April 23, 2013 | by Chris Johnson
ENDA to be introduced on Thursday
United States Capitol Building, dome, gay news, Washington Blade

ENDA is set for reintroduction in both chambers of Congress on Thursday. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

The Employment Non-Discrimination Act is set to be introduced in both chambers of Congress on Thursday, according to multiple sources, but without major changes that were previously under consideration.

The bill will be reintroduced in the House by Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.), the most senior openly gay member of the chamber, who’s taking over the legislation now that former Rep. Barney Frank has retired. In the Senate, the legislation will be reintroduced by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.). The lawmakers’ offices confirmed they would introduce ENDA concurrently on Thursday.

The Senate version of the bill will have five original sponsors: Merkley and lesbian Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) will be two Democrats, Sens. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) will be two Republicans and Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chair Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) will round out the quintet.

The number of original co-sponsors in the House remains to be seen. Conchita Cruz, a Polis spokesperson, said many House members have told her boss “they want to make sure that they are included” as original co-sponsors.

Tico Almeida, president of Freedom to Work, said his organization will push for a committee vote and movement on the Senate floor for ENDA “as soon as possible.”

“ENDA had a recent committee hearing where not a single Republican senator bothered to show up to express any opposition or even ask questions about the drafting of the bill, so I think Chairman Harkin should schedule the committee vote on ENDA as soon as possible in May or June,” Almeida said. “It would be great to have ENDA teed up to go to the Senate floor in July.”

Harkin, whose committee has jurisdiction over ENDA, has already pledged to mark up the legislation this year. The office of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has said Democratic leadership “looks forward to working with” Harkin to set up a floor vote on the bill.

Almeida said the time period immediately after Supreme Court decisions are expected on California’s Proposition 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act would make July an excellent opportunity for a floor vote on ENDA, which would ban anti-LGBT employment discrimination.

“After the Supreme Court rules in the Windsor marriage case, many right-wingers are going to denounce marriage equality for same-sex couples, but claim that they don’t believe in discrimination against LGBT Americans,” Almeida said. “That’s the time when we should call some of those bluffs by putting ENDA on the Senate floor and letting all 100 senators go on the record about whether hardworking Americans should get fired just because of who they are or who they love.”

One question about the bill was whether ENDA would be changed upon reintroduction. LGBT advocates had previously told the Washington Blade the legislation has been under review prior to reintroduction in the 113th Congress.

Two areas that were said to be under review were the religious exemption as well as the area of disparate impact, which ENDA hadn’t previously addressed. However, multiple sources familiar with ENDA said these changes were ultimately not made to the bill.

Jamal Raad, a Merkley spokesperson, said “there will be a few changes to update the language” on ENDA, but said he couldn’t provide actual legislative text until reintroduction on Thursday.

Almeida said another change he’s seeking for ENDA as it progresses through the legislative process is an update to the bill in the aftermath of the Supreme Court ruling in Gross v. FBL Financial. That 2009 decision raised the bar for the standard of proof in making certain employment discrimination claims.

“If this legal loophole does not get fixed before ENDA becomes law, there will be gay and transgender victims of discrimination with meritorious cases who are denied justice because of the unequal standard that the conservative activists on the Supreme Court created a few years ago,” Almeida said. “Gay and transgender plaintiffs deserve to have the same standard of proof applied to their cases as plaintiffs alleging racial or religious discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.”

Almeida said the fix would be along the lines of the bipartisan legislation introduced by Harkin and Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) known as the Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act. That bill hasn’t yet been reintroduced in the 113th Congress.

“Especially since Chairman Harkin is the author of the bi-partisan legislation to address the Gross case, I’m hoping that he and the committee staff will close this loophole when ENDA goes to mark-up,” Almeida said.

As ENDA advances, many eyes will be on the U.S. senators who’ve recently come out for marriage equality, but haven’t yet articulated a position on the legislation.

Those who’ve come to support marriage equality, but didn’t co-sponsor ENDA in the previous Congress are Sens. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), John Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), Max Baucus (D-Mont.), Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), Tim Johnson (D-S.D.) — and most notably Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio). Also in question among the U.S. senators who support marriage equality is Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), who’s new to Congress.

Eyes also will be Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who voted for “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal and recently said she’s “evolving” on the issue of marriage equality.

Reid also wasn’t a co-sponsor in the previous Congress, but he typically doesn’t co-sponsor bills because of his leadership position.

Freshmen senators who were formerly U.S. House members — Sens. Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) — were co-sponsors of ENDA in the lower chamber of Congress, so would likely support the bill again in the Senate. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) has said he supports ENDA and Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) signed an LGBT non-discrimination bill into law as governor of the state in 1998.

Other freshman Democrats — Sens. Mo Cowan (D-Mass.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) — signed a letter in February identifying themselves as ENDA supporters.

NOTE: An earlier version of this article neglected to include Sen. Martin Heinrich as among the freshmen Senate Democrats who supported ENDA as U.S. House members. He also signed the letter identifying himself as an ENDA supporter. Whitney Potter, a Heinrich spokesperson, said the senator intends to support ENDA as a U.S. senator.

Chris Johnson is Chief Political & White House Reporter for the Washington Blade. Johnson attends the daily White House press briefings and is a member of the White House Correspondents' Association. Follow Chris

9 Comments
  • VisionofHildegardofBingen

    Great news! Discrimination is bad!

  • peter rosenstein

    This is great news. Now we have to make sure that in the Senate there are at least as many sponsors as the number of Senators that support marriage-equality.

  • Christine Elizabeth St George

    I am curious if this bill addresses the discrimination faced by transgendered individuals or if the HRC actively lobbied to have transgendered individuals excluded.

    • Christine that question is a valid concern. We have yet to see any language or indication from anyone concerning language.

      You can be assured HRC is working under the same premises they have been operating on for their entire 33 years of existence. In those 33 years, one transgender employee in the last 20 years and one more just about 20 years back, albeit for a brief 18 months.

      If HRC openly discriminates against transgender Americans, what makes anyone believe they'll fight to create laws which protect them?

  • I have set up a petition on the White House We the People Site. HERE ARE DETAILS ON HOW TO SIGN THE PETITION. PLEASE GO TO THE SITE AND SIGN TO SHOW YOUR SUPPORT.

    From: Whitehouse.gov <info@messages.whitehouse.gov>.
    Date: Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:34 AM.
    Subject: GRANT THROUGH EXECUTIVE ORDER NON-DISCRIMINATION PROTECTION TO GAY, LESBIAN, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER CITIZENS. has been published!
    To: tlonepartner@gmail.com

    Thank you for creating a petition on We the People!

    You now have 30 days to get 100,000 signatures in order for your petition.
    to be reviewed by the White House. Until your petition has 150 signatures,
    it will only be available from the following URL and will not be publicly.
    viewable on the Open Petitions section of We the People:

    http://wh.gov/eEUm

    ———————————————–

    Here's some more information about this petition:

    GRANT THROUGH EXECUTIVE ORDER NON-DISCRIMINATION PROTECTION TO.
    GAY, LESBIAN, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER CITIZENS.

    Through Presidential Executive Order grant federal non-discrimination.
    protection to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender citizens in the same way.
    it is currently granted to others on the basis of race, color, religion, sex.
    or national origin. Similar rights were granted to these other groups under.
    Executive Order 11246, which was signed into law on September 24, 1965. It
    is well over due to provide similar protection to our GLBT colleagues,
    friends and family members.

  • I hope the Democrats and the HRC doesn't throw transgender rights under the bus this time and it's telling that this article conveniently leaves that important part of ENDA's history out of this glowing fluff piece.

  • Coletta Hughes

    I have almost no trust in this protecting transgender people.

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2014. All rights reserved.
Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin