Connect with us

Local

Md. lawmaker faces retaliation for anti-gay views: lawyer

Claims Del. Alston indicted because she withdrew marriage support

Published

on

alston

The lawyer representing Maryland State Del. Tiffany Alston (D-Prince Georgeā€™s County) says heā€™s convinced that Alston was targeted for alleged campaign finance violations under the stateā€™s criminal law because she withdrew her support for a same-sex marriage bill earlier this year.

Baltimore attorney J. Wyndal Gordon told the Blade Monday that Alstonā€™s indictment on felony theft charges in September was the result of a ā€œbacklashā€ against her decision to oppose the same-sex marriage equality bill after she promised to vote for it.

Gordon said authorities initially investigated Alston for alleged campaign irregularities through a non-criminal, civil process overseen by the stateā€™s Board of Elections. He said state prosecutors changed course and sought a criminal indictment against her almost immediately after she angered same-sex marriage supporters by switching sides and opposing the bill.

ā€œThatā€™s when there was an intense scrutiny placed upon her and they started looking at her with a jaundiced eye like they were out to get her after that situation occurred,ā€ he said.

MORE IN THE BLADE: THE BACKGROUND ON THE ALSTON INDICTMENT

The Maryland Office of the State Prosecutor charged Alston with one count of felony theft, one count of misdemeanor theft, one count of fraudulent misappropriation by a fiduciary, and two election law violations. If convicted, she faces a possible sentence of ten years in jail.

A conviction also would force her to give up her seat as a state delegate representing Prince Georgeā€™s County.

The charges, which were handed down by a grand jury on Sept. 23, allege that Alston made illegal disbursements from her election campaign account for personal use. Among other things, the indictment charges that she issued two campaign account checks totaling $3,560 to cover the cost of her wedding in December 2010.

LGBT activists called that allegation an ironic development, saying she allegedly broke the law to help pay for her own wedding just a few months before she moved to deny weddings for same-sex couples.

James Cabezas, chief prosecutor at the Office of the State Prosecutor, declined to comment on Gordonā€™s claim that Alstonā€™s indictment was a result of a backlash against her opposition to the marriage bill. Cabezas said the office never discusses pending cases.

ā€œWhen a matter is being litigated in a courtroom, thatā€™s where we do our talking,ā€ he said.

Gordon said he will argue at Alstonā€™s trial, scheduled to begin Jan. 10, that the funds Alston withdrew from her campaign account were her own personal funds.

ā€œSo the funds that sheā€™s accused of stealing were actually her personal funds that she invested in her own campaign with agreements with the campaign treasurer that she would be reimbursed for what she contributed to the campaign,ā€ he said. ā€œAnd the law allows for that as well.ā€

MORE IN THE BLADE: GEARING UP FOR ANOTHER MARRIAGE FIGHT IN MARYLAND

When asked if the backlash he claims resulted in Alstonā€™s indictment was brought about, in part, by gay community outrage over her decision to switch sides on the marriage bill, Gordon said he bases his assertion on ā€œanecdotalā€ rather than ā€œempiricalā€ evidence.

ā€œI think it was an unpopular position that she took,ā€ he said. ā€œIt took a lot of courage for her to reconsider her previous position and vote the way her constituency insisted that she voted. And sheā€™s paying the price for it. And whoā€™s behind it? Letā€™s just say those who were in favor of gay marriage. Thatā€™s the best I can say.ā€

Gay rights attorney Patrick Wojahn, who serves as board chair for the Equality Maryland Foundation, a statewide LGBT advocacy group, described as a ā€œred herringā€ Gordonā€™s claim that Alston was singled out for prosecution due to her flip-flop on the marriage bill.

ā€œThese are completely separate issues,ā€ he said. ā€œI donā€™t think thereā€™s any likelihood that the state prosecutor would care about a legislative issue.ā€

Lisa Polyak, board chair of Equality Maryland, said Gordon’s claim that Alston’s indictment was linked to her views on the marriage bill came as a surprise to the group.

“Our focus continues to be on achieving equal treatment under the law for the LGBT community of Maryland, and we welcome Del. Alston’s assistance in this struggle,” Polyak said. “Mr. Gordon’s remarks are disappointing, as they seem to scapegoat our community as a means to achieve fair treatment for his client.”

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

West Virginia

Appeals court strikes down W.Va. transgender athlete ban

Ruling finds law violates studentsā€™ constitutional rights, Title IX

Published

on

The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on April 16, 2024, blocked West Virginiaā€™s ban on transgender athletes, finding the law violates trans studentsā€™ rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the constitution. The ban was challenged by Becky Pepper-Jackson (pictured) a 13-year-old trans student athlete from West Virginia. (Photo courtesy of Billy Wolfe/ACLU)

BY LORI KERSEYĀ | The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has struck down West Virginiaā€™s ban on transgender athletes, finding the law violates trans studentsā€™ rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the constitution and Title IX, a federal civil rights law prohibiting discrimination based on sex in education programs.

The case, B.P.J. vs. the West Virginia Board of Education, was filed in May 2021 on behalf of Becky Pepper-Jackson, a 13-year-old trans middle school student and track athlete who would be barred from participating if the ban is upheld. Pepper-Jackson is represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, the American Civil Liberties Union of West Virginia and Lambda Legal.

In April 2021, West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice signed into law a bill prohibiting trans women and girls in the state from participating in sports that align with their gender identity. The U.S. Court of Appeals in February 2023 blocked the state from removing Pepper-Jackson from her schoolā€™s track and field team as legal advocates appealed a lower courtā€™s ruling upholding the ban. 

In Tuesdayā€™s ruling, Judge Toby Heytens wrote that offering Pepper-Jackson the ā€œchoiceā€ between not participating in sports and participating only on boys teams is not a real choice.

ā€œThe defendants cannot expect that B.P.J. will countermand her social transition, her medical treatment, and all the work she has done with her schools, teachers and coaches for nearly half her life by introducing herself to teammates, coaches and even opponents as a boy,ā€ the judge wrote. 

ā€œBy participating on boys teams, B.P.J. would be sharing the field with boys who are larger, stronger, and faster than her because of the elevated levels of circulating testosterone she lacks,ā€ he wrote. ā€œThe Act thus exposes B.P.J. to the very harms Title IX is meant to prevent by effectively ā€˜exclud[ing]ā€™ her from ā€˜participation inā€™ all non-coed sports entirely.ā€

In a statement Tuesday, Joshua Block, senior staff attorney for the ACLUā€™s LGBTQ and HIV Project, called the courtā€™s ruling ā€œa tremendous victory for our client, transgender West Virginians and the freedom of all youth to play as who they are.ā€

ā€œIt also continues a string of federal courts ruling against bans on the participation of transgender athletes and in favor of their equal participation as the gender they know themselves to be,ā€ Block wrote. ā€œThis case is fundamentally about the equality of transgender youth in our schools and our communities and weā€™re thankful the 4th Circuit agreed.ā€ 

ā€œWe hope todayā€™s ruling sends a message of hope to the trans youth of West Virginia,ā€ Aubrey Sparks, legal director of the ACLU of West Virginia, said in the statement. ā€œAnd a message of warning to politicians who continue to dehumanize this vulnerable population.ā€

West Virginia is one of 21 states that have banned trans student-athletes over the last three years, according to the ACLU. 

In a statement Tuesday, West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey vowed to defend the ban and said he is ā€œdeeply disappointedā€ in the decision. 

ā€œThe Save Womenā€™s Sports Act is ā€˜constitutionally permissibleā€™ and the law complies with Title IX,ā€ Morrisey said. ā€œI will keep fighting to safeguard Title IX. We must keep working to protect womenā€™s sports so that womenā€™s safety is secured and girls have a truly fair playing field. We know the law is correct and will use every available tool to defend it.ā€

******************************************************************************************

Lori Kersey

Lori Kersey is a reporter with a decade of experience reporting in West Virginia. She covers state government for West Virginia Watch.

******************************************************************************************

The preceding article was previously published by the West Virginia Watch and is republished with permission.

Nonprofit, nonpartisan, independent journalism not hidden behind a paywall. Mountaineers are always free, and so is West Virginia Watch.

West Virginia Watch is part of States Newsroom, the nationā€™s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Reenactment of first gay rights picket at White House set for April 17

Event marks 59th anniversary of historic push for gay rights in nationā€™s capital

Published

on

Lilli Vincenz was among the original 1965 White House picketers. (Blade file photo by Michael Key)

D.C.ā€™s Rainbow History Project announced it will hold a reenactment on Wednesday, April 17, of the historic first protest for gay rights in the form of a picket line in front of the White House that took place on that same day in 1965.

In a statement released last week, Rainbow History Project says the reenactment will mark the 59th anniversary of an event that is credited with bringing attention for the first time to the federal governmentā€™s longstanding discrimination against a minority group referred to then as homosexuals or gays and lesbians.

The statement notes that the 1965 event was organized by the Mattachine Society of Washington, D.C., the first politically active LGBT organization in the nationā€™s capital founded by local gay rights pioneer Frank Kameny.

ā€œThe picket took place on the White House sidewalk, Lafayette Park, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., on April 17, 1965,ā€  the statement says. ā€œFor exactly one hour, from 4:20 p.m. to 5:20 p.m., members of the Mattachine Society of Washington walked in a circle, non-stop, in silence, carrying posters of their demands,ā€ the statement continues.

ā€œThe White House picket is the origin story for public demonstrations for gay rights in the U.S., and the origin story for Pride Marches and the annual LGBTQ Pride celebrations which occur across the globe,ā€ according to the statement.

It says those picketing in the April 1965 event, which included Kameny and longtime local D.C.-area lesbian activist Lilli Vincenz, both of whom held doctorate degrees, called on the government to adopt the Mattachine Society of Washingtonā€™s four major demands: an end to the exclusion of homosexuals from federal government employment; an end to the ban on gays and lesbians from serving in the U.S. military; an end to the ā€œblanket denialā€ of security clearances for gay people; and an end to the ā€œgovernment refusal to meet with the LGBTQ community.ā€™

Among those who chose not to respond to the request for a meeting was President Lyndon B. Johnson, who occupied the White House at the time of the 1965 picketing.

Vincent Slatt, the Rainbow History Projectā€™s director of archiving and one of the lead organizers of the April 17 reenactment event, said the event is aimed, among other things, at drawing attention to how far the LGBTQ community has come since 1965. He said the event is not in any way a protest of the administration of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, who Slatt called staunch supporters of the LGBTQ community.

ā€œWe are just reenacting this historical event and pointing out how far weā€™ve come,ā€ Slatt told the Washington Blade. ā€œIf you think about what it means in 1965 when these people were protesting and LBJ would not even respond to them. And now, we are at a place where Vice President Harris speaks on a stage at Capital Pride.ā€

The Rainbow History Project statement notes that the reenactment event will also be held in honor of Kameny, who died in 2011, and Vincenz, who passed away in 2023, both of whom participated in a similar reenactment event in 2008.

Among those who will be participating in this weekā€™s reenactment on April 17 will be longtime local LGBTQ rights activist Paul Kuntzler, who is the only known surviving person who was among the White House picketers at the April 1965 event. Kuntzler will be carrying a replica of his own picket sign he held at the 1965 event, the statement says.

It says Rainbow History Project volunteers will also carry replicas of the original protest signs and hand out literature explaining the picket to passersby and tourists.

Similar to the 1965 event, the reenactment picketing at the White House will begin on April 17 at about 4:15 p.m., according to Slatt of the Rainbow History Project.

Continue Reading

District of Columbia

Four LGBTQ candidates running for delegate to Democratic National Convention from D.C.

Thirty-two candidates competing for 13 elected delegate positions in April 20 party caucus

Published

on

From left, candidates include John Fanning, Jimmie Williams, Monika Nemeth and David Meadows. (Photos courtesy of the D.C. Democratic Party)

Four LGBTQ Democratic Party activists are running for election as delegates from D.C. to the Democratic National Convention at an April 20 local Democratic Party caucus election in which all D.C. voters who are registered as Democrats will be eligible to vote.

The four LGBTQ candidates are among 32 candidates competing for just 13 elected delegate positions. D.C. will have a total of 51 delegates to the Democratic Convention, but the other 38 include elected officials and party leaders who are considered ā€œautomaticā€ or appointed delegates. The convention will be held in Chicago Aug. 19-23,

Under the delegate selection process put in place by the D.C. Democratic Party, six of the thirteen elected delegate positions will be elected by voters in a section of the city designated as District 1, which includes Wards 1,2, 6, and 8. The other seven elected delegates will be chosen by voters in District 2, which includes Wards 3, 4, 5, and 7.

The LGBTQ candidates include longtime gay Democratic activists David Meadows of Ward 6 and John Fanning of Ward 2 who are running in District 1. Transgender rights advocate and Democratic Party activist Monika Nemeth of Ward 3 and gay Democratic activist Jimmie Williams of Ward 7 are running in DistrictĀ  2.

All four of the LGBTQ candidates have been active members of the Capital Stonewall Democrats, one of D.C.ā€™s largest LGBTQ political organizations. Nemeth and Meadows are past presidents of the organization. Williams has served as chair of the Ward 7 Democratic Committee and is a current member of the committee. Fanning has served as an elected member of the D.C. Democratic State Committee from Ward 2 and served as a delegate to the 2016 Democratic National Convention.

A total of 12 candidates are running in each of the two districts. Under party rules the highest six vote getters in District 1 and the highest 7 vote getters in District 2 will be declared the winners.

The Saturday, April 20 caucus election for the delegate candidates will take place at the Walter E. Washington D.C. Convention Center. An announcement by party officials says two voting sessions will take place, one from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. and the other from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

Aside from the elected delegates, two prominent D.C. LGBTQ Democratic leaders will be appointed as delegates to the 2024 Democratic National Convention in their role as members of the Democratic National Committee from D.C.

They are Claire Lucas, a highly acclaimed Democratic Party and LGBTQ rights advocate and party fundraiser; and Earl Fowlkes, one of the lead organizers of D.C.ā€™s annual Black LGBTQ Pride celebration and former president of Capital Stonewall Democrats.

Lucas and Fowlkes and the four LGBTQ candidates running in the April 20 caucus election are committed to backing President Joe Biden as the Democratic nominee for re-election.

Statements from each of the candidates running for delegate in the April 20 caucus election, including the four LGBTQ candidates, can be accessed here: Candidates for Delegate | DC Democratic Party

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular