September 15, 2011 | by Chris Johnson
‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ comes to an end
Quantico

An estimated 2 million U.S. service members were trained on gay-related issues in the run-up to next Tuesday’s lifting of the military’s gay ban. (Washington Blade file photo by Michael Key)

As gay and lesbian troops await the end of the 18-year-old ban on openly gay service members on Tuesday, observers say the change will have significant impact beyond the military.

“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” will finally be lifted from the books thanks to the certification of repeal that President Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen sent to Congress on July 22. In accordance with the repeal law that President Obama signed in December, certification started a 60-day timeclock for the end of the ban on Sept. 20.

Aaron Belkin, author of “How We Won,” a book on the lessons learned for progressive causes resulting from “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal, said the end of the military’s gay ban represents the end of what he called the “political paranoia” that led to the institution of the law in 1993.

“Just abstracting away from the question of LGBT rights that’s a danger to every American citizen,” Belkin said. “Sept. 20 is about the cultural change for the military and the political change for gay and lesbian troops … but I would say, even more importantly, it’s a moment when truth and fairness trumped paranoia, and that’s just critical.”

Jeff Krehely, director of the LGBT research and communications project at the Center for American Progress, said allowing open service will be significant for many Americans.

“‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ repeal is huge and tremendous, but I think there are much larger implications for society because a lot of people really respect the military,” Krehely said.

Observers agree the process that led to the end of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” will have a lasting impact as well.

Alex Nicholson, executive director of Servicemembers United, said the training in which service members have been participating will have significant influence on the perspective with which troops — and the American public at large — view gay and lesbian people.

“They really took the time to train and educate the force on the various assets of this policy and hypotheticals,” Nicholson said. “It was an hour of instruction on gays and lesbians, on gay families, on gay partners and it was a really a normalization routine. It was really exposed to millions of America’s most conservative youth to the normality of gays and lesbians.”

Among the situations that the training addressed, Nicholson said, were gay troops holding hands, going on dates or participating in military events with their partners. Nearly 2 million service members received the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” training before certification took place on July 22, according to the Pentagon.

Workplace discrimination against LGBT people could be an issue that gains new focus after “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal. No federal law exists to protect LGBT workers against discrimination. Firing someone for being gay is legal in 29 states and firing someone for being transgender is legal in 35 states.

Krehely said open service could generate support for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would prohibit discrimination against LGBT workers in most situations in the public and private workforce, or encourage other employers to add protections for LGBT workers.

“The military is probably one of the biggest and most visible workplaces in our country,” Krehely said. “I think Sept. 20 is a clear indication that this discrimination should not be there any longer, and that we need to move forward on ENDA, and educate people about the broader workplace issues that we’re up against.”

Despite the potential for long-term impact, advocates say the change resulting in the end of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” won’t be immediately apparent and any impact of any lifting the gay ban will be more drawn out.

Krehely said the end of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” next week won’t mean the “world changes necessarily” on Tuesday.

“I think that it’s just people who want to serve their country will want to do that without living in fear,” Krehely said. “That’s the biggest change. It may not be visible, but it’s really important to those people and it’s really important to the military itself.”

Nicholson predicted Tuesday will be a “non-event” and said many gay service members will choose not to come out even though they won’t be in danger of dismissal now that the military’s gay ban is off the books.

“I think you’ll see a good number of them who decide not to come out,” Nicholson said. “I think the post-repeal military is going to resemble any conservative American workplace where individuals judge their willingness and their comfort level in coming out.”

According to the most recent findings from the Williams Institute at the University of California in Los Angeles, an estimated 48,500 lesbians, gay men and bisexuals serve on active duty or in the ready reserve in the U.S. military, while an additional 22,000 are in standby and retired reserve forces. These 70,500 service members make up 2.2 percent of the total force.

But what will happen to those service members who choose to be public about their sexual orientation? Will service members patronize their local gay bars while in uniform? Will Pride parades include contingents of openly gay troops?

Some gay troops have already started brandishing their military credentials during Pride celebrations. In July, about 200 active-duty troops and veterans marched in San Diego’s Pride parade. They weren’t wearing uniforms, but T-shirts indicating their branch of service. The event was the first time a military contingent participated in a Pride celebration in the United States.

Nicholson said that the standards that apply to straight service members with regard to uniforms will also apply to gay troops — so wearing the uniform may not be appropriate in some circumstances.

“Unless it’s some unusual circumstances, service members don’t wear their uniforms out to the bar,” Nicholson said. “I can pretty much guarantee that violations of long-standing and well-understood regulations like that for the sake of publicity is going to be frowned upon by gay troops because the community consensus is they want to blend in like everyone else and not have any special treatment.”

Nonetheless, gay troops will undoubtedly be visible in the post-repeal world. Belkin said the higher visibility of gay troops — and their relationships — following the end of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”  will add to the political pressure to advance the fight for same-sex marriage.

“We’re going to see gay and lesbian service members coming back from the Middle East and talking about the importance of marriage equality, and, very tragically, we’re going to see gay and lesbian service members fall in the battlefield and their partners, husbands and wives will not be dealt any benefits their straight counterparts have,” Belkin said. “That is going to illustrate for the public in a much more vivid way the stakes of the marriage debate.”

What’s the next frontier for those who worked to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell?” Securing benefits for gay and lesbian troops is the next step advocates plan to take after the gay ban is lifted from the books.

The Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibits federal recognition of same-sex marriage, prevents the military from offering benefits to gay troops, such as health care benefits. But other benefits related to housing and legal services could be changed administratively.

Krehely said benefits for gay troops will be among the issues advocacy groups will be pushing for in the post-repeal world.

“I think that there are still some implementation issues that need to be worked out in terms of benefits and housing, and I think that’s something advocacy organizations and research groups are going to keep trying to make some progress on,” Krehely said.

 

Chris Johnson is Chief Political & White House Reporter for the Washington Blade. Johnson attends the daily White House press briefings and is a member of the White House Correspondents' Association. Follow Chris

13 Comments
  • Gee, I wonder how many of the male and female soldiers, airmen, seaman, and marines who were discharged based on sexual orientation will now proudly re-enlist as proud Americans who want to honorably serve their country? Hey Dan Choi, if you escape incarceration as a result of your onging trial, will you re-enlist? I thought not.

    • laurelboy, Dan Choi already re-enlisted the day Judge Philips laid an injunction on DADT. Going to apologize for slandering a person who put his life on the line for his country and his career on the line for the LGBT community? I thought not.

      And wtf are you talking about, “incarceration”?

      • So you assert that the media whore has already reenlisted? News to me. I’ll have to see it to believe it though that he’ll cast aside his new-found fame and fortune to return to the trenches.

        Incarceration – dictionary defines as being imprisoned, which, unless I erred again, could happen to Big Dan if he’s found guilty at his current but belayed trial.

    • I am a soldier in the Army, right now over in Iraq fighting for everyones rights. Guess what?!?! I’m gay!! I’ve been openly gay since i joined in April 1 2011. I didnt care, I hoped to get treated harder on to show that yeah im gay n i can do what a straight man can do. Which i did, but i also did better then most of the straight guys in basic that were on my ass most of the time. I can honestly say, if i got a dishonorable for being gay i would not re-enlist.

  • Laurelboy2: There are actually hundreds of former servicemen and servicewomen seeking to re-enlist.
    They’re not as fickle as you seem to be believe.

    Read: “Discharged for Being Gay, Veterans Seek to Re-enlist” — Sept 4, 2011 (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/05/us/05reenlist.html)
    And “Troops Discharged for Being Homosexual Try to Re-enlist” — Oct 20, 2010 (http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/troops-discharged-being-homosexual-try-re-enlist)
    And testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee — March 3, 2010 (http://armed-services.senate.gov/statemnt/2010/03%20March/Almy%2003-18-10.pdf)

    But whether or not these 13,000 people choose to resume their former work, assuming they are still alive and haven’t retrained in a civilian role, is their call. They’ve already done more than their share of defense for your liberties, others are still doing it, and the least you could do is respect that.

  • For someone kicked to the curb by that military and a plaintiff in the LCR case that this administration, DOJ, and DOD are STILL fighting, Mr. Nicholson’s attitude is surprisingly Pollyannish. It’s going to take a LOT more than an hour of PowerPoint slides focusing entirely on “process” a la “No, it’s not okay to punch out two men holding hands” while in no way addressing the irrationality of prejudice behind such feelings to reverse over 250 years of institutionalized military homohatred—bigotry REINFORCED by those parts of the “training” that translated, despite disingenuous denials to the contrary, “No, gay service members are NOT as good as you because they won’t get the same protections against harassment and discrimination you do.” Yes, one era of military homophobia ends Tuesday, but another begins—and just like with discharges, we will only learn the names of a few of its victims when they go public. In fact, it will be worse, because unlike they’re admittedly incomplete counting of discharges, repeal implementation policy BANS tracking of gay-related events. Incomprehensibly, a black Commander-in-Chief and the black head of repeal implementation are repeating the same mistakes the military made regarding race after they FINALLY fully integrated. It took them over 20 years to finally begin enforcing the full intent of Truman’s 1948 Executive Order which was all about “equal opportunity.” In fact, it didn’t actually mention integration at all.

    Finally, with respect Chris, San Diego’s June event was NOT “the first time a military contingent participated in a Pride celebration in the United States”—or even San Diego. For documentation—including a photo of a gay military contingent in DC’s 1991 Pride parade, please see: [link removed]

    • Hmmm, I don’t know why the link was “removed,” but those interested in the facts about the many Pride events over decades that military gays have partcipated in vs. the nonsense about San Diego’s June event, just go to Karen Ocamb’s lgbtpov.com site and search for the article. Thank you.

    • “No, it’s not okay to punch out two men holding hands”…Why do you assume that gay men can’t fight back, and punch out the person(s) who initiate the violence? Maybe you’ve never been in the military and don’t know that gay men can be as tough, and tougher, than straight guys. My many years in the Marine Corps taught me one thing, you judge a Marine by his fighting ability, not by the partner he chooses. This will be a fight, no pun intended, until people stop assuming gay and lesbian service members are weaker because of sexual orientation.

  • While I agree that DADT repeal could be the first healthy step towards eventual DOMA repeal, I disagree with Alex Nicholson’s comments regarding the tone of the training. The training for my command was neutral at best (addressing the policy issues and NOTHING more). Additionally, I talked to many servicemembers and read numerous anecdotal reports that said the same thing- the training had nothing to do with educating servicemembers about “gays and lesbians, on gay families, on gay partners.” While there were some vignettes in the training material that alluded to those issues, most of the briefings to which I was exposed, including the Tier II training, dealt with explaining the change in policy and had nothing to do with normalizing or educating the collective camouflaged masses about gays and lesbians, our lifestyle, challenges or social issues. Explaining that gay partners, including legally married same-sex couples, won’t get traditional military benefits given to hetero couples is not educating the force about gays and lesbians.

© Copyright Brown, Naff, Pitts Omnimedia, Inc. 2014. All rights reserved.
Directory powered by Business Directory Plugin