- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
Levin wants imminent vote on ‘Don’t Ask’ legislation
Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Carl Levin (D-Mich.) is calling for an immiment vote on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” legislation as LGBT advocates fear moving forward with bill before negotiations are settled could doom the measure to failure.
On the Senate floor Thursday, Levin urged Senate leadership to bring to the floor before the week is out the fiscal year 2011 defense authorization bill, which contains “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal language.
“If we don’t proceed on this bill this week, then invoking cloture sometime next week, even if we can do it, it would be a symbolic victory,” Levin said. ”And I don’t believe that there would be enough time to hammer out a final bill before the end of this session.”
Levin noted that after passage in the Senate, the legislation would still need to go to conference committee before heading to the president’s desk. The Michigan senator said over the past 10 years, conferencing the legislation has taken an average of 75 days.
“Even if we get 60 votes today to invoke cloture on the motion to proceed to this bill, and even if we’re able to consider amendments and pass this bill in a few days, it will be a possibly insurmountable challenge to work out all of the differences with the House,” Levin said.
The Michigan senator concluded that the Senate would need to bring up the the defense authorization bill this week if the legislation is to be passed with the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” provision intact.
“But the only way that this will be real and that the repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, don’t Tell,’ assuming we continue to keep it in the bill, will be real is if we proceed to the bill this week.” Levin said. “We cannot and should not delay this vote any longer.”
Levin’s remarks concerned “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal advocates who feel going to the vote too soon could bring an unfortunate result.
Fred Sainz, the Human Rights Campaign’s vice president of communications, warned the Senate against taking up the defense authorization bill before negotiations over the legislation complete.
“If senators move forward with a vote on NDAA before a deal has been solidified, the vote will fail and all key players will share the responsibility,” Sainz said.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), earlier in the day said he’s “likely” to move forward with the defense authorization bill sometime on Thursday.
Reid has been in talks with Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.), the sponsor of repeal language in the Senate, and Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who’s seen as the most likely Republican to vote for the motion to proceed, to find sufficient GOP support in moving forward.
Assuming that all 58 members of the Democratic caucus vote in favor of the motion to proceed, repeal advocates would need to pick up at least two votes from Republican senators to meet the 60-vote threshold necessary to overcome a filibuster and move forward with the legislation.
Collins has said she would vote in favor of the motion to proceed only after she’s assured a fair amendment process for the defense authorization bill and only after the Senate first takes up the extension of the Bush-era tax cuts.
Tagged with Carl Levin, Don't Ask Don't Tell, Fred Sainz, Human Rights Campaign
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.


view print edition
Why is HRC commenting on this? Who woke them up?
[Translate]
This process has been so pathetic, it is unforgivable.
[Translate]