine) April 1, 2022
Sometimes when you think you should say something, you should keep thinking about what you are going to say until you realize it is stupid and say nothing. https://t.co/rOsir5KqcF
— Max Marin 🧢 I like funk hip hop vidyagames n weed (@Doctor_Seraphim) April 2, 2022
2026 Midterm Elections
Markey’s primary win deemed success for LGBTQ activists
Mass. lawmaker champions transgender rights
U.S. Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) clinched the Democratic seat for his reelection campaign in Massachusetts’s primary election on Tuesday.
Markey won the deep-blue state with 64.8 percent of the vote, according to NBC News, triumphing over Marine Corps combat veteran and Congressman Seth Moulton, who received 35.2 percent of the vote.
Massachusetts’s primary election, which determined which Democratic candidate will head to the polls to face off against the Republican challenger in November, is being considered a victory for LGBTQ-inclusive policy, as well as for a divisive pro-transgender rights candidate — both things Markey has become an outspoken champion of.
Markey has experience at multiple levels of government, from the state level, where he served three terms in the state House of Representatives, to his federal tenure, including 20 terms in the U.S. House of Representatives and is now serving his second term as a senator. He has become a fixture of a changing Democratic Party in one of the most consistently blue places in the U.S.
This primary — and much of the national discussion surrounding the Senate seat — focused a lot of campaigning power on fighting the growing sentiment, led mostly by Republicans, that the frustration many Americans feel lends itself to an anti-establishment and anti-incumbent attitude.
Markey ran his campaign using his past as a reflection of his commitment to constantly putting his best foot forward for Bay Staters — particularly with apprehension for issues younger and more progressive democrats have been righting for — including Green New Deal and “Medicare for All” while Moulton — who was also elected to federal office prior to this run — campaigned on being younger than Markey, arguing that he was not the same type of established politician.
Moulton also faced backlash for negative comments about trans athletes, sparking criticism for those who did want younger candidate but want for trans rights to be protected.
Markey’s track record of supporting the LGBTQ community is one of the most clear in federal politics, one that has garnered a “100 percent lifetime voting record” on the Human Rights Campaign’s PAC politician review scorecard.
That list of Markey’s actions includes being a cosponsor of the Equality Act, driving landmark legislation to ensure federal protections for LGBTQ Americans, and being one of the most vocal proponents for trans rights in the federal government — specifically in multiple appropriations bills and in the National Defense Authorization Act. He was also the lead sponsor of the Transgender Health Care Access Act and the Transgender Bill of Rights resolution.
Markey first introduced the Transgender Bill of Rights in the Senate in 2023, where it ultimately failed to be brought to law. He reintroduced the legislation this year once again. This was a direct response to the attitude pushed by many conservatives after 2021, when the push to minimize trans rights started to become a key part of their cause and has been constantly propped up by the Trump-Vance administration.
“Massachusetts needs a senator who stands up and fights back, a senator who never forgets who they are fighting for,” Markey said during his victory speech. “That has been the mission of my life, and it always will be.”
Following the calling of the primary, a slew of LGBTQ organizations rallied behind Markey, many pushing his past as an asset that puts his money where his mouth is through advocating for legislation specifically protecting the LGBTQ community.
Tyler Hack, the executive director of the Christopher Street Project, an organization dedicated to pushing for legal protections for trans americans, released a statement following Markey’s win. Hack argued that putting forward such a staunchly pro-trans candidate is a win for the community, especially after endorsing him earlier this year.
“Tonight, anti-trans politics lost. Massachusetts rejected the idea that attacking transgender people is a shortcut to political power. Voters chose a different path: one where equality is not negotiable, cruelty is not courage, and transgender people do not have to disappear for Democrats to succeed.”
The Human Rights Campaign also endorsed him as a candidate earlier this year and issued a statement via its president, Kelley Robinson.
“Ed Markey has spent decades fighting for LGBTQ+ equality, for working people, and for a more livable world,” Robinson said. “He knows why equality matters. He’s stood with us no matter what. We were proud to endorse him this year, and when a pro-equality majority takes back the Senate this fall, we will continue to count on him as a champion for our community.”
Markey is running for reelection against Republican John Deaton in November, where he is expected to win.
Congress
HRC president campaigns for Chris Pappas in NH
Gay congressman running to succeed retiring U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen
Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson on Sunday campaigned for U.S. Rep. Chris Pappas (D-N.H.) in New Hampshire.
Robinson traveled to Manchester, the state’s largest city, nine days before the Sept. 8 primary that will determine who will vie for retiring U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.)’s seat.
We’re hitting the pavement across New Hampshire to fight for a freer, fairer future for everyone.
Glad to have Human Rights Campaign President @KelleyJRobinson join us for a canvass launch in Manchester today. pic.twitter.com/XWCEaQxy4o
— Chris Pappas (@ChrisPappasNH) August 30, 2026
Former U.S. Sen. John E. Sununu, who represented New Hampshire in the U.S. Senate from 2003-2009, will face off against former U.S. Sen. Scott Brown, who represented Massachusetts in the U.S. Senate from 2010-2013, in the Republican primary.
Karishma Manzur is among the Democrats challenging Pappas.
A poll the University of New Hampshire Survey Center released on Aug. 26 shows Sununu is ahead of Brown. The same survey shows Pappas ahead of Manzur and his other Democratic challengers.
The UNH Survey Center poll shows Sununu ahead of Pappas by a 45-43 percent margin if they were to face off in the general election. The margin of error is +/-2.1 percent.
Pappas would become the first openly gay man elected to the U.S. Senate if he were to win in November.
Congress
Chris Van Hollen says the Democratic Party needs change. Is he the one to lead it?
Senator is backing anti-establishment Democrats across the country
By LEE O. SANDERLIN | The Democratic Party is having something of an identity crisis — losing to President Donald Trump twice in three elections will do that.
Should the party embrace anti-establishment figures who espouse progressive policy ideas like Medicare for all and rhetoric about unrigging the economy for the 1 percent? Or should Democrats try to appeal to moderates who want to return to semi-normalcy in a time of political upheaval?
Although he’s been in Congress since 2002, with key leadership roles throughout his tenure, Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen, 67, counts himself firmly in the anti-establishment camp.
The rest of this article can be found on the Baltimore Banner’s website.
-
Technology5 days agoE-INFOSOL leaders encourage youth to pursue tech careers
-
Books5 days agoNew book examines Trump cuts to LGBTQ healthcare
-
Theater3 days agoImmersive ‘Nation-State’ imagines a society free of authoritarianism
-
Poland3 days agoPoland begins to legally recognize same-sex marriages from other countries
