- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
-

Leahy withholds amendments for gay couples in immigration bill
-

Tensions high as Senate panel considers immigration reform
-

U.K. House of Commons approves marriage bill
-

Gay DC psychiatrist named head of APA
-

Gay judicial nominee confirmed to Oregon federal court
-

Capital Trans Pride
-

Sally Ride to receive Presidential Medal of Freedom
Gallagher: Grassley ‘not referring to me’ in DOMA hearing
A prominent voice in the movement against same-sex marriage maintains a Republican senator wasn’t referring to her Wednesday in comments about an absent witness who was invited to testify before the Senate in favor of the Defense of Marriage Act.
Maggie Gallagher, chair of the National Organization for Marriage, said Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) wasn’t alluding to her when he mentioned a potential witness who was invited to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee in support of DOMA, but chose not to come out of fear of reprisal.
“He certainly was not referring to me,” Gallagher said via e-mail to the Washington Blade. “I was not asked this time, and certainly am not refusing Senate or public appearances.”
Gallagher has testified several times before Congress in opposition to same-sex marriage. Most recently, she testified in April before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution in a hearing titled, “Defending Marriage.”
In his opening remarks, Grassley said Republicans wanted to invite a witness to testify on behalf of DOMA to counter the arguments of pro-LGBT witnesses. However, Grassley said the witness, whom the senator identified as a “she,” decided not to come because she feared pro-LGBT forces would retaliate against her.
“The minority very much hoped to call a witness today at this hearing to testify in support of DOMA, I’m sure she would have done an excellent job,” Grassley said. “She declined, however, citing one reason the threats and intimidation that have been leveled not only her but her friends and family as a result of her support of DOMA. She will continue to write on the issue but will no longer speak publicly.”
In a blog posting, Think Progress speculated that the potential witness “could very well be the National Organization for Marriage’s (NOM) Maggie Gallagher, who was noticeably absent from the GOP’s witness list.”
Beth Levine, a Grassley spokesperson, said the office isn’t “identifying the woman cited in Sen. Grassley’s statement this morning.”
Tagged with Charles Grassley, Defense of Marriage Act, Maggie Gallagher
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.


view print edition