Connect with us

homepage news

Huckabee moderates tone on marriage in new book

Potential 2016 contender says harms of gay nuptials ‘greatly overstated’



Mike Huckabee, CPAC, Conservative Political Action Conference, gay news, Washington Blade

Mike Huckabee now says harms of gay nuptials ‘greatly overstated.’ (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Potential Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee seems to be moderating his stalwart opposition to same-sex marriage in his new book, but LGBT advocates are unimpressed with his new comments on the issue.

According to a recent report from CNN, Huckabee’s new book, “God, Guns, Grits and Gravy,” touches on his views on marriage equality in addition to his views of pop culture and other potential Republican presidential nominees.

“The claim that same-sex marriage is destroying society is actually greatly overstated,” Huckabee reportedly concedes in the book.

According to CNN, the former Arkansas governor, who enjoys widespread support in the evangelical community, faults Christians for what he sees as the pervasiveness of divorce and remarriages as well as LGBT advocates for “militantly” seeking marriage rights for same-sex couples.

“Christians who themselves abandoned the primacy of lifelong marriage to follow the divorce and remarriage customs of a secular society have as much to answer for as do those who militantly push to redefine marriage,” he reportedly says.

Those words mark a change in tone for Huckabee, who announced this month he’s ending his show on Fox News in a move that observers have said demonstrates he’s heading toward a run for the White House in 2016. In October, Huckabee threatened in an interview with the American Family Association to bolt the Republican Party if it capitulates on same-sex marriage.

“If the Republicans wanna lose guys like me, and a whole bunch of still God-fearing Bible-believing people, go ahead and just abdicate on this issue, and go ahead and say abortion doesn’t matter, either,” Huckabee said. “Because at that point, you lose me, I’m gone. I’ll become an independent, I’ll start finding people that have guts to stand, I’m tired of this.”

Despite the apparent change in tone from Huckabee on same-sex marriage in his new book, advocates were unimpressed with his remarks.

Stephen Peters, a spokesperson for the Human Rights Campaign, said Huckabee’s new thoughts on marriage equality don’t detract from what many consider an abysmal record on LGBT issues.

“In keeping with the majority of Americans, we expect the next president of the United States to support nationwide marriage equality,” Peters said. “Mike Huckabee has clearly established himself as an extreme, anti-equality politician. One sentence in a book is not going to change that.”

Ian Sams, spokesperson for the Democratic National Committee, also criticized Huckabee’s record, which includes support for an Arizona bill vetoed by Gov. Jan Brewer that would have allowed individuals and businesses to refuse services for same-sex couples.

“For years, LGBT Americans and their allies have known that marriage equality leads to a stronger, fairer society — and now that 70 percent of Americans live in states where marriage equality is reality, the forces for progress are stronger than ever,” Sams said. “Unfortunately, Mike Huckabee hasn’t seen it that way. Instead, he’s been one of the loudest anti-gay voices within a Republican Party that has opposed LGBT equality for decades.”

Sams added, “His recent comments beg one simple question: If you don’t think marriage equality is harming society, then why do you continue to oppose it so intensely?”

Gregory Angelo, executive director of the Log Cabin Republicans, said he doesn’t think the comments represent any change from what the potential 2016 contender has said in the past.

“I don’t think Governor Huckabee has had any great epiphany,” Angelo said. “In his book he’s doing what he does best — preaching. Elsewhere in the book he invokes polygamy — a favorite chestnut of marriage equality opponents — as a way of framing his continued opposition to marriage equality.”

Still, Angelo said the remarks serve as a reminder that members of the Republican Party aren’t as stalwart in their opposition to same-sex marriage as progressive make them out to be.

“If anything, Governor Huckabee’s remarks will hopefully show independents — and especially hard-line liberals — what I have always said: That opinions on marriage equality among the GOP are more nuanced than the general narrative pushed by the media leads people to believe,” Angelo said.

Also in the book, Huckabee reportedly describes a memory he has of a Boy Scout troop leader molesting members of his troop as his introduction to gay people.

“To be clear, I am not equating all gay men with pedophiles; I’m just relating how this particular person was my introduction to the then-unfathomable concept of same-sex attraction,” Huckabee is quoted as saying.

Moreover, Huckabee reportedly offer questions about homosexuality, saying he describes his outlook as “God-centered and not man-centered.”

“Are such variations normal?” Huckabee reportedly asks. “Which ones? Are there any limits on what is an acceptable attraction? If so, what is the objective basis for those limits, and who gets to draw that line?”

Another question reportedly in the book: “Is Lady Gaga correct when she sings about being ‘Born this Way’?”

Evan Wolfson, president of the LGBT group Freedom to Marry, disputed any notion that Huckabee was moving ahead on the issue of same-sex marriage.

“Progress is the last word to come to mind when reading Huckabee’s latest swirl of insinuations and anti-gay smears evoking pedophilia, repeating the empty talking-point that gay couples seeking the same freedom to marry as others are somehow trying to ‘radically redefine’ marriage, and lumping inclusion in marriage with destructive forces on the family,” Wolfson said. “And that doesn’t even take account of his contempt for the separation of church and state and other bedrock constitutional guarantees that keep Americans free.”

But one LGBT advocate who saw promise in Huckabee’s new remarks on marriage was Brandan Robertson, national spokesperson for Evangelicals for Marriage Equality, who said Huckabee’s change in tone isn’t unique among conservatives.

“Many conservative politicians and theologians have begun to recognize that the staunch anti-LGBTQ rhetoric that has traditionally been used in conversations and public discourse around marriage equality not only is turning away the millennial constituency who largely support and affirm LGBTQ people but also that the rhetoric has actually been a source of great harm and trauma to many LGBTQ individuals,” Robertson said. “Many conservatives have realized that a softening of tone is essential and I view this change as a small step in the right direction.”

Still, Robertson acknowledged that Huckabee’s position “is still the same” and he’s unlikely to change minds with the comments he’s made in his book.

“He is still articulating a view that equates same-sex marriage with occurrences like divorce and still argues that same-sex civil marriage is a fundamental attempt to redefine the institution of marriage,” Robertson said. “These arguments, though dressed in a much more compassionate tone, are the same ones that have been leveled against the LGBTQ community for decades. Huckabee is far from promoting same-sex marriage or arguing for civil equality for LGBTQ individuals, so it’s unlikely that his statements will have much of an effect at all on advancing equality in Evangelicalism.”

Continue Reading


  1. Steve Clark

    January 13, 2015 at 6:09 pm

    What "much more compassionate tone"? "Militant" gays are just as much to blame for social ills as straight couples who divorce? Not one word in his new comment demonstrates anything that fits any reasonable definition of "compassionate." OMG I'm so tired of desperate gay Christians fawning over being hit slightly less hard with a baseball bat.

  2. Anonymous

    January 13, 2015 at 9:23 pm

    Apologies if this comes up twice, but I made this comment earlier and it seems to have gone into a black hole of some sort.

    Mike Huckabee is not backing away or being more compassionate or even, as Steve Clark suggested, hitting anyone slightly less hard. What that statement reflects is not a change in attitude about the freedom to marry, but a newer hardline stance on divorce. There are three states with a special type of civil marriage called a covenant marriage. A covenant marriage is harder to enter into (you have to get premarital counseling, for example), and more importantly, makes it harder to get a divorce. Arkansas is one of those three states. Huckabee signed it into law in 2001 when he was governor and then he and Jan went and got one in 2005. He's not shifting his opinion on same sex couples marrying, he's not equating the freedom to marry with a thing that he sees as not that bad; he's taking a much harder stance on divorce. He now holds a much tougher position on divorce than the Pope. There's no reason to see this as a softer, more compassionate, or less ridiculous stance on letting same sex couples marry. That is not what's happening here. He's still the guy who'll leave the GOP if they decide to be reasonable on the freedom to marry.

  3. Alan Arthur Katz

    January 14, 2015 at 7:46 am

    It never fails to appall me to discover that one more self-proclaimed "righteous religious" figure has no problem lying through his or her teeth to get his or her way. They're not righteous, they're self-righteous. Big difference.

    And none are more self-righteous than Huckabee, whose hypocrisy is exceeded only by his political ambition. He knows he can't win an election with his extremist and hate-driven message, so he needs to temper it for the masses, while continuing to lie about gays and threaten everyone in sight when he doesn't get his way.

    It was only a couple of weeks ago when he called on politicians to defy the Supreme Court in an act of open insurrection. A week before that, he threatened to leave the TeaPublican party because it wasn't radical enough for him, and too many governors gave in to the Constitution and enforced the rulings of the Federal Courts.

    Huckabee is a fraud, a liar and a coward – who doesn't even have the courage of his own convictions when groveling on his knees to rich people to fund his campaign. Just thinking about this snake-oil salesman turns my stomach.

  4. Gina Marie Conners

    January 15, 2015 at 4:14 pm

    I'm sorry, but Huckabee and his ilk need to recognize that they have already lost on marriage equality, abortion and LGBT rights. There is no longer a public concensus supporting their positions on those issues. They need to realize that not every belief, no matter how fervently held, should be a public law.

    Thirty-six states and DC have same sex marriage laws. Marriage as a fundamental right is rapidly becoming settled law and public sentiment has shifted dramatically to support marriage equity. Likewise, it will be 42 years this month since the Roe v. Wade decision was handed down and abortion is still legal in every state in the union – despite the fact that the GOP has controlled the White House for 24 of those 42 years and both houses of Congress for almost 12 of those years. Moreover, Republican presidents have filled nine vacancies on the Supreme Court. Roe is staying because there is no concensus among the American public to get rid of it. And every time the Supreme Court has taken a case on LGBT rights over the past 20 years it has affirmed and expanded LGBT citizenship rights. There is no reason to think it will reverse course any time soon.

  5. John Lee

    January 15, 2015 at 4:45 pm

    More proof that Huckabee and his party just won't get into the 21st century. This is getting absolutely and utterly ridiculous.

  6. Jay Phelps

    January 19, 2015 at 10:29 pm

    Huckabee hasn't "toned down" his beliefs. he hasn't suddenly changed in tune in the last month. He's simply in politician mode right now and trying to come across as less hateful. Don't believe it for a minute.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

homepage news

Equality Act, contorted as a danger by anti-LGBTQ forces, is all but dead

No political willpower to force vote or reach a compromise



Despite having President Biden in the White House and Democratic majorities in both chambers of Congress, efforts to update federal civil rights laws to strengthen the prohibition on discrimination against LGBTQ people by passing the Equality Act are all but dead as opponents of the measure have contorted it beyond recognition.

Political willpower is lacking to find a compromise that would be acceptable to enough Republican senators to end a filibuster on the bill — a tall order in any event — nor is there the willpower to force a vote on the Equality Act as opponents stoke fears about transgender kids in sports and not even unanimity in the Democratic caucus in favor of the bill is present, stakeholders who spoke to the Blade on condition of anonymity said.

In fact, there are no imminent plans to hold a vote on the legislation even though Pride month is days away, which would be an opportune time for Congress to demonstrate solidarity with the LGBTQ community by holding a vote on the legislation.

If the Equality Act were to come up for a Senate vote in the next month, it would not have the support to pass. Continued assurances that bipartisan talks are continuing on the legislation have yielded no evidence of additional support, let alone the 10 Republicans needed to end a filibuster.

“I haven’t really heard an update either way, which is usually not good,” one Democratic insider said. “My understanding is that our side was entrenched in a no-compromise mindset and with [Sen. Joe] Manchin saying he didn’t like the bill, it doomed it this Congress. And the bullying of hundreds of trans athletes derailed our message and our arguments of why it was broadly needed.”

The only thing keeping the final nail from being hammered into the Equality Act’s coffin is the unwillingness of its supporters to admit defeat. Other stakeholders who spoke to the Blade continued to assert bipartisan talks are ongoing, strongly pushing back on any conclusion the legislation is dead.

Alphonso David, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said the Equality Act is “alive and well,” citing widespread public support he said includes “the majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents and a growing number of communities across the country engaging and mobilizing every day in support of the legislation.”

“They understand the urgent need to pass this bill and stand up for LGBTQ people across our country,” David added. “As we engage with elected officials, we have confidence that Congress will listen to the voices of their constituents and continue fighting for the Equality Act through the lengthy legislative process.  We will also continue our unprecedented campaign to grow the already-high public support for a popular bill that will save lives and make our country fairer and more equal for all. We will not stop until the Equality Act is passed.”

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), chief sponsor of the Equality Act in the Senate, also signaled through a spokesperson work continues on the legislation, refusing to give up on expectations the legislation would soon become law.

“Sen. Merkley and his staff are in active discussions with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to try to get this done,” McLennan said. “We definitely see it as a key priority that we expect to become law.”

A spokesperson Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who had promised to force a vote on the Equality Act in the Senate on the day the U.S. House approved it earlier this year, pointed to a March 25 “Dear Colleague” letter in which he identified the Equality Act as one of several bills he’d bring up for a vote.

Despite any assurances, the hold up on the bill is apparent. Although the U.S. House approved the legislation earlier this year, the Senate Judiciary Committee hasn’t even reported out the bill yet to the floor in the aftermath of the first-ever Senate hearing on the bill in March. A Senate Judiciary Committee Democratic aide, however, disputed that inaction as evidence the Equality Act is dead in its tracks: “Bipartisan efforts on a path forward are ongoing.”

Democrats are quick to blame Republicans for inaction on the Equality Act, but with Manchin withholding his support for the legislation they can’t even count on the entirety of their caucus to vote “yes” if it came to the floor. Progressives continue to advocate an end to the filibuster to advance legislation Biden has promised as part of his agenda, but even if they were to overcome headwinds and dismantle the institution needing 60 votes to advance legislation, the Equality Act would likely not have majority support to win approval in the Senate with a 50-50 party split.

The office of Manchin, who has previously said he couldn’t support the Equality Act over concerns about public schools having to implement the transgender protections applying to sports and bathrooms, hasn’t responded to multiple requests this year from the Blade on the legislation and didn’t respond to a request to comment for this article.

Meanwhile, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who declined to co-sponsor the Equality Act this year after having signed onto the legislation in the previous Congress, insisted through a spokesperson talks are still happening across the aisle despite the appearances the legislation is dead.

“There continues to be bipartisan support for passing a law that protects the civil rights of Americans, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity,” said Annie Clark, a Collins spokesperson. “The Equality Act was a starting point for negotiations, and in its current form, it cannot pass. That’s why there are ongoing discussions among senators and stakeholders about a path forward.”

Let’s face it: Anti-LGBTQ forces have railroaded the debate by making the Equality Act about an end to women’s sports by allowing transgender athletes and danger to women in sex-segregated places like bathrooms and prisons. That doesn’t even get into resolving the issue on drawing the line between civil rights for LGBTQ people and religious freedom, which continues to be litigated in the courts as the U.S. Supreme Court is expected any day now to issue a ruling in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia to determine if foster care agencies can reject same-sex couples over religious objections.

For transgender Americans, who continue to report discrimination and violence at high rates, the absence of the Equality Act may be most keenly felt.

Mara Keisling, outgoing executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, disputed any notion the Equality Act is dead and insisted the legislation is “very much alive.”

“We remain optimistic despite misinformation from the opposition,” Keisling said. “NCTE and our movement partners are still working fruitfully on the Equality Act with senators. In fact, we are gaining momentum with all the field organizing we’re doing, like phone banking constituents to call their senators. Legislating takes time. Nothing ever gets through Congress quickly. We expect to see a vote during this Congress, and we are hopeful we can win.”

But one Democratic source said calls to members of Congress against the Equality Act, apparently coordinated by groups like the Heritage Foundation, have has outnumbered calls in favor of it by a substantial margin, with a particular emphasis on Manchin.

No stories are present in the media about same-sex couples being kicked out of a restaurant for holding hands or transgender people for using the restroom consistent with their gender identity, which would be perfectly legal in 25 states thanks to the patchwork of civil rights laws throughout the United States and inadequate protections under federal law.

Tyler Deaton, senior adviser for the American Unity Fund, which has bolstered the Republican-led Fairness for All Act as an alternative to the Equality Act, said he continues to believe the votes are present for a compromise form of the bill.

“I know for a fact there is a supermajority level of support in the Senate for a version of the Equality Act that is fully protective of both LGBTQ civil rights and religious freedom,” Deaton said. “There is interest on both sides of the aisle in getting something done this Congress.”

Deaton, however, didn’t respond to a follow-up inquiry on what evidence exists of agreeing on this compromise.

Biden has already missed the goal he campaigned on in the 2020 election to sign the Equality Act into law within his first 100 days in office. Although Biden renewed his call to pass the legislation in his speech to Congress last month, as things stand now that appears to be a goal he won’t realize for the remainder of this Congress.

Nor has the Biden administration made the Equality Act an issue for top officials within the administration as it pushes for an infrastructure package as a top priority. One Democratic insider said Louisa Terrell, legislative affairs director for the White House, delegated work on the Equality Act to a deputy as opposed to handling it herself.

To be sure, Biden has demonstrated support for the LGBTQ community through executive action at an unprecedented rate, signing an executive order on day one ordering federal agencies to implement the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last year in Bostock v. Clayton County to the fullest extent possible and dismantling former President Trump’s transgender military ban. Biden also made historic LGBTQ appointments with the confirmation of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Rachel Levine as assistant secretary of health.

A White House spokesperson insisted Biden’s team across the board remains committed to the Equality Act, pointing to his remarks to Congress.

“President Biden has urged Congress to get the Equality Act to his desk so he can sign it into law and provide long overdue civil rights protections to LGBTQ+ Americans, and he remains committed to seeing this legislation passed as quickly as possible,” the spokesperson said. “The White House and its entire legislative team remains in ongoing and close coordination with organizations, leaders, members of Congress, including the Equality Caucus, and staff to ensure we are working across the aisle to push the Equality Act forward.”

But at least in the near-term, that progress will fall short of fulfilling the promise of updating federal civil rights law with the Equality Act, which will mean LGBTQ people won’t be able to rely on those protections when faced with discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

Continue Reading

homepage news

D.C. bill to ban LGBTQ panic defense delayed by Capitol security

Delivery of bill to Congress was held up due to protocols related to Jan. 6 riots



New fencing around the Capitol following the Jan. 6 insurrection prevented some D.C. bills from being delivered to the Hill for a required congressional review. (Blade file photo by Michael K. Lavers)

A bill approved unanimously last December by the D.C. Council to ban the so-called LGBTQ panic defense has been delayed from taking effect as a city law because the fence installed around the U.S. Capitol following the Jan. 6 insurrection prevented the law from being delivered to Congress.

According to Eric Salmi, communications director for D.C. Council member Charles Allen (D-Ward 6), who guided the bill through the Council’s legislative process, all bills approved by the Council and signed by the D.C. mayor must be hand-delivered to Congress for a required congressional review.

“What happened was when the Capitol fence went up after the January insurrection, it created an issue where we physically could not deliver laws to Congress per the congressional review period,” Salmi told the Washington Blade.

Among the bills that could not immediately be delivered to Congress was the Bella Evangelista and Tony Hunter Panic Defense Prohibition and Hate Crimes Response Amendment Act of 2020, which was approved by the Council on a second and final vote on Dec. 15.

Between the time the bill was signed by Mayor Muriel Bowser and published in the D.C. Register under procedural requirements for all bills, it was not ready to be transmitted to Congress until Feb. 16, the Council’s legislative record for the bill shows.

Salmi said the impasse in delivering the bill to Congress due to the security fence prevented the bill from reaching Congress on that date and prevented the mandatory 60-day congressional review period for this bill from beginning at that time. He noted that most bills require a 30 legislative day review by Congress.

But the Evangelista-Hunter bill, named after a transgender woman and a gay man who died in violent attacks by perpetrators who attempted to use the trans and gay panic defense, includes a law enforcement related provision that under the city’s Home Rule Charter passed by Congress in the early 1970s requires a 60-day congressional review.

“There is a chance it goes into effect any day now, just given the timeline is close to being up,” Salmi said on Tuesday. “I don’t know the exact date it was delivered, but I do know the countdown is on,” said Salmi, who added, “I would expect any day now it should go into effect and there’s nothing stopping it other than an insurrection in January.”

If the delivery to Congress had not been delayed, the D.C. Council’s legislative office estimated the congressional review would have been completed by May 12.

A congressional source who spoke on condition of being identified only as a senior Democratic aide, said the holdup of D.C. bills because of the Capitol fence has been corrected.

“The House found an immediate workaround, when this issue first arose after the Jan. 6 insurrection,” the aide said.

“This is yet another reason why D.C. Council bills should not be subject to a congressional review period and why we need to grant D.C. statehood,” the aide said.

The aide added that while no disapproval resolution had been introduced in Congress to overturn the D.C. Evangelista-Hunter bill, House Democrats would have defeated such a resolution.

“House Democrats support D.C. home rule, statehood, and LGBTQ rights,” said the aide.

LGBTQ rights advocates have argued that a ban on using a gay or transgender panic defense in criminal trials is needed to prevent defense attorneys from inappropriately asking juries to find that a victim’s sexual orientation or gender identity or expression is to blame for a defendant’s criminal act, including murder.

Some attorneys have argued that their clients “panicked” after discovering the person against whom they committed a violent crime was gay or transgender, prompting them to act in a way they believed to be a form of self-defense.

In addition to its provision banning the LGBTQ panic defense, the Evangelista-Hunter bill includes a separate provision that strengthens the city’s existing hate crimes law by clarifying that hatred need not be the sole motivating factor for an underlying crime such as assault, murder, or threats to be prosecuted as a hate crime.

LGBTQ supportive prosecutors have said the clarification was needed because it is often difficult to prove to a jury that hatred is the only motive behind a violent crime. The prosecutors noted that juries have found defendants not guilty of committing a hate crime on grounds that they believed other motives were involved in a particular crime after defense lawyers argued that the law required “hate” to be the only motive in order to find someone guilty of a hate crime.

Salmi noted that while the hate crime clarification and panic defense prohibition provisions of the Evangelista-Hunter bill will become law as soon as the congressional review is completed, yet another provision in the bill will not become law after the congressional review because there are insufficient funds in the D.C. budget to cover the costs of implementing the provision.

The provision gives the D.C. Office of Human Rights and the Office of the D.C. Attorney General authority to investigate hate related discrimination at places of public accommodation. Salmi said the provision expands protections against discrimination to include web-based retailers or online delivery services that are not physically located in D.C.

“That is subject to appropriations,” Salmi said. “And until it is funded in the upcoming budget it cannot be legally enforced.”

He said that at Council member Allen’s request, the Council added language to the bill that ensures that all other provisions of the legislation that do not require additional funding – including the ban on use of the LGBTQ panic defense and the provision clarifying that hatred doesn’t have to be the sole motive for a hate crime – will take effect as soon as the congressional approval process is completed.

Continue Reading

homepage news

D.C. man charged with 2020 anti-gay death threat rearrested

Defendant implicated in three anti-LGBTQ incidents since 2011



shooting, DC Eagle, assault, hate crime, anti-gay attack, police discrimination, sex police, Sisson, gay news, Washington Blade

A D.C. man arrested in August 2020 for allegedly threatening to kill a gay man outside the victim’s apartment in the city’s Adams Morgan neighborhood and who was released while awaiting trial was arrested again two weeks ago for allegedly threatening to kill another man in an unrelated incident.

D.C. Superior Court records show that Jalal Malki, who was 37 at the time of his 2020 arrest on a charge of bias-related attempts to do bodily harm against the gay man, was charged on May 4, 2021 with unlawful entry, simple assault, threats to kidnap and injure a person, and attempted possession of a prohibited weapon against the owner of a vacant house at 4412 Georgia Ave., N.W.

Court charging documents state that Malki was allegedly staying at the house without permission as a squatter. An arrest affidavit filed in court by D.C. police says Malki allegedly threatened to kill the man who owns the house shortly after the man arrived at the house while Malki was inside.

According to the affidavit, Malki walked up to the owner of the house while the owner was sitting in his car after having called police and told him, “If you come back here, I’m going to kill you.” While making that threat Malki displayed what appeared to be a gun in his waistband, but which was later found to be a toy gun, the affidavit says.

Malki then walked back inside the house minutes before police arrived and arrested him. Court records show that similar to the court proceedings following his 2020 arrest for threatening the gay man, a judge in the latest case ordered Malki released while awaiting trial. In both cases, the judge ordered him to stay away from the two men he allegedly threatened to kill.

An arrest affidavit filed by D.C. police in the 2020 case states that Malki allegedly made the threats inside an apartment building where the victim lived on the 2300 block of Champlain Street, N.W. It says Malki was living in a nearby building but often visited the building where the victim lived.

“Victim 1 continued to state during an interview that it was not the first time that Defendant 1 had made threats to him, but this time Defendant 1 stated that if he caught him outside, he would ‘fucking kill him.’” the affidavit says. It quotes the victim as saying during this time Malki repeatedly called the victim a “fucking faggot.”

The affidavit, prepared by the arresting officers, says that after the officers arrested Malki and were leading him to a police transport vehicle to be booked for the arrest, he expressed an “excited utterance” that he was “in disbelief that officers sided with the ‘fucking faggot.’”

Court records show that Malki is scheduled to appear in court on June 4 for a status hearing for both the 2020 arrest and the arrest two weeks ago for allegedly threatening to kill the owner of the house in which police say he was illegally squatting.

Superior Court records show that Malki had been arrested three times between 2011 and 2015 in cases unrelated to the 2021 and 2020 cases for allegedly also making threats of violence against people. Two of the cases appear to be LGBTQ related, but prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney’s Office did not list the cases as hate crimes.

In the first of the three cases, filed in July 2011, Malki allegedly shoved a man inside Dupont Circle and threatened to kill him after asking the man why he was wearing a purple shirt.

“Victim 1 believes the assault occurred because Suspect 1 believes Victim 1 is a homosexual,” the police arrest affidavit says.

Court records show prosecutors charged Malki with simple assault and threats to do bodily harm in the case. But the court records show that on Sept. 13, 2011, D.C. Superior Court Judge Stephen F. Eilperin found Malki not guilty on both charges following a non-jury trial.

The online court records do not state why the judge rendered a not guilty verdict. With the courthouse currently closed to the public and the press due to COVID-related restrictions, the Washington Blade couldn’t immediately obtain the records to determine the judge’s reason for the verdict.

In the second case, court records show Malki was arrested by D.C. police outside the Townhouse Tavern bar and restaurant at 1637 R St., N.W. on Nov. 7, 2012 for allegedly threatening one or more people with a knife after employees ordered Malki to leave the establishment for “disorderly behavior.”

At the time, the Townhouse Tavern was located next door to the gay nightclub Cobalt, which before going out of business two years ago, was located at the corner of 17th and R Streets, N.W.

The police arrest affidavit in the case says Malki allegedly pointed a knife in a threatening way at two of the tavern’s employees who blocked his path when he attempted to re-enter the tavern. The affidavit says he was initially charged by D.C. police with assault with a dangerous weapon – knife. Court records, however, show that prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney’s Office lowered the charges to two counts of simple assault. The records show that on Jan. 15, 2013, Malki pleaded guilty to the two charges as part of a plea bargain arrangement.

The records show that Judge Marissa Demeo on that same day issued a sentence of 30 days for each of the two charges but suspended all 30 days for both counts. She then sentenced Malki to one year of supervised probation for both charges and ordered that he undergo alcohol and drug testing and undergo treatment if appropriate.

In the third case prior to the 2020 and 2021 cases, court records show Malki was arrested outside the Cobalt gay nightclub on March 14, 2015 on multiple counts of simple assault, attempted assault with a dangerous weapon – knife, possession of a prohibited weapon – knife, and unlawful entry.

The arrest affidavit says an altercation started on the sidewalk outside the bar when for unknown reasons, Malki grabbed a female customer who was outside smoking and attempted to pull her toward him. When her female friend came to her aid, Malki allegedly got “aggressive” by threatening the woman and “removed what appeared to be a knife from an unknown location” and pointed it at the woman’s friend in a threatening way, the affidavit says.

It says a Cobalt employee minutes later ordered Malki to leave the area and he appeared to do so. But others noticed that he walked toward another entrance door to Cobalt and attempted to enter the establishment knowing he had been ordered not to return because of previous problems with his behavior, the affidavit says. When he attempted to push away another employee to force his way into Cobalt, Malki fell to the ground during a scuffle and other employees held him on the ground while someone else called D.C. police.

Court records show that similar to all of Malki’s arrests, a judge released him while awaiting trial and ordered him to stay away from Cobalt and all of those he was charged with threatening and assaulting.

The records show that on Sept. 18, 2015, Malki agreed to a plea bargain offer by prosecutors in which all except two of the charges – attempted possession of a prohibited weapon and simple assault – were dropped. Judge Alfred S. Irving Jr. on Oct. 2, 2015 sentenced Malki to 60 days of incarnation for each of the two charges but suspended all but five days, which he allowed Malki to serve on weekends, the court records show.

The judge ordered that the two five-day jail terms could be served concurrently, meaning just five days total would be served, according to court records. The records also show that Judge Irving sentenced Malki to one year of supervised probation for each of the two counts and ordered that he enter an alcohol treatment program and stay away from Cobalt.

Continue Reading

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts