Connect with us

National

Same-sex marriage supporters, opponents gather outside Supreme Court

Advocates on both sides of the issue held rallies in D.C.

Published

on

Supreme Court, gay marriage, same sex marriage, marriage equality, Proposition 8, Hollingsworth vs. Perry, gay news, Washington Blade
Supreme Court, gay marriage, same sex marriage, marriage equality, Proposition 8, Hollingsworth vs. Perry, gay news, Washington Blade

(Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Supporters and opponents of marriage rights for same-sex couples gathered outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday as the justices heard oral arguments in a case that challenges Californiaā€™s Proposition 8.

Baltimore Ravens linebacker Brendon Ayanbadejo, OutServe-SLDN Executive Director Allyson Robinson, National Organization for Women President Terry Oā€™Neill and gay retired New Hampshire Bishop V. Gene Robinson and his daughter Ella are among those who spoke at a rally in support of nuptials for gays and lesbians that drew a few thousand people.

Robinson also joined Rev. Dennis Wiley of Covenant Baptist Church of Christ in Southwest Washington, Rev. Abena McCray of Unity Fellowship Church in D.C., Sister Jeannine Gramick of New Ways Ministry in Mount Rainier, Md., Washington National Cathedral Dean Gary Hall and others at an interfaith service at the Lutheran Church of the Reformation near the Supreme Court earlier in the day.

Supreme Court, gay marriage, same sex marriage, marriage equality, Proposition 8, Hollingsworth vs. Perry, gay news, Washington Blade, Margaret Hoover

Margaret Hoover (Washington Blade photo by Blake Bergen)

ā€œWe all know that something special is happening here today,ā€ Republican strategist Margaret Hoover said. ā€œThatā€™s why we are here in love to demonstrate that all Americans have the constitutional right and the freedom to marry the person they love.ā€

D.C. Congressional Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton pointed out nine states and the nationā€™s capital allow same-sex couples to marry.

ā€œThere are no second class citizens in America,ā€ Norton said. ā€œThere are no second class marriages in America.

Jo-Ann Shain and Mary Jo Kennedy of Brooklyn, N.Y., and their daughter Aliya Shain held a poster with a picture of Edie Windsor outside the Supreme Court, Windsor is the New York City widow who challenged the Defense of Marriage Act after she paid $363,000 in estate taxes in 2009 when her partner of more than 40 years passed away. The couple, who has been together for 31 years, in 2004 challenged the Empire State’s same-sex marriage ban.

New York State Supreme Court Justice Doris Ling-Cohan in 2005 ruled the law was unconstitutional.

ā€œThis is a watershed moment for our community,ā€ Jo-Ann Shain told the Washington Blade before she, her wife whom she married in New York in 2011 after the stateā€™s same-sex marriage law took effect and their daughter held up their signs to shield members of the Westboro Baptist Church who had gathered on the sidewalk. ā€œThis is history in the making and we wouldnā€™t miss it.ā€

Baltimore resident Lucas McCahill, who is an organizer with the American Humanist Association, said the claim the United States is ā€œa free countryā€ is ā€œactually a blatant lie.ā€ She told the Blade outside the Supreme Court the justices ruling in favor of marriage rights for same-sex couples would change that reality.

ā€œItā€™s just a part of my basic values to uphold equality for everybody, no matter who you are, what you look like,ā€ McCahill said.

David PĆ©rez, president of the Latino GLBT History Project Board of Directors, agreed.

ā€œWeā€™re really excited to be out here to support marriage equality,ā€ he said, noting his organization is among those that supported last yearā€™s campaign in support of referenda on Marylandā€™s same-sex marriage law and DREAM Act that both passed. ā€œWe definitely want the justices to know the American people support marriage equality.ā€

Same-sex marriage opponents march to Supreme Court

As same-sex marriage supporters spoke outside the Supreme Court, an estimated 2,000 opponents of nuptials for gays and lesbians marched onto First Street, N.E. Some held a large banner that read ā€œLet the people decide,ā€ while others waved signs that said ā€œVote for holy matrimonyā€ and ā€œChildren do better with a mom and a dad!ā€ in Spanish.

Backers of nuptials for gays and lesbians gathered adjacent to the marchers and shouted slogans in support of the issue. Several of them held American, gay Pride and Human Rights Campaign flags as they squared off against the protesters.

ā€œWeā€™re here in order to defend civil society from one of the greatest assaults that itā€™s experienced in its history,ā€ Father Johannes Smith of New York told the Blade outside the Supreme Court. ā€œThe whole idea of homosexual marriage is an assault on the foundations of a sound society.ā€

Christina Hughes, who traveled to D.C. from Miami to march against nuptials for gays and lesbians, said she feels marriage is ā€œdefined by God between a man and a woman.ā€

ā€œWho are we to try and change that,ā€ she said. ā€œGod is our creator and we should go by Godā€™s laws.ā€

Roughly 1,000 same-sex marriage opponents attended a rally on the National Mall after they marched to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Supreme Court, gay marriage, same sex marriage, marriage equality, Proposition 8, Hollingsworth vs. Perry, gay news, Washington Blade, NOM, National Organization for Marriage

(Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

National Organization for Marriage President Brian Brown; Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops; Concerned Women for America President Penny Nance; Ruth Institute President Jennifer Roback Morse; American Values President Gary Bauer; New York State Sen. Ruben Diaz, Sr.; and Tami Fitzgerald, executive director of the North Carolina Values Coalition, are among those who spoke.

The Family Leader CEO Bob Vander Plaats noted Rev. Billy Graham and newly elected Pope Francisā€™ opposition to same-sex marriage. He also spoke about the 2010 recall of the three Iowa Supreme Court justices who ruled a year earlier the Hawkeye Stateā€™s ban on nuptials for gays and lesbians was unconstitutional.

ā€œWe saw what happened when a court usurps the obvious will of the people,ā€ Vander Plaats said. ā€œWhat happened there is the people of Iowa listened and they responded and they responded with the historic ouster of all the judges in the 2010 election.ā€

Supreme Court, gay marriage, same sex marriage, marriage equality, Proposition 8, Hollingsworth vs. Perry, gay news, Washington Blade, NOM, National Organization for Marriage

NOM President Brian Brown (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Bishop Harry Jackson of Hope Christian Church of Beltsville, Md., claimed marriage between a man and woman reduces poverty and rates of youth incarceration, domestic violence and sexual abuse.

ā€œWhen a man and a woman are in the house, there is health, there is healing, there is peace, there is joy, thereā€™s security,ā€ he said. ā€œThere is the rule and reign of God in the house. One man, one woman is Godā€™s architectural plan so the desert places of urban America will bloom and blossom like a rose.ā€

An ABC News/Washington Post poll released last week shows 58 percent of Americans support marriage rights for same-sex couples. The survey further indicates 52 percent of Republican and GOP-leaning independents between 18-49 back nuptials for gays and lesbians.

Brown and other same-sex marriage opponents sought to discredit polls that continue to show a majority of Americans now support the issue.

Supreme Court, gay marriage, same sex marriage, marriage equality, Proposition 8, Hollingsworth vs. Perry, gay news, Washington Blade, NOM, National Organization for Marriage

(Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

NOM Cultural Director Thomas Peters highlighted to the Blade a recent poll he did not identify that he said showed 60 percent of Americans ā€œbelieve in the proposition thatā€ marriage is between one man and one woman.

ā€œIn free and fair votes of the people in 31 states, weā€™ve won by over 60 percent,ā€ he said. ā€œEven in states like Rhode Island we are arguing for a public vote. Proponents of gay marriage donā€™t want the people to vote on it. I donā€™t think that gay marriage advocates even believe their own polls because even in deep blue states they donā€™t want to take the issue to the people.ā€

Jo-Ann Shain said she feels public opinion is one of the factors the justices should consider as they weigh the issue.

ā€œAlthough weā€™re married in our state, weā€™re not whole unless the feds recognize our marriages,ā€ she said.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

National

Anti-LGBTQ Franklin Graham to give invocation at Trumpā€™s inauguration

Evangelical leader also delivered address in 2017

Published

on

Franklin Graham speaks at the 2024 Republican National Convention. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Anti-LGBTQ evangelist Franklin Graham will deliver the invocation for President-elect Donald Trumpā€™s inauguration on Monday, Jan. 20, according to a copy of the program that was circulated on X.

Graham, who serves as president and CEO of Samaritanā€™s Purse, the evangelical Christian humanitarian aid organization, and of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, which was named for his late father, offered the opening prayer for Trumpā€™s first inauguration in 2017.

As documented by GLAAD, the Asheville, N.C.,-based evangelist has attacked the LGBTQ community throughout his life and career.

He supported the draconian laws in Russia targeting ā€œpropaganda of nontraditional sexual relationsā€ that have been used to suppress media that presents ā€œLGBTQ identities and relationships in a positive or normalizing light.ā€

Praising Russian President Vladimir Putin for taking ā€œa stand to protect his nationā€™s children from the damaging effects of the gay and lesbian agenda,ā€ Graham also bemoaned that ā€œAmericaā€™s own morality has fallen so far that on this issue.ā€

Grahamā€™s anti-LGBTQ advocacy on matters of domestic policy in the U.S. has included opposing Pride events, which he compared to celebrations of ā€œlying, adultery, or murder,ā€ and curricula on LGBTQ history in public schools, telling a radio host in 2019 that educators have no right to ā€œteach our children something that is an affront to God.ā€

When his home state rolled back rules prohibiting gender diverse people from using public restrooms consistent with their identities, he tweeted that ā€œpeople of NC will be exposed to pedophiles and sexually perverted men in womenā€™s public restrooms.ā€

Graham has repeatedly smeared LGBTQ people as predatory and said the community seeks to ā€œrecruitā€ children into being gay, lesbian, or transgender.

He has also consistently opposed same-sex marriage, claiming that former President Barack Obama, by embracing marriage equality, had ā€œshaken his fist at the same God who created and defined marriage,ā€ adding, ā€œit grieves me that our president would now affirm same-sex marriage, though I believe it grieves God even more.ā€

Graham also supports the harmful and discredited practice of conversion therapy, which he likened to ā€œconversion to Christianity.ā€

When Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg announced his bid for the Democratic nomination for president in 2020, Graham tweeted that ā€œMayor Buttigieg says he’s a gay Christian. As a Christian I believe the Bible which defines homosexuality as sin, something to be repentant of, not something to be flaunted, praised or politicized. The Bible says marriage is between a man and a woman ā€” not two men, not two women.”Ā 

Graham embraced Trump well before he was taken seriously in Republican politics, telling ABC in 2011 that the New York real estate tycoon was his preferred candidate.

Particularly during the incoming presidentā€™s first campaign as the GOP nominee and during his first term, the evangelical leaderā€™s support was seen as strategically important to bringing conservative Christians into the fold despite their misgivings about Trump, who was better known as a philandering womanizer than a devout religious leader. 

Continue Reading

National

Homophobe Anita Bryant dies at 84

Published

on

Anita Bryant (Screen capture via SuchIsLifeVideos/YouTube)

Anita Bryant, the singer and orange juice pitch woman who gained notoriety for a homophobic campaign against gay rights in the 1970s, died on Dec. 16 after a battle with cancer, according to a statement released by her family. She was 84.

Bryant was a former Miss Oklahoma, a Grammy-nominated singer, author, and recipient of the USO Silver Medallion for Service, according to her familyā€™s statement. Bryant, a fundamentalist Christian, performed at the White House and the Super Bowl, among other highlights of her singing career.

Bryant incurred the ire of the LGBTQ community after she fought successfully to overturn a Dade County, Fla., ordinance that would have protected gay people from discrimination. Her ā€œSave Our Childrenā€ campaign led gay bars to boycott Florida orange juice. In 1977, while promoting her campaign in Iowa, Tom Higgins, a gay rights activist, threw a pie in her face, an iconic moment caught by photographers.Ā 

Bryantā€™s homophobic legacy lives on with Florida politicians like Gov. Ron DeSantis rolling back LGBTQ protections and enshrining discrimination in state law. 

Continue Reading

National

New Meta guidelines include carveout to allow anti-LGBTQ speech on Facebook, Instagram

Zuckerberg cozying up to Trump ahead of second term

Published

on

Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder, chairman, and CEO of Meta (Screen capture via Bloomberg Television/YouTube)

New content moderation policies governing hate speech on Facebook, Instagram, and Threads that were enacted by parent company Meta on Wednesday contain a carveout that allows users to call LGBTQ people mentally ill.

According to the guidelines, which otherwise prohibit use of such insults on the online platforms, “We do allow allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation, given political and religious discourse about transgenderism and homosexuality and common non-serious usage of words like ā€˜weird.ā€™ā€

Meta also removed rules that forbid insults about a personā€™s appearance based on race, ethnicity, national origin, disability, religious affiliation, caste, sexual orientation, sex, gender identity, and serious disease while withdrawing policies that prohibited expressions of hate against a person or a group on the basis of their protected class and references to transgender or nonbinary people as ā€œit.ā€

In a video on Tuesday, Mark Zuckerberg, the company’s co-founder, chairman, and CEO, said the platforms’ “restrictions on topics like immigration and gender” were now “out of touch with mainstream discourse.ā€ 

ā€œWhat started as a movement to be more inclusive has increasingly been used to shut down opinions and shut out people with different ideas, and itā€™s gone too far,ā€ he added.

In a statement to the Washington Blade, Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson said “Everyone should be able to engage and learn online without fear of being targeted or harassed. While we understand the difficulties in enforcing content moderation, we have grave concerns that the changes announced by Meta will put the LGBTQ+ community in danger both online and off.”

“What’s left of Meta’s hateful conduct policy expressly allows users to bully LGBTQ+ people based on their gender identity or sexual orientation and even permits calls for the exclusion of LGBTQ+ people from public spaces,” she said. “We can expect increased anti-LGBTQ+ harassment, further suppression of LGBTQ+ content, and drastic chilling effects on LGBTQ+ users’ expression.”

Robinson added, “While we recognize the immense harms and dangers of these new policies, we ALL have a role to play in lifting up our stories, pushing back on misinformation and hate, and supporting each other in online spaces. We need everyone engaged now more than ever. HRC isn’t going anywhere, and we will always be here for you.”

As attacks against LGBTQ and especially transgender Americans have ramped up over the past few years in legislative chambers and courtrooms throughout the country, bias-motivated crimes including acts of violence are also on the rise along with homophobic and transphobic hate speech, misinformation, and conspiracy theories that are spread farther and faster thanks to the massive reach of social media platforms and the policies and practices by which the companies moderate user content and design their algorithms.

However ascendant certain homophobic and transphobic ideas might be on social media and in the broader realm of “political and religious discourse,” homosexuality and gender variance are not considered mental illnesses in the mainstream study or clinical practice of psychiatry.

The American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from its internationally recognized Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders more than 50 years ago and more than 30 years ago erased “transsexualism” to use “gender identity disorder” instead before switching to “gender dysphoria” in 2013. These changes were meant to clarify the distinction between the patient’s identity as trans and the ego-dystonic distress experienced in many cases when one’s birth sex differs from one’s gender identity.

Research has consistently shown the efficacy of treating gender dysphoria with gender-affirming health interventions ā€” the psychiatric, medical, and surgical care that can bring patients’ brains and bodies into closer alignment with their self-concept while reducing the incidence of severe depression, anxiety, self-harm behavior, and suicide.

Just like slandering LGBTQ people as sick or sexually deviant, the pathologization of homosexuality and gender variance as disordered (or linked to different mental illnesses that are actually listed in the DSM) is not new, but rather a revival of a coarser homophobia and transphobia that until the recent past was largely relegated to a time well before queer people had secured any meaningful progress toward legal, social, and political equality.

Wednesday’s announcement by Meta marked just the latest move that seems meant to ingratiate the tech giant with President-elect Donald Trump and curry favor with his incoming administration, which in turn could smooth tensions with conservative lawmakers who have often been at odds with either Facebook, Instagram, and Zuckerberg ā€” who had enjoyed a close relationship with the Obama White House and over the years has occasionally championed progressive policies like opposing mass deportations.

Public signs of reconciliation with Trump began this summer, when Meta removed restrictions on his Facebook and Instagram accounts that were enacted following the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

In the months since, the company has continued cozying up to Trump and Republican leaders in Washington, including with Tuesday’s announcement that Meta platforms will no longer use professional fact checking, among other policy changes that mirror those enacted by Elon Musk after he took over Twitter in 2022, changed its name to X, and created conditions that have allowed hate and misinformation to proliferate far more than ever before.

In recent months, Musk, the world’s richest man, has emerged as one of the president-elect’s fiercest allies, spending a reported $277 million to support his presidential campaign and using his platform and influence to champion many of the incoming administration’s policy priorities, including efforts to target the trans community.

Last month, Zuckerberg and Apple CEO Tim Cook each donated $1 million to Trump’s inaugural committee, with Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and OpenAI’s Sam Altman each reportedly pledging matching contributions.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular