Connect with us

Virginia

Va. lawmakers leave LGBTQ students in precarious position

‘Politicizing and censoring our nation’s history’

Published

on

Gov. Glenn Youngkin is expected to sign a bill giving parents the power to review sexually explicit content before it is taught in the classroom. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

Legislation proposed during the Virginia General Assembly’s 60-day session has angered LGBTQ activists in the state as they say it will bar self-expression in schools and uphold troublesome relics of past homophobic legislation. 

A bill giving parents the power to review sexually explicit content before it is taught in the classroom was passed by both chambers of the General Assembly and is likely to be signed by Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin. 

Officially listed as SB 656, it also requires educators to provide alternatives to instructional material and related academic activities that include sexually explicit content. 

The bill, spearheaded by Sen. Siobhan Dunnavant, R-Henrico, is in line with Youngkin’s 2021 gubernatorial campaign during which he promised to give parents a more involved role in determining their children’s curriculum. 

“This administration has made it a priority to enact classroom censorship, politicizing and censoring our nation’s history and the lived experience of marginalized communities,” said Breanna Diaz, policy and advocacy counsel at American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia. ACLU of Virginia is a private non-profit organization that advocates for LGBTQ individuals in the commonwealth through public education, litigation, and advocacy.

 “[This bill], arguably, is going to erase LGBTQ history and LGBTQ figures and movement leaders from the classroom,” she said.

Although lawmakers proposed the bill with one of the goals being to facilitate curricula lucidity between schools and parents, various local school divisions already had systems in place that kept parents aware of any controversial content that would be discussed in classes. 

“Parents always get copies of the reading lists that their children are expected to go through,” said Sen. Barbara Favola, D-Arlington, in a February interview with the Virginia Mercury. 

The goal of the bill, activists say, is to remove literature from the classroom that explicitly discusses race and sexuality and thwarts students’ and teachers’ ability to express their identities. 

“SB 656 is duplicative and redundant and adds an additional layer of labor on educators to avoid confusion and possibly getting in trouble for doing their job and teaching everything,” said Diaz. “They might have to develop multiple curricula, or just outright remove entire books, lessons, and studies.” 

The General Assembly also struck down legislation that would have given voters a chance to decide on whether to overturn a now-defunct provision in the commonwealth that bans same-sex marriage. 

The Marshall-Newman Amendment — approved in 2006 — defines marriage as between a man and a woman, and anti-LGBTQ groups argued that repealing the bill would help legalize polygamy and child marriage in the state.

“It is defunct, discriminatory, bigoted, and it has no place in our constitution,” said Narissa Rahaman, executive director of Equality Virginia. “Marriage equality is the law of the land,” she said. 

Gov. Youngkin has opposed marriage equality. He, however, has also stressed that it is “legally acceptable” in Virginia and he would “support that” as governor, the Washington Blade reported in January.

Activists in other states, such as Texas, are also pushing to amend parts of the constitutions that clutch onto homophobic relics of history in legislation.

These efforts have been in vain as the Texas Legislature failed to repeal a homophobic law that has been unenforceable since 2003, The Guardian reported in 2019.

“That bad example in Texas is what we’re seeing play out in Virginia,” said Diaz.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Virginia

Va. county board of supervisors votes to defund library

Samuels Public Library faced calls to remove LGBTQ-themed books

Published

on

(Bigstock photo)

The Warren County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted 4-1 in favor of defunding the Samuels Public Library in Front Royal after some residents complained about certain books in the library.

“The library is a nonprofit overseen by a board of trustees, but it counts on the county for about 70 percent of its operating budget.” NBC Washington reported. “The board has been trying to gain more control over the library after some residents complained about certain books in the collection.”

The Winchester Star in 2023 reported a wide-array of books with queer themes have been targeted by those who wish to remove stories about LGBTQ families and people. They have sought to ban children who frequent the library, which is more than 200 years old, from reading them.

Some of the books targeted were “Over the Shop” by JonArno Lawson, “Pride Colors” by Robin Stevenson, “Mama and Mommy and Me in the Middle” by Nina LaCour, “Plenty of Hugs” by Fran Manushkin, “I Love You Because I Love You,” by Muon Thi Van, and “Bathe the Cat” by Alice B. McGinty. 

“Samuels Public Library serves more than 41,000 people in the County of Warren.” according to the library’s website. “In the last fiscal year, the Library had more than 127,000 visitors, over 400,000 checkouts, and hosted 542 programs that saw 19,194 attendees.”

Continue Reading

Virginia

Pride Liberation Project to protest school board meetings across Va.

Student-led group to highlight White House’s anti-LGBTQ rhetoric, policies

Published

on

Members of the Pride Liberation Project hold signs supporting transgender rights during a Loudoun County School Board meeting on Aug. 19, 2022. The group has announced it will protest school board meetings across Virginia in response to the Trump-Vance administration's anti-LGBTQ rhetoric and policies. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Virginia’s largest student-led LGBTQ rights group on Monday announced it will protest school board meetings across the state in response to the rise in anti-LGBTQ rhetoric from the Trump-Vance administration 

“Since taking office, the Trump-Musk administration has unleashed a barrage of attacks against LGBTQIA+ students,” said Conifer Selintung of the Pride Liberation Project in a statement. “They have attacked discrimination protections in Title IX, targeted transgender athletes, attempted to strip funding for life-saving gender affirming care, and tried to whitewash history. The Trump-Musk administration’s obsession with queer young people is already impacting our lives. Defying medical consensus, multiple hospitals suspended gender affirming care last month.”

The Pride Liberation Project press release included statements from students across Virginia.

“These executive orders are attacking our communities instead of focusing on the real issues in our schools,” said Red O’Brien, a Virginia Beach junior who is planning to rally at their school board meeting.

“I’m an adult–it’s crazy and invasive that legislators can stop me from getting lifesaving healthcare,” said Everest Clauberg, a Virginia Commonwealth University student who receives gender-affirming care from VCU Endocrinology.

VCU Children’s Hospital of Richmond on Feb. 25 announced it would resume gender-affirming care for existing patients as deemed appropriate.

The Pride Liberation Project in recent years has organized more than 90 student-led protests across Virginia.

Continue Reading

Virginia

Va. lawmakers approve two LGBTQ rights bills during 2025 legislative session

Measures await Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s signature

Published

on

Virginia Capitol (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

The Virginia General Assembly’s 2025 legislative session ended on Saturday with two LGBTQ rights bills awaiting Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s signature.

The first bill would amend the state’s definition of marriage to include members of the LGBTQ community. SJ 249, also known as the Constitutional Amendment; Marriage between Two Adult Persons, would change the state’s definition of marriage to “between two adult persons” rather than “a union between one man and one woman.”

This amendment would repeal the definition of marriage in Virginia, updating it to reflect the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, which extended marriage rights to same-sex couples across the country. This amendment would also enshrine marriage rights for same-sex couples in Virginia, ensuring that only another constitutional amendment or law that a majority of state lawmakers approve, can change it again.

Same-sex couples would have the same legal rights — tax breaks, inheritance rights, and Social Security benefits — in Virginia, even if Obergefell were to be overturned federally.  

For the amendment to take effect, it would need to pass the legislature again in 2026, then go to a referendum.

The second LGBTQ rights bill the General Assembly approved would amend the Virginia Human Rights Act.

Employees under the law, as it currently stands, do have protections against discrimination, harassment, and retaliation based on special protected categories that include race, color, religion, national origin, sex, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions, age, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability to businesses with 15 or more employees, allowing complaints of violations to be reported to and investigated the state, copying the federal law.

Senate Bill 1052, also known as the Virginia Human Rights Act; Definition of ‘Employer,’ would eliminate what some have called a “small business exception” in existing law. The measure would extend human rights protections to employees of businesses with as few as five workers, ensuring they are covered under the Virginia Human Rights Act. It would also grant small business employees the right to file complaints against their employers for potential human rights violations, holding businesses legally accountable for any misconduct.

Youngkin has until March 24 to amend these bills. The governor cannot act on the proposed constitutional amendment.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular