National
National news in brief
Pelosi to offer message at San Francisco Pride & more
Pelosi to offer message at San Francisco Pride
SAN FRANCISCO — U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is scheduled to give a pre-recorded video address at an upcoming San Francisco Pride event, making her the first speaker to offer remarks at a Pride celebration.
In a statement last week, San Francisco Pride announced Pelosi would offer the message for a June 27 event at San Francisco’s Civic Center for the city’s 40th Pride celebration.
Amy Andre, executive director of San Francisco Pride, said event organizers are “extremely honored that Speaker Pelosi will be a part of this historic event.”
“She is dedicated to achieving equality for every American,” Andre said. “As a respected and esteemed ally of our community, she’s a champion for all Americans who believe in equal rights.”
In addition to the video message, the speaker is also set to make public an official letter honoring “San Francisco’s proud history of advocacy for equal rights and to honor the contributions of the LGBT community to our city, our state and our nation.”
The letter is set for publication June 7 in San Francisco Pride’s annual promotional magazine. It also will be available at sfpride.org.
Girl, Virginia mom missing from Vt. custody fight
MONTPELIER, Vt. — A child custody fight between former lesbian partners is headed back to court in Vermont even though the girl at the heart of it remains missing.
Eight-year-old Isabella Miller-Jenkins and birth mother Lisa Miller failed to appear for a court-ordered Jan. 1 custody swap in which Miller’s former partner, Janet Jenkins, was to get the girl. Miller is from Forest, Va. Jenkins is from Fair Haven, Vt.
The girl is listed as missing. The Associated Press reported a lawyer for Jenkins said Miller and the girl are believed to have flown to El Salvador last September.
According to the Associated Press, the Vermont Supreme Court will hear arguments June 23 from Miller’s attorneys, who say a Family Court judge erred last November in awarding custody to Jenkins.
Kolbe reacts to McCain opposition to ‘Don’t Ask’ repeal
WASHINGTON — A former out Republican congressman told the Blade he disagrees with his longtime friend Sen. John McCain’s opposition to repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” but respects his position.
Jim Kolbe (R-Ariz.), who served in Congress from 1985 to 2007, said June 2 that he’s “obviously on the other side” of McCain (R-Ariz.) on the issue of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
“I disagree with him, but Sen. McCain and I have a long relationship and friendship that goes back a long ways, and we have a history of cooperation on a lot of different issues for Arizona and for the nation,” Kolbe said. “And so, I may disagree with him on this, and do, both professionally and personally, but I respect his position.”
McCain has emerged as one of the chief opponents of repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in the U.S. Senate. He’s pledged to stop repeal by supporting a Senate filibuster of the defense authorization bill to which the repeal language is attached.
Some pundits have speculated that McCain is taking a position in strong opposition to ending “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” because he’s facing a primary challenge from conservative J.D. Hayworth.
Kolbe declined to say why McCain is opposed to repeal. The former congressman said he didn’t know if McCain might change his position on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” but Kolbe said he hopes the senator will change his mind.
“I certainly hope that he will and be supportive of changing the policy, but I don’t know,” Kolbe said.
Kolbe noted that he hasn’t had any conversations recently with McCain on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
In 1996, after Kolbe publicly came out as gay following his vote in favor of the Defense of Marriage Act, McCain came to the congressman’s defense and said Kolbe’s coming out didn’t cause “much of a ripple” in Arizona.
Kolbe endorsed McCain during the 2008 presidential campaign. In a Q&A with the Blade in October 2008, McCain identified Kolbe as someone he counted as among his gay friends.
National
Advocacy groups issue US travel advisory ahead of World Cup
Renee Good’s death in Minneapolis among incidents cited
More than 100 organizations have issued a travel advisory for the U.S. ahead of the 2026 World Cup.
The World Cup will take place in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico from June 11-July 19.
“In light of the deteriorating human rights situation in the United States and in the absence of meaningful action and concrete guarantees from FIFA, host cities, or the U.S. government, the undersigned organizations are issuing this travel advisory for fans, players, journalists, and other visitors traveling to and within the United States for the June 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup. World Cup games will be played in 11 different cities across the United States, which, like many localities, have already been the target of the Trump administration’s violent and abusive immigration crackdown,” reads the advisory that the Council for Global Equality and other groups that include the American Civil Liberties Union issued on April 23. “The impacts of these policies vary by locality.”
“While the Trump administration’s rising authoritarianism and increasing violence pose serious risks to all, those from immigrant communities, racial and ethnic minority groups, and LGBTQ+ individuals have been and continue to be disproportionately targeted and affected by the administration’s policies and, as such, are most vulnerable to serious harm when traveling to and/or within the United States,” it adds. “This travel advisory calls on fans, players, journalists, and other visitors to exercise caution.”
The advisory specifically mentions Renee Good.
A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent on Jan. 7 shot and killed her in Minneapolis. Good, 37, left behind her wife and three children.
The full advisory can be read here.
State Department
Democracy Forward files FOIA request for State Department bathroom policy records
April 20 memo outlined anti-transgender rule
Democracy Forward on Tuesday filed a Freedom of Information Act request for records on the State Department’s new bathroom policy.
A memo titled “Updates Regarding Biological Sex and Intimate Spaces, Including Restrooms” that the State Department issued on April 20 notes employees can no longer use bathrooms that correspond with their gender identity.
“The administration affirms that there are two sexes — male and female — and that federal facilities should operate on this objective and longstanding basis to ensure consistency, privacy, and safety in shared spaces,” State Department spokesperson Tommy Piggot told the Daily Signal, a conservative news website that first reported on the memo. “In line with President Trump’s executive order this provides clear, uniform guidance to the department by grounding policy in biological sex as determined at birth.”
President Donald Trump shortly after he took office in January 2025 issued an executive order that directed the federal government to only recognize two genders: male and female. The sweeping directive also ordered federal government agencies to “effectuate this policy by taking appropriate action to ensure that intimate spaces designated for women, girls, or females (or for men, boys, or males) are designated by sex and not identity.”
Democracy Forward’s FOIA request that the Washington Blade exclusively obtained on Tuesday is specifically seeking a copy of the memo that details the State Department’s new bathroom policy. Democracy Forward has also requested “all” memo-specific communications between the State Department’s Bureau of Global Public Affairs and the Daily Signal from April 1-21.
Federal Government
House Republicans push nationwide ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill
Measures would restrict federal funding for LGBTQ-affirming schools
Republicans have been gaining ground in reshaping education policy to be less inclusive toward LGBTQ students at the state level, and now they are turning their focus to Capitol Hill.
Some GOP lawmakers are pushing for a nationwide “Don’t Say Gay” bill, doubling down on their commitment to being the party of “traditional family values” by excluding anyone who does not identify with their sex at birth.
The largest anti-LGBTQ education legislation to reach the House chamber is House Bill 2616 — the Parental Rights Over the Education and Care of Their Kids Act, or the PROTECT Kids Act. The PROTECT Kids Act, proposed by U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.), and co-sponsored by U.S. Reps. Burgess Owens (R-Utah), Mary Miller (R-Ill.), Robert Onder (R-Mo.), and Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.), would require any public elementary and middle schools that receive federal funding to require parental consent to change a child’s gender expression in school.
The bill, which was discussed during Tuesday’s House Rules Committee hearing, would specifically require any schools that get federal money from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 — which was created to minimize financial discrepancies in education for low-income students — to get parental approval before identifying any child’s gender identity as anything other than what was provided to the school initially. This includes getting approval before allowing children to use their preferred locker room or bathroom.
It reads that any school receiving this funding “shall obtain parental consent before changing a covered student’s (1) gender markers, pronouns, or preferred name on any school form; or (2) sex-based accommodations, including locker rooms or bathrooms.”
LGBTQ rights advocates have criticized both national and state efforts to require parental permission to use a child’s preferred gender identity, as it raises issues of at-home safety — especially if the home is not LGBTQ-affirming — and could lead to the outing of transgender or gender-curious students.
A follow-up bill, HB 2617, proposed by Owens, one of the bill’s co-sponsors, prevents the use of federal funding to “advance concepts related to gender ideology,” using the definition from President Donald Trump’s 2025 Executive Order 14168, making that an enshrined definition in law of sex rather than just by executive order. There is also a bill making its way through the senate with the same text— Senate Bill 2251.
Advocates have also criticized this follow-up legislation, as it would restrict school staff — including teachers and counselors — from acknowledging trans students’ identities or providing any support. They have said that this kind of isolation can worsen mental health outcomes for LGBTQ youth and allows for education to be politicized rather than being based in reality.
David Stacy, the Human Rights Campaign’s vice president of government affairs, called this legislation out for using LGBTQ children as political pawns in an ideology fight — one that could greatly harm the safety of these children if passed.
“Trans kids are not a political agenda — they are students who deserve safety and affirmation at school like anyone else,” Stacy said in a statement. “Despite the many pressing issues facing our nation, House Republicans continue their bizarre obsession with trans people. H.R. 2616 does not protect children. It targets them. This bill is cruel, and we’re prepared to fight it.”
This is similar to Florida House Bills 1557 and 1069, referred to as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill and “Don’t Say They” bill, respectively, restricting classroom discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity, prohibiting the use of pronouns consistent with one’s gender identity, expanding book banning procedures, and censoring health curriculum.
The American Civil Liberties Union is tracking 233 bills related to restricting student and educator rights in the U.S.
-
National5 days agoBREAKING NEWS: Shots fired at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner
-
Movies5 days agoAn acting legend meets his match in ‘The Christophers’
-
Theater4 days agoWorld premiere of ‘Everything, Devoured’ oozes queer energy
-
The White House3 days agoFrom red carpet to chaos: A first-person narrative of the WHCD shooting
