Connect with us

National

Will new GOP support ensure ‘Don’t Ask’ repeal?

Brown, Murkowski, Snowe announce support

Published

on

Opponents of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” are increasingly confident they have the 60 votes needed in the Senate to repeal the military’s gay ban in the wake of announcements from three Republican senators pledging to back stand-alone legislation to end the 1993 law.

On Thursday, Sens. Scott Brown (R-Mass.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) said in separate statements that they would support standalone legislation pending before the Senate to end “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” now that the chamber has resolved the extension of the Bush-era tax cuts.

The three lawmakers had previously announced they support “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal, but hadn’t yet endorsed any specific legislation to achieve that goal. Earlier this month, they voted against the motion to proceed on major defense budget legislation containing language to repeal the military’s gay ban.

John Gentzel, a Snowe spokesperson, confirmed in a statement to the Blade that Snowe would support the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal bill — provided certain legislation clears the Senate first.

Asked via e-mail whether Snowe would vote in favor of the repeal bill, Gentzel replied, “Yes, assuming it comes to the floor after the Senate deals with taxes and the [continuing resolution] first (per the GOP letter to Reid from Dec. 1).”

Gentzel was referring to a letter in which all 42 members of the Republican caucus pledged to oppose legislation coming to the floor if the extension of the Bush-era tax cuts and funding for the government hadn’t yet been addressed.

A spokesperson for Sen. Scott Brown said he'd vote in favor of the 'Don't Ask' repeal bill (Blade photo by Michael Key).

According to ABC News, Gail Gitcho, a Brown spokesperson, said the Massachusetts senator would vote in favor of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal if Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) brought “a clean repeal bill” to the floor.

“Sen. Brown accepts the Pentagon’s recommendation to repeal the policy after proper preparations have been completed,” Gitcho said. “If and when a clean repeal bill comes up for a vote, he will support it.”

Michael Brumas, a Murkowski spokesperson, also said via e-mail that the Alaska senator would vote in favor of the bill.

“Sen. Murkowski will support a stand-alone repeal of the [‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’] bill,” Brumas said. “With the tax package out of the way, and legislation to fund the government on a glide path to passage, Sen. Murkowski will vote to move to [‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’] when it is brought to the floor.”

The announcements from Snowe, Brown and Murkowski mean four committed Republican votes in favor of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) is an original co-sponsor of the legislation.

Other possibilities for Republican support are Sens. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) and George Voinovich (R-Ohio). The Indiana senator has expressed support for repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” but also voted against moving ahead with the fiscal year 2011 defense authorization bill and hasn’t backed any specific measure that would end the military’s gay ban.

Fred Sainz, the Human Right Campaign’s vice president of communications, said he’s “confident” that announcements from Brown and Murkowski mean that 60 votes are present in the Senate to end “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

“Sens. Collins, Brown and Murkowski’s commitment is proof that this unjust and discriminatory law will soon be a part of the dust-bin of history,” Sainz said.

But even with this support in the Senate, questions remain over whether Reid will schedule a vote on the repeal legislation in the limited time remaining before lawmakers adjourn for this Congress. Reid has said he’d bring the legislation to the floor before the end of the session — and has even threatened to keep the Senate in session until Jan. 4 to repeal the law — but anxiety remains as he hasn’t yet scheduled the bill.

In a news conference, Reid said he doesn’t know if he’ll bring the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal legislation to the Senate floor before Christmas but reiterated he plans on bringing the bill to the floor along with other bills before the end of the year.

“I don’t know if I’ll bring it before Christmas,” Reid said. “Before this Congress ends, we’re going to to — we’re going to complete — or have a vote, determine a vote on the START treaty, the DREAM Act, ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’, 9/11 and, hopefully, we can get an agreement on nominations. Otherwise we’ll have some votes on nominations.”

Questions over President Obama’s commitment to pushing the Senate to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” also continue as White House officials assert that Obama is making calls to ensure repeal happens.

In response to a question from The Advocate on why Obama hasn’t been on TV calling for “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs during a news conference Thursday insisted the president has been active in repeal efforts.

“Let’s be clear, we would not be at this point if it wasn’t for the president’s leadership in bringing this issue to the forefront,” Gibbs said. “There’s time to do this if there are those on the other side of the aisle that wish to get this done.  And it is clear that whether it’s Sen. Brown or Sen. Murkowski or Sen. Snowe or others, there’s an effort to get this done if we have time to do it.”

Asked whether the president has been in conversations with Reid on the issue, Gibbs replied, “They talk regularly.”

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

Hungary

JD Vance to travel to Hungary next week

Country’s elections to take place on April 12

Published

on

Vice President JD Vance speaks at CPAC on Feb. 20, 2024. He and his wife, Usha Vance, will travel to Hungary next week. (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Vice President JD Vance and his wife, second lady Usha Vance, will visit Hungary next week.

An announcement the White House released on Thursday said the Vances will be in Budapest, the Hungarian capital, from April 7-8.

JD Vance “will hold bilateral meetings with” Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán. The announcement further indicates the vice president “will also deliver remarks on the rich partnership between the United States and Hungary.”

The Vances will travel to Hungary less than a week before the country’s parliamentary elections take place on April 12.

Orbán, who has been in office since 2010, and his Fidesz-KDNP coalition government have faced widespread criticism over its anti-LGBTQ crackdown.

The Associated Press notes polls indicate Orbán is trailing Péter Magyar and his center-right Tisza party.

Continue Reading

The White House

Pam Bondi ousted as attorney general

Donald Trump announced firing on Thursday

Published

on

Now former U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi (Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

President Donald Trump removed Attorney General Pam Bondi from her post Thursday, following growing criticism over how she and the Department of Justice handled a range of issues, including matters related to sex offender and Trump ally Jeffrey Epstein.

Trump announced Bondi’s removal on Truth Social, where he also said Todd Blanche will serve as acting head of the Justice Department.

“Pam Bondi is a great American patriot and a loyal friend, who faithfully served as my attorney general over the past year,” Trump wrote on the platform. “Pam did a tremendous job overseeing a massive crackdown on crime across our country, with murders plummeting to their lowest level since 1900.”

Trump was seen as recently as Wednesday with the now-former attorney general at a Supreme Court hearing on citizenship.

The decision contrasts with Trump’s previous public praise of Bondi, the 87th U.S. attorney general and former 37th attorney general of Florida, who served in that role from 2011-2019 before joining the Trump-Vance administration. He has frequently lauded her loyalty and said he speaks with her often. Bondi was also one of president’s defense lawyers during his first impeachment trial.

Privately, however, Trump had grown frustrated that Bondi was not “moving quickly enough” to prosecute critics and political adversaries he wanted to face criminal charges, according to multiple sources. The New York Times reported that her inability to charge former FBI Director James B. Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James with any crimes is a large factor in the president’s choice to fire her from the government’s primary law enforcement agency.

The move comes as Trump has sought to minimize public turmoil within his administration, avoiding the perception of a revolving-door Cabinet that defined his first term.

Lee Zeldin, a former Republican congressman from New York who unsuccessfully ran for governor, has emerged as a leading contender to lead the Justice Department. He has been one of Trump’s most reliable allies.

“He’s our secret weapon,” Trump said of Zeldin in February during a White House event promoting the coal industry, adding, “He’s getting those approvals done in record-setting time.”

Bondi has also growing faced scrutiny from Congress.

The House Oversight Committee recently subpoenaed her to testify about the department’s handling of certain files, where she declined to answer key questions during a contentious House Judiciary Committee hearing in February.

The Tampa native has a long history of opposing LGBTQ rights through her roles in government. As Florida attorney general, she fought against the legalization of same-sex marriage, arguing it would cause “serious public harm,” pushing forward a legal battle that cost taxpayers nearly half a million dollars. She also asked the Florida Supreme Court to overturn a lower court ruling that found the state’s same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional.

More recently, Bondi established a “Title IX Special Investigations Team” within the Justice Department focused on restricting transgender women and girls from participating in women’s and girls’ sports teams and accessing facilities aligned with their gender identity. She also told Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia to turn over the medical records of anyone under 19 who received gender-affirming care.

Her removal follows Trump’s decision last month to oust another controversial female Cabinet figure, Kristi Noem.

Continue Reading

The White House

VIDEO: Gay journalist detained for booing Trumps at ‘Chicago’ opening night

Eugene Ramirez booed first family at Kennedy Center

Published

on

Eugene Ramirez outside of the Kennedy Center after the ordeal, holding a First Amendment rights protest sign he found. (Photo courtesy of Eugene Ramirez)

President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump attended the opening night of “Chicago” at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts on Tuesday. They were greeted by a mix of cheers, applause, and some audible boos.

Among them was Eugene Ramirez, a gay Washington resident, who later shared his account of the night after being briefly detained by security for booing the president and giving a thumbs-down gesture — an expression of what many would call a textbook definition of constitutionally protected speech to criticize the government.

Ramirez attended the opening night performance with a group of friends, hoping to catch a final show before the center undergoes two years of major changes under Trump oversight. The musical, based on a 1926 play of the same name, has become synonymous with Broadway success.

With music by John Kander, lyrics by Fred Ebb, and a book by Ebb and Bob Fosse, “Chicago” has cemented itself as a cultural staple — known for its signature Fosse choreography, stripped-down staging, and sleek, campy aesthetic. The story follows Roxie Hart and Velma Kelly, women who murder their husbands but — with the help of the manipulative, charismatic, and narcissistic attorney Billy Flynn — walk away scot-free.

It remains the longest-running American musical in Broadway history, and its 2002 film adaptation famously won the Academy Award for Best Picture. On this night, however, the production also became the backdrop for a very modern moment of political protest.

“I accompanied five friends to opening night of ‘Chicago’, as a way to enjoy a final performance in the Kennedy Center as we know it,” Ramirez began to recount to the Washington Blade, describing the moment his group settled into their seats inside the ornate Opera House theater.

Just before the performance began, the twice impeached president and first lady appeared in the balcony box, drawing immediate attention from the audience below. Theatergoers stood, cheered, clapped, and waved, while Ramirez made a different choice.

While accounts of the crowd’s reaction have varied, Ramirez said his response was intentional, immediate, and within his rights. Moments after booing and giving a thumbs-down while recording on his iPhone, security intervened.

The video of Ramirez booing the Trump’s is here:

“Within moments, the director [of security] and another guard approached and escorted me to a side area where several other security guards were waiting,” he said. “I was detained until everyone was seated and the lights dimmed.”

As he was escorted away, Ramirez said his instincts as a journalist kicked in. A former lead anchor for Sinclair’s national evening news broadcast, he said the situation immediately felt off — or more aptly put — as if he could see the strings being pulled from someone attempting to control the narrative.

“Journalism is a vocation, not just a job. I immediately knew there wasn’t just an uncomfortable interaction with security,” he said. “The Kennedy Center is a federally funded cultural institution, and being questioned about speech related to the president in that setting felt like something the public should know about.”

Ramirez explained the difference between a standard visit by a public official and this performance: the president’s appearance wasn’t just ceremonial; it was very clearly a media moment.

“The White House press pool was there, and it was clear this was an effort to manage the president’s image in the media,” Ramirez continued. “The irony was not lost on me that this was happening on opening night of ‘Chicago’, a musical about manipulating the press to shape public perception.”

According to Ramirez, the explanation he received from Kennedy Center Director of Safety and Security Karles C. Jackson Sr., was brief, but illuminating.

“He said, ‘they don’t want booing,’ and even called out my thumbs-down gesture. He never clarified who ‘they’ were, but whether it was the administration or the Kennedy Center, the distinction felt meaningless,” he explained. “Mr. Jackson ultimately told me he was just trying to do his job, shook my hand, and allowed me to return to my seat once the lights dimmed and the overture started playing.”

Ramirez said he didn’t blame the guard individually, noting the broader context of the Kennedy Center’s uncertain future and the pressures staff were under.

“With the center closing in the coming months, some of these security guards being pressured to restrict our freedom of speech may only have a few weeks of work left.”

He believes the decision to remove him was driven less by disruption than optics, particularly given the presence of the press.

“It was very clearly about protection — whether protecting the president from visible dissent, or his image before the media present. There was no disruption as almost everyone was standing and reacting loudly to the arrival of the president and first lady, with cheers, applause, and hand gestures. The difference was that my reaction, unlike most, was negative.”

Drawing on his experience covering public officials, Ramirez said the incident felt more about controlling perception than security.

“Usually, law enforcement may monitor or intervene if there’s a disruption, but here there was no disruption at all. Simply expressing dissent in a public, cultural space drew the attention of security. It made it feel less like a matter of decorum and more like an effort to control the narrative around the president,” he said. “It’s about what happens when dissent is treated as disruption rather than a right.”

“The show hadn’t started. I threatened no one. Billy Flynn would have approved of the optics. The rest of us should be paying attention.”

Ramirez framed the incident as part of a broader constitutional concern, one that is plaguing the Trump-Vance administration as they continue to reject rules and normalcy set forth by other reserved presidents.

“Being singled out by security at a federally funded institution for expressing dissent shouldn’t be brushed off; it undermines the First Amendment,” he said, looking at it slightly distanced from it now. “Being of Cuban heritage, and a journalist, it’s a right I’m not willing to give up readily.”

“Publicly funded cultural institutions should allow visible dissent, even in politically charged moments,” he added. “Of course, I understand the need to manage disruptions during a performance, but that was not the case here.”

The themes of “Chicago”, a long-running satire about media manipulation and public perception, added another layer of irony to the experience, Ramirez explained.

“The satire truly leapt off the stage! A show about controlling the narrative, manipulating the press, and covering up truths by leaning on showmanship and distractions. The show is decades old, but could’ve been written today. We’re being razzle-dazzled daily and it’s getting harder to tell fact from fiction, no matter where you get your news.”

He, being gay, also acknowledged how hard it must have been for the performers on stage, assuming that at least some in the cast were also members of the LGBTQ community — and artists — two things Trump doesn’t always get along with.

“It was not lost on me that many of the actors on that stage, that the president and first lady presumably applauded, are members of the LGBTQ community which this administration has rolled back protections for under the guise of religious liberty and free speech, resulting in blatant discrimination.”

He pointed to a particular number that felt surreal given the circumstances.

“Its ‘Razzle Dazzle’ number celebrates keeping audiences off balance; at its climax, a massive American flag descends as the song celebrates blinding audiences to what is real. Watching that scene after being detained for a thumbs-down was surreal.”

Ramirez said the show’s closing lines were especially sharp given the presidential audience and what he just experienced.

“At the end of the show,

Velma says: ‘You know, a lot of people have lost faith in America.’

Roxie replies: ‘And for what America stands for.’

Velma: ‘But we are the living examples of what a wonderful country this is.’

Roxie: ‘So we’d just like to say thank you and God bless you.’

They had both just gotten away with murder!”

His closing lines, however, were a bit more pointed than “scintillating sinners” Roxie Hart and Velma Kelly’s were in the show.

“Democracy only works when citizens are allowed to boo,” he said. “Tuesday night at the Kennedy Center, ‘Chicago’ made that point better than I ever could.”

The Blade reached out to the Kennedy Center but did not receive a comment back.

Continue Reading

Popular