- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- March 2009
- October 2006
- July 2002
America's Leading Gay News Source
-

Affleck mocks ‘ex-gay’ camps on SNL skit
-

Rehoboth Summer Kickoff Party
-

Thousands attend Puerto Rico LGBT rights march
-

Dems seeking to delay gay-inclusive immigration reform?
-

Puerto Rico Senate committee holds adoption bill hearing
-

GLAAD leaderless again with Graddick resignation
-

U.S. ambassador to U.N. observes IDAHO
Brewer asks Supreme Court to reverse Ariz. DP benefits
The Supreme Court will have to decide when it returns from summer recess whether or not to consider a lawsuit challenging an Arizona law aimed at stripping state workers of domestic partner benefits.
Last week on July 2, Gov. Jan Brewer (R) appealed to the court an injunction from the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals preventing the enforcement of the anti-gay law, which was signed by Brewer in 2009.
The petition filed by Brewer — who’s known for championing her state’s controversial immigration law — appeals a Sept. 6 decision from the appeals court. Judges had affirmed a district court’s decision to place injunction against enforcing the anti-gay law, which would take away health benefits afforded to the domestic partners of state employees.
The lawsuit challenging the anti-gay law, which was signed by Brewer, was filed later in 2009 by Lambda Legal and the lawfirm Perkins Coie on behalf of 10 state employees. Plaintiffs argued that taking away domestic partner benefits from state employees violates the U.S. Constitution’s promises of equal protection.
Tara Borelli, senior staff attorney with Lambda Legal, expressed confidence that the injunction against the anti-gay law would remain standing.
“We are confident that the lower courts’ decisions upholding domestic partner coverage for lesbian and gay employees will continue to carry the day,” Borelli said. “Arizona’s arguments have been turned down again and again by the federal courts, and we expect it will be no different here.”
Supporters of the injunction must provide a response by Aug. 6. The court will decide whether or not to take the case when it returns from summer recess.
The case won’t be the only LGBT-related lawsuit that the court will have to decide whether or not to consider. Attorneys for U.S. House Speaker Boehner John Boehner appealed on behalf of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group litigation a court decision overturning the Defense of Marriage Act, and the Justice Department has also asked the high court to consider DOMA cases. Additionally, the Ninth Circuit decision overturning California’s Proposition 8 is expected to be appealed to the Supreme Court.
Tagged with Arizona, domestic partner benefits, Homepage Headlines, Jan Brewer, Supreme Court
We welcome your thoughtful, respectful comments. Please read our 'Terms of Service' page for more information about community expectations.
Comments from new visitors, flagged users, or those containing questionable language are automatically held for moderation and may not appear immediately.


view print edition
[...] will consider whether to take up the case of Diaz v. Brewer, in which Gov. Jan Brewer (R) has appealed an injunction placed by a district court prohibiting her from enforcing a law taking away domestic partner [...]
[Translate]