The D.C. Office of Human Rights has found probable cause that the Willard InterContinental Hotel allegedly forced a gay assistant chef out of his job after he complained that he was repeatedly subjected to anti-gay harassment and taunts by co-workers and supervisors.
A 15-page Letter of Determination of Probable Cause issued by the OHR on Dec. 17 says D.C. resident Alberto Vega, 43, establishes a “prima facie case” that he was subjected to a hostile work environment because of his sexual orientation and was “constructively discharged” from his job in August 2013.
The OHR finding says the hotel’s alleged actions against Vega violated the D.C. Human Rights Act, which, among other things, bans employment discrimination based on sexual orientation.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission defines a constructive discharge as an illegal form of forced resignation brought about by “making the work environment so intolerable a reasonable person would not be able to stay.”
OHR’s probable cause letter says its investigation into Vega’s complaint found that he was “harassed on a frequent, nearly daily basis by multiple members of the kitchen staff. The jokes were offensive, and supervising chefs laughed about them, compounding the impact of the ridicule.”
The probable cause letter notes that the discrimination complaint that Vega filed with the OHR alleges that the harassment began around September 2012, about six months after he began his job at the Willard in March of 2012. It says fellow kitchen workers made the anti-gay comments in both English and Spanish. Vega is a native of Puerto Rico and speaks fluent Spanish and English.
“Some of the Spanish speaking staff constantly called the complainant a ‘culero,’ meaning ‘fag’ and ‘burro’ which means donkey indicating that homosexuals are sub-humans,” the probable cause document quotes Vega’s complaint as saying.
Other alleged comments made by Vega’s co-workers and quoted in the probable cause document include, “God punches faggots;” “If Obama wins we would have to tolerate seeing faggots getting married;” and “Real men have children; why don’t you have any?”
The probable cause letter says that since the entire kitchen staff worked together closely in a small space in the kitchen, “complainant could not escape the harassment. Complainant credibly asserts that the comments caused him significant stress and affected him personally in such that he sometimes had to leave work early or was out of work sick.”
The letter says personnel officials at the hotel, to whom Vega repeatedly reported the alleged harassment, told him they investigated his allegations and could not substantiate them.
The probable cause letter was signed by Monica Palacio, the OHR director who was appointed by former Mayor Vincent Gray and asked to stay on as director by Mayor Muriel Bowser.
Eric Janson, an attorney representing the hotel, told the Blade on Tuesday that he would have no comment on a pending case except to say that on behalf of the Willard his law firm of Seyfarth Shaw filed a motion for reconsideration of the probable cause finding.
Under procedures established by the OHR, parties charged with discrimination have the option to request a reconsideration of a finding of probable cause. If the OHR reverses its finding the case is dismissed.
If it upholds the finding after reviewing its initial decision it then certifies the case to be sent to the D.C. Commission on Human Rights, which conducts a trial-like evidentiary hearing open to the public that includes testimony by witnesses.
Under the D.C. Human Rights Act, the Commission is authorized to make a final decision over whether discrimination occurred and what, if any, penalty should be handed down to the accused party.
Also prior to certifying a case to be sent to the Commission, the OHR says it makes a final effort to persuade the complainant and accused party, referred to as the respondent, to negotiate a reconciliation agreement in which the case could be settled without the need for a hearing.
OHR spokesperson Elliot Imse said the office never acknowledges whether it is considering a case until it certifies the case for consideration by the Commission on Human Rights, regardless of whether a finding of probable cause has been made. He said no case involving the Willard Hotel had been certified as of this week so his office would have no comment.
Officials at the Willard Hotel did not respond to a request by the Washington Blade for a comment on the allegations made by Vega. But in a statement released to the Blade, a Willard spokesperson discussed the hotel’s policy on discrimination.
“The Willard InterContinental hotel holds the safety, comfort and well-being of our guests and employees as our top priority and concern, and condemns unlawful discrimination in all of its forms,” said Barbara Bahny, the hotel’s director of public relations. “At this time, the hotel is unable to comment further since the litigation is ongoing.”
The Willard is considered one of the most prestigious hotels in the nation’s capital and has a history that dates back to when Abraham Lincoln stayed there prior to being inaugurated as president in 1861.
The InterContinental Hotels Group, which owns the Willard and dozens of other hotels in the U.S. and abroad, received a perfect score of 100 in the Human Rights Campaign Foundation’s Corporate Equality Index, which rates Fortune 500 companies on their personnel policies affecting LGBT employees.
“We are monitoring this case,” said Deena Fidas, director of the HRC Foundation’s Workplace Equality Program and co-author of the Corporate Equality Index after the Blade informed HRC about the case. “Whenever allegations of harassment or discrimination surface, it is distressing, and we take them very seriously.”
Fidas said HRC Foundation would continue to monitor this and other cases and “make determinations when appropriate.”
The OHR letter finding probable cause says Vega applied for at least two other food service jobs at the Willard and for a third job at a hotel in Alexandria, Va., owned by the Willard’s parent company, InterContinental Hotels Group, in an effort to leave what he believed to be the hostile work environment he faced in the job he had.
Officials told him he was deemed unqualified for one of the jobs, another reportedly had already been filled and the third was incorrectly posted as being open when it was not, according to the Willard’s version of what happened, as reported in the OHR’s probable cause letter.
Vega charges in his complaint that he was qualified for all three positions and all were open at the time he applied. He charges in his complaint that hotel officials used excuses to claim two of the jobs were no longer available.
“Respondent did not facilitate his transfer or hire into another department or location and thus there is probable cause that respondent retaliated against him for bringing internal complaints,” the OHR letter says.
The probable cause letter reports that officials at the Willard deny they fired Vega and insist he voluntarily resigned after refusing to return to work in August 2013.
“Complainant did not ‘voluntarily resign,’ the letter attributes Vega’s attorney as saying in a rebuttal to the hotel’s version of what happened.
“[H]e was terminated as he could not remain in a hostile environment,” the letter attributes Vega’s complaint as saying. “Complainant did not refuse to work; he refused to go back into the kitchen into a hostile work environment,” the probable cause letter reports the complaint as saying.
“He was then told by the HR Director that he was to turn in his key and badge and was no longer an employee of the company since he would not go back into the hostile work environment,” the letter describes the complaint as alleging.
Brian Markovitz, Vega’s attorney, told the Washington Blade in a statement that the hotel management failed to properly investigate Vega’s reports of harassment on the job that investigators at the Office of Human Rights quickly substantiated through interviewing multiple witnesses.
“Possibly the worst thing for Mr. Vega wasn’t the terrible treatment he received from the lower-level workers,” Markovitz said. “It was the Willard’s response. Management was supposed to protect Mr. Vega for bravely coming forward,” he said.
“But some managers he directly worked with laughed at and participated in the anti-gay jokes and comments,” he said. “Despite Mr. Vega’s constant pleas for help, hotel management told him again and again that what he was saying wasn’t true even though there were impartial witnesses available who could confirm the harassment.”
Added Markovitz, “For this to happen in the nation’s capital, it’s just outrageous and despicable.”
Markovitz said he was troubled that the hotel incorrectly listed Vega’s job title in its response to the complaint as a “prep cook,” which is an entry-level kitchen job. He said Vega, who has had culinary training and significant experience in the culinary field, had the title of Commis Chef, which is considered the equivalent of an assistant chef.
Since leaving his job at the Willard, Vega has been working as a culinary instructor at the city’s Carlos Rosario International Public Charter School, Markovitz said.
The OHR probable cause letter says OHR investigators obtained statements from 10 Willard employees, including workers and managers, in addition to a statement from Vega, as part of its investigation. The letter says investigators also obtained at least eight internal email messages between Vega and hotel officials and between hotel managers and other employees – all pertaining to matters related to Vega’s discrimination complaint.
Top 10 Blade news stories by web traffic
COVID breakthroughs, Equality Act, and anti-trans attacks
Each year our staff gathers in late December to review the highest trafficked stories of the year and there’s more than a little bit of competitive spirit as we review the results. Here are the top 10 stories by web traffic at HYPERLINK “http://washingtonblade.com”washingtonblade.com for 2021.
#10: Mark Glaze, gun reform advocate, dies at 51
The sad, tragic story of Glaze’s death captivated readers in November.
#9: COVID breakthrough infections strike summer tourists visiting Provincetown
This one went viral in July after a COVID outbreak was blamed on gay tourists.
#8: Thank you, Kordell Stewart, for thoughtful response to ‘the rumor’
This opinion piece thanked the former NFL quarterback for writing a personal essay addressing gay rumors.
#7: Elliot Page tweets; trans bb’s first swim trunks #transjoy #transisbeautiful
The actor created excitement by posting his first photo in swim trunks back in May.
#6: Romney declares opposition to LGBTQ Equality Act
Mitt Romney disappointed activists with his announcement; the Equality Act passed the House but never saw a vote in the Senate.
#5: White House warns state legislatures that passing anti-trans bills is illegal
The year 2021 saw a disturbing trend of GOP-led legislatures attacking trans people.
#4: Lincoln Project’s avowed ignorance of Weaver texts undercut by leaked communications
The Lincoln Project’s leaders, amid a scandal of co-founder John Weaver soliciting sexual favors from young men, have asserted they were unaware of his indiscretions until the Blade obtained electronic communications that called that claim into question.
#3: FOX 5’s McCoy suspended over offensive Tweet
Blake McCoy tweeted that obese people shouldn’t get priority for the COVID vaccine.
#2: Transgender USAF veteran trapped in Taliban takeover of Kabul
Among the Americans trapped in the suburban areas of Kabul under Taliban control was a transgender government contractor for the U.S. State Department and former U.S. Air Force Sergeant. She was later safely evacuated.
#1: Amid coup chaos, Trump quietly erases LGBTQ protections in adoption, health services
And our most popular story of 2021 was about the Trump administration nixing regulations barring federal grantees in the Department of Health & Human Services from discriminating against LGBTQ people, including in adoption services.
CDC still falling short on LGBTQ data collection for COVID patients: expert
Despite requests since the start of the COVID pandemic for the U.S. government to enhance data collection for patients who are LGBTQ, the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention is still falling short on issuing nationwide guidance to states on the issue, a leading expert health on the issue told the Blade.
With a renewed focus on COVID infections reaching new heights just before the start of the holidays amid the emergence of Omicron, the absence of any LGBTQ data collection — now across both the Trump and Biden administrations — remains a sore point for health experts who say that information could be used for public outreach.
Sean Cahill, director of Health Policy Research at the Boston-based Fenway Institute, said Wednesday major federal entities and hospitals have been collecting data on whether patients identify as LGBTQ for years — such as the National Health & Nutrition Examination Survey, which has been collecting sexual orientation data since the 1990s — but the CDC hasn’t duplicated that effort for COVID even though the pandemic has been underway for two years.
“It’s not like this is a new idea,” Cahill said. “But for some reason, the pandemic hit, and all of a sudden, we realize how little systematic data we were collecting in our health system. And it’s a real problem because we’re two years into the pandemic almost, and we still don’t know how it’s affecting this vulnerable population that experiences health disparities in other areas.”
The Blade was among the first outlets to report on the lack of efforts by the states to collect data on whether a COVID patient identifies as LGBTQ, reporting in April 2020 on the absence of data even in places with influential LGBTQ communities. The CDC hasn’t responded to the Blade’s requests for nearly two years on why it doesn’t instruct states to collect this data, nor did it respond this week to a request for comment on this article.
Cahill, who has published articles in the American Journal of Public Health on the importance of LGBTQ data collection and reporting in COVID-19 testing, care, and vaccination — said he’s been making the case to the CDC to issue guidance to states on whether COVID patients identify as LGBTQ since June 2020.
Among those efforts, he said, were to include two comments he delivered to the Biden COVID-19 Health Equity Task Force in spring 2021, a letter a coalition of groups sent to the Association of State & Territorial Health Officers asking for states to collect and report SOGI in COVID in December 2020 as well as letters to HHS leadership and congressional leadership in spring and summer 2020 asking for them to take steps to encourage or require SOGI data collection in COVID.
Asked what CDC officials had to say in response when he brought this issue to their attention, Cahill said, “They listen, but they don’t really tell me anything.”
“We’ve been making that case, and to date, as of December 22, 2021, they have not issued guidance, they have not changed the case report form. I hope that they’re in the process of doing that, and maybe we’ll be pleasantly surprised in January, and they’ll come up with something…I really hope that’s true, but right now they’re not doing anything to promote SOGI data collection and reporting in surveillance data.”
Cahill, in an email to the Blade after the initial publication of this article, clarified CDC has indicated guidance on LGBTQ data collection for COVID patients may come in the near future.
“HHS leaders told us this fall that CDC is working on an initiative to expand SOGI data collection,” Cahill said. “We are hopeful that we will see guidance early in 2022. Key people at CDC, including Director Walensky, understand the importance of SOGI data collection given their long history of working on HIV prevention.”
In other issues related to LGBTQ data collection, there has been a history of states resisting federal mandates. The Trump administration, for example, rescinded guidance calling on states to collect information on whether foster youth identified as LGBTQ after complaints from states on the Obama-era process, much to the consternation of LGBTQ advocates who said the data was helpful.
The White House COVID-19 Health Equity Task Force has at least recognized the potential for enhancing LGBTQ data collection efforts. Last month, it published an implementation plan, calling for “an equity-centered approach to data collection, including sufficient funding to collect data for groups that are often left out of data collection (e.g….LGBTQIA+ people).”
The plan also calls for “fund[ing] activities to improve data collection…including tracking COVID-19 related outcomes for people of color and other underserved populations,” and specifically calls for the collection of LGBTQ data.
The importance of collecting LGBTQ data, Cahill said, is based on its potential use in public outreach, including efforts to recognize disparities in health population and to create messaging for outreach, including for populations that may be reluctant to take the vaccine.
“If we see a disparity, we can say: Why is that?” Cahill said. “We could do focus groups of the population — try to understand and then what kind of messages would reassure you and make you feel comfortable getting a vaccine, and we could push those messages out through public education campaigns led by state local health departments led by the federal government.”
The LGBTQ data, Cahill said, could be broken down further to determine if racial and ethnic disparities exist within the LGBTQ population, or whether LGBTQ people are likely to suffer from the disease in certain regions, such as the South.
“We have data showing that lesbian or bisexual women, and transgender people are less likely to be in preventive regular routine care for their health,” Cahill said. “And so if that’s true, there’s a good chance that they’re less likely to know where to get a vaccine, to have a medical professional they trust to talk to about it today.”
Among the leaders who are supportive, Cahill said, is Rachel Levine, assistant secretary for health and the first openly transgender person confirmed by the U.S. Senate for a presidential appointment. Cahill said he raised the issue with her along with other officials at the Department of Health & Human Services three times in the last year.
In her previous role as Pennsylvania secretary of health, Levine led the way and made her state the first in the nation to set up an LGBTQ data collection system for COVID patients.
“So she definitely gets it, and I know she’s supportive of it, but we really need the CDC to act,” Cahill said.
Although the federal government has remained intransigent in taking action, Cahill said the situation has improved among states and counted five states — California, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Nevada and Oregon — in addition to D.C. as among those that have elected to collect data on sexual orientation and gender identity of COVID patients.
However, Cahill said even those data collection efforts are falling short because those jurisdictions have merely been public about collecting the data, but haven’t reported back anything yet.
“Only California has reported data publicly, and the data that they’re reporting is really just the completeness of the data,” Cahill said. “They’re not reporting the data itself…And they’re also just asking people who tests positive. So, if somebody says positive COVID in California, a contact tracer follows up with that individual and asks them a battery of questions, and among the questions that are asked are SOGI questions.”
As a result of these efforts, Cahill said, California has data on the LGBTQ status of COVID patients, but the data is overwhelmingly more complete for the gender identity of these patients rather than their sexual orientation. As of May 2021, California reported that they had sexual orientation data for 9.5 percent of individuals who had died from COVID and 16 percent of people who tested positive, but for gender identity, the data were 99.5 percent.
Equality Act, contorted as a danger by anti-LGBTQ forces, is all but dead
No political willpower to force vote or reach a compromise
Despite having President Biden in the White House and Democratic majorities in both chambers of Congress, efforts to update federal civil rights laws to strengthen the prohibition on discrimination against LGBTQ people by passing the Equality Act are all but dead as opponents of the measure have contorted it beyond recognition.
Political willpower is lacking to find a compromise that would be acceptable to enough Republican senators to end a filibuster on the bill — a tall order in any event — nor is there the willpower to force a vote on the Equality Act as opponents stoke fears about transgender kids in sports and not even unanimity in the Democratic caucus in favor of the bill is present, stakeholders who spoke to the Blade on condition of anonymity said.
In fact, there are no imminent plans to hold a vote on the legislation even though Pride month is days away, which would be an opportune time for Congress to demonstrate solidarity with the LGBTQ community by holding a vote on the legislation.
If the Equality Act were to come up for a Senate vote in the next month, it would not have the support to pass. Continued assurances that bipartisan talks are continuing on the legislation have yielded no evidence of additional support, let alone the 10 Republicans needed to end a filibuster.
“I haven’t really heard an update either way, which is usually not good,” one Democratic insider said. “My understanding is that our side was entrenched in a no-compromise mindset and with [Sen. Joe] Manchin saying he didn’t like the bill, it doomed it this Congress. And the bullying of hundreds of trans athletes derailed our message and our arguments of why it was broadly needed.”
The only thing keeping the final nail from being hammered into the Equality Act’s coffin is the unwillingness of its supporters to admit defeat. Other stakeholders who spoke to the Blade continued to assert bipartisan talks are ongoing, strongly pushing back on any conclusion the legislation is dead.
Alphonso David, president of the Human Rights Campaign, said the Equality Act is “alive and well,” citing widespread public support he said includes “the majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents and a growing number of communities across the country engaging and mobilizing every day in support of the legislation.”
“They understand the urgent need to pass this bill and stand up for LGBTQ people across our country,” David added. “As we engage with elected officials, we have confidence that Congress will listen to the voices of their constituents and continue fighting for the Equality Act through the lengthy legislative process. We will also continue our unprecedented campaign to grow the already-high public support for a popular bill that will save lives and make our country fairer and more equal for all. We will not stop until the Equality Act is passed.”
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), chief sponsor of the Equality Act in the Senate, also signaled through a spokesperson work continues on the legislation, refusing to give up on expectations the legislation would soon become law.
“Sen. Merkley and his staff are in active discussions with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to try to get this done,” McLennan said. “We definitely see it as a key priority that we expect to become law.”
A spokesperson Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), who had promised to force a vote on the Equality Act in the Senate on the day the U.S. House approved it earlier this year, pointed to a March 25 “Dear Colleague” letter in which he identified the Equality Act as one of several bills he’d bring up for a vote.
Despite any assurances, the hold up on the bill is apparent. Although the U.S. House approved the legislation earlier this year, the Senate Judiciary Committee hasn’t even reported out the bill yet to the floor in the aftermath of the first-ever Senate hearing on the bill in March. A Senate Judiciary Committee Democratic aide, however, disputed that inaction as evidence the Equality Act is dead in its tracks: “Bipartisan efforts on a path forward are ongoing.”
Democrats are quick to blame Republicans for inaction on the Equality Act, but with Manchin withholding his support for the legislation they can’t even count on the entirety of their caucus to vote “yes” if it came to the floor. Progressives continue to advocate an end to the filibuster to advance legislation Biden has promised as part of his agenda, but even if they were to overcome headwinds and dismantle the institution needing 60 votes to advance legislation, the Equality Act would likely not have majority support to win approval in the Senate with a 50-50 party split.
The office of Manchin, who has previously said he couldn’t support the Equality Act over concerns about public schools having to implement the transgender protections applying to sports and bathrooms, hasn’t responded to multiple requests this year from the Blade on the legislation and didn’t respond to a request to comment for this article.
Meanwhile, Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who declined to co-sponsor the Equality Act this year after having signed onto the legislation in the previous Congress, insisted through a spokesperson talks are still happening across the aisle despite the appearances the legislation is dead.
“There continues to be bipartisan support for passing a law that protects the civil rights of Americans, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity,” said Annie Clark, a Collins spokesperson. “The Equality Act was a starting point for negotiations, and in its current form, it cannot pass. That’s why there are ongoing discussions among senators and stakeholders about a path forward.”
Let’s face it: Anti-LGBTQ forces have railroaded the debate by making the Equality Act about an end to women’s sports by allowing transgender athletes and danger to women in sex-segregated places like bathrooms and prisons. That doesn’t even get into resolving the issue on drawing the line between civil rights for LGBTQ people and religious freedom, which continues to be litigated in the courts as the U.S. Supreme Court is expected any day now to issue a ruling in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia to determine if foster care agencies can reject same-sex couples over religious objections.
For transgender Americans, who continue to report discrimination and violence at high rates, the absence of the Equality Act may be most keenly felt.
Mara Keisling, outgoing executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, disputed any notion the Equality Act is dead and insisted the legislation is “very much alive.”
“We remain optimistic despite misinformation from the opposition,” Keisling said. “NCTE and our movement partners are still working fruitfully on the Equality Act with senators. In fact, we are gaining momentum with all the field organizing we’re doing, like phone banking constituents to call their senators. Legislating takes time. Nothing ever gets through Congress quickly. We expect to see a vote during this Congress, and we are hopeful we can win.”
But one Democratic source said calls to members of Congress against the Equality Act, apparently coordinated by groups like the Heritage Foundation, have has outnumbered calls in favor of it by a substantial margin, with a particular emphasis on Manchin.
No stories are present in the media about same-sex couples being kicked out of a restaurant for holding hands or transgender people for using the restroom consistent with their gender identity, which would be perfectly legal in 25 states thanks to the patchwork of civil rights laws throughout the United States and inadequate protections under federal law.
Tyler Deaton, senior adviser for the American Unity Fund, which has bolstered the Republican-led Fairness for All Act as an alternative to the Equality Act, said he continues to believe the votes are present for a compromise form of the bill.
“I know for a fact there is a supermajority level of support in the Senate for a version of the Equality Act that is fully protective of both LGBTQ civil rights and religious freedom,” Deaton said. “There is interest on both sides of the aisle in getting something done this Congress.”
Deaton, however, didn’t respond to a follow-up inquiry on what evidence exists of agreeing on this compromise.
Biden has already missed the goal he campaigned on in the 2020 election to sign the Equality Act into law within his first 100 days in office. Although Biden renewed his call to pass the legislation in his speech to Congress last month, as things stand now that appears to be a goal he won’t realize for the remainder of this Congress.
Nor has the Biden administration made the Equality Act an issue for top officials within the administration as it pushes for an infrastructure package as a top priority. One Democratic insider said Louisa Terrell, legislative affairs director for the White House, delegated work on the Equality Act to a deputy as opposed to handling it herself.
To be sure, Biden has demonstrated support for the LGBTQ community through executive action at an unprecedented rate, signing an executive order on day one ordering federal agencies to implement the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision last year in Bostock v. Clayton County to the fullest extent possible and dismantling former President Trump’s transgender military ban. Biden also made historic LGBTQ appointments with the confirmation of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Rachel Levine as assistant secretary of health.
A White House spokesperson insisted Biden’s team across the board remains committed to the Equality Act, pointing to his remarks to Congress.
“President Biden has urged Congress to get the Equality Act to his desk so he can sign it into law and provide long overdue civil rights protections to LGBTQ+ Americans, and he remains committed to seeing this legislation passed as quickly as possible,” the spokesperson said. “The White House and its entire legislative team remains in ongoing and close coordination with organizations, leaders, members of Congress, including the Equality Caucus, and staff to ensure we are working across the aisle to push the Equality Act forward.”
But at least in the near-term, that progress will fall short of fulfilling the promise of updating federal civil rights law with the Equality Act, which will mean LGBTQ people won’t be able to rely on those protections when faced with discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.
Global Equality Caucus trabaja por igualdad LGBTQ en Latinoamérica
Janet Jackson doc premieres this weekend
California mom claims school manipulated child into changing gender identity
Man who killed one in 2000 Roanoke gay bar shooting dies in prison
South Korean electronics giant pulls pro-LGBTQ ad after backlash
Florida House committee passes “Don’t Say Gay” bill
Transgender rights group’s Los Angeles office receives bomb threat
Lesbian couple murdered, dismembered in Mexico border city
Biden’s empty political theater on LGBTQ equality
Transgender Mexicans receive amended birth certificates at country’s consulates
Sign Up for Blade eBlasts
National3 days ago
Florida House committee passes “Don’t Say Gay” bill
News5 days ago
LGBTQ groups stop short of criticizing Sinema for obstructing filibuster reform
National4 days ago
Transgender rights group’s Los Angeles office receives bomb threat
Local6 days ago
Anti-LGBTQ group claims Va. marriage amendment repeal will legalize polygamy
National6 days ago
FDA-funded blood donation study recruiting gay, bi men
World4 days ago
Lesbian couple murdered, dismembered in Mexico border city
Opinions4 days ago
Biden’s empty political theater on LGBTQ equality
National6 days ago
Jim Obergefell announces bid for seat in Ohio state legislature