Connect with us

National

DynCorp adopts LGBT-inclusive non-discrimination policy

Military contractor responds to media reports, online petition

Published

on

A military contractor that has come under fire for allegedly allowing anti-gay harassment on the job has changed its policy to include non-discrimination protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

DynCorp International LLC, a military contractor and aircraft maintenance company in Fairfax, Va., updated its non-discrimation policy last month to include protections for LGBT workers, according to a company spokesperson.

Ashley Burke, a DynCorp spokesperson, said, “In keeping with our goals of maintaining a positive, supportive work environment, a number of our internal policies and our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct were updated and strengthened in January.”

The company’s code of ethics and business conductĀ details the change on its second page under a heading for guidelines governing daily workplace behavior.Ā A previous version of this guidance lacked the words sexual orientation and gender identity.

“We offer equal employment opportunities and encourage workplace diversityĀ and make employment decisions without regard to race, ethnicity, religion, color, national origin, gender, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, veteran status, marital status, ancestry, genetic information, disability, or any status protected by federal, state, local or host country law,” the new guidance states.

DynCorp came under pressure to change its policy after the Washington Blade reported last month on a settlement the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reached with the company as a result of a complaint was filed on alleged anti-gay harassment on the job.

A straight employee at the company, James Friso, was allegedly harassed in 2006 based on his perceived sexual orientation while on post at Taji, Iraq.Ā According toĀ the EEOC complaint, one of Frisoā€™s male co-workers allegedly called Friso ā€œfaggot,ā€ ā€œdick-sucker,ā€ and ā€œqueerā€ on a daily basis.Ā When Friso allegedly complained the company did nothing and sent him to another post with lower pay in Mannheim, Germany. The company has denied any wrongdoing.

As a result of the EEOC settlement, Friso wasĀ awarded $155,000, but the contractor wasn’t required to change its non-discrimination policy to include protections based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

Freedom to Work, an LGBT workplace advocacy group, launched an online petition last month urging DynCorp to change its policy to include LGBT protections. As of Thursday, the petition had 54,878 signatures.

Tico Almeida, Freedom to Work’s president, commended DynCorp for updating the policy and said it represents a positive change for a company.

ā€œDynCorp has an ugly history of sex trafficking committed against young girls, racial discrimination against African-Americans, and most recently a hostile work environment with anti-gay epithets like ā€˜faggotā€™ and ā€˜queerā€™ used on a daily basis,” Almeida said. “Iā€™m very glad to know theyā€™ve seen the error of their ways and have listened to the call of almost 55,000 Americans who signed the Freedom to Work petition on Change.org in the last two weeks asking DynCorp to add sexual orientation and gender identity to their non-discrimination policy. That change was long overdue.”

Almedia noted thatĀ DynCorp is now in line with leading military contractors like Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman, which he said added LGBT protections to their policies years ago.

“Those top government contractors realize that discrimination is bad for the bottom line ā€“ and a waste of our taxpayer money,” Almeida added.

Freedom to Work had been drawing attention to the alleged anti-gay practices of DynCorp and its previous lack of LGBT-inclusive non-discrimination policy to prompt action from the White House. The group, as well as other advocates, have been pushing President Obama to issue an executive order barring federal dollars from going to contractors without non-discrimination protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

DynCorp receives more than 96 percent of its revenue from federal contracts that amount to $2 billion each year, making it the 32nd largest federal contractor, according to Freedom to Work.

Almeida said DynCorp’s ability to change its policy demonstrates that other companies could follow suit if Obama issued the directive.

ā€œIf a big corporation like DynCorp can change, then President Obama can certainly create change by signing the ENDA executive order that his staff has already drafted for him,” Almeida said. “The order is sitting on a desk in the White House right now just waiting to be signed, and itā€™s time for the president to put pen to paper.ā€

Multiple sources have told the Blade that the Labor and Justice Departments have cleared an administrative measure that would bar federal dollars from going to companies without LGBT-inclusive non-discrimination protections and have sent their recommendation to the White House for final approval. The White House hasn’t said one way or the other whether Obama will issue the directive.

Advertisement
FUND LGBTQ JOURNALISM
SIGN UP FOR E-BLAST

U.S. Federal Courts

Federal judge blocks Trumpā€™s trans military ban

Cites ā€˜cruel ironyā€™ of fighting for rights they donā€™t enjoy

Published

on

President Donald Trump aims to ban trans people from serving in the military.

A federal judge in D.C. on Tuesday blocked President Donald Trumpā€™s ban on transgender service members, which was scheduled to take effect on Friday.

U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes issued the preliminary injunction, saying the policy violates the Constitution. 

ā€œIndeed, the cruel irony is that thousands of transgender service members have sacrificed ā€” some risking their lives ā€” to ensure for others the very equal protection rights the military ban seeks to deny them,ā€ Reyes wrote.

The legal challenge to Trumpā€™s trans military ban executive, Talbott v. Trump, was brought by LGBTQ groups GLAD Law and National Center for Lesbian Rights. 

Reyes found that the ban violates equal protection because it discriminates based on trans status and sex and because ā€œit is soaked in animus,ā€ noting that its language is ā€œunabashedly demeaning, its policy stigmatizes transgender persons as inherently unfit, and its conclusions bear no relation to fact.ā€

The lead attorneys in the case are GLAD Law Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights Jennifer Levi and NCLR Legal Director Shannon Minter.

ā€œToday’s decisive ruling speaks volumes,ā€ said Levi. ā€œThe court’s unambiguous factual findings lay bare how this ban specifically targets and undermines our courageous service members who have committed themselves to defending our nation. Given the court’s clear-eyed assessment, we are confident this ruling will stand strong on appeal.ā€

Nicolas Talbott, a second lieutenant in the Army Reserves, and Erica Vandal, a major in the U.S. Army, are two of the 14 plaintiffs in the case. They spoke during a virtual press conference with Levi and Minter on Wednesday.

“Yesterdayā€™s ruling is just such a tremendous step forward for transgender service members,ā€ said Talbott.

Vandal added the ruling “clearly recognizes that transgender soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines have been serving openly as our authentic selves for nearly a decade in every capacity, at every echelon, in every theater and combat zone across the world, all while meeting and exceeding the same standards as every one else without causing any degradation or unit cohesion.ā€Ā 

Levi said Reyes’s ruling requires “the military to return to business as usual.”

The decision is stayed until 10 a.m. on Thursday. It is not immediately clear whether the Trump-Vance administration will challenge it.

“What the order does is stave off, put off any effect of the ban actually being implemented against any individuals,” said Levi.

Continue Reading

National

Trans Lifeline CEO apologizes for botched online lottery to recruit hotline operators

Applicants compare debacle to ā€˜Hunger Games,ā€™ and Ticketmaster

Published

on

The CEO of Trans Lifeline ā€” kai alviar horton ā€” admitted on social media that their organization was not prepared for the number of applications it received.

Job hunters by the thousands expressed disappointment, frustration, and anger Wednesday over the process to submit online applications for three lucrative but challenging positions as remote telephone operators for the nationā€™s only transgender-led crisis hotline, Trans Lifeline. One applicant complained on Instagram that their experience was akin to ā€œThe Hunger Games.ā€Ā 

But it turns out, the odds were never in their favor. 

The CEO of the San Francisco-based nonprofit ā€” kai alviar horton, who joined Trans Lifeline in July 2024 and does not capitalize any letters in his name ā€” admitted on social media late Wednesday that their organization was not prepared for the sheer number of applications, which he said was anticipated to number 100, over 48 hours. 

ā€œWe know now that our impact has caused so many of you hurt and further distrust in us,ā€ horton wrote in the letter posted on Instagram, acknowledging that Trans Lifeline had endured ā€œmany storms of instability and harm.ā€Ā 

ā€œThe process we strived towards landed in ways that did not build accessibility,ā€ they wrote. ā€œThis process hurt you, and we are genuinely sorry. We are committed to learning to do better.ā€ 

The job posting still appears online at a portal called levels.fyi offering an annual salary of $63,000, ā€œgenerous paid time-off benefitsā€ and ā€œ100% employer-paid health care premiumsā€ as well as retirement benefits and more. Given that studies by the Williams Institute have shown the significant challenges trans people face in the workplace, from discrimination to harassment, especially in comparison to cisgender employees and candidates, Trans Lifelineā€™s offer was a beacon in the darkness to many.Ā 

ā€œYou know better than most how hard it is for trans people to get work, especially with decent pay,ā€ wrote @terfhunter420. ā€œI hope youā€™re reading the impact this application process has had on people here and consider making some big changes for your next batch of hiring. Something less like trying to score concert tickets on the radio.ā€

ā€œTo our surprise,ā€ horton wrote, ā€œwe received over 2,500 applications before the submission window even opened,ā€ which was at 1 p.m. EDT Wednesday. He said his team then ā€œdid our best to reach out to every single applicant to let them know to submit again within the window we outlined in the job posting.ā€ 

But when that window opened at 10 oā€™clock in San Francisco Wednesday, horton said his team was suddenly flooded with more than 1,200 submissions, ā€œin just the first five minutes.ā€

The instructions to apply noted that in addition to a resume, candidates had to also submit a five-minute long, detailed self-made video, in lieu of a cover letter. The site indicates this was intended to ā€œsimplify the process.ā€ But many frustrated candidates noted in their comments online that this particular requirement added a significant extra burden of time and energy, ā€œonly to have it all go to waste due to technical failures,ā€ wrote @astoldbyjae.Ā 

Adding insult to injury is that untold thousands of potential candidates are left to wonder if their submissions were even received or would ever be seen, given that the portal was set up to be limited to accepting no more than 100 submissions on the first day; When hit with more than ten times that many applications, many job hunters reported getting error messages, and shared the pain of that experience in the comments on hortonā€™s post. 

ā€œIā€™m heartsick myself right now,ā€ wrote @zorro_nova. ā€œI tried in that first minute only to get my own error message.ā€ Another wrote: ā€œI won’t lie I was definitely surprised to see how the hiring process was handled, it was almost like watching a Ticketmaster sale of a Taylor Swift concert more than a job listing.ā€ @mistersister2024 added: ā€œAs someone who made the 5-minute video, carefully edited it, and then didnā€™t even get to submit it, this process was very frustrating.ā€

ā€œWe were devastated,ā€ wrote @jennakjirsten. ā€œI think it was hard not even being able to submit the form, even if it had been one of a thousand. We also worry that by only accepting the quickest to apply, you may have missed out on some very qualified applicants.ā€

As of press time, horton has not responded to an inquiry by the Blade about what if anything they will do for candidates who received error messages, or exactly how many applications they have on hand. 

But in his online letter, horton did announce that so many submissions were received that to process them all, Trans Lifeline has postponed selection of candidates to be invited to interview for the three open positions until April 7, instead of March 24. 

He also revealed the org has just two employees dedicated to reviewing all the applications received on Wednesday.

ā€œShout out to the two trans people in hiring who have to read 3,000 applications individually or else they get canceled,ā€ wrote @jaki_riot. ā€œY’all some MVPs because the response to this situation feels a bit unreasonable.ā€

Several commenters praised horton for his apology and for their transparency. 

ā€œImo, Trans lifeline has done SO much to earn that benefit of the doubt,ā€ wrote @kingofyarn. ā€œAnd seeing the backlash made me sad, because it’s as if yā€™all haven’t worked incredibly hard to earn that trust. I love this heartfelt apology and of course, transparency with a strong moral code.ā€

As horton acknowledged in his letter, Trans Lifeline has survived crises before now. Founded in 2014, the nonprofitā€™s two founders left the organization two years later amid accusations of corruption. An internal investigation found ā€œthere had been significant spending of Trans Lifeline funds outside the scope of the current budgetā€ that ā€œran afoul of Trans Lifelineā€™s obligations to the 501(c)(3) tax laws.ā€ A report in December 2023 by PBS indicated a downturn in donations forced the nonprofit to reduce the number of hours the hotline was available and slash its budget.Ā 

At that time, PBS reported the organization employed as many as 45 people, with around 200 volunteers who help, according to Adam Callahan, director for the hotline program. Every hotline operator identifies as either trans or nonbinary. 

As of press time, the careers page on the Trans Lifeline site indicated ā€œStaff Hotline Operator applications are closed.ā€Ā 

ā€œWe are so grateful for the overwhelming interest in our Hotline Operator positionsā€”1,000 applications within the first two minutes! Thank you to each person who took the time to apply. Weā€™ve received a fantastic pool of candidates and have now closed the application process. We are working diligently to review the first 100 complete applications received and aim to notify everyone of their status by Friday, March 21st. If you have not heard from us, be assured we are still actively considering your application. Please keep an eye on your inbox for our email. We will respond to everyone who has applied. We appreciate your understanding and enthusiasm.ā€

Continue Reading

State Department

US withdraws from OAS LGBTI Core Group

Decision ‘in line with the president’s recent executive orders’

Published

on

The U.S. Embassy in El Salvador in 2023 hung and flew the Progress Pride flag. The U.S. has withdrawn from the Organization of American States' LGBTI Core Group. (Photo courtesy of the U.S. Embassy of El Salvador's Facebook page.)

A State Department spokesperson on Tuesday confirmed the U.S. has withdrawn from the Organization of American States’ LGBTI Core Group.

The U.S., along with Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Uruguay, co-founded the Core Group in 2016 during that year’s OAS General Assembly that took place in the Dominican Republic.

“We look forward to deepening our collaboration at the OAS on issues impacting LGBTI persons so as to enhance dialogue, cooperation, and the sharing of best practices at regional and multilateral levels, recognizing also the various efforts and developments undertaken by and in member states,” reads a joint statement the countries issued on June 15, 2016. “Furthermore, we encourage and welcome the participation of other interested OAS member states in the membership and activities of the Core Group.”

“We also look forward to collaborating with civil society organizations and other social actors as we seek to further shared goals,” it adds. “Our commitment in these areas is firm and will remain so.”

President Donald Trump since he took office on Jan. 20 has signed a number of executive orders that have specifically targeted the LGBTQ and intersex community. These include the ā€œDefending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Governmentā€ directive that, among other things, bans the State Department from issuing passports with ā€œXā€ gender markers.

A directive that Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued bans embassies and other U.S. diplomatic institutions from flying the Pride flag. (Former President Joe Biden in March 2024Ā signedĀ a government spending bill with a provision that banned Pride flags from flying over U.S. embassies.)

“In line with the presidentā€™s recent executive orders, we have withdrawn from the OAS LGBTI Core Group,” the State Department spokesperson told the Washington Blade.

The U.S. last month withdrew from the U.N. LGBTI Core Group, a group of U.N. member states that have pledged to support LGBTQ and intersex rights.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign Up for Weekly E-Blast

Follow Us @washblade

Advertisement

Popular