Connect with us

District of Columbia

GLAA announces ratings for D.C. Council candidates

Janeese Lewis George, Robert White, Nate Fleming receive highest marks

Published

on

There are 10 candidates running to replace Vincent Gray who is not seeking re-election to the D.C. Council. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

GLAA D.C., formerly known as the Gay & Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington, announced on May 13 that it has awarded its highest ratings for D.C. Council candidates running in the cityā€™s June 4 primary election to incumbent Council members Janeese Lewis George (D-Ward 4) and Robert White (D-At-Large) and to Ward 7 Democratic candidate Nate Fleming.

On a rating scale of +10, the highest possible rating, to -10, the lowest rating, GLAA awarded ratings of +9.5 to Lewis George, + 9 to Robert White, and +8.5 to Fleming.

Fleming is one of 10 candidates running in the Democratic primary for the Ward 7 Council seat, which is being vacated by incumbent Council member and former D.C. Mayor Vincent Gray, who is not running for re-election. In addition to Fleming, GLAA issued ratings for seven other Ward 7 Democratic contenders who, like Fleming, returned a required GLAA candidate questionnaire.

The remaining two Ward 7 candidates were not rated under a GLAA policy adopted this year of not rating candidates that did not return the questionnaire, the responses to which GLAA uses to determine its ratings, according to GLAA President Tyrone Hanley. A statement accompanying the GLAA ratings shows that it rated 13 D.C. Council candidates ā€“ all Democrats —  out of a total of 18 Council candidates on the June 4 primary ballot.

Ballot information released by the D.C. Board of Elections shows that only one Republican candidate and one Statehood Green Party candidate is running this year for a  D.C. Council seat.  GOP activist Nate Derenge is running for the Ward 8 seat held by incumbent Democrat Trayon White and Statehood Green Party candidate Darryl Moch is running for the At-Large Council seat held by Robert White.

GLAA shows in its ratings statement that neither Trayon White nor Derenge nor Moch returned the questionnaire, preventing them from being rated. However, one of two Democratic candidates running against Tryon White in the primary ā€” Salim Aldofo ā€” did return the questionnaire and received a rating of +5.5. The other Democratic candidate, Rahman Branch, did not return the questionnaire and was not rated. Trayon White has been a supporter on LGBTQ issues while serving on the Council.

GLAA President Hanley said GLAA this year decided to limit its ratings to candidates of all political parties running for D.C. Council seats. In addition to candidates running for an At-Large Council seat and Council seats in Wards 4, 7, and 8, the June 4 primary ballot includes candidates running for the D.C. Congressional Delegate seat, the Shadow U.S. House seat, and the Shadow U.S. Senate seat. GLAA chose not to issue ratings for those races, according to Hanley. He said during mayoral election years, GLAA rates all candidates for mayor.

The Capital Stonewall Democrats, D.Cā€™s largest local LGBTQ political organization,  was scheduled to release its endorsements of D.C. Council candidates and candidates for all other local D.C. races, including Congressional Delegate and Senate and House ā€œshadowā€ races, at a May 21 endorsement event. The Blade will report on those endorsements in an upcoming story.

Like in all past years beginning in the early 1970s when GLAA began rating candidates in local D.C elections, the group has not rated federal candidates, including those running for U.S. president. Thus, it issued no rating this year for President Joe Biden and two lesser-known Democratic challengers appearing on the D.C. presidential primary ballot on June 4 ā€“ Marianne Williamson and Armando Perez-Serrato.

In the At-Large Council race, GLAA gave Robert Whiteā€™s sole Democratic challenger, Rodney Red Grant, who returned the questionnaire, a rating of +3.5.

ā€œThe ratings are based solely on the issues and may not be interpreted as endorsements,ā€ GLAA says in its statement accompanying the ratings. The statement says the ratings are based on the candidatesā€™ response to the questionnaire, the questions for which GLAA says reflect the groupā€™s positions on a wide range of issues as stated in a document it calls ā€œA Loving Community: GLAA Policy Brief 2024.ā€ It sends a link to that document to all candidates to whom it sends them the questionnaire and urges the candidate to seek out the brief ā€œfor guidance and clarificationā€ in responding to the questions. GLAA says the ratings are also based on the candidatesā€™ record on the issues GLAA deems of importance, including LGBTQ issues.

Like its questionnaire in recent years, this yearā€™s nine-question questionnaire asks the candidates whether they would support mostly non-LGBTQ specific issues supported by GLAA, some of which are controversial. One of the questions asks the candidates, ā€œDo you support enacting legislation to decriminalize sex work for adults, including the selling and purchasing of sex and third-party involvement not involving fraud, violence, and coercion?ā€

Another question asks if the candidates would support decriminalizing illegal drug use by supporting ā€œremoving the criminal penalties for drug possession for personal use and increasing investments in health services.ā€ Other questions ask whether candidates would address ā€œconcentrated wealth in the District by raising revenue through taxing the most wealthy residents,ā€ would they support funding for ā€œharm reduction and overdose prevention services to save lives,ā€ and would they support a Green New Deal for Housing bill pending before the D.C. Council that would ā€œSocialize Our Housingā€ to address putting in place city subsidized housing for those in need.

One of the questions that might be considered LGBTQ specific asks whether candidates would support sufficient funding for the D.C. Office of Human Rights to ensure the office has enough staff members to adequately enforce the cityā€™s nondiscrimination laws and to end a discrimination case backlog that the office sometimes encounters.

Some activists have criticized GLAA for not including more LGBTQ-specific questions in its questionnaire. Others have defended the questionnaire on grounds that D.C. long ago has passed a full range of LGBTQ supportive laws and most if not, all serious candidates running in D.C. for public office for the past 20 years or more have expressed strong support for LGBTQ equality. They argue that LGBTQ voters, while weighing the depth of support candidates have on LGBTQ issues, most of the time base their vote on a candidateā€™s record and position on non-LGBTQ issues when all candidates in a specific race are LGBTQ supportive.

Hanley told the Washington Blade GLAA believes the current questionnaire addresses the issues of importance to the largest number of LGBTQ D.C. residents.

ā€œMy response is that we care about whatever issues are impacting queer and trans people,ā€ Hanley said. ā€œWe canā€™t isolate the challenges we are experiencing as queer and trans people to things that are specifically related to our identity as queer and trans people because they are all interconnected,ā€ he said.

ā€œSo, how will I tell a Black trans woman we care about her not being discriminated against at her job for being trans, for being Black, or for being a woman, but we donā€™t care that she doesnā€™t have housing? Hanley asked. ā€œTo me, that seems like a very inhumane way of thinking about human beings because we are whole human beings,ā€ he said, some of whom, he added, face a wide range of issues such as homelessness,  drug issues, and ā€œstruggling to make ends meet.ā€

The GLAA statement that accompanies its ratings, which is posted on its website, includes links to each of the candidatesā€™ questionnaire responses as well as an explanation of why it gave its specific rating to each of the candidates. In its explanation section GLAA says all the candidates expressed overall support for the LGBTQ community and expressed support for the concerns  related to the issues raised by the questions even if they were not at this time ready to back some of the issues like decriminalization of sex work.  

Following are the GLAA ratings given to 12 Democratic D.C. Council candidates and one ā€œunknownā€ candidate that Hanley says submitted their questionnaire but did not reveal their identity on the questionnaire:

DC Council At-Large

Robert White: +9

Rodney Red Grant: +3.5

DC Council Ward 4

Janeese Lewis George: +9.5

DC Council Ward 7

Ebony-Rose Thompson: +4.5

Ebony Payne: +5

Kelvin Brown: +2.5

Nate Fleming: +8.5

Roscoe Grant Jr.: +3.5

Veda Rasheed: +5

Villareal VJ Johnson II: +4

Wendell Felder: +2

DC Council Ward 8

Salim Aldofo: +5.5

Unknown: +2

The full GLAA ratings, a breakdown of the ratings based on a GLAA rating criteria, the candidate questionnaire response, and GLAAā€™s explanation for each of its candidate ratings can be accessed at the GLAA website.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

District of Columbia

LGBTQ-friendly senior living community to open near Dupont Circle

Luxury assisted living apartments located in the former Fairfax Hotel

Published

on

An upscale senior and assisted living apartment building located two blocks from Dupont Circle is set to open this month.

An upscale senior and assisted living apartment building located two blocks from Dupont Circle, which is scheduled to hold a grand opening ceremony on Feb. 12, has announced it is ā€œLGBTQ+ friendly.ā€

A statement released by the new seniors home, called the Inspir Embassy Row, located at 2100 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., says it is proud to have received recognition as a SAGECare Platinum Credentialed Provider from the New York City-based LGBTQ seniors advocacy and training group SAGE.

ā€œTo earn this prestigious credential, a minimum of 80 percent of Inspirā€™s management and non-management staff completed comprehensive training in LGBTQ+ aging cultural competency,ā€ the statement says.

ā€œThe program covered crucial topics including historical and contemporary LGBTQ+ struggles, proper terminology usage related to sexual orientation and gender identity, and strategies to address the unique challenges faced by this demographic,ā€ according to the statement sent to the Washington Blade.

Inspir Embassy Rowā€™s general manager, Tim Cox, who is gay and said he lives with his husband just five blocks from the soon to open facility, provided the Washington Blade with a tour of the senior living building. He said it includes 174 apartments, including studio apartments and one and two-bedroom apartments.

Tim Cox is general manager of Inspir Embassy Row. (Washington Blade photo by Lou Chibbaro, Jr.)

Residents have signed up for about 45 of the apartments so far, Cox said, including some LGBTQ residents, who will begin moving in on Feb. 18. He said the upscale building is open to seniors who currently do not need assisted living services as well as those who need different levels of care, including memory loss care.

He said a doctor and nurse practitioner will be among the staff team providing services for residents. Although most of the apartments haveĀ a kitchenette with a refrigerator and microwave but no cooktop and a limited number have full kitchens, Cox said three meals a day will be served in the buildingā€™s large, first floor dining room. The building also includes common areas with spaces for entertainment such as the showing of movies and a large grand piano for visiting performers.

ā€œAt Inspir Embassy Row, weā€™re dedicated to creating an inclusive environment that celebrates the diversity of our residents,ā€ Cox said in the statement released by the building, which is the former home of the Fairfax Hotel.

(Washington Blade photo by Lou Chibbaro, Jr.)

ā€œThis SAGECare certification is a testament to our commitment to providing personalized, compassionate care that respects and honors the identities and experiences of all our residents, including those in the LGBTQ+ community,ā€ Cox said.

He added, ā€œOur goal is to create a home where every resident feels valued, respected and free to be themselves. The SAGECare certification is just the beginning of our journey to set a new standard for inclusive senior living in Washington, D.C.ā€

But the monthly rent for residents of Inspir Embassy Row will likely place it out of reach for many potential senior residents. Cox said the monthly rent for a one-room studio apartment is $8,100, with the monthly cost of a one-bedroom apartment ranging from $11,500 to about $15,000. A two-bedroom apartment will cost $18,500 per month.

Some of those costs will be covered for residents who have long-term care insurance, Cox said.

Asked if potential residents who can afford the monthly costs at Inspir Embassy Row would be better off staying in their own homes and hiring staff and others to comfortably assist them, Cox said Inspir provides far more than just meals and a place to stay.

(Washington Blade photo by Lou Chibbaro, Jr.)

When remaining at your own home ā€œyouā€™re isolated, youā€™re lonely, you donā€™t have activities,ā€ he said. ā€œWhen you have people coming to care for you, theyā€™re not there as companions,ā€ Cox said. ā€œSo, for this, we give them opportunities. We take them to the Kennedy Center. We have music here on a daily basis.ā€

Cox added, ā€œWe have authors come in. We have speakers that are renowned coming in. Since weā€™re on Embassy Row, weā€™ll have ambassadors come in to introduce their country. So, really it is being able to get to know our community better and being social, interactive.ā€

The statement released by Inspir Embassy Row says the facility will provide ā€œLGBTQ+ specific activities, events, or support groups to allow residents the opportunity to share similar experiences with other residents,ā€ and there will be ā€œpartnerships with local LGBTQ+ organizations.ā€ 

(Washington Blade photo by Lou Chibbaro, Jr.)
Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Officials praise D.C. Office of LGBTQ Affairs, raise concern over funding delays

Leaders of local advocacy groups testify at Council oversight hearing

Published

on

Local officials praised the work of Office of LGBTQ Affairs Director Japer Bowles. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

Officials with five local LGBTQ community organizations and officials with another four groups that also provide services for LGBTQ D.C. residents testified before a D.C. Council performance oversight hearing on Jan. 30 that examined the work of Mayor Muriel Bowserā€™s Office of LGBTQ Affairs.

The hearing, which also examined the Mayorā€™s Office of Veterans Affairs and Office of Religious Affairs, was called by D.C Council member Brianne Nadeau (D-Ward 1) in her role as chair of the Councilā€™s Committee on Public Works and Operations. 

Nearly all the witnesses praised what they called the LGBTQ Affairs Officeā€™s longstanding support for the D.C. LGBTQ community through a wide range of services and programs and what they called the ā€œdedicatedā€ work of its director, Japer Bowles.

Officials with at least four of the LGBTQ organizations, including the D.C. LGBTQ Budget Coalition and the LGBTQ youth advisory group SMYAL, expressed concern over what they called long delays in funding from grants awarded to LGBTQ and LGBTQ supportive groups by the Office of LGBTQ Affairs.

Several of the witnesses, including Kimberley Bush, executive director of the D.C. LGBTQ+ Community Center, who submitted written testimony, said the funding delays were being caused by other D.C. government agencies that administer city grant programs. 

Bush stated that the delays in funding for the LGBTQ+ Community Center for a  $50,000 Community Development Grant and a $50,000 Violence Prevention and Response Team (VPART) Grant, ā€œby no faultā€ of the LGBTQ Affairs Office, ā€œcaused extraordinary and substantial financial strain on our cash flow.ā€

Heidi Ellis, coordinator of the D.C. LGBTQ+ Budget Coalition, raised a related issue of concern that the mayorā€™s office, based on ā€œshifting priorities,ā€ sometimes significantly lowers the level of grant funds from the Office of LGBTQ Affairs to community-based LGBTQ grant recipients.

Ellis and other witnesses at the hearing referred to this as ā€œyo-yo funding and shifting of mayoral prioritiesā€ that they said makes it difficult for LGBTQ groups receiving city grants to continue their programs and services.  

In his own testimony, and in response to questions from Nadeau and D.C. Council member Zachary Parker (D-Ward 5), who is the Councilā€™s only gay member, LGBTQ Affairs Office Director Bowles said some of the delays in grant payments were due to a vacancy in the office staff position that administers the grants, which he said has now been filled.

Among other things, Bowles said the complexity of the grant approval process, which he said involves ā€œdifferent layers of funding decisionsā€ by other D.C. government offices, also has caused some delays. He said that despite what he called some of his officeā€™s challenges, the office continues to expand its role in supporting the local LGBTQ community.

ā€œWith Mayor Bowserā€™s leadership and support, Iā€™m proud to have led efforts that transformed the office,ā€ he stated in his testimony. ā€œWe secured the bid for WorldPride 2025, expanded our grant programs from $75,000 to over $6 million, revamped our community engagement strategy, and much more,ā€ he said.

ā€œThese changes have had a direct impact on addressing public safety concerns and providing housing and support to vulnerable residents,ā€ he added. According to Bowles, his officeā€™s LGBTQIA+ Community Development Grant program saw a record expansion in fiscal year 2024, with more than $1 million awarded to 29 community-based organizations. (The Washington Blade has been a recipient of a grant that funds a journalism fellow who reports on local LGBTQ community news.)

ā€œThese grants support a wide range of LGBTQIA+ dedicated initiatives, including mental health counseling, youth leadership, and arts and culture projects,ā€ he said. ā€œAs part of our broader advocacy efforts, we secured funding for the Violence Prevention and Response Team, which provides trauma-informed legal and counseling services to survivors of hate-based incidents.ā€

Among the LGBTQ officials who praised Bowlesā€™s work and the LGBTQ Affairs Office while raising concerns about the officeā€™s ability to carry out its ambitious programs was Vincent Slatt, chair of the D.C. Advisory Neighborhood Commissionā€™s Rainbow Caucus. The caucus currently consists of 38 out LGBTQ ANC commissioners based in all eight D.C. wards.   

Slatt called on Mayor Bowser and the D.C. Council to increase the number of full-time staff members for the LGBTQ Affairs Office from its current six staff members to 10 or 11 full-time staffers.

ā€œTo address these challenges, we strongly recommend increasing the officeā€™s staff to match the scale of its responsibilities and the growing needs of our community,ā€ Slatt told the committee. He added that the officeā€™s current ā€œchronic staffing and budget shortage disparities will become even more concerning in light of the recent and anticipated homophobic and transphobic attacks expected from the White House and Congress.ā€

The other LGBTQ community witnesses who praised the LGBTQ Affairs Officeā€™s overall work were Rebecca York, SMYALā€™s director of Youth Development and Community Engagement; Justin Johns, director of operations for the D.C. LGBTQ+ Community Center; Ryan Bos, executive director of the Capital Pride Alliance; and Bo Belotti, development manager for the community services organization HIPS.

In response to a request from the Washington Blade for comment on whether the mayor and other city officials were taking steps to address the issue of grant funding delays raised at the D.C. Council hearing, the office of the mayor released this statement: ā€œWashington, D.C. is proud to support the LGBTQIA+ community. The Mayor’s Office of LGBTQ Affairs continues to deliver impactful programs with its dedicated staff, and we are always assessing ways to enhance support across all community affairs offices.ā€

The Office of the D.C. Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development (DMPED) responded to the Blade inquiry with its own statement: ā€œDMPED has been working closely and collaboratively with the D.C. LGBTQ+ Community Center to finalize their grant agreement. We are proud to support this transformative project that is delivering a world-class services center for our LGBTQ community.ā€

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

D.C. Black Pride announces 2025 theme of ā€˜Freedomā€™

ā€˜Cocktails for a Causeā€™ fundraiser draws more than 100

Published

on

D.C. Black Pride lead organizer Kenya Hutton, standing in rear, introduces fellow Black Pride organizers and fellow board members after announcing this year's Black Pride theme. Standing from left to right: Shannon Garcon, Derrick 'Strawberry' Cox, Genise Chambers-Woods, Kathy Neal, and Savanna Wanzer. (Washington Blade photo by Lou Chibbaro, Jr.)

Organizers of D.C.ā€™s annual LGBTQ Black Pride celebration announced at a Jan. 29 ā€˜Cocktails for a Causeā€™ fundraising event that the theme for this yearā€™s celebration is ā€œBlack Pride is Freedom.ā€

Like past years, this yearā€™s Black Pride will take place during Memorial Day weekend from May 23-26 and will be an official event of World Pride, which D.C. is hosting this year.

Just over 100 people turned out for the theme announcement event at the City Club of D.C., which provided the cocktail lounge meeting space free of charge and was donating a percentage of its drink sales to Black Pride, according to Black Pride organizer Kenya Hutton.

Hutton, who serves as CEO and president of the Center for Black Equity, a D.C.-based LGBTQ advocacy group that organizes Black Pride, said the theme was selected in part based on the issues the LGBTQ community is facing in 2025.

ā€œJust looking at how things are going in the world right now, it seems that our safe spaces are in jeopardy,ā€ Hutton told the Washington Blade in recounting what he said at the Jan. 29 event.

ā€œAnd with the attacks that are happening on the Black community and Black LGBTQ communities, especially on our trans community, coming out with the theme of Black Pride is Freedom is sort of a declaration,ā€ he said.

ā€œIt is declaring that we are going to continue being free, weā€™re going to love how we are freely, love who we want freely, show how we want to be freely,ā€ Hutton said. ā€œWe just want to be free and weā€™re not going back in the closet, weā€™re not going to go into hiding. Weā€™re going to live out free and out loud unapologetically,ā€ he said.  

Hutton said most of this yearā€™s Black Pride events, which include panel discussions and workshops, will take place at the Capital Hilton Hotel.

The Capital Pride Alliance, which organizes most of D.C.ā€™s LGBTQ Pride events and is the lead organizer of this yearā€™s World Pride, states on its website that World Pride events will take place in D.C. from May 17 through June 8.

 Among the first of the events will be D.C. Trans Pride, which is scheduled to be held May 17-18, just ahead of Black Pride, which is set to be held May 23-26.

A listing of the World Price events can be accessed at worldpridedc.org.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular