Connect with us

Opinions

Rescuing the Sustainable Development Goals agenda: A call for a fair global financing architecture

The SDG Summit will take place during the U.N. General Assembly

Published

on

U.N. headquarters in New York (Washington Blade photo by Michael K. Lavers)

By DR. RICHARD AMENYAH | The Summit on Rescuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), simply called the SDG Summit, will take place this month as part of the U.N. General Assembly (UNGA) in New York to mark the 78th anniversary of the UNGA and the midpoint of the 2030 Global Agenda for sustainable development. 

The world must do more to bolster efforts and accelerate progress to achieve the SDGs and leave no one behind.  

The urgency of the matter is underscored by stark realities facing our world today. Currently, more than half the world is sadly being left behind because only 12 percent of the SDGs are on track, progress on 50 percent is weak and insufficient. Shockingly, 30 percent of these critical goals are either stalled or regressing. Further, the SDG summit is happening at a time when faith in multilateralism is dwindling. Now more than ever, leaders must commit to an empowered United Nations — equipped to support members states in this decade of action to achieve the 2030 agenda.  

U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres has asked all leaders to make concrete commitment on how to rescue the SDGs. His approach to the issues of the SDGs shows the seriousness with which he wants member states to review progress, invest catalytically, and prioritize evidence-centered, human-rights based approaches to accelerating SDG implementation. 

Financially, the world is in an existential debt conundrum. The global public debt has ballooned to a staggering $92 trillion, a fivefold increase since 2000. What’s more, nearly 30 percent of this crushing public debt is owed by developing countries. This pattern of debt can be attributed to the inequalities in the international financial architecture which exacerbates the negative impact of cascading crises on sustainable development. Developing countries have been undercut by such a flawed financial architecture such that for them to finance their development, they must access credit or borrow from more expensive sources such as private creditors, bondholders, banks and other lenders offer financing on commercial terms. This situation has exacerbated their vulnerabilities and made it even harder to resolve debt crises. Meanwhile, flows of official development assistance from the Global North are far below the long-standing commitment of 0.7 percent of Gross Domestic Product. 

In the past 10 years, the portion of external public debt owed to private creditors has risen across all regions. This accounted for 62 percent of developing countries’ total external public debt in 2021. Access to credit is unfair, unjust and depends on where you live. Consequently, developing nations pay exorbitantly higher interest rates when compared to economic powerhouses like Germany and the United States. The Caribbean, Latin America and Africa are particularly hard-hit, grappling with interest rates of 7.7 percent and 11.6 percent respectively, compared to Germany’s 1.5 percent and the United States’ 3.1 percent This means that on average, African countries pay four times more (as the Caribbean pays over two times more) for borrowing than the United States — and eight times more (as the Caribbean pays five times more) than the wealthiest European countries. How can this be said to be a fair and democratic global financial governance system?  

Many of our countries are trapped in unsustainable debt. Currently, at least 19 developing countries are spending more on interest than on education and 45 are spending more on interest than on health. In total, 48 countries are home to 3.3 billion people, whose lives are directly affected by underinvestment in education or health due to large interest payment burdens. No doubt, many of these countries cannot sustainably finance their HIV programs, let alone adequately financing general health programs without support from The Global Fund, the President’s Emergency Program for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) or Global Vaccine Alliance for example. Furthermore, with limited health investments, these countries will continue to be ill-equipped to fight future global pandemics and will have to continue to rely on the Global North. 

To course correct and enable financial justice, we must echo the secretary general’s call for a reengineering of the global financial architecture, to one which is fair and just, regardless of whether you live in the Global North or the Global South. From the G7 summit in Tokyo, and the 15th BRICS summit in South Africa, Africa Climate Summit in Kenya, ASEAN-UN Summit in Indonesia, G20 meeting in India and the G77 in Cuba the message to world leaders is simple “in a fracturing world overwhelmed by crises, there is simply no alternative to cooperation.” The secretary general will continue to advocate for development financing to address the climate emergencies, mitigate the growing inequalities compounded by conflicts and global pandemics resulting in worsening of the global cost-of-living crisis, the need to bridge the digital divide to make development sustainable, transformative and inclusive. Of note, Africa is underrepresented in the global financial architecture and requires a permanent seat on the Security Council. 

The world needs a fairer system for development financing to accelerate the implementation of the SDGs. This SDG Summit is a test of the true commitment of our leaders to salvage the world from its current polycrises by working together to offer hope for humanity one more time, through collaboration and partnerships, within the multilateral systems of the U.N., to change the world for the better.  

The commitments made on climate finance in 2020 must be honored. Funding for adaptation and mitigation remains critical, and the promises sealed in New York, Addis Ababa and Paris, by world leaders, to promote peace, prosperity and the well-being of people and planet must be upheld. It’s time to dismantle and rebuild the current unjust and dysfunctional global financial system, urgently rescuing and energizing the implementation of the SDGs to ensure no one is left behind. 

This is our moment of truth, and the U.N. must once again rise as the guarantor of world peace, security, and development, with member states working together as equals to shape a brighter, more equitable future for all of humanity. Africa and the Caribbean, including other Small Island Developing States, need a fairer system, including debt relief and debt restructuring mechanisms that support payment suspensions (especially during climate/natural disasters), longer lending terms and lower rates, to better adapt to and manage the impact of climate crisis and how they manage their own development tailored to their national vision.  

The world is looking on with hope that this SDG Summit will go down in history as when our leaders, despite their geopolitical divide, secured the future of the world by uniting in solidarity to transform and course correct our path to sustainable development. 

Dr. Richard Amenyah is a medical doctor from Ghana and public health specialist. He is the director for the UNAIDS multi-country office for the Caribbean. You can reach him on Twitter at @RichardAmenyah or @UNAIDSCaribbean. 

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Commentary

Washington Blade responds to concerns over White House pool duties

Inaccurate media reports create confusion but we stand with our colleagues

Published

on

A photo from inside the White House on Monday. (Washington Blade photo by Joe Reberkenny)

Last week, President Trump announced his unconstitutional ban of CNN, MSNow, and Politico from the White House. Coincidentally, on Monday, it was the Washington Blade’s turn to serve as the print pool reporter on duty covering the president’s actions that day. This important responsibility is shared and rotated among the print members with each serving roughly once per month. The Blade is the only LGBTQ outlet with a seat in the briefing room, a slot in the pool rotation, and membership in the White House Correspondents’ Association, something we fought for decades to secure after enduring years of discrimination, ridicule, and resistance to openly queer journalists working inside the White House. We take our responsibilities there seriously. 

There are two pools that cover the president: broadcast and print. The other four members of the broadcast pool — ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox News — agreed to boycott their pool duties. There has been no boycott among the print pool, which is a separate entity. I called the president of the White House Correspondents’ Association on Monday to confirm that no outlets in the print pool were boycotting. 

A boycott by the Blade would set us back and lead to our expulsion from the pool and briefing room and our replacement by a right-wing outlet sympathetic to President Trump’s approach to attacking the media. The LGBTQ community is far better served with the Blade in the room than a far-right blogger taking our seat.

Let’s be clear: the Blade stands for diversity, equity, and inclusion and we stand for the First Amendment and freedom of the press. In solidarity with the broadcast pool, we made two important decisions on Monday — the first day anyone had to think about any of this. First, we refused to take or share any videos or still photos of the president, which would have undermined the broadcast boycott. Second, when Politico’s turn comes up for pool duty in mid-October, the Blade will not fill in and cover for them while they are banned. Politico must be readmitted and allowed to do their job. 

After a rough day navigating and reporting on all of this, the Advocate published a reckless and inaccurate story suggesting that the Blade had crossed a picket line. Not true, as there is no print pool boycott. They claimed that I wouldn’t talk to their reporter. Also not true. I called their reporter within 90 minutes of receiving his message and he didn’t take the call or call me back. Their story named me and our White House reporter, immediately exposing us to public criticism and worse. The environment in D.C. is so toxic and even violent these days that subjecting our staff to unfair and false accusations like this invites harassment, doxxing, and worse. To do that without even talking to us is next level irresponsible and the antithesis of journalism.

On Tuesday, I talked to two reporters and an editor at the Advocate but they refused to retract anything in their inaccurate story. If the reporter had returned my call, I could have explained all of this but they are more concerned with clickbait and sensational headlines, a dangerous practice in these troubled times. 

Back to the pool. The Blade was in the briefing room in the Reagan era, when Press Secretary Larry Speakes made jokes about AIDS and the reporters in the room laughed out loud. We endured all of that abuse and worse for decades, always standing in the back of the room and never being called on. The Blade’s journalists persevered. When President George W. Bush was re-elected in 2004, the Blade’s White House credentials were revoked amid an earlier press crackdown. Notably, no one boycotted or stood up for us. When Barack Obama won election in 2008, I received an email from his communications director informing me that effective midnight on Jan. 20, 2009, the Blade’s credentials would be restored. 

So we have had quite a ride navigating administrations and their changing requirements for gaining access but always playing the long game. As Barney Frank used to say, “If you’re not at the table, then you’re probably on the menu.” The Blade is at the table and we do our best to ensure the LGBTQ community’s issues are addressed by both parties. 

Thanks for reading and supporting the Blade’s work. If you have questions about our approach, you can reach me at [email protected].  


Kevin Naff is editor of the Washington Blade. Reach him at [email protected].

Continue Reading

Opinions

Young people should know history of the fight for human rights

Trump is working to erase contributions of marginalized people

Published

on

From left, Rep. Bella Abzug (D-N.Y), Frank Kameny and Rep. Shirley Chisholm (D-N.Y.). (Photos of Abzug and Chisholm public domain; Washington Blade archive photo of Kameny)

When talking with otherwise really smart young people, I am amazed how little knowledge many of them have about the fight for human rights in the United States. Our country was founded by white men, who didn’t think about giving full rights to Black Americans, women, the LGBTQ community (what they knew of it, or called it). They wrote in the Declaration of Independence, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” But that referred to all white men, and intentionally didn’t mention women. For 250 years, the country has been trying to make up for that, and making progress in fits and starts. We have yet to fully succeed. Today the felon, and his fascist aides, in the White House, are working daily to take us backwards. 

For that reason alone, it is important for younger generations to understand the fight for human rights, know who was fighting for those rights, and understand it is an ongoing fight. Often, when listening to some millennials speak, one would think the world began with them. They either forgot, or never learned, about all those who fought for the rights they now have. I realize this was true for previous generations as well. In 2016 I co-hosted a fundraiser for Pete Buttigieg during his run for president. He is an undeniably brilliant guy. Yet when he spoke of marriage equality, he just thanked Justice Kennedy for it. I reminded him after he spoke, while it’s nice to thank Kennedy for his vote, it shouldn’t be done without acknowledging the many activists who worked for decades, to get to the point that allowed Kennedy to cast that vote. In the same way it was clear to me during the Hillary Clinton campaign for president, many young women didn’t understand the work many of their own mothers had done, to fight for their right to control their own healthcare, and women’s rights in general. They took for granted the rights they had. Now, after losing some of them, many will realize the fight for their rights is never-ending. 

When I speak to younger members of the LGBTQ community, I am amazed how many don’t know the history of the AIDS epidemic, many thinking it was always a disease you could deal with by taking medication. They don’t understand the work so many activists did to bring attention to this devastating disease, and get the healthcare so many needed. Those like Cleve Jones, Larry Kramer, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and so many others. Recently, I realized how many young women don’t know the names of Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan, Shirley Chisholm, Bella Abzug — women who fought for their rights. And this is just recent history, no less knowing about the Suffragettes, the strong women who fought for their right to vote. I’ve met young women who don’t know what the ERA is, and others who think it passed. Many don’t know the nation couldn’t get 38 states to approve an amendment to include them in the Constitution. The same for young members of the LGBTQ community who don’t know what the Equality Act is. Others think it passed, and are shocked when told it didn’t and in 27 states, they can be married on Sunday, and kicked out of their home, and fired from their job, on Monday. They don’t know names like Frank Kameny, Harvey Milk, Barney Frank, or the history of the Mattachine Society, or the Stonewall Riots.

Our current president is trying to wipe out all this history, and reverse any progress that has been made. Knowing this, it makes it even more important for school systems across the nation to fight to educate our children. We should ensure no child can graduate high school, without taking a course called “The 250-year fight for human rights in the United States.” They need to understand the history, and learn about the people who fought for their rights. They need to know how far we have come in 250 years, and understand, as we begin the next 250, how far we still have to go, to ensure real, full equality, for all.


Peter Rosenstein is a longtime LGBTQ rights and Democratic Party activist.

Continue Reading

Commentary

What LGBTQ veterans are building after ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’

DADT repeal took effect on Sept. 20, 2011. Trans servicemember ban reinstated

Published

on

The Pentagon (Photo by icholakov/Bigstock)

Fifteen years ago this month, the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” took effect. At the time, the importance of the change was obvious: gay, lesbian, and bisexual Americans would no longer have to hide who they were to wear the uniform. What was harder to see was what would follow: a generation of LGBTQ veterans able to carry their service openly into American civic life.

Earlier this month, Alaska state Rep. Andrew Gray, an Army veteran, stood before the Anchorage Assembly and asked the city to recognize Sept. 20 as LGBTQ Veterans Day.

His former command sergeant major, Mike Grunst, followed him to the microphone. A 35-year veteran who had served in combat, Grunst called troops who had served while hiding who they were “the bravest I have ever served with.”

Then Denise Sudbeck stepped forward. A Vietnam-era Navy veteran, she thanked the country for the privilege of serving and asked that the next generation have the same chance.

The Assembly approved the recognition.

Nothing about the scene required a new vocabulary. A veteran made a request of his community. A commander vouched for those who served beside him. Another veteran asked that younger Americans inherit the opportunity she valued. They entered the civic record simply as veterans.

That identity can do more than win recognition.

When federal policy abruptly ended the careers of transgender servicemembers this year, veterans and servicemembers in California began asking a practical question: What happens when those Americans come home?

Republican Assemblyman Jeff Gonzalez, a Marine combat veteran, began one hearing with questions about transgender military service. He listened as veterans explained how the military handles medical care and deployment case by case.

Then the discussion turned to separation.

“I don’t wanna see any veteran homeless,” Gonzalez said. Before the hearing ended, he was asking: “How can I help? How can I understand? How can I be a good advocate?”

The legislation that followed would provide housing, employment and transition assistance to discharged servicemembers. Republican state Sen. Shannon Grove spoke for it. The Senate passed it 32 to 0.

Americans have plainly not settled their disagreements over transgender people. Nor should military service be a prerequisite for rights that belong to every citizen.

But military service creates relationships that are difficult to reduce to the abstractions of the culture war. Before a legislature, “the transgender issue” can become a veteran who deployed, an officer who led troops, or the person who once stood beside you.

The political question changes because the human relationship has already changed.

The pattern is beginning to appear across the country. Kansas is among the states recognizing LGBTQ Veterans Day for the first time this year. New York and Virginia are pursuing broader state-level programs for LGBTQ veterans.

Sept. 20 is deliberate. On that day in 2011, “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” ended.

We usually remember repeal for what LGBTQ Americans gained: the ability to serve openly. Fifteen years later, we can also see what the country gained.

A gay veteran can stand before his local government beside the commander who once led him. A transgender servicemember can sit before a legislator who begins with doubts and ends by asking how he can help. A veteran from an older generation can ask her neighbors to give those who follow her the same chance to serve.

This is citizenship in practice.

The enduring legacy of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal is not only that Americans were finally allowed to serve openly. It is also what they can now build after coming home.

Continue Reading

Popular