August 12, 2010 | by Chris Johnson
GOP House members move to condemn Prop 8 ruling

A group of conservative House Republicans on Tuesday introduced a resolution in Congress to condemn the recent federal court decision overturning Proposition 8 in California.

The introduction of the non-binding measure is one of the most prominent moves against the ruling from Republicans, whose response has largely been muted, or in some cases supportive of the decision.

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) is sponsoring the resolution, H. Res. 1607. The measure is pending before the House Judiciary Committee.

The resolution offers findings faulting U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker’s decision for engaging in improper conduct during his consideration of the case. It says Walker “failed to conduct himself in an impartial manner” and “attempted to illegally broadcast the trial in disregard of the harassment such broadcast would invite on witnesses supporting Proposition 8.”

The resolution concludes that the sense of the U.S. House is that:

• Walker “failed to conduct himself in an impartial manner before striking down California’s popularly enacted Proposition 8 and thereby redefined traditional marriage to include same-sex relationships;”

• and Walker’s decision to overturn “California’s popularly enacted Proposition 8 is wrong.”

In a statement, Smith emphasized the importance of the resolution as a means to speak out against the decision, because “when it comes to judicial activism, it doesn’t get much worse.”

“The judge showed bias,” Smith said. “In his ruling, he imposed his personal views, contrary to the wishes of the majority of voters in the state.”

Smith noted that the debate over Prop 8 isn’t “about the worth of gay individuals.”

“Those who support traditional marriage recognize that gay people can be loyal friends, dedicated community leaders, and beloved sons and daughters,” he said. “And those with religious objections to same-sex marriage distinguish between the conduct, which they consider inappropriate, and the person, whom they may cherish and appreciate.”

As of Wednesday, the resolution had 17 co-sponsors, including Reps. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) and Steve King (R-Iowa).

A House Democratic leadership aide, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said House Democratic leadership had no plan to bring the resolution to the House floor.

“I suppose if they want to file a discharge petition maybe they could do that, but I think we will be out of session before the clock runs [out] on a discharge,” said the aide. “So the bottom line is that the Democratic leadership has no intention of bringing this to the floor.”

A discharge petition brings a bill out of committee and to the House floor without a report from the committee and usually without cooperation of leadership. A discharge petition requires the signature of 218 House members — a simple majority.

Whether this resolution has the support of the Republican leadership is unclear. The office of House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) didn’t immediately respond to the Blade’s request to comment on whether he supports the resolution.

Gay groups representing LGBT people on opposite ends of the political spectrum pounced on the resolution as unnecessary and hostile.

Christian Berle, deputy executive director of the National Log Cabin Republicans, said the measure was “in direct contradiction” to the tenets of individual liberty espoused by the Republican Party.

“Log Cabin Republicans would oppose any effort by Congress to play politics with this ruling,” Berle said. “Now is the time for Republicans to focus on the real issues voters care about: jobs, the economy, taxes, government spending and a free market economy.”

Michael Mitchell, executive director of the National Stonewall Democrats, said the proposed resolution represents “a willful disregard for the three branches of government.”

“On the one hand, I think it’s grandstanding,” he said. “I think that they’re just really trying to shore up their base. I think that they are definitely on the wrong side of history and that time is going to show that very quickly even in their own party.”

But in an e-mail blast Wednesday, Brian Brown, president of the National Organization for Marriage, which opposes marriage rights for same-sex couples, urged supporters to call their members of Congress to join on as co-sponsors to the resolution.

“House Resolution 1607 is an important first opportunity for leaders in Congress to go on record defending Proposition 8 and condemning the activism from the bench that would simply create — out of thin air — a new constitutional right to same-sex marriage, while overthrowing the will of 7 million California voters,” he said.

Chris Johnson is Chief Political & White House Reporter for the Washington Blade. Johnson attends the daily White House press briefings and is a member of the White House Correspondents' Association. Follow Chris

7 Comments
  • Who are the other sponsors of the resolution? Please name names.

  • The 7 million voters who supported Prop 8 keeps being bantered around without acknowledging the 6.4 million who opposed it!

  • Equality is not a new right that has just been created out of thin air. Americans have always had the right to equality, but every minority group has had to fight for recognition of that right. I’m sick of hearing the opponents of gay rights mis-quoting the Bible to justify their viewpoint. The religious viewpoint is not relevant, as the court has just said. But if it were relevant, my religious view should have just as much weight as theirs. I am a religious person, and I believe gay marriage is a valid expression of my Christian faith.

  • 6.4 million votes against Prop 8 were joined by nearly 8.25 million registered California voters who weren’t concerned enough to vote at all. The 7 million that the H8ers brag about was less than 1/3 of all registered voters.

  • Think what’s going to happen if and when this issue reaches the Supreme Court of the United States and their potential ruling legalizes equal marriage nationwide. These sad excuses for grown men and women on the far religious right are not going to have anymore say on this matter. Their petty bickering, the ceaseless interfering in the personal affairs of other people they seem to loving basing their ENTIRE lives around is going to come to a complete and total standstill. I keep dreaming of that day, when the sheer idiocy that spews from their lips is forever silenced.

    For now, I can only cross my fingers and pray!

  • Why don’t the House-holes just reveal their cards now and introduce an impeachment resolution against Judge Walker instead of meaningless resolutions!

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2014. All rights reserved.
Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin