Connect with us


Planned #DachaOn14th needs your licensing support

Convoluted D.C. liquor licensing gives small groups big powers to fight new venues



Dacha Beer Garden, gay news, Washington Blade

(Image courtesy of Dacha)

The bustling commercial junction at 14th and S streets in northwest D.C., two blocks south of U Street in the amenity-laden MidCity area, is blighted by a barren vacant lot and streetscape eyesore.

It’s a jarringly unattractive and incongruous corner spot, one of the few remaining undeveloped parcels along the mid-town thoroughfare and currently used for commercial parking. Nestled amid an array of retail stores and plethora of restaurant, bar and nightlife establishments, this void is a paved pockmark.

That empty space has been an ugly sight for as long as anyone can recall and, due to zoning rules limiting development options, is unlikely to change anytime soon.

Unlikely, that is, unless the city approves a planned $3 million investment by a local small business to transform the location with a brand-new building.

Dacha Beer Garden proprietors and gay business partners Dmitri Chekaldin and Ilya Alter hope to contribute a community enterprise offering an innovative neighborhood socializing option. They have operated the popular outdoor seasonal Dacha Beer Garden in the adjacent Shaw neighborhood, at 7th and Q streets, for the past four years.

It would be one of less than a handful of new-construction dedicated-use full-service D.C. restaurant-bar structures built from the ground up during the past five decades.

The business duo’s plan for an additional venue with both indoor and outdoor space enabling year-round operation has been laboriously winding its way through the city’s convoluted liquor-licensing system for months.

Alter and Chekaldin face opposition from both an ad-hoc license protest by a small “group of five or more” and two long-notorious inter-related “civic associations” with few members and even less community support.

These objectors are pressuring the three area Advisory Neighborhood Commissions to recommend that the D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Board either block the business from opening or restrict operating hours and reduce guest capacity to an unsustainable level in an effort to halt the project. Because the property is located near the boundaries of two adjacent ANCs, a total of three commissions are allowed to “weigh-in” with the Board.

These so-called “citizens” groups, the Dupont Circle Citizens Association and its spawn-like cohort bred from among DCCA members forming an adjunct Shaw-Dupont Citizens Alliance, reflexively oppose new hospitality establishments. Their shameful legacy includes waging an infamous eight-year battle against gay-owned culinary standout Hank’s Oyster Bar along Dupont’s 17th Street commercial strip.

Five years ago, both of these symbiotic naysayer gaggles pushed to impose a total moratorium on all new liquor licenses throughout the entire MidCity area of Logan, Shaw, 14th and U streets and all nearby business zones.

Overwhelming numbers of area residents, however, fought back and successfully derailed the attempted prohibition. Had the community not done so, none of the new bars and restaurants that have sprung up since 2012 would have been allowed to open.

The majority of area residents need to make their voices heard again.

On Wednesday, Dacha unveiled a revised building design and site layout that fully resolves the claimed worries of opponents regarding potential external noise. The number of outdoor seats, now within a small courtyard surrounded on three sides by both an L-shaped new building and adjacent existing business, has been reduced to only one-third of occupancy.

All other seating and service is inside an expanded interior with a 20-ft. building elevation serving as a sound barrier along an adjacent alley and the property-facing side street. There will be no DJs, live music or other performances – only low-volume background music. Dacha is also working with sound mitigation specialists to continue a perfect record of compliance with D.C. noise regulations.

Dacha this week launched an online community effort asking local supporters to “send a message” urging the ANCs and D.C. Council representatives Jack Evans and Brianne Nadeau to endorse ABC licensing for the new venue.

To support #DachaOn14th, go online to “sign and send” a message here.

Mark Lee is a long-time entrepreneur and community business advocate. Follow on Twitter: @MarkLeeDC. Reach him at [email protected].

Continue Reading


  1. Popeye

    July 22, 2017 at 10:07 am

    “The bustling commercial junction at 14th and S streets in northwest D.C., two blocks south of U Street in the amenity-laden MidCity area, is blighted by a barren vacant lot and streetscape eyesore.”

    Oh please. It’s a parking lot. Hardly “blighted.”

    And concerns about Dacha are not remotely the same as the attempted moratorium on new bars in the neighborhood. False equivalence.

    “Dacha is also working with sound mitigation specialists to continue a perfect record of compliance with D.C. noise regulations.”

    Wow. Are you on the PR team? That is some serious (and false) spin. Their record in Shaw is FAR from perfect.

    • lnm3921

      July 25, 2017 at 9:16 pm

      Most if not all of Mark Lee’s articles are serious and false spin to push his agenda!

  2. Mark Lee

    July 22, 2017 at 10:42 am

    [In reply to “Popeye”]

    FACT CHECK: The Dacha outdoor beer garden in Shaw has never been cited for a D.C. Noise Control Act violation during inspections by MPD, DCRA, or ABRA.

    I stand by the observation made in my column as true and correct.

    – Mark Lee, Washington Blade contributing columnist

    • Dodo_District

      July 23, 2017 at 11:00 am

      This report sounds very one sided. No input or comments from the next door neighbors Protesting this establishment? Dig a little deeper it’s not about blocking bars or alcohol. Try speaking to Jack Evans too.

    • Popeye

      July 24, 2017 at 10:39 am

      I’m OK with Dacha existing on 7th or coming to 14th as long as noise and security issues raised by neighbors are actually addressed but you’re about as “fair and balanced” as Fox News with your cherry-picking of facts.

      “Never been cited” for noise isn’t the same as never had a complaint. There have been many, and they HAVE been cited numerous times and fined for being over capacity – which is directly related to noise volume but easier to prove.

    • tassojunior

      July 25, 2017 at 3:31 pm

      Technically true. Not even sure if there are noise violations for human voice.
      But….Dacha holds the DC record for adjudicated violations in one two-year license. 21 confirmed infractions in their last 2-year license, including serving to minors and over-capacity. One serious enough for a $42,000 fine.

      • Popeye

        July 28, 2017 at 2:27 am

        Waiting for your reply, Mark Lee. Tell us more about Dacha’s perfect record.

  3. Chris

    July 23, 2017 at 1:19 pm

    Generally, their proposal seems reasonable from the looks of it with the outdoor area on 14th and the walls/roof closer to the residential areas. I do want to take issue with some of your characterization, however. Equating the DCCA and SDCA overstepping boundaries of the past (+ the Wallach Place crew) isn’t exactly apples to apples. And, a lot of that overstepping resulted in revisions to the ABRA protest law and eventual rolling back of or decisions not to move forward with moratoriums.

    Additionally, I think it is dishonesty by omission when you note that they have never been cited for a noise violation. You know as well as anyone, they got in some serious trouble with ABRA about over capacity and other issues and had to serve a 21 day license suspension and pay a $42,500 fine (rare and stiff by ABRA standards). They were most certainly NOT the greatest neighbors in Shaw, so I’ve have no problem with DC citizens ensuring some accountability from high profit businesses with shady pasts. In diverse neighborhoods with residences and businesses, it is a fact of life that we have to have some compromises in the city.

  4. tassojunior

    July 25, 2017 at 11:21 am

    What all these immature uber-libertarians miss is that often these projects turn out 100 times better because of “opposition”.

    This new plan in response to the opposition is terrific compared to the original plan of a bunch of tables for beer drinking by 600 people on a vacant lot.

  5. kjnisamutt

    July 27, 2017 at 10:05 am

    Yes, yet another noisy bar is the most serious issue facing the LGBTQ community in DC at this time. Why is the Blade offering a platform for this obvious corporate shill? This is the kind of stuff that belongs in a business rag, not the local voice for LGBTQ issues.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ repeal serves as a guide for enacting equality legislation

Equality Act supporters should take cues from Senate moderates



Equality legislation is close to passing in Congress, but close isn’t good enough. “Close” won’t change anything for the LGBTQ Americans who face discrimination every day. Senate Democrats and Republicans must make a push to negotiate. With a reach on both sides to find common ground, we can move equality legislation from “close” to “done deal.”

Some Democrats are waiting for the filibuster to end—despite clear evidence that they lack the votes to end it. Some Republicans are practicing a tried-and-true brand of obstructionism. To break this deadlock, we should look to the successful, bipartisan repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) as a guide.

The DADT repeal is the single reference point for LGBTQ advocates for overcoming the Senate filibuster. Other victories have been in the courts; notably, the Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell decision that made gay marriage legal nationwide.

Before Obergefell, advocates had success in the state legislatures. I worked on campaigns for the freedom to marry in Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York and elsewhere, finding common ground between Democrats and Republicans who thought it was impossible to negotiate on marriage. Eventually, enough people from both parties came together to pass marriage laws in a majority of states.

Working together at the state level is one thing. Congress is another.

Despite Democrats’ control of the White House, Senate and House, negotiations are failing at the federal level. So, we lets look to ancient history—the 2010 repeal of DADT—for guidance on reaching 60 votes in the Senate.

The most important lesson from the DADT repeal is that Senate moderates must champion the cause and lead negotiations. The more partisan figures on both sides need to step back. Overcoming the filibuster is a job for moderates, not ideologues.

As it happens, the hero of the DADT repeal is still a senator and can help. Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine led the negotiations on DADT repeal.

Senator Collins supports the Equality Act in principle and even sponsored a version of the bill in past. However, the current version is too extreme for Sen. Collins, as a result, she has withdrawn as a co-sponsor. The current bill has also foundered with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, another important figure in the repeal of DADT.

The fact that moderate, pro-LGBTQ senators are unable to back the current version of the Equality Act should send a clear message to Democrats that we need to make reasonable changes to the bill. So far, the message is being ignored.

On the Democratic side, independent Sen. Joe Lieberman was essential to the repeal of DADT. There certainly were passionate, liberal Democrats who could have asserted themselves during the debate. But then, the bill would have taken longer to pass, or even might have failed.

The lesson is clear. Listen to the moderates. Let them lead this charge.

Another important lesson from the repeal of DADT is to be flexible in the legislative strategy. DADT repeal was originally an amendment to a large defense authorization bill. Rather than give up, Collins and Lieberman fought and saved DADT repeal from defeat by pulling out key provisions they knew could pass on their own and making them a standalone measure. Repeal passed with bipartisan support.

The current version of the Equality Act tries to do too much. That’s why it can’t win support from moderate Republicans who have legitimate concerns the bill might suppress free speech or shut down religious charities.  

Over 60 senators can agree on the basic premise of the Equality Act. They would gladly vote to prohibit discrimination against LGBTQ Americans in employment, housing, and public accommodations, so long as the law didn’t intrude on the First Amendment.

If the far left believes that our country has too much religious liberty, they can deal with that in future legislation. But so long as we have a filibuster—and, there’s no indication it will end any time soon—the Equality Act needs to reflect our society’s current views on religious liberty.  

The DADT repeal passed with 65 votes in the Senate, overcoming the filibuster. Let’s replicate that victory by using the same playbook. Moderates: Take the lead.

Tyler Deaton is the senior advisor to the American Unity Fund, a conservative nonprofit organization working to advance LGBTQ freedom and religious freedom

Continue Reading


LGBTQ people are being hunted down in Afghanistan

Homosexuality punishable by death under Taliban Sharia law interpretation



Two men in Kabul, Afghanistan, in July 2021 (Photo courtesy of Dr. Ahmad Qais Munzahim)

Kabul was known as one of the few “liberal” cities in Afghanistan. The word liberal is in quotation marks, and inflected, because it is liberal compared to the rest of the country. Now that the Taliban has taken over, most people who expressed themselves differently and openly are forced to adhere to Sharia law, completely change their ways, hide their identity, or be killed.

The U.S. State Department reported in 2020 that even before the Taliban took power in August, LGBTQ people in Afghanistan faced “discrimination, assault and rape” and “homosexuality was widely seen as taboo and indecent.” Laws against lesbian, gay and transgender people made their existence illegal and punishable by up to two years in jail. Those laws were not always enforced, but they did leave LGBTQ people at risk of extortion and abuse by authorities, as reported by the U.K. government.

Even with the discrimination and abuse, LGBTQ people still had a sliver of space in society. Nemat Sadat, an LGBTQ Afghan author living in the United States said that gay, lesbian and transgender people helped the country’s cultural life develop since the Taliban’s last rule 20 years ago. But, most of these people built their lives quietly.

Now with the Taliban regime, their sliver of space in society is gone, there is no room to live quietly as an openly LGBTQ person. Under the Taliban’s interpretation of Sharia law, homosexuality is punished by death.

In an interview with Reuters, Waheedullah Hashimi, a top decision maker for the Taliban said, “there will be no democratic system at all because it does not have a base in our country,” and continued to say, “what type of political system should we apply in Afghanistan is clear. It is sharia law and that is it.”

One source spoke to a 20-year-old university student who is lesbian in Afghanistan. Her family accepted her as a lesbian, but now the new Taliban leadership has put the lives of all of her family at risk. There is a new surge of violence against any lesbian, gay and transgender people. This includes anyone speculated of being lesbian, gay, or trans, and those who support them.

This young lesbian woman has gone into hiding. She is part of hundreds of LGBTQ people in Afghanistan who are pleading with advocates and organizations outside Afghanistan for help to escape the Taliban tyranny.

Nemat Sadat shares stories of lesbian, gay and trans people in hiding. He shared a story of a gay man who watched from his hiding place in the ceiling as Taliban fighters beat the friend who refused to disclose his location.  

LGBTQ people in Afghanistan fear the risk of being arrested, beaten and killed. The Taliban made it clear that it is enforcing its strict religious laws against Afghanistan’s LGBTQ citizens. In an interview with Germany’s Bild newspaper, one Taliban judge said there were only two punishments for homosexuality: “stoning or being crushed under a wall.”

LGBTQ people in Afghanistan are reporting that their friends, partners and members of their community are being attacked and raped. They also stated that Islamic fundamentalists and riotous groups are encouraged by the new tyranny and are on the hunt for LGBTQ people.

Another source shared that a gay man was targeted for his sexuality and then raped by his male attackers. That is a terrible paradox. He was raped by his male attackers, who criminalizing him for having same sex relations.

LGBTQ people are in hiding, desperately trying to get out of the country, and trying to erase any proof of their queer identity.

They feel abandoned by the international LGBTQ community. The Taliban is proving that the Western nations have normalized relations to their government. The Taliban and their supporters see this a proof of their victory. This leaves LGBTQ people defeated and fearing torture and death.

The U.S. government and other Western countries evacuated many people out of Afghanistan, including journalists, women’s rights activists and those who worked with foreigners. But, LGBTQ activists said that nothing has been done for them. A source says about her situation, “we will definitely be killed. We are asking to be evacuated immediately from Afghanistan.” To date, no safe route has been found.

Even underground measures to help LGBTQ people are challenging and near impossible. The Rainbow Railroad is a non-governmental organization helping LGBTQ people around the world escape persecution. Executive Director Kimahli Powell said evacuating LGBTQ people from Afghanistan is especially hard as they are often alone, in hiding, and unable to contact each other. If routes to get them out is nearly impossible, that still means those routes are somewhat possible. As difficult as it may be, we must find pathways to save these people and get them out.

The Taliban regime has established itself, knowing with certainty that the world will stand aside, albeit condemning and protesting, but not intervening. This is empowering jihadists across the world, especially in the Middle East. The Taliban has many allies and admirers, including the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) and Hamas. 

The leader of Hamas, Ismail Haniyeh, travelled from Palestinian territories to meet with Taliban leaders in Qatar. The Palestinian Islamic Jihad has a history of ties to the Taliban, even with radicals joining each other’s organizations. Very public statements of congratulations were made between leaders of the Taliban, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and all with full Iranian support.

The increase in brazen forcefulness of these groups reaches beyond Afghanistan, and spreads to the lands dominated by other similar groups. This causes an escalation of the threats to anyone who opposes Sharia law or who lives differently than what Sharia law allows. LGBTQ people in these lands are in peril. 

If we do not help LGBTQ people in Afghanistan, the lives of LGBTQ people under other similar tyrannies face increased uncertainty and danger.

Since posting this video, I have been receiving direct messages from LGBTQ people in hiding in Afghanistan, and those who are seeking to be evacuated. They all share harrowing experiences of being attacked, raped, and threatened by Taliban, Islamic State and bullying groups.

Yuval David is an innovative actor, host and filmmaker with a creative mantra to entertain, uplift and inspire. He is a captivating performer and compelling storyteller who uses his platform for sharing narratives that affect social change, specifically on behalf of highly respected U.S. and international organizations that raise awareness for the marginalized and under-represented, inspired by his LGBTQ+ and Jewish identity, and his Israeli-American roots.

He can be reached through social media

Continue Reading


Proposed zoning code changes will harm Rehoboth

Public hearing to take place on Oct. 15



Double L, Diego's Hideaway, Fourth, Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, gay news, Washington Blade
(Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

As a former city commissioner for nine of the past 15 years, I have seen a lot of changes in the laws and decisions governing the city of Rehoboth Beach. Like most things in life, some have been good and some have been not so good. The ones that have been good for the city plan for the future. The ones that have been bad for the city try to hold on to the past. The city of Rehoboth Beach has been a magnet for tourists for a long time and that has not changed, nor can it be changed. Trying to stifle our business community will not decrease the numbers that come to our city but will only frustrate our residents and visitors by putting into place ordinances that will promote the construction of buildings that lack functional architectural creativity. Worse, discouraging business innovation will drive businesses to Route 1, resulting in vacant storefronts along our commercial streets that will ultimately increase costs to residents in terms of higher taxes, provision of basic services, and increased utility fees. 

On Oct. 15, a public hearing will be held regarding patchwork changes to the zoning code. The proposed changes have been put forth as “clarifications”. They are NOT clarifications but changes that will change the downtown commercial districts for generations to come. And not in a good way. 

This may seem like an over-reaction but truly it is not. Not to over-simplify, but the basic zoning code that applies to commercial buildings allows for construction of a building from lot line to lot line with a maximum height of 42 feet. The proposed changes/clarifications would count interior courtyards and elevator shafts. These changes do not change the bulk of a building but could very well disincentivize desired architectural enhancements, such as balconies and courtyards. In this day and age of COVID, open space should be promoted not penalized. Why would we stifle architects with ideas for buildings that embrace creative use of a parcel of land? The effect of the proposed changes on the new hotel projects that are currently being designed warrants involvement by everyone who wants to make sure that Rehoboth Avenue does not end up showcasing buildings with zero architectural interest. 

It is important to remember that the one square mile of the city of Rehoboth Beach is not a suburban community, nor is it a retirement community. It is a city that hosts tens of thousands of visitors eight to nine months a year with a vibrant restaurant scene, beach and boardwalk, farmers market, recreational dock, and hopefully one day a performing arts center. What can you do? Send an email by Oct. 15 to [email protected], asking the mayor and city commissioners to pause making these patchwork changes to the city code, changes that will have negative unintended consequences for years to come. Ask them to do what was programmed in the budget over a year ago—to hire a zoning expert to look holistically at the city ordinances and make practical, coordinated changes that incentivize development that sustains the aesthetics and prosperity of our town. 

Pat Coluzzi is a former city commissioner for the city of Rehoboth Beach.

Continue Reading

Follow Us @washblade

Sign Up for Blade eBlasts