Connect with us

Politics

U.S. gov’t to recognize same-sex marriages for tax purposes

Even legally wed couples in non-marriage equality states will be eligible for tax benefits

Published

on

Jeff Zarillo, Paul Katami, Sandy Stier, Kris Perry, David Boies, Chad Griffin, gay marriage, same-sex marriage, marriage equality, Proposition 8, Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA, Prop 8, California, Supreme Court, gay news, Washington Blade
Jeff Zarillo, Paul Katami, Sandy Stier, Kris Perry, David Boies, Chad Griffin, gay marriage, same-sex marriage, marriage equality, Proposition 8, Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA, Prop 8, California, Supreme Court, gay news, Washington Blade

The U.S. government will treat married same-sex couples as equal in the aftermath of the court ruling against DOMA (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key).

The legal same-sex marriages of gay couples — whether or not they reside in a state that observes their union — will now be recognized for tax purposes in the wake of the Supreme Court decision against the Defense of Marriage Act.

Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew announced the change on Thursday in a joint statement with the Internal Revenue Service.

“Today’s ruling provides certainty and clear, coherent tax filing guidance for all legally married same-sex couples nationwide,” Lew said. “It provides access to benefits, responsibilities and protections under federal tax law that all Americans deserve. This ruling also assures legally married same-sex couples that they can move freely throughout the country knowing that their federal filing status will not change.”

The decision, which brings the Obama administration into compliance with the ruling against DOMA, means gay married couples will be able to file federal taxes jointly each year. The announcement also means married gay couples be treated the same as opposite-sex married couples for income and gift and estate taxes.

These couples, according to the joint statement, will now be treated equally in terms of claiming personal and dependency exemptions, taking the standard deduction, employee benefits, contributing to an IRA and claiming the earned income tax credit or child tax credit.

LGBT advocates applauded the Obama administration for instituting the change, which they said would help bring relief to married gay couples throughout the country.

Evan Wolfson, president of Freedom to Marry, said the announcement makes today “a day of celebration and relief for married same-sex couples all over America.”

“At long last, the IRS will treat them as what they are: married,” Wolfson said. “Freedom to Marry commends the administration’s swift implementation of the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling for federal equality in an area that will have a direct, tangible impact on families’ financial health.”

Chad Griffin, president of the Human Rights Campaign, also praised the Obama administration for implementing the change.

“With today’s ruling, committed and loving gay and lesbian married couples will now be treated equally under our nation’s federal tax laws, regardless of what state they call home,” Griffin said.  “These families finally have access to crucial tax benefits and protections previously denied to them under the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act.”

The issue of unequal federal taxation for gay married couples was the reason why the Supreme Court struck down Section 3 of DOMA. Plaintiff Edith Windsor, a New York lesbian, sued the U.S. government because she had to pay $363,000 in estate taxes upon the death of her spouse, Thea Spyer.

According to the statement, the federal government will now recognize for tax purposes any legal same-sex marriage — even if the couples resides in a state that doesn’t observe the union. However, the new policy doesn’t apply to domestic partnership or civil unions.

Troy Stevenson, executive director of the New Jersey-based Garden State Equality, said the decisions demonstrates why his state needs to enact marriage equality. New Jersey offers civil unions, but not same-sex marriage.

“While this is great news for couples who have been married in the 13 states that recognize full marriage equality; let us be clear, New Jerseyans should not be required to cross state lines to be afforded the dignity of marriage,” Stevenson said. “This decision by the IRS makes it crystal clear that civil unions are not now, and never will be equal to marriage.”

Additionally, gay couples may file an amended return if they feel they would’ve receive a refund in one or more prior tax years still open under the statute of limitations. That means these couples generally can file a refund claim for up to three years in the past: 2010, 2011, and 2012. Under some circumstances, such as signing an agreement with the IRS to keep the statute of limitations open, they may be able to seek a refund from an earlier time.

Further, gay employees who receive same-sex spouse health insurance coverage from their employers on an after-tax basis may treat the amounts paid for that coverage as pre-tax and excludable from income.

Pending legislation in the Senate that would have eliminated the federal tax on employer-provided health insurance for same-sex couples is known as the Tax Parity for Health Plan Beneficiaries Act.

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), the sponsor of the bill, said in a statement to the Washington Blade he welcomes the new policy from the administration, but still seeks passage of his bill cover individuals in civil unions or domestic partnerships.

“Today’s ruling is an important part of implementing the Supreme Court’s historic decision to overturn DOMA,” Schumer said. “I still strongly believe that couples in civil unions and domestic partnerships should receive the same tax treatment as all married couples and will continue to push for exactly that.”

Senior Treasury officials lay out new policy

In a conference call with reporters, senior Treasury officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, laid out the reasoning by which the administration determined that married gay couples living in non-marriage equality states would be recognized for federal tax purposes.

“We have a federal tax code that applies to all 50 states,” officials said. “The thought process was that from tax administration standpoint, it made sense to have rules to apply across the entire nation. So, same-sex couples that are married under federal law in one state should get similar treatment regardless of where they live. On the flip side, from the administration’s standpoint, it would be very difficult to administer a situation it was dependent on where a taxpayer lived on what the state was in that time.”

Officials said the reasoning was analogous to the administration’s previous determination that common law marriages, or some kind of irregular marriage, would be recognized as a union for federal tax purposes.

It’s possible that under some circumstances, married gay couples will have to pay more in taxes than they were paying with DOMA in place. Officials didn’t have an exact number for how many gay couples would pay more in taxes, but expected it would be proportionate to the number of straight couples.

While gay couples may file an amended tax return for up to three years in the past, officials said there’s no obligation to do so — even if they should have had to pay more in taxes under the new policy.

“It’s basically the taxpayers option to that, to go back and file an amended return,” officials said. “There are instances in which a taxpayer would find it advantageous to file an amended return claiming a joint filing status for a previous tax year, but it’s not a requirement.”

In the event that an employer offers domestic partner health benefits to gay employees, but doesn’t recognize same-sex marriage, officials said federal tax immunity would also apply to these benefits. That would be a situation to similar to Walmart, which is set next year to offer domestic partner health benefits to gay employees in same-sex relationships, but won’t recognize same-sex marriages.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Politics

Former VP Dick Cheney dies at 84

Supported marriage equality before it was legalized

Published

on

Cheney, gay news, Washington Blade
Dick Cheney died at age 84. (Public domain photo)

Former Vice President Dick Cheney died of complications from pneumonia and cardio and vascular disease, according to a family statement released Tuesday morning. He was 84. 

Cheney served as vice president under President George W. Bush for eight years and previously as defense secretary under President George H.W. Bush. He also served as a House member from Wyoming and as White House chief of staff for President Gerald Ford. 

“Dick Cheney was a great and good man who taught his children and grandchildren to love our country, and to live lives of courage, honor, love, kindness, and fly fishing,” his family said in a statement. “We are grateful beyond measure for all Dick Cheney did for our country. And we are blessed beyond measure to have loved and been loved by this noble giant of a man.”

Cheney had a complicated history on LGBTQ issues; he and wife Lynne had two daughters, Liz Cheney and Mary Cheney, who’s a lesbian. Mary Cheney was criticized by LGBTQ advocates for not joining the fight against President George W. Bush’s push for a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. She later resumed support for LGBTQ issues in 2009, including same-sex marriage, after her father left office in 2009. She married her partner since 1992, Heather Poe, in 2012.

In 2010, after leaving office, Cheney predicted “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” would “be changed” and expressed support for reconsideration of the law banning open military service.

In 2013, the Cheney family’s disagreements over marriage equality spilled into the public eye after Liz Cheney announced her opposition to same-sex couples legally marrying. Mary Cheney took to Facebook to rebuke her sister: “Liz – this isn’t just an issue on which we disagree – you’re just wrong – and on the wrong side of history.” Dick and Lynne Cheney were supporters of marriage equality by 2013. Liz Cheney eventually came around years later.

Cheney, a neo-con, was often criticized for his handling of the Iraq war. He was considered one of the most powerful and domineering vice presidents of the modern era. He disappeared from public life for years but re-emerged to help Liz Cheney in her House re-election bid after she clashed with President Trump. Dick Cheney assailed Trump in a campaign video and later Liz announced that her father would vote for Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election.

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

John E. Sununu to run for NH Senate seat

Gay Congressman Chris Pappas among other candidates

Published

on

Former U.S. Sen. John E. Sununu (R-N.H.) (Screen capture via WMUR-TV/YouTube)

Former U.S. Sen. John E. Sununu on Wednesday announced he is running for retiring U.S. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.)’s seat in 2026.

“Washington, as anyone who observes can see, is a little dysfunctional right now,” Sununu told WMUR in an interview the New Hampshire television station aired on Wednesday. “There’s yelling, there’s inactivity. We’ve got a government shutdown. Friends, family, they always say, ‘Why would anyone want to work there?’ And the short answer is it’s important to New Hampshire. It’s important that we have someone who knows how to get things done.”

Sununu, 61, was in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1997-2003 and in the U.S. Senate from 2003-2009. Shaheen in 2008 defeated Sununu when he ran for re-election.

Sununu’s father is John Sununu, who was former President George H.W. Bush’s chief of staff. Sununu’s brother is former New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu.

John E. Sununu will square off against former U.S. Sen. Scott Brown in the Republican primary. Gay U.S. Rep. Chris Pappas (D-N.H.) is among the Democrats running for Shaheen’s seat.

“As a small business owner and public servant, I’m in this fight to put people first and do what’s right for New Hampshire,” said Pappas on Wednesday on X. “I’m working to lower costs and build a fair economy. Washington should work for you — not corporate interests.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Homophobia, racism, and Nazis: The dark side of rising Republican leaders

Leaked messages from young GOP leaders reveal normalized extremist rhetoric and internal party divisions.

Published

on

Vice President J.D. Vance said the messages were "kids doing stupid things" despite multiple of them being in their 30s. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

The Young Republican National Federation (YRNF) — an organization dedicated to politically organizing young conservatives and helping them win elected office across the United States — is under fire after thousands of homophobic, sexist, racist, anti-Semitic, and violent Telegram messages from state-level group chats were leaked.

Politico reviewed nearly 2,900 pages of messages exchanged between January and August 2025 by members of state chapters of the YRNF, the youth wing of the Republican Party. Many of those involved in the chats currently hold or have held positions in state governments across New York, Kansas, Arizona, and Vermont.

Participants in the chats used racist, ableist, and homophobic slurs 251 times, according to Politico’s analysis. “Faggots,” “monkeys,” “watermelon people,” and “retards” were just some of the reported language used.

Within the leaked messages, at least six instances of explicitly homophobic language came from some of the youngest leaders in the Republican Party. Much of this rhetoric targeted Hayden Padgett, who recently won election as national chair of the Young Republicans. Padgett’s victory came after a bitter contest with Peter Giunta, the former chair of the New York State Young Republicans, who led an “insurgent” faction within the group and has been quoted most frequently in coverage of the leak.

Giunta, who was found to repeatedly say how much he “loved” Hitler in the group chat and used the N-word multiple times, was reportedly angry over losing the August election. He wrote messages such as “Minnesota – faggots,” referring to the state’s Young Republican organization, and “So you mean Hayden faggot wrote the resolution himself?”

Luke Mosiman, chair of the Arizona Young Republicans, responded with “RAPE HAYDEN” — later joking about Spanish colonizers coming to America and having “sex with every single woman.” Alex Dwyer, chair of the Kansas Young Republicans, replied, “Sex is gay.” Mosiman followed with, “Sex? It was rape.”

Bobby Walker, former vice chair of the New York State Young Republicans and former communications director for New York state Sen. Peter Oberacker, made at least two homophobic comments, including “Stay in the closet faggot,” and, in another message mocking Padgett, “Adolf Padgette is in the faggotbunker as we speak.”

William Hendrix, vice chair of the Kansas Young Republicans and former communications assistant for Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, was also a frequent participant, posting numerous racist and homophobic remarks — including, “Missouri doesn’t like fags.”

Joe Maligno, who served as general counsel for the New York State Young Republicans, said, “Can we fix the showers? Gas chambers don’t fit the Hitler aesthetic.”

There were multiple anti-Semitic dog whistles used, most notably Dwyer’s use of “1488” in the chat. The “14” references the 14 words in the white supremacist slogan, “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children,” while “88” is shorthand for “Heil Hitler,” with “H” being the eighth letter in the alphabet.

In response to the controversy Vice President J.D. Vance downplayed the leak, calling it an example of “kids doing stupid things” and “telling edgy, offensive jokes.”

Everyone mentioned in the group chat is over the age of 20. Peter Giunta is 31 years old, and Joe Maligno is 35. The ages of the other participants were not specified, but most accounts indicate they are over 24.

This leak exposes how some up-and-coming Republican leaders have normalized offensive and extreme rhetoric, reflecting both the erosion of political and cultural sensitivity and the influence of Trump and his allies. It also underscores the widening divide within the party between its traditional conservative wing and a far-right faction emboldened by such rhetoric.

Continue Reading

Popular