Connect with us

National

Gay bishop gives update on acceptance in his denomination

Anglican leader Gene Robinson says U.S. church showing increasing signs of acceptance

Published

on

In 2003, Gene Robinson became the world’s first openly gay person to be ordained as a bishop in a major Christian denomination.

His elevation to the post of Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of New
Hampshire created an international furor within the Episcopal Church
and prompted thousands of clergy and lay people to leave the church in
the U.S.

Robinson, 63, spoke to the Blade following an appearance before D.C.’s
St. Thomas’s Parish, an Episcopal congregation in Dupont Circle in the
process of rebuilding its church destroyed by arson in 1970.

He noted that lesbian Canon Mary Douglas Glasspool’s election as
bishop earlier this year in the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles
resulted in far less controversy than his election seven years
earlier, indicating a gradual acceptance of gays in church leadership
positions.

Blade: You spoke tonight about the importance of the community
getting involved in the effort to build a new church building for St.
Thomas Parish. Do you have any message for the broader LGBT community
here in Washington about the benefit of this church and what
they might do to help?

Robinson: You know, asking an LGBT person to go back to the church
that has been the source of so much pain and abuse is a little like
asking an abused spouse to go back to her husband. The fact of the
matter is in many places the church is changing. And the church
realizes that for years it got it wrong about LGBT people. And what I
love about St. Thomas’ Parish is that it is really leading the way in
that kind of radically inclusive message. And it doesn’t stop with
LGBT people. It reaches out to really all of God’s children. And so I
would say to the gay community, take another look. The church you left
may be different now. And certainly St. Thomas is modeling I think the
kind of inclusive love that God is all about. And those who would use
the church or use scripture, be it the Hebrew scriptures or the
Christian scriptures, to beat us over the head, they’ve gotten it
wrong and it’s time that we rediscover God’s love in the middle of all
that.

Blade: While you’re here in D.C. can you give a brief update on
where things stand with the Episcopal Church, including your
situation?

Robinson: Well, there’s never been any question about my situation. I
was duly elected and consented to and consecrated. So there’s never
been any question about whether I would continue. What I can say is
over the last seven years I think you have seen the Episcopal Church
make dramatic steps forward. I think they consented to my election in
2003. In 2006 at our national gathering we sort of put things on hold
to figure out if what the rest of the world was saying us us — that we
were crazy and unfaithful in consecrating an openly gay person. We
stopped to consider and listen. But last summer, in 2009, when we
gathered, it was very clear that the Episcopal Church had made up its
mind that, in fact, it was being the church that God was calling it to
be and that we’re going to move forward. And of course in the ensuing
year we’ve seen the election and consecration of another openly
lesbian person at this point in time in Los Angeles. And my sense from
–  even the bishops and people who might have liked to see it go a
different way have realized that this is who the Episcopal Church is
going to be  and they’re ready to get on with it. And you haven’t seen
near the controversy over the consecration of the second openly gay
bishop as you saw with mine. And I think it just shows how far we’ve
come in seven years.

Blade: Is there some sort of schism taking place?

Robinson: Well you know, if you just read the headlines you would
think that it was virtually a 50-50 split in our church. The fact of
the matter is out of a little better than two million members, only
about a hundred thousand have left. And that’s their count, that’s how
many they claim have left the Episcopal Church.

Blade: Is it the U.S. Episcopal Church you’re talking about?

Robinson: Yeah, the U.S. church. And so we’ve seen the departure of
some 100,000 people who just can’t believe this is God’s will. But for
the most part the U.S. Episcopal Church is alive and well and moving
forward. And as I think you’ll see the same thing worldwide in the
Anglican community. There are many African and Asian Episcopal
dioceses who still don’t understand what we did. But more and more of
them are saying to us, “We don’t understand this. We don’t agree with
it. But you know we have people dropping dead of malaria and AIDS and
of severe abject poverty. We have women and children being abused.
This is so far down our priority list. We’re just going get on with
being the church.” And so I think at the end of the day we’re going to
be just fine, both internally in the Episcopal Church and the
worldwide community. That doesn’t mean there won’t still be
controversy. People will still be uncomfortable. But that’s O.K. It’s
going to take a little while to get used to it.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

State Department

Democracy Forward files FOIA request for State Department bathroom policy records

April 20 memo outlined anti-transgender rule

Published

on

(Photo courtesy of the Library of Congress)

Democracy Forward on Tuesday filed a Freedom of Information Act request for records on the State Department’s new bathroom policy.

A memo titled “Updates Regarding Biological Sex and Intimate Spaces, Including Restrooms” that the State Department issued on April 20 notes employees can no longer use bathrooms that correspond with their gender identity.

“The administration affirms that there are two sexes — male and female — and that federal facilities should operate on this objective and longstanding basis to ensure consistency, privacy, and safety in shared spaces,” State Department spokesperson Tommy Piggot told the Daily Signal, a conservative news website that first reported on the memo. “In line with President Trump’s executive order this provides clear, uniform guidance to the department by grounding policy in biological sex as determined at birth.”

President Donald Trump shortly after he took office in January 2025 issued an executive order that directed the federal government to only recognize two genders: male and female. The sweeping directive also ordered federal government agencies to “effectuate this policy by taking appropriate action to ensure that intimate spaces designated for women, girls, or females (or for men, boys, or males) are designated by sex and not identity.”

Democracy Forward’s FOIA request that the Washington Blade exclusively obtained on Tuesday is specifically seeking a copy of the memo that details the State Department’s new bathroom policy. Democracy Forward has also requested “all” memo-specific communications between the State Department’s Bureau of Global Public Affairs and the Daily Signal from April 1-21.

Continue Reading

Federal Government

House Republicans push nationwide ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill

Measures would restrict federal funding for LGBTQ-affirming schools

Published

on

(Washington Blade photo by Michael Key)

Republicans have been gaining ground in reshaping education policy to be less inclusive toward LGBTQ students at the state level, and now they are turning their focus to Capitol Hill.

Some GOP lawmakers are pushing for a nationwide “Don’t Say Gay” bill, doubling down on their commitment to being the party of “traditional family values” by excluding anyone who does not identify with their sex at birth.

The largest anti-LGBTQ education legislation to reach the House chamber is House Bill 2616 — the Parental Rights Over the Education and Care of Their Kids Act, or the PROTECT Kids Act. The PROTECT Kids Act, proposed by U.S. Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.), and co-sponsored by U.S. Reps. Burgess Owens (R-Utah), Mary Miller (R-Ill.), Robert Onder (R-Mo.), and Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.), would require any public elementary and middle schools that receive federal funding to require parental consent to change a child’s gender expression in school.

The bill, which was discussed during Tuesday’s House Rules Committee hearing, would specifically require any schools that get federal money from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 — which was created to minimize financial discrepancies in education for low-income students — to get parental approval before identifying any child’s gender identity as anything other than what was provided to the school initially. This includes getting approval before allowing children to use their preferred locker room or bathroom.

It reads that any school receiving this funding “shall obtain parental consent before changing a covered student’s (1) gender markers, pronouns, or preferred name on any school form; or (2) sex-based accommodations, including locker rooms or bathrooms.”

LGBTQ rights advocates have criticized both national and state efforts to require parental permission to use a child’s preferred gender identity, as it raises issues of at-home safety — especially if the home is not LGBTQ-affirming — and could lead to the outing of transgender or gender-curious students.

A follow-up bill, HB 2617, proposed by Owens, one of the bill’s co-sponsors, prevents the use of federal funding to “advance concepts related to gender ideology,” using the definition from President Donald Trump’s 2025 Executive Order 14168, making that an enshrined definition in law of sex rather than just by executive order. There is also a bill making its way through the senate with the same text— Senate Bill 2251.

Advocates have also criticized this follow-up legislation, as it would restrict school staff — including teachers and counselors — from acknowledging trans students’ identities or providing any support. They have said that this kind of isolation can worsen mental health outcomes for LGBTQ youth and allows for education to be politicized rather than being based in reality.

David Stacy, the Human Rights Campaign’s vice president of government affairs, called this legislation out for using LGBTQ children as political pawns in an ideology fight — one that could greatly harm the safety of these children if passed.

“Trans kids are not a political agenda — they are students who deserve safety and affirmation at school like anyone else,” Stacy said in a statement. “Despite the many pressing issues facing our nation, House Republicans continue their bizarre obsession with trans people. H.R. 2616 does not protect children. It targets them. This bill is cruel, and we’re prepared to fight it.”

This is similar to Florida House Bills 1557 and 1069, referred to as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill and “Don’t Say They” bill, respectively, restricting classroom discussions on sexual orientation and gender identity, prohibiting the use of pronouns consistent with one’s gender identity, expanding book banning procedures, and censoring health curriculum.

The American Civil Liberties Union is tracking 233 bills related to restricting student and educator rights in the U.S.

Continue Reading

National

BREAKING NEWS: Shots fired at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner

Shooter reportedly opened fire inside hotel

Published

on

(Washington Blade photo by Joe Reberkenny)

Four loud bangs were heard in the International Ballroom of the Washington Hilton during the annual White House Correspondents’ Dinner on Saturday.

According to the Associated Press, a shooter opened fire inside the hotel outside the ballroom.

Attendees could hear four loud bangs as people started to duck and take cover. During the chaos sounds of salad and glasses were dropped as hotel employees, and guests ducked for cover.

The head table — which included President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, first lady Melania Trump, and White House Correspondents Association President Weijia Jiang — were rushed off stage.

“The U.S. Secret Service, in coordination with the Metropolitan Police Department, is investigating a shooting incident near the main magnetometer screening area at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner,” the U.S. Secret Service said in a statement. “The president and the First Lady are safe along all protects. One individual is in custody. The condition of those involved is not yet known, and law enforcement is actively assessing the situation.”

Trump held a press conference at the White House after he left the hotel.

“A man charged a security checkpoint armed with multiple weapons and he was taken down by some very brave members of Secret Service,” said Trump.

Trump said the shooter is from California. He also said an officer was shot, but said his bullet proof vest “saved” him.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, interim D.C. police chief Jeffrey Carroll, U.S. Attorney for D.C. Jeanine Pirro, and other officials held their own press conference at the hotel.

Carroll said the gunman who has been identified as Cole Tomas Allen was armed with a shotgun, handgun, and “multiple” knives when he charged a Secret Service checkpoint in a hotel lobby. Carroll also told reporters that law enforcement “exchanged gunfire with that individual.”

Both he and Bowser said the gunman appeared to act alone.

“We are so very thankful to members of law enforcement who did their jobs tonight and made sure all guests were safe,” said Bowser. “Nobody else was involved.”

The Washington Blade will update this story as details become more available.

Continue Reading

Popular